Centrist Democrats or Independent
Comments
-
I live in "Appalachia" (rural western North Carolina) and can tell you things here are bad; they've been bad for years. Last week I read that our area is at 12% unemployment. Industrial plants have been closing their doors at a frightening rate for over a year now. I have seen the same "for sale" signs in front of several houses for over 18 months and driving from my home to "town", there are multiple "for sale--forclosure" signs in front of homes. We're not talking McMansions--we're talking about modest little homes that are listing under 75k.
One thing that did frighten me some last month was taking my son shopping in a neighboring county. It was obvious that the stores were not buying new stock. One store actually removed several aisles from the store! My husband does a lot of the grocery shopping and I have discovered that our local grocery store is selling products that are expired. I mean canned goods and boxed items that the expiration date doesn't mean the product will kill you, but still. I managed to buy a pack of tic tacs from them last week that had expired last November.
In recent years, our county has been #1 in the state for the production of crystal meth. I can see how desperate people might turn to something like that here; there isn't much hope. My son recently began a job at a convenience store in town, working the weekend shift all alone (he's 18). I am so scared one of those desperate people is going to come in and rob them.
Infrastructure? Sure would be nice if the "stimulous" bill would include $$ for the state to repair/replace some of our bridges. We have more crumbling bridges in our county than adequate ones. A community was recently cut off recently when a bridge collapsed under the weight of a single car--haven't heard any plans to fix it yet. We also have one-lane bridges on several roads that are a terrible hazard to drivers unfamiliar with the area.
Another neighboring county ran out of unemployment funds last month. I heard yesterday that the state has asked for a federal loan to pay unemployment claims.
Our communities' economies are very much dependend on the auto industry and textile industry. My husband lost his job in December and hasn't had any luck finding a new one. He's got a degree and over 20 years experience in his field. The textile plants started moving their operations to Mexico and overseas several years ago. The auto-related industries began failing about 5 years ago and now they're dropping like flies.
Our schools.....well, I must stay it's aggravating to see the "laptop for every child" program that provides technology to children in other countries. Not that I don't think it's a wonderful idea and ALL children deserve a chance at an education. Our schools use out of date text books and are struggling to get the equipment and resources that would provide a 21st century education. My eldest is a senior in high school and in the top 10 in his class. He has been discouraged by seeing the differences between his education and that of others he has been competing with for college. While there are many of us here who have children who appreciate their education and are supportive and involved, we are outnumbered by the children and parents who seem to have no hope and have just "given up". There seems to be the attitude that there is no way out, so why bother trying?
Even our medical services are going downhill. Late last year, the only obstetrical doctors in our county decided to quit delivering babies at the only hospital in our county. Then, last month, our local health department announced they will no longer be providing prenatal care. I fear for the pregnant mothers and children. I doubt that many of them can afford the trip to neighboring counties for care.
Our county is what's known as an "electing county" as it relates to public assistance. This means that they can set their own qualifying guidelines for things like welfare and food stamps. The income caps are so low that many who would be getting some help if they lived in another county cannot get it here. It's not surprising to me that the Social Services office here is most often patronized by the cliche' "welfare mother". You can't get help as a married couple with children--no drugs--hit a rough patch and just need a leg up to get you through. We don't qualify for a thing even though our house payment is now 90% of our "income" (unemployment). There was a chance we might qualify for the assistance for heating fuel because I'm medically disabled (but not entitled to benefits because I was 38 when dx'ed and still raising my kids--not enough recent work credits). Anyway, we didn't qualify for the fuel assitance; I'm not sure the $2.38 (yes: two dollars and thirty eight cents) we would have been given for the entire winter season would have helped much.
I think a lot of us here haven't noticed much of a difference until recently. When the marked took such a huge dive last fall and many were losing thousands in retirement and investments, most of us didn't feel a thing in th pocketbook. Things have been tough here for much longer; we're used to it. Most people here are just looking to survive. Retirement funds and investing are just not on a lot of people's radar.
Why do we live here? There are lots of reasons: my husband was born and raised here, his family is here, we have a wonderful church family and friends, there are lots of good people here struggling along with us, the cost of living IS much less than elsewhere, we don't want to uproot our children and cause them any more stress than they're already going through, and--warts and all--we LIKE it here. Small town living is just right for us. (I moved here from Metro Denver, CO twenty years ago). Life is a struggle. I'm sure if we lived elsewhere there'd still be plenty of struggling.
