Positive Obama thread

11213151718107

Comments

  • sccruiser
    sccruiser Member Posts: 1,119
    edited September 2008

    Hi All,

    Have stayed away from the political threads for a week or so. Trying to get grounded in my own perspective regarding this election year. Several points I'd like to make as I pondered the idiocy of the repugs to put Palin in as VP candidate.

    1. She is not qualified, period. I'd have trouble voting for her for dogcatcher!

    2. It's not like she is interviewing forthe 8-5 x 5 days a week = 40 hours job. HELLO!!! She's interviewing (rather poorly I might add) for a job that will require her to put this country first, and her family second. She will be working 7 days a week and many hours per day. It will be even worse for her if McCain (heaven forbid) were to expire.

    3. She is not going to get the "womens' vote" that would have gone to Hillary--they don't even put forward similar policies--they are as far apart as we are from Mars!

    4. She is being "shielded" by the repugs--IMHO, because they know she isn't qualified, and they have advisors ready to script her VP life for her. Karl Rove would be the number 1 advisor--doing just what he did for the two bushes.

    5. Complaints are coming in that the media is against her and are trying to destroy her (at least the media is telling us the repugs are saying this); so if it's true, tough babe, you signed on to play with the big boys, so you've got to work hard to stay up there with the big boys, and that means having every inch of your life examined. No more privacy. Stop playing the gender card--it's not working.

    6. Of course she wants to drill in AK--she's the governor--it will look good on her resume--and don't you think that there are going to be millions of dollars coming to AK if they drill--lots of jobs, and some more pork barrel spending.

    7. She wants creationism taught in the schools, books banned from the libraries, no abortions, and drill drill drill in ANWR.

    She's got to go go go, back to the bush where she belongs. She will not make our country any better. I just can't vote for someone who thinks that being tough means acting like a pit bull. We have enough of that breed in this country, and we don't need to have people in power who act like a ravaging dog (no offense to pit bull owners--especially the responsible ones who train them with love).

    And finally, I want to put forward something to think about. We have a huge problem in this country with the selection and election of the VP of the United States. The selected Presidential candidate "choses" the person she/he wants for VP on the ticket. Well, that was fine years ago when we didn't have people like Bush, Cheney, Rove, McCain, etc. in positions of power. Years ago the VP was a figurehead--went to the Vatican to meet w/Pope, went to funerals of dignataries in other countries, and other fluffy type events, as well as breaking the tie vote in Congress.

    So, I ask all of you, if we have VPs being elected like Cheney (and I'm not saying this just because these people are republicans, I'm going by the personality and behavior expressed while in office), shouldn't we be voting on whether or not the person is the right on for the job? Where are the checks and balances? How come more power is being given to the VP and does that mean there is a change that needs to be made? I don't know what it is--I just think we need to talk about this. Not only are they given more responsibilities than before--THE VP ASSUMES THE PRESIDENCY IF THE PRESIDENT CAN NO LONGER DO THE JOB!!. This is scary to me. I think there should be some serious vetting of these candidates--and there doesn't appear to be. If the job of the VP is changing, then somehow there needs to be a way for the American public to have a voice in this process of electing the VP. To me, this is a serious defect in the election process in this great country of ours.

    What do you all think? 

    And as for McCain--he has yet to state specifics in what and how he would make changes. He answers questions in this vague roundabout response like he's talking to young children. Does he want to be the "father" of this country? I have watched his interviews, and there are no specifics. I want: This is what I will do, and this is how I will do it. Until then, I will continue to consider him a poor choice for Prez of this country. I've sat on many hiring committees, and if a candidate for an administrative position answered questions in an interview as he has in the last few interviews, he wouldn't even get a second invitation to meet with the Pres or Chancellor of a company or school district. He would be deemed unqualified for the job! JMO. 

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited September 2008

    Years ago the VP was a figurehead--went to the Vatican to meet w/Pope, went to funerals of dignataries in other countries, and other fluffy type events, as well as breaking the tie vote in Congress.

