The Bailout: For or Against

Options
12346

Comments

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited October 2008

    a.s. - california is getting ready to ask the fed gov for a 7b loan according to governor, what state is next? very troubling for sure!

    linda - did i read you correctly, your opinion is liberalism leads to communism or facism?

    saluki - i am looking for my pesto freezer recipe and when i find it i will pm it to you.

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited October 2008

    Linda, Liberalism does not lead to fascism or communism, although contrary to some views I do think fascism (on the right) and communism (on the left) are two sides of the same coin. 

    Liberalism:  A political theory founded on the natural goodness of human beings and the autonomy of the individual and favoring civil and political liberties, government by law with the consent of the governed, and protection from arbitrary authority. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition copyright © 1992 by Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Speaking of which, I expressed agreement earlier on this thread that Bloomberg should violate the term limits law, instituted by the voters of New York, so he could run a third time. Yet, when I had time to step back from my panic concerning the bailout and evaluate the scare tactics used by just about everyone in this fiasco, I wondered how I could have agreed so quickly to a move that violates the law and the wishes of the electorate. Isn't this what happens too often when we're in the middle of a crisis, and exactly what happened after 9/11?  We permitted ourselves to be scared by the Bush administration into upholding new laws that violated the Constitution and violating other laws that had been carefully crafted to protect our democracy.  It starts small and builds.  So, for the record, I don't think Bloomberg should run for a third-term, particularly since he had a chance to put this to the electorate a year ago and he didn't. There are no indispensable leaders.  If  Bloomberg (whom I like) really wants to run again, he can put it to the voters and let them decide, not the City Council.

  • abbadoodles
    abbadoodles Member Posts: 2,618
    edited October 2008

    Oooooh, bad karma.  Can understand the sentiment, though. (Edited to read re: the WS photo)

    Well, it has passed.  Now it's wait and see how it goes.

  • OneBadBoob
    OneBadBoob Member Posts: 1,386
    edited October 2008

    For anyone who missed the VP debate, or like me, could not make it past their 9:30 pm bedtime, here it isin its entirety

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89FbCPzAsRA 

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited October 2008

    Thanks Jane.  Now we can all do our own fact checking.

  • althea
    althea Member Posts: 1,595
    edited October 2008

    a.s., love that photo on the previous page.  lol  I haven't read through all the posts here.  And I'm admittedly idealistic when I think of how government should be.  Corruption offends me and I think government should be free of it.  So I don't know what the answer is politically.  Practically speaking, however, I think we really need to add Mother Earth to the top of our list of priorities considered here. 

    I think people in every walk of life has contributed to this problem simply by being ravenous consumers.  I think lenders financed people who were destined to fail.  And I believe those consumers were buying more square feet than they could realistically afford.  Just in my own community, the wage scale is pitiful.  Yet new neighborhoods are being built every year, many with hoity toity houses.  I wouldn't be surprised if 80% of the people living in those houses are living beyond their means, paycheck to paycheck with no savings. 

    I personally live in an average house in an average nice neighborhood.  And I'm living beyond my means since bc came to visit.  Yet, there's not much option for me to downsize and still be a home owner and not a renter.  And with all these hurricanes coming along to wash our houses out to sea, it seems like the obvious factor that should be 'giving' is our materialism.  We can all live on a whole lot less than what advertisers tell us.  And it's not entirely wall street's fault that it made so many bad loans.  People consumed those loans.  So I don't know if the bailout is good, bad, or ineffective.  I simply wonder if anyone is going to get a clue that we are collectively living beyond our means, economically and environmentally, and it needs to stop.  

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited October 2008

    Athea--Cut cat.  I agree fully with your comment about Americans living beyond their means.  Most people on these threads hate to hear how things are done differently in other countries, but I see a lot we could learn from others.  We have one of the lowest savings rates in the world.  In Italy and Spain, two countries I've lived in, people are much more careful about what they spend, there's much less conspicuous consumption, and not that much credit card debt--and the people I knew in those countries had something set aside for their old age, beyond their pensions.  I recently went to a garage sale in Maine, a relatively poor state, and I couldn't believe how much stuff was being sold for a few dollars:  five plus sets of dishes, for example, from one family.  We buy, and buy, and buy.

    Why do families, for example, need homes of 5,000-10,000 square feet, or even 3,000?  Why do we need a living room and a family room, a den and a library? The houses in Italy and Spain are so much smaller than here, and having more than one bathroom is the exception, not the norm.  We're now in a recession  (hopefully it won't turn into a depression), and it's time to take stock. Does anyone on this thread remember the days when, as children, we'd get one major Christmas gift, and a few small things in our stockings: mittens, maybe some chocolates, a book.  They weren't hard times; they were wonderful times.  All the children in the neighborhood had the same, so no jealousy among friends.  We were happy with our lot. The children of my nieces and nephews get huge numbers of gifts and when I see them open their presents, tearing from one package to the next, I know instinctively that they're not as happy as I was with my one pair of skates.  

    Yes, I'm showing my age, and I'm very happy I was raised in a different time.  No regrets at all.      