I think what you can take from the news program (I hadn't seen any promos about it but will try to watch it) is perhaps a lesson in how to prepare for what Appalachia has been living with for a long time. When I see ABC Good Morning America doing a story on a couple who they call victims of the economic downturn (let's just call it a severe recession, people!) when their now 90k income won't let them get their Starbuck's every morning, pay for their nightly dinners out, or--horror of horrors--can't pay their personal trainer any more, I worry that there are a lot of people out there that are going to be completely devastated as the economic cancer metastacizes. And, you know what? My cancer center finished renovations several months ago (largely cosmetic, but some new radiation equipment was added) and my cancer hasn't cared a bit. I don't think PORK in the manner of prettying up city halls and greenways is going to matter much to the financial cancer either. Just like cancer, talk of prevention doesn't help much when you've already got it. Knowing the causes is helpful, but CURING it is required. Everybody has an opinion but most of us can agree that putting on a new dress and lipstick isn't going to make our cancer go away just as the same will not cure the country's financial ills.
Just my 2 cents (or should that be adjusted to .00875 cents? LOL!)
(((HUGS)))
Diane -
Laurap, that's what I did, I have asked nicely, the same way you want no divisiveness on your Obama thread, I think YOU are divisive. And I did start this thread in order to be away from the exteme loyalty to Obama.
This thread is not for OBAMA Supporters, it's for QUESTIONERS and People who aren't happy with the decision.
Can you not understand this? Wow, I saw that you asked others to stay away from your thread and you EXPECT them to follow your wishes. Can you not follow your own admonition? If not, I would guess you can expect others to not listen to a word you say.
-
There, I highlighted my original post so you can see this about complaining about Obama. Like I said, it's not a support of Republicans, but it is AGAINST alot of what we see happening. So far, there is no change in party politics. I don't see Obama as a Centrist like I heard he would end up to be, but like the leftie my friends warned me about. He is not being bi-partisan and not very humble in my opinion. I heard him this morning, saying it would be bipartisan to vote for this bill and I don't know how that could be when Republicans didn't sit down at the table with them to put it together.
I thougth when I voted, that FINALLY we will have someone who will try to get input from everyone, he promised a variety in his Cabinet. He promised that he would not sign bills into law without first posting them to the Web for 5 days in order to allow the public to comment on it. He's already broken that promise when he signed the Lily Ledbetter bill into law.
Here's the source:
Obama signs first law without Web comment
Updated: Thursday, January 29th, 2009 | By Angie Drobnic HolanOne of President Obama's major campaign planks was making government more open and accountable. It's a reaction to a habit in Congress of rushing bills through the House and Senate without giving people much opportunity to know what the bills would do. Indeed, sometimes members of Congress don't even know what's in the bills.
So Obama pledged during the campaign to institute "sunlight before signing."
"Too often bills are rushed through Congress and to the president before the public has the opportunity to review them," Obama's campaign Web site states . "As president, Obama will not sign any nonemergency bill without giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House Web site for five days."
But the first bill Obama signed into law as president - the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act - got no such vetting.
In fact, the Congressional Record shows that the law was passed in the Senate on Jan. 22, 2009, passed in the House on Jan. 27, and signed by the president on Jan. 29. So only two days passed between the bill's final passage and the signing.
The legislation was not posted to the White House Web site for comment in any way that we could find.
We see no way the bill could be deemed emergency legislation, even taking the broadest view. The bill overturns the effects of a Supreme Court decision that limited when workers could sue for pay discrimination. Most pertinently, the bill is retroactive to the time of the court decision - May 28, 2007. Obama earned a Promise Kept from us for signing the law. But it would have the same effect if had been signed a few days later, so it's clearly not an emergency.
We asked the White House about this and if they planned to begin posting laws to the Web site for comment soon, but we got no response.
Obama signed the measure at 10:20 a.m. About two hours later, the White House posted the bill on its Web site with a link that asks people to submit comments . But the bill was already signed at that point.
