Why do they call the prognosis "poor"?

Options
mesha
mesha Member Posts: 7

I mean, when you look at the figures it seems that around 75% of triple negs survive the first five years... I don't get it, I thought "poor" was supposed to mean that you're more likely not to survive. Am I missing something?? I'm worried

Comments

  • holligoog
    holligoog Member Posts: 75
    edited September 2009

    TNBC has up to a 70% chance of distal recurrance unless it is caught very early and before it gets in to the lymph nodes.

    Here are some links for more info:

    http://www.tnbcfoundation.org/

    http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/134622.php

    http://www.lbbc.org/data/transcript-file/LBBCtriplenegative09.pdf

    We gain strength, and courage, and confidence by each experience in which we really stop to look fear in the face... we must do that which we think we cannot.

    -Eleanor Roosevelt

  • renahen
    renahen Member Posts: 12
    edited September 2009

    Mesha, according to information on this site, a study of 50,000 women with a triple negative diagnosis shows that 77 percent survived at least five years. (see below) It's also known that after the first 5 years (some studies say 3 years), the risk of recurrence drops significantly. I had 22 positive lymph nodes back in 1986. My oncologist said that I was in a "poor prognostic group." I'm alive and well 23 years later. There are no guarantees, of course, but keep in mind that triples have a "poor" prognosis in comparison with women who are diagnosed with other types of breast cancer. That doesn't mean that triple negative is a death sentence. Wishing you the best, Rena

    Studies have shown that triple-negative breast cancer is more likely to spread beyond the breast and more likely to recur (come back) after treatment. These risks appear to be greatest in the first few years after treatment. For example, a study of more than 1,600 women in Canada published in 2007 found that women with triple-negative breast cancer were at higher risk of having the cancer recur outside the breast — but only for the first 3 years. Other studies have reached similar conclusions. As years go by, the risks of the triple-negative breast cancer recurring become similar to those risk levels for other types of breast cancer. 

    Five-year survival rates also tend to be lower for triple-negative breast cancer. A 2007 study of more than 50,000 women with all stages of breast cancer found that 77% of women with triple-negative breast cancer survived at least 5 years, versus 93% of women with other types of breast cancer. Another study of more than 1,600 women published in 2007 found that women with triple-negative breast cancer had a higher risk of death within 5 years of diagnosis, but not after that time period. The recurrence and survival figures in these and other studies are averages for all women with triple-negative breast cancer. Factors such as the grade and stage of the breast cancer will influence an individual woman’s prognosis. 

  • JanetH77
    JanetH77 Member Posts: 32
    edited September 2009

    I am a triple negative.  My oncologist told me that means I can't use any of the hormonal treatments that are helping prevent recurrence of BC.  He said I have a 25-50% chance of recurrence, which goes down to about half that percentage with chemo and also goes down further after two years.  He also said that the chemo treatment used for a triple negative has a high success rate.  I think the "poor" refers to having less options for treatment.  After chemo, there is no option for further drug therapy for a triple negative, just have to monitor carefully for recurrence.

  • kittycat
    kittycat Member Posts: 2,144
    edited September 2009

    Interesting topic.  I never saw being TN as being well, negative.  I was kind of happy to not need chemo or Tamoxifen.  I have DCIS and had no invasive components.  I wonder what my chances are for reoccurence????  Neither my BS or my onc mentioned anything about my path report being a bad thing.  They both seemed pleased, esp since I had a bilat mastectomy. 

  • vickilynn
    vickilynn Member Posts: 422
    edited September 2009

    I think that we are such individuals and so is our cancer, that no statistics or generalized statements work for any of us.  I had clear lymph nodes, yet my tumor was considered especially aggressive (grade 3) and even after a mastectomy,  I have a likelihood of reoccurence. 

    Part of the negativity of "triple negatives" is that there are no "receptors" for the chemo to be directed to.  Those with hormone + or Her2 + have receptors that specific chemos can be directed towards.  With Triple Neg we are just given whatever they can give us, hoping it will lower our chances of getting it again.

    But no cancer is predictable. 

