Organic Foods

Options

I haven't seen a post singularly devoted to this topic and I apologize if I did not dig deep enough but I have been told something that I hope someone can tell me is bunk.

I haven't gone fully organic but for only the things I can eat or drink now during chemo (limited.) This comes from my daughter who's friends Mom has advanced bc. She went all organic much to her husbands dismay as he wanted the house to have non organic things as well. Supposedly, he did months of research and discovered this "fact" about US organic foods. Said that in order to be certified Organic for animal products, does not mean that the animal is fed organic 100% of the time. I think she said only 20% of the time do these animals eat pesticide free etc. This couldn't possibly be true could it? 

Right now, I have a hard time eating fruits and veggies so that won't come until my after chemo stomach can take it.But on the little dairy I can eat/drink or chicken, I was feeling that this was absolutely free of pesticides, antibiotics and particulary homones since I am strongly hormone positive. I know someone will tell me this info.is wrong. Won't you please?

Thanks

Ellen

«1

Comments

  • bomber410
    bomber410 Member Posts: 564
    edited March 2009

    I am no expert.  I, too, look forward to the experts responding here.  Thanks for getting this thread started. 

    As for my eating/purchase patterns, I am at least buying organic when I can, washing all veggies, making foods from scratch vs. packaged meals, no more soda, etc.  So not a 100% shift but a shift all the same.

    Good luck with your treatment.

    Debbie

  • FloridaLady
    FloridaLady Member Posts: 2,155
    edited March 2009

    Who is controlling the the labeling of organic...FDA...right there is are problem.  There is something like three or four levels of  items being labeled as "organic".  I don't think this is being managed very in-depth right now.  The key is so what it was raised organic if the produce shipper and handlers (also store employee's) don't handle things right we lose some of the benefits.

    I guess we will have to do the best we can....hopefully we are getting the benefits. I'm more afraid of genetically altered foods.

    Flalady

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited March 2009

    Actually is it USDA that regulates the use of the term "organic." FDA is part of Dept. of Health and Human Service. USDA is part of the Interior Dept. 2 completely different groups.

    There is information on the USDA web site about use of the label, but it is somewhat difficult to navigate.

  • REKoz
    REKoz Member Posts: 590
    edited March 2009

    Fla Lady-

    By genetically altered, are you referring to the non hormone, no antibiotics such as chicken or dairy products with that claim?  This is all confusing. I am NOT in the financial position to be paying these higher prices to begin with. It is beyond upsetting if I am paying that kind of money for what is essentially a falsely advertised product.

  • FloridaLady
    FloridaLady Member Posts: 2,155
    edited March 2009

    Genetically altered are seed that are being re-engineered in test tubes.  Sixty five percentage of America's produce has now been genetically altered.  We can not export a lot of our veggies now because other countries do not want these "foods".  Why does America feel the need to take something that is a natural food and make big business out of it?  These re-engineered seed have patents and they are also sterile and do not reproduce. This makes the farmer have to buy new seed every year instead growing crops of seed for the next year.

    Where are the so call government agencies protecting us for this?

    Flalady

  • REKoz
    REKoz Member Posts: 590
    edited March 2009

    Well for Gods Sake, how would we EVER know who uses the 35% of unaltered seed? So, what you are saying is that the organic label can be used by those who have genetically altered seed?

    For some reason I am most resistant to eating any products that include added hormones. It's looking more and more like it doesn't friggin matter because I am not getting what I think anyway.

  • nixieschaos
    nixieschaos Member Posts: 130
    edited March 2009
    Organic Labeling

    The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) is responsible for the regulation of labels for organic products in addition to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) mandates on food labeling. There are various labels and phrases a product can contain, but these are often subject to approval by the USDA. There are key differences between 100% organic products and those containing organic ingredients.

    Organic products are gaining hold of the U.S. market as consumers are becoming more aware of their impact on the environment and the health benefits associated with organic food. In order for a product to bear the USDA organic symbol, the product must contain greater than 95% organic ingredients with the exception of water and salt. These products must be raised under organic management. Specifically, livestock cannot be raised with growth hormones or antibiotics and must be fed a 100% organic diet. The land the livestock is raised on must be free of petrol-based fertilizers and sewage.