  • sccruiser
    sccruiser Member Posts: 1,119
    edited October 2008

    Althea & AnneShirley,

    I agree with both of you on many levels. My family just finished participating in a city-wide garage sale last weekend. We made a few dollars and got rid of a lot of "stuff." What was left over when in 3 directions: Goodwill, American Cancer Society (Discovery shop--where I also visit first if I need to purchase something from household goods to clothing & baby toys), and the rest of the baby things my daughter will take to a local resale shop that specializes in baby clothes, toys, equipment, etc. They will give her a few dollars for the goods she turns in to them. It was an exhausting day, but I was proud of myself for really concentrating on cleaning out the shed and closets, and saying often "do I really need this?" It was hard for me to clean out my work clothes as I had to get a new wardrobe that fit (smaller sizes) after bc treatment, and harder still not to bring what did not sell back into the house. But I persisted, and don't miss one thing I got rid of. I hope I can continue to weed out as needed. I felt many pounds lighter by doing so!

    I was put out to pasture not of my own free will, so there has been much adjusting with that, including our monetary income. We no longer have that lovely "discretionary" income, so purchases (like I need new glasses as my prescription has changed) have to be decided on carefully. But I am learning to cut corners, and am proud of myself when I come up with another way of saving $$.

    Out here in CA homes that are 3,000square feet are considered "small." It's not unheard of for a celebrity, or silicon valley entrepeneur to build 25,000+ square foot houses with bowling alleys, theaters, gyms and indoor pools. It is so over the top nouveau riche, it just frustrates those of us who do not see any wisdom in spending money that way when there are plenty of other ways to spend it. What I see happening in this country is the need for some people to buy, buy and buy and consume more and better all the time. I think the spending and acquiring of goods is a way to feel good about oneself, when there is no spiritual or thinking inner self. I see these frantic souls rushing to own the latest blackberry, hummer, vacation villas rented for $12,000 a day.

    We are a country of people wanting to do 5 things at once, have a career and retire with millions (maybe they will need trillions now) at the age of 40. And then what do they intend to do?

    We eat quickly, and all the wrong foods. We drive quickly, talk quickly, buy quickly, and get nasty when someone who is "serving" us doesn't move fast enough. I see so many rude people each day. And I see clerks apologizing for taking the time to pack the purchase neatly into the bag, or clerks who are so bored and not challenged in their job, that it's all they can do to get the item and receipt in the bag without a have a good day message.

    I grew up with a father who worked three jobs, so we girls (3 of us) could live in an upper class neighborhood and school to attend, along with Christmases and birthdays that brought us many more gifts than we needed. My mother stayed at home and kept the house, took us to the library, shopping and to activities. My father planned wonderful 3 week vacations every summer that often included driving across country and staying at nice hotels, always with pools. I grew up in the 50s & 60s, and of course I can say now it was an ideal time. But looking back on it, for all that I had, there were many, particularly people of color who didn't have 1/10th of what I had. Don't get me wrong, there were white people also living in poverty. I remember a girl at school who I became friends with, and she invited me to her house after school one day. The house she lived with her grandmother and mother (gm was invalid, mom worked full time) was not typical of the homes surrounding theirs. Hers was a cottage, with peeling wallpaper, few lamps, and sheets covering the windows. The rooms were small, the yard filled with weeds, and composite roofing shingles covered the sides of the house. I really liked going over there, because her grandmother was very nice and encouraged us to talk about anything we wanted to. We played games and talked about school, or did our homework (jr. high). I really didn't think about her living conditions or income level. But others at our school shunned her because of those things. One day, she was no longer in school. I went by the house on my way home but it was empty. They were no longer there. I don't know what happened to them, and no one talked about them at all. I still think about her occasionally, and wonder where she ended up; was she able to go to college; where is she now; is she married w/children. I realized how blessed and privileged I was compared to others. When I think about those years, it humbles me. Although I had many more things than some of my peers, I never thought about that or thought less of someone who lived in a poor neighborhood; but as we go through these troubled times, I think more about how all of this administrations' mediocre policies that are costing us our freedom and ability to live with just the basics--shelter, food, education, water, utilities--that we have squandered some of our most valuable resources; and if we don't act quickly and make some changes in how this country lives on this planet, we are dooming our children and their childrens' future. So many species of animals, insects, and plants become extinct daily, it makes my heart bleed. These are wonderful gifts on our planet that my granddaughter will only know from a book. There are so many simple tasks that we can do to keep many recyclables out of the landfill.

    I am making it a priority as a fully retired person who is unable to work, to use less and less of what I don't really need, to volunteer for organizations that are dear to my heart and where I can make a difference; to find activities to do with my granddaughter that don't cost money; to glean again and again what I don't need in my home, that others might need; to garden, compost, and cook more, buy organic and fresh from the farmer when I can; use no pesticides in my garden; and to teach my granddaughter what I learn.

    I know that many people thrive on being a "superperson" and try to be the best and the greatest without realizing the stress they are placing on their body. I now drive the speed limit, have the radio dial on classical music, and encourage someone to turn before I do, or go ahead of me; I want to have the time to smell the roses, cuddle with my kitties; walk on the beach with my dogs; cook breakfast on the weekends for my husband and sit out under the Redwoods with him and read the Sunday paper before going on a hike; try new recipes. I want to enjoy retirement and find what I like in each person I come into contact with. I love spending 2 days a week with my 81 year old mother, and hope that she has many, many years to continue to spend those 2 days with me. It's amazing that my values and my priorities have changed so much. I'm not sure if it's the "retirement," or the breast cancer and lymphedema that is responsible for my paradigm shift? But it's great!

