Nipple skin sparing mastectomy???

Options
2

Comments

  • skippyrcis
    skippyrcis Member Posts: 186
    edited March 2009

    Pam, you are so right.  I just love Dr C Cox.  After all these years to be involved with the disease and still be so caring is awesome.  Are you in Tampa too?  So you have had your exchange?  That is great!  Are you happy with the results?

    Snoopygirl, wow 100ccs sound painful and great at the same time.  My doctor has not gone over 50ccs at a time.  Last night the spasms were pretty bad.  I am good today tho.

  • Minnesota
    Minnesota Member Posts: 923
    edited March 2009

    Hi,

    I'm new to this site, but have spent a lot of time on another site. You gals who have the option of a skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy are so lucky! I had my unilateral mastectomy in '06 and the nipple-sparing option wasn't available to me here. Since then, a friend has had this done, but had to lobby her physician, who had to get permission from the medical board due to fear of risks. From what I've read, however, in the small event of a recurrence in the skin or nipple, it would be very easy to find, as it would be right there on top. And without the internal ductwork of the breast, I would think it would be practically impossible to spread. If I could have had nipple-sparing, I definitely would have gone for it - tho I am more than happy with my DIEP breast and reconstructed nipple.

  • my560sel
    my560sel Member Posts: 1,065
    edited March 2009

    Has anyone had nipple/skin sparing mastectomy with ILC? I've read your posts and so far Gymgirl seems to be the only one who had ILC. I'm asking because I've been diagnosed with ILC and so far have had a lumpectomy and am scheduled for a re-excision on Apr 7th. I'm so fed up with all this uncertainty and am slowly leaning toward BMX and am really interested in nipple/skin sparing procedure if it's possible in my case. Are there many ILC women who have this as an option?

    Terri

  • HuneyB2
    HuneyB2 Member Posts: 26
    edited March 2009
    Skippyrcis,  I am in Ocala.  I had to travel to Tampa for each appt.  I went every Friday for a month and had 100ccs each fill.  No problems with that amt.  I had the exact same dx as you in both breasts.  Lucky to not need chemo or rads.  I had my exchange on Mar 6.  I'm doing well.  They are not perfect, but neither were the old onesLaughing.  I"m happy.  Don't have to make that trip for 3 mos.  The last trip was my 15th.  One in the back of an ambulance.  So I'm happy to stay home and recover.
  • pitanga
    pitanga Member Posts: 596
    edited March 2009

    Minnesota, I agree with yourlogic about the difficulty of spreading without a ductal network!  like your freidn i had to wheedle and cajole to get my surgeon to consider leaving my nipple. finally had my surgery day before yesterday and frozen section showed the nipple clear. hopefully the more complete info pn the path report will confirm that.

    scuse my typing, i still have a drain in and the TE hurts too

    lisa

  • sunandsandgirl
    sunandsandgirl Member Posts: 165
    edited March 2009

    Pitanga,

    I am so glad your frozen sections were clear, and I hope the final report will confirm that!  Hope you have a speedy recovery.  You will be so thrilled with the results! 

  • Snoopygirl5
    Snoopygirl5 Member Posts: 26
    edited March 2009

    my560sel - My original surgeon had me scheduled for a lumpectomy as well.  However, I'm small so a lumpectomy would have taken most of my breast when including the margins, the tumor area, etc.  He refused to do the nipple saving mastectomy because the study is still young and he would like for the study to be 5 years old before changing his mind about saving the nipple.  Although I loved him, I changed to a surgeon who was heading up the study.  I did not have that kind of time to wait 2 more years until the study was complete. 

    Although having a bimx is a personal decision, I'm glad that I chose this route for a few reasons:  no more mammograms - ever.  SO said that I would have ended up with cancer in the left breast in the future. No radiation.  Since there is no breast tissue, if I do end up with a recurrence, I will be able to detect very quickly.  AND I get new ta tas out of the deal!  :) 

    And by the way, I had 3 months of chemothapy prior to the bimx since it was also in my lymph nodes.  Thank goodness the path report came back clean! 