    Maybe McCain and/or Palin is going to try to bring the job back to that of figurehead, which if that was the case would be bad for women and politics. Do you think any of the economic gurus in the country called Palin to get her advice on the big stock loss yesterday? LOL.

    The latest in troopergate is that Palin has refused to cooperate with the investigation. Just last week she said she would fully cooperate. Aren't she and McCain saying that government needs transparency and we need to trust out public officials? When one refuses to cooperate with a bipartisan investigation that was voted for by 100% of the alaskan legislature, how does she get away with not cooperating legally and how do voters let her get away with it.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited September 2008

    I just got this a few minutes ago via email:

    I'm a little confused. Let me see if I have this straight.....
    * If you grow up in Hawaii, raised by your grandparents, you're "exotic, different."

    * Grow up in Alaska eating mooseburgers,  a quintessential American story.

    * If your name is Barack you're a radical, unpatriotic Muslim.

    * Name your kids Willow, Trig and Track, you're a maverick.

    * Graduate from Harvard law School and you are unstable.

    * Attend 5 different small colleges before graduating, you're well grounded.

    * If you spend 3 years as a brilliant community organizer, become the first black President of the Harvard Law Review, create a voter registration drive that registers 150,000 new voters, spend 12 years as a Constitutional Law professor,  spend 8 years as a State Senator representing a district with over 750,000 people, become chairman of the state Senate's Health and Human Services committee, spend 4 years in the United States Senate representing a state of  13 million people while sponsoring 131 bills and serving on the Foreign Affairs, Environment and Public Works and Veteran's Affairs committees, you don't have any real leadership experience.

    * If your total resume is: local weather girl,  4 years on the city council and 6 years as the mayor of a town with less than 7,000 people, 20 months as the governor of a state with only 650,000 people, then you're qualified to become the country's second highest ranking executive.

    * If you have been married to the same woman for 19 years while raising 2 beautiful daughters, all within Protestant churches, you're not a real Christian.

    * If you cheated on your first wife with a rich heiress, and left your disfigured wife and married the heiress the next month, you're a Christian.

    * If you teach responsible, age appropriate sex education, including the proper use of birth control, you are eroding the fiber of society.

    * If , while governor, you staunchly advocate abstinence only, with no other option in sex education in your state's school system while your unwed teen daughter ends up pregnant , you're very responsible.

    * If your wife is a Harvard graduate laywer who gave up a position in a prestigious law firm to work for the betterment of her inner city community, then gave that up to raise a family, your family's values don't represent America's.

    * If your husband is nicknamed "First Dude",  with at least one DWI conviction and no college education, who didn't register to vote until age 25 and once was a member of a group that advocated the secession of Alaska from the USA, your family is extremely admirable.

    OK, much clearer now.

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited September 2008

    That's great felicia!

  • LAphoenix
    LAphoenix Member Posts: 452
    edited September 2008

    Yeah, that's on the money!

    Here's a quote from conservative pundit Richard Cohen:

    McCain has turned ugly. His dishonesty would be unacceptable in any politician, but McCain has always set his own bar higher than most. He has contempt for most of his colleagues for that very reason: They lie. He tells the truth. He internalizes the code of the McCains -- his grandfather, his father: both admirals of the shining sea. He serves his country differently, that's all -- but just as honorably. No more, though.

    His opportunistic and irresponsible choice of Sarah Palin as his political heir -- the person in whose hands he would leave the country -- is a form of personal treason, a betrayal of all he once stood for. Palin, no matter what her other attributes, is shockingly unprepared to become president. McCain knows that. He means to win, which is all right; he means to win at all costs, which is not.

    Did you hear about the anti-Palin rally in Anchorage?  It was the biggest rally in their recent history.  Mostly women.  You know you're a divisive politician when people from your own state are willing to stand in the rain to oppose your VP nomination.     