    I hope that our country can repair itself and our reputation abroad. Some on this board don't seem to care what Europe thinks about us. Well, I do, and I think it is very important for our nation to have good relations with all countries of the world. We all live on this small space in our universe. If we wreck it completely, I don't think we will soon find another place to move to and wreck!

    Change is hard for some, but there has to be much change on this planet if the human species is to survive! 

  • lewisfamily503
    lewisfamily503 Member Posts: 621
    edited October 2008

    I am confused with regard to this topic.  I don't know who to believe.  Obviously our economy is in trouble.  Will a almost trillion dollar bailout (excuse me, "rescue" plan) work?  Is it somehow OUR fault?   Not sure what to think about all of this.  I do agree that many Americans seem to live beyond their means.   Please do not count my family among those.  We own our cars free and clear.  We DO NOT carry credit card debit.  The only bill we owe is the mortgage which will be paid  off in several years.  Our credit rating is over 900.  I am frustrated by the  free-for-all of Wall Street and really, many, many corporations over this past decade.  I DO blame the Republicans.  After all, they have been in charge and spearheaded "deregulation."    i have absolute faith that this can be fixed but for God's sake, we desperately need a change in leadership.   PLEASE vote for change!!!!

    Anne 

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited October 2008

    Anne--I am voting for change but it may not be the change you're hoping for; I'm voting for Nader.  I know it will take a miracle for him to win, but I still have that grain of hope that the sky will open, Americans will see the light, and we'll get real change, not just a new coat of paint.  Nader is the perfect example of less is better.  I have no idea how he lives these days but in his hey day I believe he owned one suit, and not much else.  Of course, I wouldn't hold him out as an example to follow, mainly because I can't imagine surviving in one suit. LOL

    I've done some study on the current Wall Street problem--the subprime loan crisis, and I believe the blame is shared equally between the parties. We can at least give the Democrats credit for wanting to make home ownership available to all.  The Republicans, in contrast, almost always deregulate to help business, in the mistaken belief that trickle down economics works.  It's certainly trickled down recently.  Wall Street screwed up and the bill trickled down to us. But the deregulation I believe was also helped along during the Clinton administration, by the Democrats.  A pox on both their houses.

    Grace--nice post, and I agree that when we make the decision to downgrade, it's surprising how easy it becomes and how happy we also become.  I'm a good example of the opposite, upgrading and realizing too late how unnecessary it was. We've spent so many years in our small Manhattan apartment of some 550 feet that when we looked for a house in Maine, we found it hard to resist a beautiful old house, of some 2800 square feet, with eleven foot high ceilings.  We had to laugh at ourselves when we took stock one day and released that we were actually living in the same space we do in New York, and all the remaining rooms were almost never used.  Imagine all that unnecessary cleaning and furniture and heating bills we let ourselves in for!  And now, of course, with the housing crisis, we can't sell.  Serves us right for participating in the great American space odyssey. 

    Is everyone aware of how much pork was added to the bill that the House signed today--almost 150 billion dollars in either new spending or tax deductions was added to the bill by the Senate.  It's really a disgrace and I'm wondering if we as the funders of the bill can demand that none of the tax deductions in the bill get implemented and none of the extra money spent.  It's almost beyond belief--but not really--that they would have had the nerve to pile on all those earmarks.  

  • sccruiser
    sccruiser Member Posts: 1,119
    edited October 2008

    Yes, I was aware of the earmarks added to the bill. I think it is criminal that the Senate did that--and just to get it passed!! I am really getting sick of American politics. I don't believe any of them have our best interests at heart. I think it's all for the big business and money makers. I think Henry Paulson is doing a number on us. I just don't believe that he is putting the country first. It didn't happen with any of the other cabinet members, so I don't think it's happening with him. I wonder if he's not "serving" his constitutents--his cronies in the investment business. Ackkkkkkkkk!

    AnneShirley,

    We live in a 1400sq ft home on 1 acre. I wouldn't mind moving to a smaller home, but we are inthe same boat you and your husband are in--the market out here is not good for selling a home right now. I love the land even more than the house. I have started really gardening and using the space to create outdoor living areas. We have much shade so I have lovely Japanese maples and Australian Tree ferns with hostas and other shade loving plants. We have a playground area for our granddaughter. I have one side of the house we have yet to landscape. I'm of a mind to put in a labyrinth for meditation walks. We could easily live in 1/2 the home. If the economy continues as it is now, we may rent out 1/2 the house. I know this winter we are making changes as far as heating and cooking. We will use 3 small electric heaters to heat--1 each in the family room, guest room (computer also), and master bedroom. We have radiant floor heating in the large bathroom. We won't be using the propane for central heat (too expensive). I plan to cook with the crock pot and microwave as much as I can (stove is propane).

    We have really worked at composting as much as we can, and now make one trip to the garbage and recycle center every 2 months. I am determined to really look at all we have and ask if we really need it. I'd like to pare down to 1/2 of what we have now.