    Minnesota - I wish that this had been available to you a couple of years ago as well.  2 years can make a huge difference with the new studies.  There will be things not available to me that I will wish I had done. We are very lucky to have USF and Moffitt on the cutting edge and in our backyard.  I'm glad that you are happy with your end result.  That is the wonderful thing!

    skippycris - I'm glad that your muscle spasms are better today.  those hurt like crazy. 

    HuneyB2 - can you further explain the "not perfect" part? 

  • Peggio
    Peggio Member Posts: 274
    edited March 2009

    Hi Everyone,

    I'm so glad to find this site.   I had a skin and nipple sparing MX on Nov. 18.  I'm so glad that was an option for me.  I was considering a PBM last  Feb. but the nipple sparing wasn't an option at that time.  When I went in Sept. and found out I had to get yet another biopsy because the ADH had grown considerably and had spread to a different area, I elected to get a BMX and just waiting 6 months made the difference because my surgeon was working with a PS that did it.  I'm so glad I did because when the path report came back they had found DCIS in my ADH breast and ADH in my "good" breast that had always been clear.

    One question I have is that my incisions are at the bottom of my nipples and the left one is perfect, but the right one is a little cinched in. Has anyone had anything like that? Were your incisions in your nipple or under the breast?

    Thanks for any feedback.

    Peggio

  • Snoopygirl5
    Snoopygirl5 Member Posts: 26
    edited March 2009

    Hi Peggio - My incisions are both underneath my breast.  One of the only things that was good about  being small to begin with.

    I did notice what look like a cince in my left nipple but talked to the PS on Monday and he said that they will fix any problems with cinching or projection while doing the exchange surgery.  He said that they will never be as good as what God made, but they will do their very best to fix them up as nice as possible. 

  • Peggio
    Peggio Member Posts: 274
    edited March 2009

    Hi Snoopygirl5 -

    My PS said the same thing.  He will go in the nipple for the exchange, I just hope at the end of it all that they look like the left one.  Are you almost done with your fills?  I think I may be close to being done. The last one was really tight I had to take pain pills for 2 days and I am only at 325cc. My PS doesn't overfill though. I think he puts in a bigger implant to reduce rippling.  I kept telling him I want to look natural, but I want to be bigger than I was. I have an appt in April to discuss it with him further to make sure we are on the same page about size..

    Peggio

  • lmrunner
    lmrunner Member Posts: 22
    edited March 2009

    Hello all,

    I haven't been out here in awhile, but just had surgery last week to replace an expander that had to be removed due to a staph infection.  Anyway, I had a skin-sparing, nipple sparing mastectomy back in October - done at the Cleveland Clinic by a doctor who works with Dr. Crowe (Dr. Jill Dietz).  They did not offer it at first, but I asked about it before the surgery and they were willing to do it if the samples of the nipple tissue (underneath) were sent to the lab and tested during the surgery.  Since they came back clear, they were able to save the nipple.  So far, so good.  And I have to say, it looks really good.   

  • Snoopygirl5
    Snoopygirl5 Member Posts: 26
    edited March 2009

    HI Peggio -

    I think I may go for one more fill for me - maybe another 50 cc's and then another couple of fills for overexpansion.  I understand about wanting to look bigger but still natural.  I want the same thing.  I feel very tight also and only have 300 cc's right now.  Not sure how much more my skin will take.

    My understanding is that he's going underneath for my exchange thru the same incisions.  I hope that he will do that and not make any further incisions.  He did say that they would fix any problems at that time.

    Imrunner - hope you are feeling better now.  those infections aren't fun.

  • my560sel
    my560sel Member Posts: 1,065
    edited March 2009

    Snoopygirl5: Thanks for the reply. I think I'm going to ask my BS when I go in for the re-excision to refer me to a PS. The PS  is the Chief of Plastic Surgery for the hospital and I'm hoping that this procedure is available. I'm not convinced that I will get clear margins after the re-excision and also not sure I want the constant worrying before/after each mammo for years to come. ILC is sneakier than IDC which is another good reason to go the Bi-MX route. Guess I have to come at this slowly not so much for myself, but my husband is pretty close to being devastated by my having cancer. Our granddaughter was DX with a brain tumor at age 3 and then mets to her spine at 5. She's 9 years old now and has come through it like a  little trooper and her last MRI was clear! Then last summer my husbands sister was Dx with IDC and had a MX. Now me....