    I just had my first chemo treatment last week, and 2 days ago was ready to call it quits - I was so miserable.  Other women have the same treatments I did (A/C followed by Neulasta) and have hardly any SE.

    So i guess we just each take what's given us, hoping it will work... encouraged by those who have survived and gone before us.  And looking for help when we're in the middle of it all. 

    But in the middle of the night, I want to just call and say, "STOP! I lied, I'm not a strong woman - I'm a wimp" 

    Then I wake up and see my DH making me something soft to eat so it won't hurt my mouth sores, or bring me a wet wash cloth for my horrible headache, or holding me in the middle of the night just to reassure me.  And he reminds me of the great battle going on inside me right now for life.  It gives me the courage to go on.

  • glostagirl
    glostagirl Member Posts: 388
    edited September 2009

    Hang in there Vickilynn.  I felt the same as you when I began treatment in May.  I am now 3 weeks past my last infusion and am feeling strong everyday.  

    It's an upwind battle for you now, but before you know it your course will change and you'll be heading down wind!

  • silverlady
    silverlady Member Posts: 30
    edited September 2009

    Hi, I am new here, and I must say, you ladies have made my day!  My family was feeling quite bad when I told them that the goal was 3 years! I almost cried when I read that...so far I have not cried!   Especially since my Oncologist told me I had a 'good' cance at 10 years!  That is what I had read on the net. My son asked me, Mom how come you are handling this so well?  I said, Well Scott, I have cancer and that is a fact...I will go from there!  l In fact, because of the triple neg. I have decided to go to UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center in LA for my treatment instead of here in the small town in FL where it is scheduled!  Dr Sara Hurvitz does trials and studies in triple neg at that hospital. My family lives about 150 miles North of LA, so I will be hnear family, have none down here in FL. 

     How long after you were diagnozed Triple Neg. did you have your surgeries?  I am scheduled for Thurday, but am thinking about canceling it and having it also done in CA as I may not be able to travel well if I have the surgery here and chemo in CA.  My cancer is a IDC, PET showed no cancer anywhere else in my body...of course won't know for sure what the nodes have till surgery.  Was told originally it was probably a 1 cm now it is 3cm x 2.5.  I know they are fast growing, and am wondering it delaying it a couple weeks or so will hurt?  I discovered the lump on Aug.1st.  I find very little written about triple neg.  Good luck to all you ladies and would love to hear from you.  I believe in God, but have not been attending church, but I have put this all in Gods hands! 

  • Debonthelake
    Debonthelake Member Posts: 244
    edited September 2009

    Poor prognosis is probably not an accurate term.  Treatment improves all of the time.  Triple negative is a fast growing and aggressive type of cancer and there are no targeted therapies yet that target the triple negative cancer cells alone.  However, this cancer responds better to chemo than other cancers do.  Exercise and diet can also reduce recurrence another 50%.  So we do what we can and the rest we leave up to God.

    Silverlady I don't have a clue what advice to give you.  But, it sounds like it is growing very fast.  Perhaps you could discuss this with your doctors or even ask the doctors you are scheduled to see at UCLA.  

    Vicki lynn -- Chemo is no fun.  But, you recover for the two weeks between cycles and there is an end.  It will get better and there is life after cancer and chemo.

    God be with all of you.

  • carolinachick
    carolinachick Member Posts: 387
    edited September 2009

    The good news is that there is a lot of research focused on TNBC.  Hopefully we will have some additional treatments especially for us soon!

  • silverlady
    silverlady Member Posts: 30
    edited September 2009

    debonthelake,

    I talked with my surgeon this morning, we are cancelling my surgery here in FL and he is happy I am going to UCLA JCCC for my treatment.  I told him what the Oncologist told me Friday about the size being 3 x 2.5 and my surgeon says, he took the measurement off the ultra scan and says it is 1 cm, so my oncologist must have been talking about the size of the lump which can be larger than the cancer itself.   So that little bit of knowledge makes me feel better.  I have left a msg at the hospital answering service in CA and if I don't here in the AM tomorrow, I will call them and get this all started ASAP. 