-
Thanks Madalyn! I guess I didn't feel comfortable on the other thread since it was not ok to voice anything negative unless it was Republican negatives. So, I am pretty upset with Mr. Obama right now --- will still try to be hopeful because I need our government to work it out.
I really am wondering about the wisdom of having one person in charge like this. Bush made poor decisions and didn't own up to it. Obama is making poor decisions but he is owning up to it. Still poor decisions that keep effecting us. It's too bad there wasn't such a thing as CO-Presidents.
And who else has ever thought we should vote for the VP, not have a 2 person ticket? I think we would have all voted for Hillary to be VP --- who would want Biden? The polls were clear that it was Hillary and Obama. If Obama passed away, we'd be stuck with Biden instead of having our true 2nd choice.
-
Well Laura just demostrated to us once again that it is always easy to criticize but what do you do if your guy is in power and things are falling apart ? You continue bashing previous administration trying to distract form the current problems. The so called positive Obama thread is filling up with anti-Bush posts as they are running out of postive things to say about Obama administration that still does not have a full cabinet .
Obama is creating doom and gloom instead of trying to inspire Americans with hopeful messages, This is a pure political play of making people so afraid and miserable that any improvement would be considered as a miracle.
here is an intersting article which argues that this recession is not any worse that 70s and 80s and that one of the major differences is our "President talking the economy down"
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Why-This-Recession-Seems-cnbc-14354968.html
-
Hi, I just want to say, thanks ilj for support but I don't want to invite a debate here. Thx.
-
Wow! No, I didn't realize that he was doing that!! I thought when he said pull out, we were leaving. I am sick of that war! To me, if we are going to Afghanistan again, it should be by a unanimous UN vote to help those people, not just us bossy bullies ... Sorry, that's how I see the US when they invade other countries. I understood 9/11 repercussions, but I think we should have bombed them and left. They let terrorists in, we bomb them, it's not our job to fix their country .. unless they want to pay us to be there!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
Afghanistan again? We never left there. It just hasn't gotten as much news time as Iraq.
-
Can I say something positive about Obama here
We are not going to Afghanistan to "fix" their country , we are going there to make sure that Tailban and Al Quieda are not coming back. I would rather have a war on the foreign soil then in our cities. Let's face forit all his faults Bush has one indisputable accomplishment: no terrorist strikes on US soil since 9/11. I am hoping and praying that Obama will be able to maintain this.
-
I am not here to debate. I am here because I am a Centrist Democrat. I respect everyone's views and in turn expect the same.
This is a public forum and this is the Centrist Democrat and Independent thread. Again from the header of the Political Corner here at BC.org:
All views on politics and other subject matter are welcome. Expected in this forum are political differences but personal respect.
The way I see it is this:
Even though I do not agree with everything in the original post or subsequent posts,
I choose to read and post on the Positive Obama thread because I am.
I choose not to read or post on the Respectable Republican thread because I am not. That being said, from time to time I do read posts from a couple sisters that I have known and respected for years knowing full well that I will not agree with them. But I care about them and respect their opinions for what they are, theirs.
Even though I do not agree with everything in the original post or subsequent posts,
I choose to read and post on the Centrist Democrat and Independent thread because I am.
Again I am not looking for debate but I do expect personal respect.
Jader, I am sorry that you do not like the cartoon from the Phoenix Arizona daily newspaper, it's posting was not intended to create debate.
The name of this thread paints a broad picture and different opinions should be expected and as on all message boards, if you disagree simply move on to the next post. Again, this is a public forum.
I know you can't change a thread name here but if you want a narrower view start a new thread that spells that out in the title, like Democrats Unhappy with President Obama. I can guarantee you won't see any posts from me, but I am sure you will have plenty of company...
Please understand I respect you and your views and only ask the same.
-
ilj, I think when US goes in, they start trying to stabilize and work on the infrastructure. They bring in contractors. Our boys start policing ... I wish he wouldn't send the boys, we've had too many die already.
-------------------
My dad is in love with Michelle and her girls. Just had to post it, thought it was a pretty picture. And happy for Sidney, he's seen so much in his life.
-
Diane - wow thanks so much for sharing your story, it really helps to get that personal insight into problems that we face.
I hope something comes for your husband real soon!