    I have been shopping less at the grocery, and going to the farmers' market once or twice a week. I have some pantry items that I now look to use first, rather than go to the store. It's amazing, I have actually lost 7 lbs. in the last 3 weeks by preparing our meals this way. I was able to move the pantry items into the kitchen, and use the pantry for some linen storage. We also worked very diligently to pare down our books--have reduced to the point of eliminating 2 bookcases! It's time we reaquainted ourselves with the local library--which is wonderful! And it's all FREE!!

    I'm not sure people realize how serious this issue is. I have stopped shopping in any department stores for the past 10 months. Christmas in my family is celebrated by getting together and sharing dinner (last year we did appetizers and desserts) without ANY gifts (except for my granddaughter). We each give a donation to our favorite charity instead. I have even bought some of my granddaughter's birthday and Christmas gifts at the local thrift stores. I try to go when they have the 50% off sale once a week. Birthday gifts have gone the same way in my family. It has changed the relationships we have with each other. I think we enjoy each other's company just as much, and we spend less--no credit card purchases to struggle to pay in January!

    Out here, the new homes in San Jose area are little McMansions with columns and fronts like sheik palaces in the Middle East--and the house occupies most of the land--there is little yard--people are working to pay for their greed--no time to enjoy the space or what little land there is! It's very sad. The idea of knowing your neighbors has disappeared in the large cities and suburbia in CA. Not the case where we live in the mountains--we rely on our neighbors and they rely on us in times of emergencies. We need each other to survive! Luckily, we have great neighbors and have a potluck dinner several times a year.

    I don't like what this country is turning into, and I don't like the negative perceptions (while I accept that other countries feel this way about us) that other countries have about the US. I don't know if either party can change that. I want to be optimistic, but I see so much and read so much about people in this country who put themselves before their country. It's the meritocracy that I find offensive, and I wish we had a true democracy. I wish that everyone in this country could follow the golden rule. I really want to see us educate all children in this country regardless of race, age, gender, religious affiliation, etc. I really want to see us recognize that we (as a country) have tortured, murdered, and decimated all different groups of people who were different from us, or who had land that we wanted, or who we believed were animals and not human. I wish all Americans could say, yes we did that, and not feel guilty about it, but just make sure that it doesn't happen again--starting with admitting that this administrations' war with Iraq was over oil, OIL!! If the oil had been in Darfur--we would have stepped in to help stop the slaughter of innocent men, women & children. But we seem to only go to war when it will "benefit" us somehow, particularly the wealthy & big business. Cynicism often rears its ugly head in me. I want to have hope, but sometimes the comments that are made make me really sad and afraid for the generations that come after us. I still don't think the bailout (excuse me, rescue plan) was the way to go. I just don't trust this administration. And how many years will our grandchildren and their children be paying off these bonds to fix the greedy peoples' problems? 

  • pinoideae
    pinoideae Member Posts: 1,271
    edited October 2008

    Althea, I have to disagree.  Sorry.  No homeowener that was offered a bad loan should feel guilty.  Come on people, the sub prime mortgage was like a casino.  It lures you in and then sucks you in. 

  • pinoideae
    pinoideae Member Posts: 1,271
    edited October 2008
    Obama vs. Palin on Experience

    Is there a libertarian position on what sort of experience a vice president needs? Libertarians have offered mixed reactions to the Sarah Palin pick. David Boaz would have preferred South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford.

    Compared to Sen. Joe Biden, a 36-veteran of the Senate, Palin is a breath of fresh Alaskan air. But conservatives and libertarians should remember the lesson of George W. Bush and never relent in their pressure to make sure a potential McCain-Palin administration does more than talk about cleaning up Washington and reducing the size of government.

    The Obama campaign likely will turn to surrogates to make the inexperience argument against Palin because any direct shot from Obama is likely to backfire. Obama's national experience amounts to four years in the U.S. Senate, most of which he spent not legislating but running for president.

    Palin's tenure as Alaska governor equals, if not exceeds, Obama in experience. Palin, 44, has spent 12 years in elected office: 10 years as a city councilor and mayor and nearly two as governor. Obama, 47, has also spent 12 years in office: eight years as a state senator and close to four as a U.S. senator.

    "Today, John McCain put the former mayor of a town of 9,000 with zero foreign policy experience a heartbeat away from the presidency," an Obama spokesman sniffed. They soon backpedaled on that line of attack, perhaps realizing Obama might alienate small-town voters who realize their mayors are often tested with tough decisions and budgets, rather than up-or-down votes.

    Comparing her experience to Biden borders on ridiculous. Since when do libertarians find encouragement in government, much less someone who has spent 36 years in Washington funding programs like Amtrak and prosecuting the drug war?

    On foreign policy, it's not trivial to note that Obama seeks the presidency while Palin seeks the number two slot. Even if McCain died in office, Palin would retain McCain's foreign policy team and have at least some experience as vice president.

    As McCain's operatives are sure to stress in the coming weeks, it's pretty ironic for Obama to bash Palin on foreign policy experience when, in July, he visited Iraq for the first time since announcing his presidential bid - after repeated criticism from McCain - and has not held a single hearing on Afghanistan in his Senate subcommittee (again, letting Biden carry his foreign policy water). He also visited Afghanistan for the first time in July. Palin has visited Kuwait once in her role as commander of the Alaska National Guard.

