Not a Typical Triple 3--Am I Alone Here?

Options
ICudaShuda
ICudaShuda Member Posts: 1

This is my first post, but I am very curious and concerned because I wonder how I got this disease, and how it will affect my family.

I am not a typical triple 3 negative, being Caucasion, older, and do not carry the mutant gene.  There is no breast cancer history in my family.

My doc says this was a fluke, but my granddaughter, only 31, has undergone 11 biopsies already.  I am worried for her, even though I developed this cancer at age 70, which should not be a worry for her genetically.

 Are others of you out there a non-typical TN?

«134567

Comments

  • LRM216
    LRM216 Member Posts: 2,115
    edited August 2009

    ICuda - one thing I have learned is that all the gals I have met on various boards that are triple neg have all been white, most younger than I, and quite a few have BRCA 1.  I am white, 62 at diagnose, no cancer on either side of my family ever - and no BRCA 1.  Never skipped a mammo and never felt this lump - no one did.  A real sharp radiologist just compared my last two mammos to the 2009 one and saw a 1.2 cm nodule.  Go figure. 

    Linda

  • Debonthelake
    Debonthelake Member Posts: 244
    edited August 2009

    I'm 54 and lilly white.  I'm not sure if there is any color in my family tree or not.  After all I'm an American.  My mother had breast cancer but it was ER positive.  I am also BRACA negative.  There are a lot of us out there.  In women of color 60% of them have triple negative breast cancer.  I'm watching the research on women of color because who knows what they find may apply to me.

  • cwrightrn
    cwrightrn Member Posts: 242
    edited August 2009

    I am a 39 year old caucasian,TN, BRCA (-) but my mom's sister had breast cancer and my mom's first cousin has ovarian cancer...not sure how I am genetically negative but I am.....there is probably another gene out there that hasn't been identified that I will be positive for but the research is way down the time line.

  • angelsabove
    angelsabove Member Posts: 363
    edited August 2009

    I am 36 year old white female with absolutely no family history on either side and I had the brca test and I am negative....I too have NO IDEA WHERE THIS CAME FROM....

  • carolinachick
    carolinachick Member Posts: 387
    edited August 2009

    I'm white, was diagnosed at 44, and am awaiting the BRCA test results.  I have several distant relatives who have had breast cancer, but no close relative on either side.

  • chumfry
    chumfry Member Posts: 642
    edited August 2009

    I've had triple-neg BC twice, two different varieties! In 2005, a 4.5 cm medullary tumor that wasn't there on a mammo eight months before. It grew really really fast. In 2007, had 1.2 cm IDC tumor in other breast, found on routine post-treatment mammo.

    I'm about as white as you get, Scandinavian and British gene pool <grin> No cancer of any kind in my family. BRCA-negative. But I feel like there's another gene out there that may apply to us. It just hasn't been discovered yet.

    I'm the oldest (51) of four sisters. They are all getting earlier mammos, etc.

    --CindyMN

  • defeatbc
    defeatbc Member Posts: 53
    edited August 2009

    My mother and I are atypical.  We're both Asian and do not cary the BRCA mutation.  I'm also a borderline case for TN as I have very weak ER and PR results.

    As someone has mentioned above, although this is more common in BC patients with African ancestry, most of the posters on this forum appear to be Caucasian.

  • cheranthia
    cheranthia Member Posts: 65
    edited August 2009

    I don't fit the "typical" tri-neg mold either. I'm caucasian and do not have the BRCA mutation. I WAS young (48) at diagnosis. That's the only factor I have that fits the profile. You can't really effectively define something by what it is not, but that's exactly what the tri-neg designation is. It is useful to look for commonalities and groups that have a higher incidence of it, as these are clues that could lead to an important discovery and maybe even a treatment. Still, I think that triple negative BC is probably not one disease, but many diseases with different conditions that drive them. We need more targeted research!

  • Indomitable1
    Indomitable1 Member Posts: 253
    edited August 2009

    Well, I do fit the mold (44 yo, African American)  and that doesn't make it any better!

    I do have a family history of BC  but it was my grandmother at age 86 who was ER+ and lived another 10 years with no recurrence and her daughter, my aunt, in her 50s-HER2+ (2 year survivor). I did not have the BRCA mutation. So, here I am. I agree we need more targeted research to better define the variants of TNBC and discover targeted therapies.

    Nevertheless, we are not alone in this journey.

  • Debonthelake
    Debonthelake Member Posts: 244
    edited August 2009

    Indomitable 1  You are so right, whether we fit a mold or not we are all in the same boat.  I'm really interested in the research that was featured on Black in America.  I feel like there is a gene out there that we don't know about yet.  If the specialist from University of Michigan finds a common gene among the women of Detroit and the women in Ghana I'm doing to Detroit for the same test.