-
Gosh everyone who can read this post -- I am so sorry I mislabeled the thread -- I thought the paragraph explained it ....
Tell me Miss Laura, how should I name the thread so that way there is no slamming of the other people? There is enough of that on your thread. So, you are going to stand your ground. Kinda creepy. I can tell what a polite and nice person you are now.
-
Diane said: And, you know what? My cancer center finished renovations several months ago (largely cosmetic, but some new radiation equipment was added) and my cancer hasn't cared a bit. I don't think PORK in the manner of prettying up city halls and greenways is going to matter much to the financial cancer either. Just like cancer, talk of prevention doesn't help much when you've already got it. Knowing the causes is helpful, but CURING it is required. Everybody has an opinion but most of us can agree that putting on a new dress and lipstick isn't going to make our cancer go away just as the same will not cure the country's financial ills.
That is exactly my point about being upset with this bill!!! We don't need a remodel, we don't need lipstick, we need real jobs. I hate to see them create government jobs because then that has to be sustained.
I also don't understand why they are intent on freezing out the Republicans. I know that the Republicans did it to them but that was when Bill was president -- so there was a balance. I don't know when the balance shifted back to the Democrats but it happened during Bush's "reign". I thought Obama was really going to change this up.
If in 12 months things have turned around we will all be grateful for him, I sure hope so because my nails are getting shorter and shorter.
-
Actually, I thought Obama stated all along that he planned to pull out of Iraq and send the troops to Afghanistan. That is what he said during the campaign. Afghanistan is not considered part of the middle east. Or do I need to go back to school.....
-
When it comes to the nation's economic issues, 67% of U.S. voters have more confidence in their own judgment than they do in the average member of Congress
.....................................
I am surprised the number isn't higher. Imo, third graders could do better....
-
Arianna Huffington's site is good ...... Joe Palermo wrote this about bipartisanship and what it has done in the past!!!
President Barack Obama outsmarted Senator Judd Gregg and the Republicans by shifting the responsibility for the 2010 census from the Commerce Department to the White House. After realizing he would not be able to game the census for the political benefit of the GOP Gregg decided to pull the plug on his outpouring of "bipartisanship" and drop out as Obama's Commerce Secretary. Some corporate media pundits spun Gregg's action as being somehow evidence of an Obama failure. "Why can't Obama keep his cabinet together?" asked Chris Matthews. With "burrowed" Bushite career employees in all the departments and agencies of government and with prominent Republicans mounting a full-court press on Obama's legislative agenda I fail to see why the actions of Judd Gregg have so captured the media's imagination.
And nowhere have I heard any pundit mention the fact that some of the worst policies the United States government has enacted over the past forty years have been "bipartisan."
For example:
On August 10, 1964, Congress passed by a vote of 416 to 0 in the House and 88 to 2 in the Senate the "Gulf of Tonkin Resolution." It was a stunning show of "bipartisanship" giving President Lyndon Johnson carte blanche to take the country to war in Vietnam. The war cost the nation about $900 billion and after it was over the only thing the U.S. had to show for it was fifty-eight thousand dead Americans, over two million dead Vietnamese, and a bitterly divided and polarized nation.
On October 15, 1982, President Ronald Reagan signed into law a bill that lifted most of the restrictions on the savings-and-loan industry. "All in all," the president said, "I think we hit the jackpot." The bipartisan bill allowed thrifts to jump into huge, high-risk real estate ventures and to compete with money market funds. Bolstered by federal guarantees they were now "too big to fail" and the ensuing corruption and criminality was so widespread that George W. Bush's younger brother, Neil Bush, and Arizona Senator John McCain were caught up in scandals relating to failed S & Ls. It was another "bipartisan" disaster that cost American taxpayers $160 billion.
On November 12, 1999, President Bill Clinton signed into law the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act. This ingenious piece of "bipartisan" legislation that Wall Street spent millions on lobbying to get passed and Larry Summers and Robert Rubin supported, dismantled much of the New Deal regulatory apparatus that separated the FDIC-insured commercial bank deposits from the more risk-taking investment banks. It created a new consolidated system of "financial services" where brokerage firms, insurance companies, banks and other forms of organization of capital intermingled at will. This "bipartisan" deregulation scheme ultimately brought down the nation's financial system after the unregulated derivatives and mortgage-backed securities markets collapsed under the weight of fraud, abuse, corruption, and general recklessness.