    Libertarians still have grave concerns about McCain's foreign policy, but I think the Iraq war has lost salience as an issue, especially since the U.S. and Iraqi governments have basically agreed to withdraw troops by 2011, and most voters are focusing on the economy.

    Finally, some have suggested that Palin was tapped simply because she was a woman. No doubt that played a role in her selection, but what matters is Palin's reform record and standing as the antithesis of a Beltway insider. I predict attacks that Palin was only selected because of her gender will be as successful as complaints that Obama won because of his race.

    posted by Jeff Patch on 09.02.08 @ 8:42 am Print This Post

    Filed Under: Government and Politics, Tax and Budget Policy

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited October 2008

    I too am confused at the direction this thread is going.  There are many people out there, like my husband - who openly admits he doesnt know who he is voting for and wont know until he walks into the voting booth.  Most of you know who Im voting for - so wont discuss that here lol. 

    I have never been in a situation where I was financial sound.  In fact, I do believe that because of living from paycheck to paycheck with no real retirement plan - I will end up being a bag lady.  Thats if I live long enough.

    I have always paid my bills, but then something happened to me.  Breast cancer entered my home, and despite having insurance, I have had to pay thousands of dollars to doctors, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies who have greed that is quite despicable to me.  I still remain in good credit, but it has been difficult to say the least.

    So when we are talking about people spending beyond their means, who are we talking about?  I bought my first house in 2005 and believe me it wasnt easy.  Even had a $40,000 dollar down payment and getting the loan approved was more than difficult.  I almost gave up a couple of times if it were not for my friend encouraging and walking me through this house buying process.  It makes me wonder who were these people getting these loans.  I sure wasnt one of them.

    I also ask when did it happen, that all of a sudden CEO's are getting million dollar bonuses for a job not well done.  Why insurance companies are making huge profits by denying necessary tests and treatment for so many.  My educations didnt come easy.  I worked full time and went to school for most of my life.  I believe there are way too many people out there who cannot make ends meet.  Who cannot buy groceries until pay day, and when they do, their food costs have gone up and up, leaving less and less to spend on other things of necessity. Buying a pair of shoes, getting a winter coat, heating their homes.

    I have said before, I dont understand the whole economic bail out strategies and probably never will.  My husband didnt want the bail out.  Somehow I feel better knowing the bill was approved, although I despise the fact that there were earmarks added to get the job done.

    I just want to live my life each day.  Enjoy the people around me and pray for those who dont have what I have - which isnt much in itself.

    Its a cold day here in Chicago.  Gonna try and make some Minestrone today.  Dont have a recipe, it will be a little of this and a little of that.  Hope it comes out good so I can share my recipe with ya all.  Im gonna run out and get some fresh Italian Bread - to dip with.  As some would say - yummers!

    Nicki 

  • Naniam
    Naniam Member Posts: 1,766
    edited October 2008

    I'm coming in after the vote has been taken in the house and finally passed.  I was one against the bailout - I was angry.  I'm am close to retirement and I was willing for my money to take a hit.  I felt the markets should figure this out on their on - free capitalism working.  I don't have lots of money to loose but I wanted a system that worked - not one government had control of - for my grandchildren.  I'm angry.  Angry that loans were offered to people that should never have gotten them, didn't even work, were known illegal ailens.  I am one of the "average" guys that work hard, get loans the old fashioned way that requires you to be able to pay for them and I'm sorry, but the 5% of bad loans that as caused this mess - I didn't want my tax money helping people that my taxes help all the darn time.  It is responsibility, accountability - all levels - corporate, our congress, personal.

    This "fix" was to rebound the stock market - well guess what, didn't happen.  You watch, 6 months from now we are going to be ask to do more.  None of this will end until we "FIX" the banking rules/laws that encouraged these kinds of loans. 

    I do know and you can find it on the internet - just by checking on reform of banking laws - and not on any political website that my Senator, Elizabeth Dole AND John McCain in 2005 warned what was going to happen and wanted changes in the laws of Fannie and Freddie.  It was blocked - that is as political as I will get.

    I'm angry that, from what I can see and my pea brain understand, not one law was mentioned in the bill to reform the lending practices that caused all this greed.  We should all be angry at that - until that is done, this will keep happening.  I'm tired of the finger pointing - however, I DO point my fingers at a few members and they are the ones with the very public faces now writing the bills that were passed.  I wish some could be brought up on ethics violations - they lined their pockets and I"M PAYING FOR IT !!! 

    Watch out - this is on the first part of the whole mess.  Nothing was "fixed". 

    Brenda 

  • gsg
    gsg Member Posts: 3,386
    edited October 2008

    I always stay out of the political threads...but I have to say there were people on both sides of the aisle who have been sounding alarm bells for quite some time...not just one party.

    Here's what Senator Dorgan (D-ND) said recently regarding comments he made back in 1999...I have copy and pasted it from a statement he gave recently regarding the bailout:

    “How did we get here? In 1999, when the Congress was pressured to repeal the financial protections that were put in place following the Great Depression, I voted against it. That bill, the mis-named Financial Modernization Act, repealed the Glass-Steagall Act. I warned then that a ‘financial swamp’ would result from the casino-like prospect of merging banking with the speculative activity of real estate and securities.