    The McCain campaign is smart to keep her away from reporters, but how much longer can they get away with that?  Her favorable ratings are already sinking.  And without her, McCain just doesn't sell.  Did you see all those empty seats in the arena where he was speaking on Sunday?       

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited September 2008

    My chiropractor and I were discussing WHY some people don't want an intelligent president and why they see intellect as elite. I know I'm secure enough in my own intelligence that I hope the president is smarted and better educated than me. I sure don't feel qualified to be president but after the last few republican presidents I know I'm smart enough.  We mused that not wanting the smartest president seems foolish.  Of course, in school they always said the C students were the ones who ran companies (or maybe someone was trying to make the C students feel better). Obama sometimes talks like he's teaching  one of his constitutional law classes and I enjoy the way he presents info.

    Suz, I guess since GWB had a DWI and Cindy McCain had a drug problem and stole drugs from a charity program she was affiliated with-- people don't blink as much about that kind of thing. A 20 year clear record is good and hopefully he learned his lesson without killing anyone. Plus he's not running for office anyway.  A friend of mine used to live in Alaska and she thinks there are a lot of nuts there. She said people were always talking about secession, how they have the lower 48 wrapped around their fingers because of oil. Of course it's not a random sample of people, but she reallly hated the people there as a whole though doesn't lump them into one basket since there are "normal" people (her words). She's east coast liberal and felt like a fish out of water-- or ice . Somehow I don;t think Alaska and me would fit together well.

  • sccruiser
    sccruiser Member Posts: 1,119
    edited September 2008

    She's not cooperating w/the investigation because McCain's spokesperson claims that 2 of the members of the committee have made it clear (way before Palin was announced as VP candidate) that they support Obama. Okay. Well, then, wouldn't the opposite be true of the repugs--they would be supporting Palin/McCain--so, this hypothesis is true, then we can presume that it wouldn't be possible for there to be a bipartisan committee to determine if she did the deed. Of course, that doesn't make any sense. This isn't about the election, it's about whether a candidate is appropriate for the job she's interviewing for--and I still say she's qualified for returning to AK and be their governor and a stay-at-home mom. That's it. What the media has uncovered so far, is that she will use the power of her position to singly determine the punishment of anyone who crosses her. We don't need an individual with those low ethical and moral values to be the second in command to become Pres of this great country.

    I'd like to see all the candidates tell the truth--and stop picking little bits of sentences and making them seem like that's the truth--all this out of context stuff is just plain stupid. I know that people are smarter than this--and everyone around me keeps telling me that we have to realize the middle of the country thinks differently--I just don't buy that--I will continue to believe that the American public is smarter and intelligent enough to know that a President who is past his prime and a VP with no experience running a government should not be voted into the wh. We can't afford to have 4 more years of Bush regime politics. This country will go down. Look at what's happening in all areas of our economy--Bush has done this--he has ruined the reputation and standing of this country in the world.

    Another thing Palin "lied" about: Alaskan oil bringing 20% of it to the US. NOT. The oil from Alaska is 3%. And if she's so good at running government and reducing costs--me thinks she needs some more classes in economics seeing that she doesn't know the difference between 3% and 20%--that's a 17% "mistake," because her supporters will say, she didn't lie, she just made an "honest" mistake. How many more honest mistakes has she made and will she make if she were elected VP.

    I'm getting a little irritated with Obama and Biden right now. I'd like to sit them down and give them a talking to. Biden needs to address the Repugs regarding Palin, and Obama needs to really start hammering at McCain on his economic plan (there is one, right?), heathcare (he better take him on on this one as I understand JM will do nothing about healthcare if he is elected.