On June 7, 2001, President George W. Bush signed into law the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001. This "bipartisan" legislation quickly drained $1.6 trillion from the federal treasury and bestowed the biggest benefits on the wealthiest Americans and corporations. It turned a budget surplus into budget deficits as far as the eye can see and was the opening salvo of one of the most fiscally destructive periods in American history.
On October 10, 2002, the House of Representatives in a show of "bipartisanship" voted 296 to 133 to pass the Authorization for the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq, and the Senate followed with its own "bipartisan" vote of 77 to 23. Demonstrating their "bipartisanship" by voting for the measure was Joe Biden, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, Chris Dodd, and John Edwards. This act has resulted in the deaths of at least 150,000 Iraqi civilians and 4,300 Americans. It has cost American taxpayers about $850 billion so far and our leaders thought it wise to throw all the costs of the war onto the national debt. This illegal war and occupation has "won" nothing for the United States other than the opprobrium of the world and a severely weakened the military.
All told, these "bipartisan" wars and twisted economic schemes have so far cost the nation at least $5.2 trillion. So forgive me if I don't get excited when I hear the word "bipartisan" thrown around as if it possesses some kind of magic value. And I'm not too concerned about Judd Gregg's decision to pick up his marbles are go home
-
Oh no, I think that he saw he was a token in the Cabinet. I think he spoke truth saying he was unhappy about the stimulus package.
Daisy, I printed the whole article, the point was to show how forcing the other side to vote your way doesn't always benefit us. I am extremely upset about all the deregulation that occured in the name of bipartisanship. We might lay blame at Clinton for that but if Republicans didn't vote for it, how can you lay it as only his feet ... same with the war in Iraq ... it's everyone's fault. The sooner the finger pointing stops, the faster we can MOVE ON.
-
Laura, you do come over and read posts. What two favorite sister's posts do you read AND respect. Surely not mine. You told me to take Vivre and Rosemary advice and stay away from your thread. So, I know you are reading the Respectfully Republican thread.
Have a good day.
Jader, don't know how much I can participate in this thread. I cannot say anything nice about Obama right now except that he has a pretty smile.
I do not trust him. He has lied over and over and he's only been in office less than a month. When he says that a bill will be posted for 5 days so we can read it FIRST he just plain lied. He can say this is an emergency all he wants, but he's lying. And not giving anyone time to read this bill and demanded they most vote is absolutely ridiculolus. He's a lawyer. Doesn't he know that you're supposed to read legal documents before your sign it? And now HE'S going to sign it without reading it. But he can trust his friends to do things right...SPEND SPEND SPEND....the Spending Bull.
Shirley
-
Apparently job retraining is part of the package. I wonder how one would find out if you qualify for re-training. Do you have to be unemployed? Or does being part of a dying industry qualify? I'd really like to know about this part. It would be a dream come true to change careers and get assistance to do it....even if I had to work part-time while getting re-trained. I wonder if it means education or learning how to work a piece of machinery?
-
Shirley, if you really want to read the reconciled version of the stimulus bill (the House and the Senate combined), it's viewable on the White House website:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/arra_public_review/
You can leave comments at the site too. Earlier versions have been available for review for a while now.
-
I too thought that Obama always said he wanted to put more resources (people) into Afghanistan. This is the war that was UN sanctioned. We are perhaps more aware of it up here in Canada because Canadian forces are deployed there. Canada declined to be involved in the Iraq war. Saddam was no saint, but he didn't have weapons of mass destruction and Iraq was not a hotbed of Taliban plotting. That was Afghanistan with mostly Saudi money.
-
Well, I watched the show on Appalachia last night and it broke my heart.
I wish, just wish, that someone would do a solution show on things like this. Why couldn't Diane Sawyer do a 2 hour show and the last 1/2 hour or hour, show what the town needs, how much it would cost and show America how to help them!!!!!!! And show what nice people ABC is by giving the family a nice, even used, car for transportation.
I mean, lets say she said they need a new school bus so the kids can get to school and that means we need a bus driver, that will cost $30,000 for the driver, and $100K for the bus. America, who will donate this?