    My best to you and wishing you great health. May your path's always come back clean !

    Terri

  • gymgirl
    gymgirl Member Posts: 121
    edited March 2009

    Karen - sorry I haven't been online for awhile so hope your incisions aren't still sore. My incisions under the breasts are fairly long and took awhile to heal. After the steri-strips came off I kept those silicone scar strips on them. On one side the scar is thin and hardly noticable. On the other, it is wider and shows some but who cares! My nipples and breasts themselves aren't scarred at all! My nipples actually look and act more normally now than they did even 6 months ago (I'm now 1-1/2 years from my BLM). For the first year they were usually half-erect and I didn't like that they showed through a thin bra. But now they soften normally. I didn't think it would ever happen! Having them touched is a bit weird though; to my DH they look and feel normal, but to me they are numb. Being able to avoid that additional surgery to reconstruct nips was so worth it. Glad to hear that you others are pleased with your results too. I echo the "don't buy bras yet" advice too. I bought one to show my PS what size I wanted to be and he got close, but not exactly. And the implants are such a different shape from the TE, that they don't fill the cups the same. Save your bra shopping for when the swelling goes down and you can enjoy your new shape.

  • karen9516
    karen9516 Member Posts: 155
    edited March 2009

    gymgirl- Thanks for the response! I know what you mean about they way they fell when touched. The left one is numb and the right one is super sensitive but at least I feel it. I have friends who have had a lift and even breast augmentation and they say the same thing about their nipples. I don't care it would be the same if they were recreated.

  • pitanga
    pitanga Member Posts: 596
    edited April 2009

    Hi girls,

    I am checking in with some bad news: A month after my nipple-sparing surgery I now only have half a nipple.

    What happened was this: as i was going under from the anesthesia, I heard my breast surgeon telling my PS that she "HAD TO" excise the old lumpectomy scar, which curved around the upper-outer edge of the areola.

    The entire nipple was black at first. A week later most had gone back to normal, but the part adjacent to the scar she had re-excised was still black. When 3 weeks had gone by, my PS said this was necrosis and she would have to slice off the upper layer to let the skin below heal...This was done last Friday, under local anesthesia. She told me as she was working on it that it looked quite superficial except for one part that was deeper and that she would have to cut out all the skin, and that part would not grow back. I could not see what she was doing so took her word for it.

    So yesterday I went to get the dressing changed, and lo and behold, it was healing just fine BUT there was only half a nipple. Of the part of the areola that had been black, nothing was left. She had cut it all out and sutured the outer breast skin directly to the nipple itself.

    I cried when I saw that... I already felt betrayed by my breast surgeon--her rationale for re-excising the old scar was she was "worried it might develop cancer in the future"--but shouldnt that have been MY decision?  I have a metastasis for God´s sake... If I am going to die it is not going to be from some piddling local recurrence!  The necrosis, I am sure, developed from the lack of blood circulation because of that re-excision. But there it was, so what to do but get rid of it... But why did my PS tell me it was "mostly superficial" as she was busily cutting out the whole thing?

    Part of me says I am being a baby and that I should be just thankful that I even have half a nipple and when it heals, get the thing tattooed and forget about it. But it really upsets me to find these things out after the fact, when it is too late.

    Lisa

  • Peggio
    Peggio Member Posts: 274
    edited April 2009

    Hi Lisa - I feel so bad that you had to go through all of that. You are not being a baby!  You choose nipple sparing surgery because that was important to you and I think not feeling like you were getting correct information and that choices were taken out of your hands is very disappointing.  What did your PS say to you yesterday regarding the areola at this point?

    I also had nipple sparing so I can understand why you would feel this way - I would too!

  • pitanga
    pitanga Member Posts: 596
    edited May 2009

    Well, as time goes by I´ve been reconciling myself to having half an areola....and I´ve forgiven my PS for not telling me as she was doing it. Aesthetics are her business and if there was a way to leave any of that necrotic areola she would have done it.

     Looking in the mirror just now I realized that maybe one reason I´m getting used to having only part of an areola is that the part that is left has lost nearly all its color, so it is really hard to see that half is missing. My areolas were never really dark, but on the non-surgery side the areola is clearly demarcated, and on the surgery side it is so pale that I have to squint to see where it ends and regular skin starts.