    Amy--My hubby and I spent almost 6 weeks travelling through Canada and Alaska. Trust me, it would not be a fitting place for you! No one ever talks about the racism that exists between the "settlers" and the First Nation peoples. I witnessed it first hand on many occasions. In fact, there is tremendous resentment by the "settlers" of the native peoples--as they have historically been given a yearly amount of money, fishing and hunting rights that other citizens don't have, and probably some other things including land ownership. I talked to one social worker (a white woman) who spoke very truthfully to me about what life is like for the First Nation people in her state. She was assigned to cases pertaining to native peoples and tried to get them what they needed--housing, jobs, etc.

    We went to one museum that provided tourists with a true look into the First Nation peoples' cultures and customs, as well as their wonderful arts and crafts--many that were for sale. There were native homes set up for each of the different tribes. In one, I was able to talk to a young man (probably just at college age) and asked him if he would attend college. It was evident from his response that he had not considered it, because none of the adults who could and should guide him (like school teachers,counselors) had given him any hope or suggested that he consider college. We talked about Alaska's policy to pay for 4 years of college education if the citizen enrolls in an Alaskan college. He seemed to be unaware of this, and was quite surprised that the program existed. I encouraged him to seek out more information. I hope he did.

    At a "roadhouse" we stopped for one of their famous cinnamon rolls (they were delicious). As we finished our meal, I asked if I could use the bathroom and was told yes. When I returned to the table, I noticed a group of First Nation people sitting at another table. They were getting ready to order, and one of the young men asked to use the bathroom. The owner became rather irate, and grabbed the menus from the people and pointed out the window at a portapotty as he said,"You can use that one, since you are only ordering coffee. Now get your selves out of here." I was shocked. We didn't leave a tip but I'm sure he didn't get the message. LOL

    It's a state that needs a lot of growing up to do, and some serious diversity training! So that was my experience there. I saw very few First Nation people employed in jobs. I would compare jobs held in this country like tourism to give you an idea--they were all pretty much white--and many of the jobs are considered "summer" jobs and are held by white high school and college students.

    That's our experience with Alaska. If you go, go for the beauty of the landscape and the animals indigenous to the country. It is a trip of a lifetime that I will always remember. If I moved there (and we won't) I'd probably get thrown out for my rowdiness in fighting for the First Nation peoples' equitable treatment. You know me, just a troublemaker when it comes to race, class, gender--and I might add a few other "isms" to the list. Hee-Hee!!

  • LAphoenix
    LAphoenix Member Posts: 452
    edited September 2008

    I think there's a small but vocal liberal contingent in Alaska, mostly in Anchorage.  I'm guessing there isn't a big openly gay population, though.  But it does seem like a little world onto itself, where the oil industry rules the roost.  Residents actually get annual checks from the oil companies, based on their profits.  It's usually around $800 per person, but this year, it's going to be around $1,200 per taxpayer.  So you can understand why they're so big on drilling there and not regulating prices.  It's literally money in their pockets.  And you better believe Palin will do everything she can to help keep the oil money coming to her fellow Alaskans.  Alternate energy be damned.     

  • AnneW
    AnneW Member Posts: 4,050
    edited September 2008

    He smiled at me today! And waved.

    Barak spoke at my work place today. I wasn't one of the fortunate few who got a ticket, so a bunch of us waited outside the health clinic at the Colorado School of Mines. He was speaking across the street at the new rec center. We watched his motorcade come in, entertained the police escorts while he spoke (listened to the speech on the local Air America radio station) then stood outside to watch him leave.

    Once the crowd heard that he wouldn't be giving an impromptu speech to the throngs outside, they left. We didn't. He finally made his exit to the bus, then made an about face and walked up the road toward us. As we waved and cheered, he smiled and waved back, a mere 20 feet away.

    I felt like I was watching the Beatles or something. I still have goosebumps.

    Hillary had my heart, but Barak has my vote.

    Anne

  • pinoideae
    pinoideae Member Posts: 1,271
    edited September 2008
  • LAphoenix
    LAphoenix Member Posts: 452
    edited September 2008

    Anne, I'm so jealous!  I guess Obama really is focusing on Colorado.  Karl Rove was in the building adjacent to where my husband works in Orange County today, but I can assure you, he wasn't rushing over there to catch Rove's smile.     