    Products with greater than 70% organic ingredients can bear a label reading "Made with organic" and then list the specific ingredients which are organic. The organic ingredients must be produced in compliance with the USDA's regulations on producing such products. Any product with less than 70% organic ingredients can only be listed on the information panel. As outlined by the USDA, it is unlawful to affix the USDA Organic label if the product contains less than 70% organic ingredients. There are strict penalties for failure to comply with the USDA regulations or improper use of the USDA Organic symbol.

  • REKoz
    REKoz Member Posts: 590
    edited March 2009

    Thanks for that info. Nixie. Now if that is truly what is abided by then I am confident that having no savings account is less important than eating what I believe is better for me.

  • havehope
    havehope Member Posts: 503
    edited March 2009

    http://www.organicconsumers.org/.

    http://organicconsumers.org/btc/BuyingGuide.cfm

    I have been eating organic for the last 17 years. The site above is one of the best. Before USDA got involved (2002) all organic products were certified by independent groups. I don't buy products that are only USDA organic approved. I look for CCOF, Oregon Tilth or NOFA certification.

    http://www.ccof.org/

    http://www.tilth.org/

    http://www.nofavt.org/orgcert.php

  • REKoz
    REKoz Member Posts: 590
    edited March 2009

    Wow, what a friggin maze this becomes. It burns me NO FRIGGIN end that we get so jerked around with this stuff. Sorry for the strong language but my God, I am losing faith in every government ANYTHING. It is just so VERY VERY wrong not to make things clear, or worse yet, present and lable things that are not in fact what they are!!! False and misleading advertising ya think? USDA now means nothing in my book. Thank you so much simvog for that info. I'll be looking at those sites and narrowing my purchases further.

    Ellen

  • vivre
    vivre Member Posts: 2,167
    edited March 2009

    Ellen, you are so justified in getting mad. We all should be. We are all being poisoned by our food. I work with Europeans, and I use to think they were just listening to anti American propaganda when they made fun at our food. Then I got cancer. Now I know they are right. The EU is much stricter in policing what happens to their food. We need to do the same thing. For instance, do you realize that most cheap ground beef, comes from dairy cows which have probably been shot up with all kinds of antibiotics and hormones. This stuff is killing us. We all need to start speaking up! Or should I say, screaming!

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited March 2009

    Isn't Europe where the Mad Cow problems first came to light?

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited March 2009

    It may have been what persuaded the EU to tighten up its restrictions several years ago. However, the one dichotomy is that the cheese-producing countries (France, Italy etc.) are still allowed to manufacture their cheeses without pasteurization -- to preserve the good taste. That's one reason why American-produced asiago, for example, has no taste, compared to the Italian import.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited March 2009

    I have to say I'm pretty fond of pasteurization from a food safety perspective. I don't know if I've ever had raw milk cheeses. I'm pretty stringent about eating only organic dairy, but even that, I want pasteurized.

    I just read the US allows raw milk cheese production, but there is a lengthened aging requirement because of the lack of pasteurization.

    If one peruses the Ask-an-Expert area of this site, Diana Dyer is the one who strongly advocates organic dairy. I find her rationale sound.

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited March 2009

    Here in Canada, added hormones in dairy cattle were banned several years ago, and the milk from any cattle requiring antibiotics must be thrown out at source.

    Certified organic means no hormones, no antibiotics, and pastureland, grains and vegetable farms must be pesticide free for 7 years before they can be labelled organic.

    DH and I grow many of our own veggies, so we know what goes into the soil.  We also generally use seeds from veggies grown the year before, so we feel "reasonably" safe.

    But, I'll take Italian or French cheeses over North American ones any day!!

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited March 2009

    I envy you being able to grow your own.

    I'm in a townhouse development next to a state park. Between ravaging deer, and neighbors dogs pissing on everything, there is no chance of growing anything edible. I'd have to put up a high fence, and I hate that boxed-in look.

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited March 2009

    Let me tell you about "free range". Apparently chickens and turkeys don't like walking on pavement. So the breeders "open the doors wide" but the foul won't roam because there is pavement from the doorway out to "freedom".