    “In 1999, when the bill was debated, I warned, ‘This bill will also raise the likelihood of future massive taxpayer bailouts…I also think we will, in 10 years time, look back and say…we forgot the lessons of the past.’ I take no satisfaction that I was right."

    That's the end of the quote.

    As for me, I don't know if this bailout was the right thing to do or not....I don't have an economic background.  It's passed and now I just pray for our country.  It's very scary times going into a long, cold winter.

  • FEB
    FEB Member Posts: 552
    edited October 2008
  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited October 2008

    And the people who passed the bill don't know if it was the right thing to do either.  I suppose that's the part that most rankles with me, that they were driven into signing this bill without knowing.  I don't know about ecnomics, other than my own, as I have never invested in the market, other than a few shares of GE, which I received from my employer.  I find the whole notion of using money to make money offensive (obviously I'm not a capitalist!).  But if I knew for sure that even with bailing out Wall Street this bill were necessary I would have been for it.  It may actually make the problem worse!  

    Neither of the major party candidates can press ahead with his platform yet they both refuse to tell the public this.  For me, it's what happened in the primary all over again.  Obama waits until after the primary and then changes his positions to bring in those on the right, with the new positions more than likely to have lost him many votes on the left during the primaries.  This is what McCain and Obama are now doing, sticking with promises and platforms they can't and won't implement but refusing to acknowledge this until after November 4, hoping the electorate is stupid enough not to notice.

    I think everyone should tune in for the debate on Tuesday, and if your candidate is forthcoming about what he will do to change his platform to accommodate this bill, then by all means, vote for him.  If he's not forthcoming, then vote for Nader or I promise you, you will not see any changes and will be voting the other ticket (whatever it is) in four years. 

    Oh, and with respect to Biden saying during the debate that the Dem platform will stay the same, except for eliminating some foreign aid money, I listened to a fact checker yesterday (can't verify the truth of this but it was not a Republican source) who said that the U.S. gave considerably less than $100 billion in foreign aid in 2007 (I think it was 28 billion but can't remember, so don't want to give a figure).  In third grade math, this means that Biden is telling us that to accommodate the $850 billion package just passed, his administration will cut out some 28 billion from its budget.  Even if the figure is higher, we still have at least 750 billion to cut somewhere else.

    I should call this thread, "A Pox on Both Their Houses!" 

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited October 2008

    Linda, we have clear philosophical differences so I can't argue your points as I really don't agree with your theories, and have never practiced them.  When I had my own consulting company I was offered the opportunity many times to  bring in my own employees, at NYNEX and at Verizon (I could have made millions as most consulting companies do on the preferred vendor list, an opportunity offered to me.)  I refused because it felt too much like selling human flesh--one gets, for example, 100 an hour for the services of the employee, pays the employee $50 or $60, pays some payroll taxes and the rest is mine.   Four or five employees (let alone 20) and I'm a very rich person.  The whole concept of living off the labor of others offends me.  And I find it even worse when people make money from money, which in my view contributes nothing to society.  Obviously, we have stark differences in our views.  I find it ironic that I'm an aetheist but think like a Christian, and so many Christians think like atheists--take for yourself and damn the other fellow.  I'm not saying this is you or anyone else on these threads; it's just my perception of the whole capitalist thing.  We need to take care of each other, not because we're commanded to do so by some higher authority but because it's the right thing to do.  Amen.

    (That did sound like a lecture from the pulpit, didn't it, but I've never denied my socialist tendencies.) 

  • FEB
    FEB Member Posts: 552
    edited October 2008
  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited October 2008

    Linda, you shouldn't put words in my mouth, particularly since I'm so willing and able to generate so many words myself. LOL  I have a philosophical view of the world and I practice what I believe.  In general, I'm not asking the rest of the world to believe as I do.  In the world I envisage none of us would be barely making ends meet, nor would I stifle creativity since I am a writer of fiction and my husband is a painter of pictures.  We'd all help those less well off and none of us would have more than our actual needs, no Jay Lenos with 20 or 40 cars or whatever the number is, no Al Gore's with 10,000 square foot homes (you see I hit both Hollywood and the Democrats) but for that world to come into being, I'd have to change human nature, which I believe to be essentially selfish, not essentially unselfish!  And I no longer have that kind of energy or naivete.  It's what I want but I'm in a minority.  Remember, I'm the one running the Ralph Nader thread.

    I do want to correct something though.  I keep hearing on these threads that Americans give more to others who are in need than any other people.  And I keep posting that this is categorically not true--not true, not true, not true.  Yet it keeps popping back up.  Many countries give far more than we do per capita, and most of these governments have some type of socialist base, and of course, a capitalistic base as well.  I don't have time now to post the figures but I have posted them in the past, at least twice.  We are not the most generous people in the world, not by a long, long shot!  We are definitely the most capitalistic, but let's see how long that lasts!

    I admire people with much who give much to others.  They are not in the majority, however.  And Warren Buffet, a very generous man, is also capable of manipulating markets in a way that causes great hurt to others.  I'm not enough of an economist to calculate whether Buffet's dealings in the market have created more good than harm, but it is possible that the harm was greater than the good. I'll leave that up to someone else. But remember that Buffet is an exception in the money he gives away. I should also add he's an Obama supporter, not a McCain supporter. 