    Interesting story about Alaska, Grace.  You made me hungry for cinnamon buns.  I have a good friend who grew up there, but she never talks about the Native Americans.  I'll have to ask her about them. 

    Obama and Biden are definitely stepping up the economic attacks.  Did you hear any of Biden's speech today?  He was on fire.  Hopefully once the media grows tired of new shiny penny Palin, they'll spend more time covering Biden.           

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited September 2008

    Some wonderful posts.  Im so sick of McCain and Palin I have to turn the TV off.

    Felicia:  I loved your post.  LOVED it!

    I sure hope everyone is right and that Palin's popularity is dropping. 

    Nicki

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited September 2008

    AnneW-- how exciting! Did you bring your camera? I was fortunate enough to hear him speak in a larger audience and I got to shake his hand. I thought it was like meeting the beatles too in that so many people were excited to see the man who will hopefully be our next president and bring the US back to practicing what we preach and gaining national and international respect.  Repubs may call that "like a rock star" but I call it patriots who want our country back.

    I was at target yesterday looking at their flags. The day Obama gets elected I'm buying one and hanging it high.

    I personally don't have a problem with alaska wanting to secede from the union because I'd like to move to a state that supports equal rights if McCain successfully lies his way to the white house.  If we let alaska secede today wout Palin still be eligible to be VEEP?

  • pinoideae
    pinoideae Member Posts: 1,271
    edited September 2008

    Government of Canada committed to promoting Inuit civic participation IQALUIT, March 24, 2004 -- Nancy Karetak-Lindell, Member of Parliament (Nunavut), on behalf of the Honourable Hélène Chalifour Scherrer, Minister of Canadian Heritage, today announced that the Government of Canada will collaborate with the Qikiqtani Inuit Association (QIA) to encourage civic participation by the Inuit population of the Baffin region of Nunavut.

    "I am pleased that the Government of Canada is committed to creating opportunities for Inuit to participate effectively in decision-making processes that affect their daily lives," said Ms. Karetak-Lindell. "This funding will allow the Qikiqtani Inuit Association to continue its important work of supporting the different needs of community members in this region."

    "The Government of Canada is committed to improving the lives of Aboriginal people across the country," said Minister Chalifour Scherrer. "Our partnership with the Qikiqtani Inuit Association ensures that the Inuit in the Baffin region are able to contribute to their region's political, social, cultural and economic development and to participate more effectively in Canadian society."

    The funding of $204,168 will allow the QIA to better represent its membership by reinforcing existing community links, creating partnerships with governments and other agencies, and responding to the needs of the community. It will also allow the QIA to conduct research, to promote the Inuit culture and language, and to address issues such as child care, justice, education, health, housing, and self-government.

    Financial assistance is provided by the Department of Canadian Heritage through its Aboriginal Representative Organizations Program (AROP). The objective of AROP is to maintain a consultative framework of Inuit, Métis, and Non-Status Indian representative organizations through which governments can address the social, economic, political, and cultural issues affecting the lives of Aboriginal peoples in Canada.

    Funding for this program was provided for in the February 2003 federal Budget.

  • sccruiser
    sccruiser Member Posts: 1,119
    edited September 2008

    Reminds me of the Kennedy/Nixon campaign battle for Prez. My dh and his family lived in NY at the time. My MIL was downtown for a parade and rally. She said this about Kennedy: I was waving as his convertible went by slowly. We made eye contact (at least she thought they did) and I wanted to melt. His gaze was mesmerizing. People were inthralled with the Kennedy's--specifically Jack and Jackie O.

