Just Seen the Onc......

Options
Frenchie
Frenchie Member Posts: 37
Just Seen the Onc......

Comments

  • Frenchie
    Frenchie Member Posts: 37
    edited June 2009

    Feeling so vulnerable because my suggestion of coming off Avastin trial and getting further chemo was not accomodated. Unhappy  

    Surely common sense tells you TN, node positive cancer classed as Early Stage means EVERY POSSIBLE THING must be done to prevent recurrence.  

    My wife is young, strong - I know she could tolerate a third round of chemo  - possibly Abraxane or Cisplatin etc.

    Our Onc is so well respected and number 4 in Australia (attends San Antonio every year).  How do I get a second opinion with any confidence, and without p!ssing her off?  

    Anyone heard of Oncs suggesting a third round of chemo following 4xAC & 4xT? Confused

  • hope8882
    hope8882 Member Posts: 5
    edited June 2009

    My wife is currently on day 17 of 35 radiation treatments.  She got 15 weekly treatments of A/C and 12 weekly Taxol + Carboplatin.  After radiation, she is getting a third round for 9 weeks.  Looks like it will be Xeloda, Navelbine, and Methotrexate.  We are asking for Ixempra and Sutent as well.  We're still waiting to see what he decides. She had 13 positive nodes.  So, some oncs will give a third round in these situations.  Every onc is different.  Hope this helps.

  • hollyann
    hollyann Member Posts: 2,992
    edited June 2009

    Frenchie and hope,   the only thing I can offer here is support and hugs.....I know alsmot nothing about chemo but I am sure some of our TN sisters will come along with advice......My heart goes out to both of your wives and you...I know how hard it is dealing with bc as I have a sister who eas dx 5 months before I was dx so I am dealing with not only my own diagnosis but my sisters.......I am happy to report though that both of us are doing well and still dancing with NED!.....I hope one day soon both of your wives can say the same thing........

  • Frenchie
    Frenchie Member Posts: 37
    edited June 2009

    Thank you for your replies.  Hope, it sounds like your wife is getting good care, and from what I've researched the right line of treatment.

    We just feel trapped by the Avastin trial, and the Oncologist's insistance that nothing has been clinically proven to help with regards to a 3rd line of chemo.  That's very hard to take, when you read things like this:

    http://meeting.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/abstract/27/15S/625

    Getting a second opinion is not as easy as we thought either.  Andrea's GP believes that whoever else we see will report back to her current Oncologist.  Perth is a small town.  

    Does anyone know of a web page or help line where Breast Oncologists can be reached?

  • FloridaLady
    FloridaLady Member Posts: 2,155
    edited June 2009

    frenchie,

    Search Avastin trials on clinicaltrials.gov...you will find very few trial have been completed for Avastin in the last four years.

    Avastin Falls Short in Test as Colon Cancer Medicine

    By ANDREW POLLACK

    In results from a widely watched clinical trial, the drug Avastin failed to show a significant effect on preventing the recurrence of colon cancer, the drug's maker, Genentech, said early Wednesday.

    Although Avastin is already a best-selling cancer treatment, success in this trial could have paved the way to a new use of the drug, potentially increasing sales by billions of dollars a year.

    Now those efforts will be set back. And it appears that the Swiss drug giant Roche may have paid more than necessary when it agreed in March to buy, for $46.8 billion, the portion of Genentech it did not already own.

    Roche shares were down more than 10 percent on Wednesday, closing at $29.54.

    Genentech and Roche said they would continue to try to develop Avastin for use in early-stage cancer.

    "Our initial review of the data leads us to continue to believe Avastin may be active in patients with early-stage colon cancer," Hal Barron, Genentech's chief medical officer, said in a statement.

    The companies did not release any data from the trial, saying the details would be presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting, which begins in late May. They said only that the trial did not meet its endpoint, meaning Avastin did not reduce the risk of cancer returning by the target level.

    *****Avastin had sales of $2.7 billion in the United States alone last year. But it is currently approved only for late-stage colon, breast and lung cancers. In those uses, trials have shown the drug can prolong life up to a few months.

    The new trial was an effort to use Avastin earlier in the course of the disease, right after surgery to remove the tumor. The hope of such so-called adjuvant therapy is to prevent the cancer from coming back at all, effectively curing the patient.

    The trial had about 2,700 patients who received six months of the standard chemotherapy or six months of that chemotherapy plus a year of Avastin. The study, sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, measured how many patients were alive and free of cancer over time.

    The existing chemotherapy already keeps about 70 percent of colon cancer patients free of the disease three years after their surgery. So a significant improvement over that level had been considered a high hurdle. Genentech had rated the chance of success in the trial at 61 percent, while Roche had forecast it at only 55 percent.

    Roche has long insisted that its desire to own all of Genentech did not hinge on the results of this trial.

    And yet, the trial appeared to play a prominent role in Roche's months-long negotiations to buy the 44 percent of Genentech it did not already own. Roche, which had started those discussions last summer, wanted to get the deal done before the results of the Avastin trial were announced - on the assumption that a successful trial would have sent Genentech's stock soaring, possibly putting the takeover price out of reach.

    A failed trial, on the other hand, could have pushed down Genentech's stock. So it now looks as if Roche could have paid less had the results come out before it completed the deal.

    While fighting to remain independent or to persuade Roche to make a higher offer, Genentech, based in South San Francisco, Calif., argued that Avastin sales could quadruple, to $10 billion, by 2015 if the drug could be used for early-stage colon, lung and breast cancers. Roche, based in Basel, Switzerland, is running another trial of Avastin for early-stage colon cancer, with results expected in 2010.

  • chumfry
    chumfry Member Posts: 642
    edited June 2009

    Frenchie:

    I may be wrong, but 4xAC and 4xTaxol seems to be pretty standard for Stage 2 cancer. That's what I had for my 2005 tumor, which was 4.5 cm and growing fast. I developed a second primary (not related to first tumor) in 2007 and got 12 weekly carboplatin and taxol.

    There's a fine line between benefit and risk when it comes to chemo. The link you posted referred to "locally advanced" BC, which probably means tumors much bigger than 2 cm. I know you want to do everything possible for your wife, but sometimes more isn't better.

    --CindyMN

  • HollyHopes
    HollyHopes Member Posts: 497
    edited June 2009

    Hi - I had stage 2/grade 3 and had the 4xAC and 4x Taxol (dose dense)...followed by radiation...

  • ddlatt
    ddlatt Member Posts: 448
    edited June 2009

    i had bilateral mastectmy, stage1/grade 3 and had 4xAC and 4x Taxol (dose dense) followed by 35 radiation treatments. 

  • Debonthelake
    Debonthelake Member Posts: 244
    edited June 2009

    I had 6 rounds of Taxotere and Carboplatin.  My Oncologist said the extra two rounds increased effectiveness by 10 percent if the client could tolerate it.  But, he did say that any more than that wouldn't matter.  The effectiveness did not increase over the 6 rounds.  So more is not always better.

Categories