  • Paulette531
    Paulette531 Member Posts: 738
    edited October 2008

    Linda...I have to agree with you on all counts. And helping people who truly need help is one thing but enabling people is another. And too often the two are confused.

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited October 2008

    I posted earlier my response to Sarah Palin's little speech at the end of the debate, and how much I disliked it.  It sounded as though Orwell were warning us about 1984.  Just now I found an article on that speech.  Here it is:

    Unbelievable. Sarah Palin finished her closing remarks by quoting Ronald Reagan:

    It was Ronald Reagan who said that freedom is always just one generation away from extinction. We don’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream; we have to fight for it and protect it, and then hand it to them so that they shall do the same, or we’re going to find ourselves spending our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children about a time in America, back in the day, when men and women were free.

    When did he say this? It was on a recording he made for Operation Coffeecup — a campaign organized by the American Medical Association to block the passage of Medicare. Doctors’ wives were supposed to organize coffee klatches for patients, where they would play the Reagan recording, which declared that Medicare would lead us to totalitarianism.

    You couldn’t make this stuff up.

    Me again:  I should have known!  Thank goodness for Medicare, or I don't know where I might be now.  I had just turned 65 when I found out I had BC; the cost of my medical treatments would have been beyond my means without Medicare, so I guess my instincts were correct when I found that scare tactic so offensive.  Perhaps it resonanted in some back chamber of my brain! 

  • sccruiser
    sccruiser Member Posts: 1,119
    edited October 2008

    Certainly there is greed in the Hollywood movie industry and music industry. Those are luxuries. It is not a necessity of life to buy a CD or pay $12. to see a trashy movie. Right now, to most of the American people, gas is a necessity of life! It heats their living space in the cold months, and cools it in the hot months. It cooks their food and runs the appliances in their houses for clean clothes, hot water, clean dishes and clean house. It works the tools they use in the yard to keep their abode fire safe if they live in the woods, and free of rodents (like rats) in close city quarters. It makes the clothes they need to work, play, and sleep. It runs their cars so they can get to work, get an education, get to medical services. I think we could go on and on about this. that is why people make such a big deal regarding "OIL." That is why we are so dependent on this one item. And that is why we need to tax the oil companies so that research can be done and work can be done to reduce our need for foreign oil, AS WELL AS THE NEED FOR DOMESTIC OIL--AS IN NO MORE DRILLING!! The American public is going to have to learn new strategies for living our lives using less oil. It's good for us, and it's good for the planet. The oil companies have been receiving huge, I mean humungous tax breaks and making even bigger profits off of their oil supplies. This has been going on for a number of years. We hear how they need these tax breaks and huge profits for research into alternative energy development. Okay, maybe that's true, however I haven't seen any published results of their research development in renewable clean energy plans. Just doesn't sit right with me. They get all these breaks to make big profits and supposedly are using these for research so we can use less energy in the future, and under the current Republican administration we have yet to see how they spent one dime or put into place a way of reducing our dependence on oil. Seems like the foxes are guarding the hen house here? Just doesn't make sense. It's like taxing the bakery to make healthy goods instead of sugary and fatty goods, and the baker says he's using his profits to research healthier sources, but isn't it in his interest to continue the "research" and not change his products, which would put him out of business if his customers like the sugary, fatty stuff he's selling right now?

    We Americans don't want to get out of our comfort zones. And Warren Buffett has a huge stake in windpower, so that's why he has put together an energy plan that will reduce our dependence on foreign oil. Another person out for themselves first, and country last!!

    I agree with Anneshirley, Americans are do not give the most. Americans basically live with a meritocracy philosophy, not a democratic or holistic philosophy. We have lost the desire to truly live by the golden rule. And many of the organizations that we donate to, who use those funds to help other means, that help has strings attached to it along with a body of people who have decided that they know what's best for another group of people--it's called missionary response. It was used for years in Third World countries where faith based people brought Christianity and their doctrines to force other peoples to gain the help only if they abided by what the missionaries thought what was best for them. The missionaries never asked what the people needed to succeed. That way of bringing help to others continues in this country. That is why we cannot end homelessness in this country. That is why so many of our Veterans are living on the streets. That is why we cannot understand why people of color say, that's okay, your help is not needed. It's time we realize that what we perceive as democracy, is probably not the definition of democracy in another country. That's also why the war in Iraq was a stupid plan.

    Other countries do very well paying larger amts of taxes and taking care of their citizens--from cradle to grave--and yet creativity and growing their livelihood is not stifled nor stagnant. The citizens of these countries do not rely on foreign oil, nor other countries to produce their good for slave wages and sell them in huge mega stores without being fully inspected. These countries encourage individual growth and creativity. After all, we import much of the more expensive household goods from these countries. Many of these countries are on the leading edge of buidling green housing developments that are centrally located so cars are not required. These countries provide beautiful artisan quality household goods that many Americans enjoy displaying in their homes. these countries have developed the best appliances that are the most energy efficient, and require little water to work--washer, dishwasher, bathtubs, etc. We could learn much from these countries if we weren't so bullheaded in thinking we know better than anyone else in the world. We have our noses stuck so high in the air, we can't smell what's bad all around us!