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited March 2009

    That makes me want to go spray paint a gravel pattern on their paved walkways.

    And I think I believe the story. One of my cats absolutely refuses to sit on my lap if my pants have any sort of pattern. Plaid, Dr. Seuss, you name it, he won't get up. The rest of the time, he's like a lap goiter.

  • dlb823
    dlb823 Member Posts: 9,430
    edited March 2009

    Hi, Ellen ~  I've been following this thread, and thought I would share something that I just got today via The Environmental Working Group (http://www.ewg.org/):

    http://www.foodnews.org/fulllist.php

    It's a list of fruits & veggies that shows which are the most pesticide contaminated.  I found a few of the results (potatoes?, tangerines? bananas?) a bit surprising, as I'd never think of these as either needing to be purchased organic or requiring soaking (as I do with some produce) to remove any pesticide residue.    

    The EWG, by the way, has a free email newsletter that covers a lot of safety issues, from food to water to cosmetics and cleaners.    Deanna

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited March 2009

    That's a great list Deanna, I've been recommending that one for a number of months now.

    EWG says if you avoid the dirty dozen (the 12 highest pesticide load) or only buy them organic, you can avoid about 90% of your exposure to pesticides.

    I think they have updated the list. Bananas used to be ok non-organic. 

  • dlb823
    dlb823 Member Posts: 9,430
    edited March 2009

    LJ ~ I'm familiar with "The Dirty Dozen," and have definitely switched to organic apples and strawberries, for example, because of it.  But who would have thought bananas???  Grrrrrr.... it is just so frustrating!  Here we are living in the USA in the 21st century, and yet something as basic as providing wholesome food for ourselves and or families is as difficult as ever -- maybe more so.  The other thing I started to cringe about after I saw that new list is restaurant food, which I have always been a bit squirmish about due to cleanliness concerns, and even more so since chemo.  So now add this revised pesticide list to worry about, and I don't know if I'll ever enjoy eating in a restaurant again!  Even getting something as simple as a smoothie might be iffy!   Deanna

  • FloridaLady
    FloridaLady Member Posts: 2,155
    edited March 2009

    Research corn and potatoes that can not be exported do to the fact they have been genetically altered.  These are just of the few items of produced banned outside of the US.

    Flalady

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited March 2009
    So I guess the trick is to find/patronize organic restaurants, or perhaps try to select menu choices that are on the lower side of the pesticide list even when dining out (get the onion soup for an appetizer rather than a salad) Smile
  • FloridaLady
    FloridaLady Member Posts: 2,155
    edited March 2009
    Subcommittee G Section 1 Europe by Patrick Dunnigan

    The European community has taken a very cautious approach toward genetically engineered foods. The motivations are largely cultural. Europeâs situation is much different than that of any other region in the world, and their policies reflect these differences.

    Regulations are being imposed on a variety of levels of government. Most notably, the European Parliament, individual European nations, and individual stores themselves have all imposed restrictions on genetically altered foods.

    According to the European Parliament records from 02/14/97, manufacturers must label all food that might have genetically manufactured ingredients. This includes food with genetically manufactured organisms, food with an intentionally modified molecular structure, and food that has been isolated for microorganisms, fungi, and algae. (8) Furthermore, the genetically altered food must not mislead the consumer, present any danger to the consumer, or differ from the food that it is intended to replace so that the altered food is a nutritional disadvantage to the consumer. Next, manufacturers must apply for permission to market their product in a particular country in the European Union for the first time. (8) A thorough investigation regarding the possible effects must be performed to ensure safety. Also, any genetically altered food must be labeled with its composition, nutritional value and effects, and the intended use of the food. (8) Finally, a country in the European Union can suspend the sale of a particular type of food immediately if new evidence surfaces that the previously approved food is, in fact, unsafe.