ABC has tv shows that fix things up, why didn't Diane Sawyer's team AT THE VERY LEAST, show at the end of the show, that ABC fixed up the rental for them to make it liveable? Or provide them with a year's supply of credit at the grocery store that excludes the purchase of alcohol and cigarettes? Or something sensible like dressers for the kids instead of suitcases under the bed? Or clothes, new ones for the first time, rain gear for Mom?
I get disgusted when I watch these expose' shows and they get the piece, they sell the advertising and the people get zilch. If it weren't for showing their plight, there'd be no story. I don't think it's the same thing as the nature shows who refuse to interfere when they see animals starving or in need of water.
-
Thanks, LAphoenix.
-
I posted over on the REP thread that I had seen that show, too. It showed us that Bobby Kennedy had been there talking about the problems with the area and the value of these Americans. There was a reporter with him? Or maybe he was in gov't as well, not sure .. Anyway, the young man with Bobby is now the mayor and he showed that things have changed (didn't say they are perfect but better) down in the city. He said it's up in the mountains that things are still the same.
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=6845926
There's a link on how to help ...... but you're right Jader, I don't think I saw that on tv about how to help. Even so, they can give you the link or tell you, but why not say, They need that bus to get people down the hill to jobs or to school ... America Help, we'll donate the 1st $50,000 to get it started??!!
-
Yo, Maria! Hi! Can you get on a trial? Where the Pharm Co pays for the drugs? Try another onc? That's what we did with my husband, he was on Medicare with a Stage IV brain tumor, a number of oncs said a drug wasn't available for him, but then we found one who was running a Phase III trial for it. It was for recurrence only, but the onc said he considered Stage IV to be recurrent. Only thing is I wouldn't do a blind trial ... I don't like those ...
-
Gals,
About the banks and so forth, I saw an interview with a financial expert (LOL) who said the problem is the banks got too big. He said it's basically an anti-trust problem. "If a bank is too big to fail, it's too big to exist." That's the quote. I think it's so true! My Mom was warning about de-regulating the banks at the time, because the regs were put there after the Depression to prevent this very thing from happening. So I roll my eyes whenever I hear them say our banking regulations are "antiquated." They're not, we need to go back to the old regs we had until they changed them to allow this risk taking and greed.
-
Yes, I agree unique ....... regulation is needed to protect the average person who puts money in the bank. Most people are not high flying investors who are savvy in diversification. I saw huge lines outside banks here a few months ago. At that one bank that failed, people only got their $100,000 and $.50 on the dollar of anything over ...... old people whose savings were now gone.
Criminal.
-
I watched the show last night. Things are not much different where I am for a lot of people. We--although our income would be considered modest and perhaps not even middle class in most places--used to be doing quite well here. When I was volunteering for an early childhood intervention program, I would see situations much like the ones on the program. The thing is, even if the programs/money would roll in...places like this have no one to administer the funds. Along with that, there is so much corruption here. I have discovered through my geneaological research of my husband's family that the same 10-15 families have been in power in this area for at least 200 years. It seems to me that when the "haves" are looking to stay that way, educating and assisting the "have nots" is not in their best interest. It is truly a sad situation for so many.
I remember seeing Paula Abdul do something on Idol Gives Back last year or perhaps even the year before. I remember seeing footage of her visiting some families in Kentucky. Perhaps you could google it if you're interested in helping?
Something that is very exciting and is a prospect for many in this situation is BEREA COLLEGE just outside of Louisville, KY. Students can attend there 4 years tuition free. They admit about 75% in-state and the remainder is out-of-state focusing on other areas of the Appalachains. So sad about the boy on the program who was the first to graduate high school in his family and had the football scholarship; it was so disappointing to hear that he dropped out of college!
Ok...so what do you all know about this Hughes woman in Florida? I'm not sure what I believe, but I'm starting to feel like the president is looking at his job as one big photo op. Although I didn't vote for him, I sat with tears in my eyes and pride in my heart the day he was inaugerated. I am proud to live in a country that has progressed enough to finally elect an african american man to be president; I just don't think this particular man is the right one. I sure hope the madness stops and he gets some things done that most of us can agree are good things.
(((HUGS)))
Diane
-
Wow...not sure what to say to that.
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team