    As for the pork barrel added to the "rescue plan," this bill was a bi-partisan effort, wasn't it? Don't blame the Dems for everything. We may have contributed to this, but the Republicans are no better. Congress was in this together. Perhaps the time will come when some of the complainers will actually run for office. I think there are women on this board who would make excellent political leaders. Anyone want to step up to the task?

    By the way, McCain and Obama both voted to pass this bill. Looks like neither of them stood up for what they said earlier! 

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited October 2008

    France has great medical care, a gorgeous country, great food (particularly the bread), long paid vacations, and yes high taxes.  I say raise my taxes however much you want if you can guarantee me good croissants.  And I predict that Nicholas, an experiment, will be gone in the next election.  Hope so anyway.

  • Jaybird627
    Jaybird627 Member Posts: 2,144
    edited October 2008

    AS, I'm with you on France and their croissants!!!  Wink

    And I, too, live in a small home (1,100 sq.ft?). I have one working tv, no dishwasher, one bathroom and live as modestly as I can. (oh, do things need to be repaired around here!)

    I am very dismayed that this bailout package passed so easily.

    I'd move to Europe in a heartbeat if I could. Guess I'll just have to fly there every week instead.

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited October 2008

    Jay--we had a lunch place one block from us in New York (for more than 20 years) which I only discovered a year ago.  The owner was French and his croissants were as good as anything I ever got in France.  Just a few months after we found the place he closed because his rent went up.  It was one of the saddest days in my life, although I did gain ten pounds after discovering his croissants so perhaps it shouldn't have been so sad.  I haven't lost them yet.

    Can't you move to Europe?  Wouldn't the airline permit you to make Paris your home base?  Do you have any European ancestors that permit descendants to apply for a passport:  Italian, Irish, etc.  I have an Irish passport by virtue of my parents, and my husband, from SA, has one by virtue of being married to an Irish citizen--me.

    Speaking of SA, for those not in the know, Argentina swings left these days and has for quite a while.  Also, its current president, a woman, has a rocky relationship with the U.S. government, hardly a country conservatives would want to flee to if Obama gets into office. In addition, Americans can't just walk into any country they point to and settle in.  Immigrating to Canada for Obama supporters is not so easy either.  Canada has an immigration point system, and most Americans wouldn't meet it.   

    Grace--about European appliances.  It is true they are more efficient, but their washing machines can drive one crazy.  They seem to go on for hours; every time I think the machine is finished, it starts up again, and again. Clothes are cleaner though.  Very few apartments and houses in Spain and Italy come equipped with dishwashers, at least no one I knew had one,  which I find distressing as it's the one appliance I truly love, and in Spain and Italy, not that many have clothes dryers or air conditioners.  It's surprising how quickly one adjusts backwards and does without--the dishwasher was the only appliance I actually missed.  I loved drying our clothes outdoors.  

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited October 2008

    The bailout.  It's now wait and see, but after listening to a number of different economists, I do believe the bailout will make very little difference to the average citizen and that the next administration, Dem or Republican, will have to cut back on many expected services, will find it impossible to offer new services, and that the electorate will be very unhappy for a long time to come.  Just heard someone--the McLaughlin Group--predict 11% unemployment next year. I hope this is wrong, but if we should grow to 11% unemployment, we'll be like so many countries in the European Union, France for example, that have high unemployment rates, only in our case we don't have the social network that provides their citizens with health care, housing, and other necessities in hard times.  I'm rather fascinated by all the possibilities.  Will we over time begin to shift towards a government with a broader base of social  benefits, including a national health care program.  That would be at least one good thing to come out of this crisis.

  • sccruiser
    sccruiser Member Posts: 1,119
    edited October 2008

    Yes, I could give up the dryer if I could keep the dishwasher! I was amazed when visiting my relatives in Finland. They all have drying racks above their sinks. So easy to dry dishes and nothing to clutter the counters. Wonder if that is so in other countries? Thought it a clever design. The other clever design was the shower in the bathroom. It is at one end and there is no curtain or ridge to step over. There is a drain, and after showering, you use the squeegee on a long handle to push water off the sides and floor into the drain. Took all of a minute, and no soap scum to clean later!!

     anneshirley wrote: "I'm rather fascinated by all the possibilities.  Will we over time begin to shift towards a government with a broader base of social  benefits, including a national health care program.  That would be at least one good thing to come out of this crisis."

    Would be great--but as far as happening--not if the republicans get into office!! They keep pushing less government, and it's each individual for themselves. You know, grab that old boot strap and pull yourself up all by yourself!

    I heard that 100,000 more jobs went away last month! I know out here in Northern CA, any new jobs that are "created," are working at the new mega stores opening all over--closes the small businesses faster than the republicans can say socialism! Our cities are starting to run together, and on large boulevards there are so many strip malls, you don't even know what city you are in--you might have even been sent through time to LA. LOL 

  • suzfive
    suzfive Member Posts: 456
    edited October 2008

    In France physicians income averages about $55,000 a year. In the U.S. their income averages about $194,000. Think you can get American physicians to take a 2/3 pay cut?  

Categories