  • sylviaexmouthuk
    sylviaexmouthuk Member Posts: 7,847
    edited March 2010

    ICudaShuda, I was interested to read that you are not a typical triple negative breast cancer patient. Have you just been diagnosed?

    I was diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer in June 2005 at the age of 62. I am also a white woman. Until that date I had never been ill and the diagnosis came as a shock. The tumour was large and appeared to come from nowhere. I do not think much was known about triple negative breast cancer at that time and it was quite difficult obtaining information. I was just told that the prognosis was poor because there was no follow up preventive treatment after the standard chemotherapy, mastectomy and radiotherapy. So far, four years later, I am remain in the clear, but am a nervous wreck at check-up times!

    Here in England (UK) we do not appear to get the testing that you have in the US. No one ever mentioned the BRCA1 gene until I brought it up. I saw a genetic nurse, but after interviewing me she told me that there was not enough family history of breast cancer to justify genetic testing. Only my maternal grandmother had breast cancer in old age.

    In view of the letters I have been reading on this site I am going to be writing to this nurse in an attempt to get tested.

    I have been told that triple negative breast cancers are similar to BRCA1 inherited breast cancer, but that the BRCA1 gene has not been damaged, as it has with hereditary cancer, but that the gene has somehow been silenced through a process known as methylation, and this somehow allows cancer cells to proliferate.

    I also found out about basal-like cancers and that most, but not all, triple negative breast cancers, are basal-like. I was told that mine was probably basal, but I do not think it was tested for this at the time.

    I really feel that triple negative breast cancer patients are a neglected group of breast cancer patients, who do not get enough publicity. Somehow we have to try to change that.

    You might be interested to know that a lot of research appears to find a connection between breast cancer in general and hyperparathyroidism. There is a lot of information available in the internet about this.

    Four years ago when I was diagnosed with breast cancer I was also diagnosed with an overactive parathyroid gland, which results in elevated levels of calcium in the blood. I feel that the hyperparathyroidism played a role in the development of my breast cancer. The experts appear not to be able to decide whether the breast cancer causes the hyperparathyroidism or vice-versa. It is worth checking all this out.

    I would like to know if the experts can test you and tell you whether you have the BRCA gene that has been silenced. In the letters I have read, people are saying that they were BRCA negative. What does this mean? Does it mean that they do not have hereditary breast cancer?

    Please write if you have any information. To all those with triple negative cancer be strong and positive and get as much information as you can. We need preventive treatment after the standard treatment.

  • MsBliss
    MsBliss Member Posts: 536
    edited August 2009

    Good topic subject!

    My stats are not typical: 

    TN tends to be among younger women with high parity and history of breast feeding.  I have none of these characteristics as I am caucasian, BRCA neg, but mom had BC, don't know her receptor status.

    Mine was completely INVISIBLE ON MAMMOGRAM, even with a marker.

    Fast growing but small at discovery, 1.3 cm. 

    Found by accident by my kitty!  

    A lot of Medullary features (prominent lymphocytes, circumscribed, high grade). 

  • MsBliss
    MsBliss Member Posts: 536
    edited August 2009

    I noticed my parathyroid markers like calcium and phosphorus were adjusted to normal after I got my Vitamin D levels up to higher levels.  Vitamin D depletion is associated with BC and I wonder if the two issues of parathyroid and D are intermingled here.

  • Debonthelake
    Debonthelake Member Posts: 244
    edited August 2009

    Sylviaexmouthuk

    Just a positive thought for you.  You have gone cancer free for 4 years.  Your statistics for reoccurence have already vastly improved.  One more year and it is highly unlikely that your triple negative breast cancer will reoccur and you can be pronounced cured.  At least that is what my Oncologist told me.  My doctor wants me to take the vitamin D as well.

  • gouldstyle
    gouldstyle Member Posts: 4
    edited August 2009
    I also had triple-negative BC.  It's nice to see there are more of us so the next time I tell someone and they look at me like I'm an alien I can think of all of you with me. Cool Also, I'm Caucasian, BRAC1 and 2 negative, young (27 when diagnosed), no family history, and never breast fed or had kids.  Perhaps with triple-negative this is no real "normal"? 
  • Rhondakay
    Rhondakay Member Posts: 16
    edited August 2009

     I need to learn something here, I'm new to this.  Triple negative?   I am negative for the two hormone receptors what is the third?  Am I understanding this correctly?  I am the first person in all of my family to EVER be dx with bc.  I'm 47, caucasion, had my first baby @ 22 and breast fed both of my children.  I'm trying to understand what is happening to me.  I haven't had any genetic testing done.  Can someone help clarify my confusion?  I would be very grateful.