    I have read also, that low fat, even no olive oil, lots of veggies especially, cabbage, kale, collard, carrots, you can find these lists on line, lots of fruits and whole grains (ugh!) no red meat, but chicken, fish, canned or fresh, and running 5 miles a week which is great, or walking 5 miles which is good and very very limited alcohol if any and no sugar or limited.  All of this is for Triple Neg.  I have been using Splenda for years, eat lots of veggies, some fruits, no longer drink alcohol, but my down fall is red meat.  That will be hard to control.  God bless us all.

  • Debonthelake
    Debonthelake Member Posts: 244
    edited September 2009

    God speed Silverlady,

    May your treatment start soon and may your cure be your pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.

    I'll keep you in my prayers.

  • renahen
    renahen Member Posts: 12
    edited September 2009

    Silverlady, I wish you all the best. You're wise to be so proactive and to go where you think you'll get the best treatment. I just want to warn you about making sudden, major changes in your diet. I did too much too fast in terms of adding whole grains to my diet, and boy did I suffer! If your body is not used to whole grains, add them in slowly and see how your system reacts. Also, while fiber is very good for us, if you have any tendency toward intestinal upsets (such as Irritable Bowel Syndrome), too much INsoluble fiber (whole grains, green leafy veggies, etc.) vs. soluble fiber can really cause a flare-up, and that's the last thing you need as you go through your cancer treatment. This link will give you some helpful info and food lists. http://www.dietsite.com/dt/diets/eatingwell/fiber/dietaryfiber.asp

    Good luck! Rena

  • LRM216
    LRM216 Member Posts: 2,115
    edited September 2009

    Good luck Silverlady - keep us all posted.  Am so glad you will be having your surgery out in CA, as I was afraid of the flying for you, so close to after the surgery.  Whether you just have your sentinel node removed or they need to remove more nodes, you don't need to be a-courting lymphodema by flying so soon after surgery.  Sending prayers and all good wishes for a speedy recovery from surgery.

    Linda

  • Meece
    Meece Member Posts: 19,483
    edited September 2009

     Just a little more hope for you ladies.  I found my TNBC by self exam in November of 2003, and I am here writing about it five years and 10 months later.  I was tickled when Dr. Hurvitz informaed me that once a TNBC patient passes the 5-year mark, the chance of recurrance is less than 1% now.  (Yes, she stated that a different cancer could occur, but chance for the same monster...not so likely)  That may have been for my type of cancer, TN and all, but there is hope!

  • MsBliss
    MsBliss Member Posts: 536
    edited September 2009

    Is Dr Hurvitz, Sara Hurvitz?  She is one of the doctors I saw.  I think she is very smart.

  • Meece
    Meece Member Posts: 19,483
    edited September 2009

    Yes, she's the one and I agree.  I feel like she could be my daughter (She seems so young!) and I am only 46!

  • carolinachick
    carolinachick Member Posts: 387
    edited September 2009

    Thanks for your words of encouragement, Meece!  Your diagnosis is very similar to mine.  You can be sure that I am planning one heck of a celebration for my 5-year cancerversary in 2014!!

    Godspeed to you Silverlady.  Keep us posted on your treatment.  I agree that making small changes are easier and seem to "stick" better than trying to change everything at once.  If you're interested in information on the low-fat diet study, here's the link:

    http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/pressreleases/WINSBreastStudy

    Take care, ladies!

    Jennifer

  • lesamariekey
    lesamariekey Member Posts: 26
    edited September 2009

    To Silverlady, I suggest you not wait. TN, is fast moving. Get the lump out and then go to LA...My lump was 4.5 and in one limp node. I did a CT/Scan and I was told it was in both my lungs. Which made me a stage4. It is up to you......However I would not take any chances with my life. And you can always do your Chemo in LA.......You have to weight to heal from your surgery anyway.........Concerned for you........Lesa

  • Meece
    Meece Member Posts: 19,483
    edited September 2009

    I had my lump removed one month and started chemo about three or four weeks later.  I agree, don't wait too long.  I waited 5 weeks before I saw a doctor after I found the lump, it was stupid, but my situation did not make it an option at that time.  Luckily, I found it early and my surgery was about 6 weeks from the time I found the lump, and it was stage 1 with 0/16 nodes.

Categories