    Some individual countries are also implementing their own standards to ensure the public safety. Leading the way in this area are France and Germany. Germany passed the Act Regulating Genetic Engineering in 1993. It put into place 16 groups that investigate the safety of all the genetically altered food that is sold in Germany. In September 1998, France decided not to authorize Novartis Seeds to market three strains of genetically altered maize in France. Last July, France imposed a two-year moratorium on approvals of all rapeseed varieties amid concerns that the genetic modifications could be transmitted to other crops. The Belgian firm Plant Genetic Systems developed two of the varieties. (5) At the same time, though, France approved the sale of two other maize varieties developed jointly by Monsanto (USA) and AgrEvo (Germany). (5)

    Finally, some stores are cracking down on the sale of genetically engineered foods. Franceâs Auchan and Carrefour have both outlawed genetic engineering in their own brands of food. (4) The British store J. Sainsbury Pic eliminated genetic engineering from its foods one year ago. In Carrefour, 1,783 products have been taken off the shelves. Another 286 had alternate ingredients substituted for the possible genetically modified organisms. (4)

    There are several cultural motivations to strictly regulate genetically modified foods in Europe. First, Europe is the most densely populated continent in the world. They have high levels of small farmers. This is unlike other areas including the United States, Canada, and Asia, where the land can support large areas of farmland. In order to maintain agriculture in Europe, many European countries subsidize their farmers. (1) Furthermore, European people tend to value their culture immensely. Accordingly, they resent foreign influence on their culture. Many Europeans tend to associate genetic engineering with American-style agriculture. (1) French farmers have accentuated the hostile feelings by referring to American beef fed with genetically engineered hormones as "le mal bouffe." (2) In the United Kingdom, British newspapers have dubbed genetically engineered products as "Frankenstein foods." (7) The British author Brewster Keen is marketing a book entitled "Farmageddon" that links bioengineered seeds with mechanized agriculture. (1) Furthermore, recent scares like mad cow disease have greatly affected public perception of genetic engineering as well. (5) Therefore, Europeans hesitate to embrace genetically modified foods.

    There are a few scientific motivations for the legislation as well. In a recent study, scientists concluded that BT corn, a genetically altered variety, releases an insecticide into soil. While the effects of the release are not yet known, studies like this are contributing to the push for legislative control. (12) Mostly, though, the lack of scientific information regarding the effects of genetically modified food is what helps to motivate the cautious policy. Many of the effects of genetic modifications are not currently known. People easily associate genetic tampering with some sort of alien organisms. While this might seem ludicrous, the fear of the unknown, especially crossing species barriers, can cause great wariness among people. Insecticides, on the other hand, do not change the plant itself and can be tested for possible harmful effects. It is difficult to decide whether or not genetically engineered organisms are safe. Scientific studies regarding insecticides are much more numerous. Therefore, many European countries hesitate to confirm genetic engineering too hastily. Accordingly, if the world finally embraces genetically engineered food, most European countries will be among the last to submit to more lax regulations

  • FloridaLady
    FloridaLady Member Posts: 2,155
    edited March 2009

    Genetic ID (TM)
    from Dana Association files:

    Genetic ID from Fairfield, Iowa offers a service to identify genetically
    altered food. Te company claims to own technology that "positively detects
    genetically-altered foods" by scanning the DNA structure of the crop samples
    send to their laboratory. Many, though apparently not all processed foods
    are also testable.
    During the recent Natural Foods Expo in Baltimore comments circulated to the
    effect that European countries have contacted the firm to explore the
    possibility of postively identifying genetically altered ingredients and
    therefore requiring labelling or excluding them from the market. The
    general feeling was that this option creates a new correlation of forces in
    the GMO battle.
    The company cites some interesting survey results in its promotional
    literature but, unfortunately, does not supply full citations of the studies:
    A Rutgers University study of 604 New Jersey residents found that 42% were
    either "not at all willing" or "not very willing" to buy genetically
    engineered produce. In the same survey 53% responded that they have "little
    faith" in compaines that make genetically engineered products.
    An Australian survey of 1,378 people found that 71% believe the long term
    health danger of genetically altered foods to be "a big worry" "a very big
    worry" or a "huge worry". Further, 89% support the required labelling of
    genetically-engineered foods. A survey of 1500 Canadians found that 51% are
    "extremely concerned" or "very concerned" about such foods. In europe 72%
    of 12,800 survey participants de2scribed such foods as risky, and they were
    collectively rated "unacceptable" in a Dutch survey of 870 people

  • FloridaLady
    FloridaLady Member Posts: 2,155
    edited March 2009
    Absence of food labeling laws keep U.S. consumers from knowing whether or not their food is genetically altered.