  • pinkdove10
    pinkdove10 Member Posts: 80
    edited August 2009

    Rhondakay- the third marker is HER2.

    What do call a 'Typical- TN'????

    I am 37, Asian Indian. Breast fed my daughter (9) for almost a year. My paternal grandmom had BC at the age od 78. No othe family history of BC.  So do i fall under the 'normal' status?

    Uma

  • Scoobydoo
    Scoobydoo Member Posts: 499
    edited August 2009

    I guess I am a typical TN.  I am part African and part Austrian (a black woman) and I am 42 years old.  I also breast fed my daughter.  I love to hear about women who have survived TNBC.  I really need that positivity.

    Anita

  • fmakj
    fmakj Member Posts: 1,278
    edited August 2009

    I also am caucasian, 44 at dx, have 3 children that I breast fed for 3 months each. I thought that TN was good news when diagnosed... I didn't find out that it wasn't until I started "lurking" on these boards.... since then, I have learned so much. Correct me if I am wrong, is "Typical" usually, African descent, between 30 - 45, having breast fed and I guess a genetic history??  I did not have genetic testing, it was not even mentioned to me.  My Onc does say that I am in a "High Risk" category because my paternal grandmother was dx in her 50's but back then they just removed the breast and sent her home - no testing or further treatment.  She did survive for many years, was in her 80's when she passed away.   Be Well All!  ML

  • carpediempenny
    carpediempenny Member Posts: 90
    edited August 2009

    I also am causasian, 47 at dx, 2 children, breast fed, no BRCA gene and no breast cancer on either side of my family. I am the first and hope to be the last.

  • jenn3
    jenn3 Member Posts: 3,316
    edited August 2009

    When I was dx I too was shocked.  I had done annual mammograms, annual visits to the dr and then one day a lump w/node involvement.  I am the very first person in our family to have cancer of any type, did not breast feed, age 43 and told by my dr I was not a "candidate" for bc.  However, after doing research, who is a candidate?  BC can hit anyone at any age.   I really don't think there is "typical" TNBC.  We are all together in this fight...........

  • CarynRose
    CarynRose Member Posts: 149
    edited August 2009

    I fit into another triple negative mold.  I'm Ashkenzi Jewish and have the BRCA1+ mutation.  85% of us have triple negative disease.  There are hundreds, possibly thousands of mutations that haven't been identified yet.  It is quite possible that you all have one of those.  They are discovering more and more each day.  I know of a woman from India (born and bred in India) who has the same type of allele that I have (185delAG).  That is supposed to be a Jewish allele, but we figured out that during the first diaspora, some Jews did not stop in Babylon.  They kept going to India.  Hence, my Indian "cousin" in Mumbai.

     I know that there has been some resistance in the African American community to genetic testing to pinpoint any common mutation.  I understand the reluctance based on the Tuskegee 'clinical trials'.  But, if more African Americans would test, they could come up with a cure that much faster.  I believe that the fact that African American women do worse than the general population has more to do with genetics than with availability of care.

     Best wishes,

    Caryn

  • thenewme
    thenewme Member Posts: 1,611
    edited August 2009

    I'm caucasian, 39 years old, BRCA 1/2 negative, no family history, 3 kids (all breastfed). Very aggressive tumor (ki-67 is 100%) that literally popped up overnight and grew to 5 cm in the 5 weeks until I had surgery. We're quite a diverse bunch - what is the common thread?? Thank goodness TN is starting to gain some attention with the researchers!

  • sylviaexmouthuk
    sylviaexmouthuk Member Posts: 7,847
    edited August 2009

    I am learning more and more about TN BC from this forum. I had no idea that having children and breast-feeding them was connected with TN BC. I was diagnosed at 62 and have had no children. I had an ectopic pregnancy in 1971 at age 29.

    When I was diagnosed with the BC I had to fill in an information sheet and was told that one of the risk factors for any kind of BC was not having had any children. A friend of mine who was diagnosed at the same time, but was only 38, also had TN BC. She has never been married and has no children.

    I agree that these TN cancers are very fast growing. Mine seemed to have appeared overnight and was large. I told my medical team this and my GP but I do not think they believed me.

    Here in the UK they do not test for the BRCA genes 1 & 2 unless there is a strong family history, so I have not been genetically tested. Could someone explain what being negative for BRCA 1 & 2 means? Does it mean that the cancer is not hereditary. I ask this because I was told by my consultant that TNs act like hereditary cancers, but are not. The p53 gene has been silenced somehow, allowing cancer cells to proliferate.

    I feel it is high time that a preventive treatment for TN BC became available. We have been left in the darkness for too long.