    Just wondering, has this happened to anyone else?

    Lisa

  • yasminv1
    yasminv1 Member Posts: 238
    edited May 2009

    pitanga,

    Sorry you are going through this. I hope someone is able to tell you if this has happened to someone else. Take Care.

  • tablover
    tablover Member Posts: 24
    edited May 2009

    I also had a nipple sparing bm and lost most of the bottom half of my areola on one side because of tissue that went necrotic after surgery (the ps had to do two revisions post bm to get rid of necrotic tissue). At first I was upset about it, but I've gotten used to it and it doesn't bother me anymore. The ps said I could get it tatooted later if I want but I don't think I will.

  • LizzyGirl15
    LizzyGirl15 Member Posts: 21
    edited May 2009

    Hey Ladies!

     It is a relief to hear that so many of you have had sucess stories with the nipple/skin saving surgery! I feel like I am in a real pickle because I am only 28 years old and have been told by 2 surgeons that I would need to have a bilateral masectomy the traditional way. I was diaganosed with a pretty large tumor but I would still love the opportunity to meet with a surgeon who might consider me. Beside Dr Crowe or Dr Cox, who else should I consider contacting? I live in the Boston area and considering using the Dana-Faber but they are very aggressive with traditional medicine. Please let me know! Thank you so much!!!

  • pitanga
    pitanga Member Posts: 596
    edited May 2009

    Thank you Yasmin and tablover for your replies. Tablover, like you I am getting used to the nipple being off-center in the areola circle but the thing I am wondering about now is the color difference between the two sides. Are your two sides the same tone or did the necrotic side lose some color?

    LizzyGirl, I am sorry to hear you are dealing with this miserable disease. You are so young.... I was 39 at first dx, so I can relate. I cannot recommend doctors in Boston but I can say that one option that was presented to me was the possibility of leaving the areola intact BUT removing the nipple itself because of the milk ducts it contains (the idea was to reconstruct it later). But the MRI showed my tumor to be far from the nipple so I was not eager to lop it off "just in case", but since my case was already a recurrence my breast surgeon was not eager to leave it a priori. The compromise we reached was to do the frozen section during surgery and if the nipple showed any malignant cells she had my permission to take it out then. She also suggested prophylactic mx on the other side, and was 100% OK about leaving the nipple there.

    In my case the MRI was crucial in helping me come to a decision, as it gave a much clearer idea of the size and location of the tumor than the mammogram had. It also showed the other side to have nothing suspicious, and that helped me to decide against the prophylactic.

    All my best,

    Lisa

  • karen9516
    karen9516 Member Posts: 155
    edited May 2009

    LizzyGirl15-You need to tell those doctors that is what you want! Why won't they do it? A nipple sparing mastectomy is better than removing nothing at all. Keep looking for someone to do it. I think in the future that they will do this more often. It is very difficult and many doctors won't do it for that reason. If you were to get cancer later you would know it it would be right there! I wish I would have kept the website addresses for the studies I read. There really are'nt many lobes and ducts in the nipple and a skilled surgeon can remove what is there. They can also do the frozen section during surgery. Mine was all preventative but I would still would have wanted one if I had cancer.

  • pitanga
    pitanga Member Posts: 596
    edited May 2009

    Karen,

    I discussed this with several doctors in making my decision and they all told me that leaving the nipple (i.e., the thing that projects out and that babies suck on when nursing) necessarily means leaving the ducts it contains, as they go right through the tissue--that is how the babies get milk out of it. The nipple does NOT contain lobes.

    The areola (pink circle of flat tissue around nipple) contains neither ducts nor lobes, so leaving it has no implications for cancer recurrence, as compared to regular skin-sparing surgery in which the nipple and areola are removed.

    As my doctors explained it to me, it is not difficult, technically speaking to leave the nipple--this is now routine for many  prophylactic mastectomies--but it does mean leaving ductal tissue, which leaves open the possibility of a recurrence when you are dealing with ductal carcinoma.

    The question is how MUCH of a possibility, and in my case since the tumor was halfway to the axila, I decided that the risk was probably quite small. I am not sure I would have made the same decision if the invasive tumor were near the areola, or if there had been DCIS in several different areas of my breast. I had a lumpectomy 9 years ago with clean margins on frozen section, followed by chemo AND rads... and here I am 9 years later with a recurrence in the area immediately adjacent to my old surgery.