    Back a couple of months, a couple of you asked how you could determine whether or not your food contained genetically modified organisms. It took a while, but I found a bit of information that might help you better understand this bomb-filled arena, or just add to your confusion.

    Here's one point that's indisputable. It is difficult for consumers to know whether the food they're buying was genetically modified, especially in this country. Most of the industrialized countries demand that GMO products be labeled as such. But not the U.S.

    The Pew Research Foundation reported that more than 90 percent of American shoppers want food labeled as to its contents, including GMO. Unless I missed it, there was nothing in the farm bill that finally passed last week that will give us a clue to the presence of GM ingredients.

    Picture
    GMO By Rediscover Biology

    Monsanto, which has a chokehold on the world's use of genetically modified seeds, is now using its extensive network of lawyers and lobbyists to pressure state agriculture agencies not to allow milk producers to label dairy products as not coming from cows fed with GM food or bovine growth hormone.

    To learn more about Monsanto, check out this link to Don Barlett and Jim Steele's very well done and balanced investigative report in this month's Vanity Fair.

    As with almost everything controversial, all the opinions on GMO have to be weighed by considering the source of the information. The Institute for Responsible Technology makes no pretense about its concern over the danger of using genetically modified substances in our food.

    The institute, founded in 2003 by Jeffery Smith, the author of "Seeds of Deception," says many consumers in the U.S. mistakenly believe that the FDA approves GM foods through rigorous, in-depth, long-term studies. In reality, the agency has absolutely no safety testing requirements.

    Smith says it's easy to understand the FDA's industry-friendly policy on regulation of GMOs when you see the revolving door between agency regulators and the companies they regulate.

    The FDA has claimed it was not aware of any information showing that GM crops were different "in any meaningful or uniform way" from non-GMO crops and therefore didn't require testing. But Smith says that 44,000 internal FDA documents made public by a lawsuit show that this was not true.

    But getting back to the original question of how to identify GMO-tainted food, the institute has released a four-page guide on what to watch out for, including a lengthy list of food items containing GM ingredients.

    The guide and other GMO information can be found at the institute's Web site at this link.

  • AllieM22
    AllieM22 Member Posts: 464
    edited March 2009

    One of the things too that is frustrating about the organic rules is that often there are rules on the books but apparently the U.S. has a big shortfall on the traveling regulators to verify that the rules are being followed. Another reason why local farmers are better--they know they are more easily held accountable (or at least known) by their customers...

  • CaseyDoodle
    CaseyDoodle Member Posts: 144
    edited March 2009

    Now I am a little worried about planting my garden.  How do I tell if the seeds are "genetically engineered?" 

    We grow all of our own vegetables, but I have never paid attention to genetic engineering of the seeds.  I also can and freeze everything I can.  This was the first year I intended to save the seeds from my garden to start next year's garden.

    Is there any government agency out there that we can trust?  I am so tired of this.  I am tired of slogging through the mud to make sure that the food I eat is safe...  What's next???

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited March 2009

    Casey, you might be able to purchase veggie seeds from Italy in an Italian grocery store if you have any nearby.  We can get them here in Ontario as my area -- the Niagara region -- has a very large Italian-Canadian population.

    Personally, I'm not especially concerned about GM foods (yes, I know, that's probably heresy on this thread!!) but if you are, then do hunt for seeds imported from Europe.  Try going to www.bertonseeds.com  This company, based in Toronto, sells Italian seeds.

    Linda

  • vivre
    vivre Member Posts: 2,167
    edited March 2009

    Seed savers exchanges (there are quite a few of them) are organized by organic gardeners who want to preserve heirloom seeds. You can buy,sell and trade seeds through them. They are usually committed to untreated and unaltered varieties of fruits and veggies.

    FlaLady, thanks again for all your great research.

Categories