    I would be interested to have more information about medullary features in TN BC. What exactly is a medullary cancer and what do prominent lymphocytes mean?

    As far as TN cancers are concerned, I was told by my consultant that about 90% of TN BC are basal-like, but I am not exactly sure what this means.

    It looks as though when you are diagnosed with BC you have to ask a lot of questions. I did ask a lot, but not much information was available four years ago. On top of everything else, there is what I see as a connection between BC and hyperparathyroidism. Are there any statistics available out there?

    What is also interesting is all the information now available about different races. Do we have any statistics about the number of black women, the number of white women, Asian and Jewish women affected by TN BC. They say all the races are mixed up, so how do we reach any conclusions?

    How much does anyone know about the p53 cancer prevention gene, sometimes called " the guardian angel gene"? p53 turns genes on and off. If p53 becomes mutated, then it no longer performs its anti-cancer activity and the cell is much more likely to become cancerous at some future point.

    I have found information about an experimental class of drugs, called PARP inhibitors, which have the potential for treating TN BCs. Trials have been carried out on women with TN BC that has spread and have found that PARP inhibitors added to chemotherapy give a longer survival time.

    Another study carried out about TN BCs and basal-like cancers has found out that CK5/6 and HER1 are frequent in TN BC. Further studies are needed to investigate whether such cases might benefit from anti-HER1 therapy.

  • Scoobydoo
    Scoobydoo Member Posts: 499
    edited August 2009

     CarynRose- Your statement "I believe that the fact that African American women do worse than the general population has more to do with genetics than with availability of care." is very upsetting to me.  Where did you read that African American women do worse?  As a black woman I hope to do very well on chemo and radiation to get rid of this cancer. 

  • ShellyJo
    ShellyJo Member Posts: 132
    edited August 2009

    I do not fit the mold either. I am of Sicilian decent. BRCA 1 AND 2 negative. I was 42 at diagnosis.I have 2 children no cancer on maternal side for the woman at all. Paternal grandmother had BC cancer at 72 i think it was. Don't think they did the gene testing back than. She had unilateral Mx, no chemo and lived till 93. My Paternal Aunt died at 50 of ovarian cancer so I was recommended to get mine removed. The obgyn onc at Mass General told me there are actually 10 genes they know of but only test for the BRCA 1 AND 2. My tumor also came out of nowhere. They say these things take years to grow. I am wondering if that is actually the case for TN. I also heard of the PARP inhibitors still being studied. Does anyone know anyone who has partaken in the PARP study?

  • angelsabove
    angelsabove Member Posts: 363
    edited August 2009

    Shellyjo,

    No I do not know of anyone in the parp study. From what I understand the studies are for stage IV. I am not sure. Maybe someone will come along and help us with that. I have also been curious if the parp is just for BRCA positive women. I am BRCA negative. I too DO NOT fit the profile. I am Caucasian, 36 years old and absolutely no history on either side. I cant imagine that a TN tumor would be there for years. I was at my obgyn doing a yearly exam the end of January. She did a breast self exam and told me see you next year all is good. It was 80 days later that I had a mound in my left breast....LITERALLY OUT OF NOWHERE. I had never had a mammo....because I did not fit the protocol....Was waiting on 40 to get mammo. Well cancer found me first.....

    May God Bless Us All

  • thenewme
    thenewme Member Posts: 1,611
    edited August 2009

    I was waiting til age 40 to get a mammogram too! Cancer found me at 39 -ugh! Triple negative is associated with a high Ki-67 score, which is the rate of tumor cell proliferation - the higher the ki-67 score, the faster the tumor is growing. In my case, mine came out of nowhere, and my Ki-67 is 100, so 100% of the tumor cells were actively dividing at the time of the test. I told my doctors that my tumor was getting bigger, but they dismissed it and said it was probably a hematoma from the biopsy. I swore I could feel that it was bigger, and sure enough when I had surgery, it had grown substantially to 5 cm!



    They've GOT to find a cause and cure for us, and soon!

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2009

    Hoa, I recently found out through path report that my new cancer is very weakly er positive.  But my oncologist thinks it is a local recurrence.  How can that be?  My first one was TN.

    How are you doing?  I just saw your response to one of my posts.  Thanks for the positive thoughts.  Unfortunately, I am on the cancer journey once again. 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2009

    Hi.  My first dx was TN.  The second one is weakly ER+, mostly -.  I have no idea what the implications are.  

    I can also feel my biggest tumor getting bigger as I await my mastectomy which is on the 2nd of Sep.

    Oh, I'm Filipino, which makes me Asian, but I've lived in San Diego for more than 30 years. 

Categories