    LizzyGirl, best of luck to you in making this very difficult decision.

    Lisa

  • karen9516
    karen9516 Member Posts: 155
    edited May 2009

    pitanga, I will find that study I am talking about. I still insist that a nipple sparing is better than having nothing done at all and if your surgeon is skilled he or she will remove the breast tissue from the nipples. It is more difficult because of that and many times the nipple doesn't survive. This is the information I have learned. I guess it is rather subjective depending on who you talk to. The surgeon can be the best in the world and the nipple can still become necrotic. That is a chance you take but some people wouln't do any thing if that weren't a choice

  • karen9516
    karen9516 Member Posts: 155
    edited May 2009

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17084333http://www.breastpreservationfoundation.org/2008/12/many-breast-cancer-patients-are-not-receiving-most-advanced-breast-conserving-surgical-techniques-new-study-finds/There are two articles on nipple sparing mastectomy and the second one talks about the Japanese physician who conducted the study I am talking about .It and many other tings on the intent say that there is very little if any recurrence of breast cancer in the nipple areola complex if any.

  • tablover
    tablover Member Posts: 24
    edited May 2009

    I had nipple sparing surgery with one of the top bs in the country (he is infact doing a study on the long term impact of nipple sparing). He firmly believes that there is about a 1% incresed risk or recurrence with nipple sparing (which to me was more than worth it). They have VERY stringent qualifications for the procedure - they will only do it there is no cancer within 3 centimeters of the nipple and they  biopsy all of the tissue directly under the nipple both during surgery and after. If any abnormal cells are found they will not leave the nipple. There is a very high risk of the nipple going necrotic (mine almost did and I did lose most of the bottom half of the areola on the cancer side) but it still looks pretty good. As others said, it should onlt be done with a surgeon who has a lot of experience because it does take a lot of skill to get all of the breast tissue out from under the nipple and still have it survive. For me, it made a huge difference psychologically and I feel very fortunate I was able to do it.

  • noellech
    noellech Member Posts: 86
    edited May 2009

    Hi Peggio - I just wanted to respond that I had my mast incision along the top of my areola and it too was a little pinched in at first. But now after some time it seems very flat and natural looking. My mast was July 08. At my exchange surgery I had my ps go in under the fold so as not to open up the nipple again.

    I too am glad I had the nipple spared, especially when I awoke from surgery but for those of you feeling bad if you didn't get to keep your nipple, keeping the nipple is no panacea. Once they remove the tissue from under the nipple, it looses its nerves so there is no feeling usually and it no longer has the relaxed and erect positions - it just kind of sits there semi erect all the time. So most of the time it doesn't look the same as the other nipple. And even though my breasts match relatively well, I didn't have a lift on my good side so my nipples are not even. So ps has to fix that later. If I had done BM it would have been wonderful to keep both nipples, but with just one it has not worked out to be as great as I thought going in.

    noelle

  • pitanga
    pitanga Member Posts: 596
    edited May 2009

    Tablover,

    Like you I lost half of the areola because of necrosis. The part that is left is paler in color than the other side. Has this happened to you? I remember you said you dont notice much the missing half...I find myself also doing a double-take when I look in the mirror --at first it looks normal, and then I see it´s lopsided-- but I think it maybe because there is almost no color difference setting the areola off from the rest of the skin.

    I asked my surgeon about the color change yesterday and she thinks that since the tissue underlying the areola is no longer there, there are fewer blood vessels to bring blood to the areola.

    Lisa

  • Bigapple09
    Bigapple09 Member Posts: 440
    edited May 2009

    I asked my very Conservative BS what the risk was of keeping my nipples and getting a cancer, she said it was a theoretical 1 to 2% risk. She was very anti keeping my nipples, so her answer really shocked me.

    When she went through the risk reduction of the bmx, she said its not a 100% reduction because they can never get all of the breast tissue, and the risk reduction is appx 99%

    So, having had a BRCA + and prior cancer risk that put me at 80 to 90% risk of getting another cancer, getting to keep my nipples and have an overall risk of appx 3% sounded pretty good.

Categories