    Yes, Alaska was very interesting, as was the Northern Terratories in Canada. Amazing to see trees that had been growing for 1,000+ years that were 2 feet high!! So much of the state has permafrost. Hard to imagine what it's like in the winter! There were several villages that we loved staying in--where the pop. was very small and not a lot of tourists. That's as much as we got off the beaten path. I can see where living in this state can be about the ability to survive--and not like going down a dirt road in our wilderness. Cell phones rarely worked outside of the larger cities--no instant AAA road service. Getting stuck out there could mean hunkering down until someone finds you, or hiking back to the "highway" and waiting for a car to come by--hopefully that day!

    Hey, now would be the time to let Alaska secede--that would most likely eliminate Palin. Interesting how McCain is keeping her right by his side! Must be worried she's going to say the wrong thing!!

    Speaking of wrong things said, a big OOPS goes to Carly Fiorina. She was talking about who was qualified to run a large corporation, and she firmly pointed out that in her opinion (and she named each of the Prez & VP candidates) none of them are able right now to run a large corporation. Shortly thereafter, McCain camp pulled her out of some speaking engagements and is monitoring what she says by preparing her talks. So, as with the Repugs, we are back to canned speeches and teleprompters!

    Obama is criticized by some Repugs as ahing and hming too much. Actually I find his pauses very refreshing, and at least he doesn't talk the way Bush does--pausing because he can't remember what word he wanted next! Obama is very steady, and not going to be pulled into the Repugs attack type campaign (on a personal level). Obama is sticking to the issues. When will McC answer the questions about the economy? I notice he doesn't let Palin answer questions from the press. No wonder she is getting poor reviews from the press. Don't think most women who would have voted for Hillary are going to move to the McCain/Palin side.

    I'd like to see more of Biden. Hey Joe, when are you going to really press Palin into real campaigning instead of hiding behind McC's trousers??? 

  • easyquilts
    easyquilts Member Posts: 876
    edited September 2008

    HI.....This  is my first time to post on this thread, although I have been reading. Please forgive me if I am a little long....

    First of all, I am a very pro-life person...Roman Catholic....and have not been able to make myself vote for anyone who was pro-choice.....To me the choice is whether or not to kill your own baby, and  that is repugnant to me...I saw four of my five grandboys born, and cannot imagine endig their lives as they are born, or while they are in the saftey ((?) of the womb.

    I also support gun rights (not military types of weapons, of course), and favor drilling to at least make an effort to fre  ourselves of dependence on foreign oil.  And, I am against using the stem cells of aborted babies for research.... 

    However.....I can no  longer do this.....The Republicans have done precious little to preserve unborn life, and I cannot stomach the thought of at least four more yeasr of what we as a country have endured during the Bush years.....For the life of me, I cannot see why anyone with any intelligence would vote for McCain/Palin.....I just don't get it. 

    I switched my party afflietion to Democrat several years ago, when I realized how angry I was with Bush for invading Iraq....I am still angry over that, but when push came to shove, I couldn't vote for pro-choice candidates for president.....I am willing to do that now, because I can see that my votes didn;t do any good, and I am so against the Bush policies...Policies that McCain will surely follow...in one way or another......If hwe lives long enough...sorry. 

    McCain and Palin  came to my town...Lebanon, Ohio, and spoke from the steps of the Golden Lamb...You may have see them on TV...6 to 8 thousand people were there....I live just a couple of minutes away from the GL, but did not go!  It was a big deal  here in SW Ohio, which is a Republican stronghold.

    If Obama had been there I would certainly  have made an effort to see him....My family and I like him a lot....We are all sick of Bush, and fear that McCain would be more of that nonssence.  We like his calm approach to things, and his thoughtful answers to questions.  I feel that we can trust Obama to make thoughtful decisions re. our country.

    The choice of Palin as a running mate is a mystery to me.....She irritates me.  I simply cannot watch her on TV, and thought the SNL skit was hilarious...I was not, and am not, a fan of Hillary, but I think the choice of Palin as VP is an insult to all thinking women.  There were so many other choices...both men and women....I've got to tell you that I was stunned when I saw her for the first time....All the talk show hosts down here are saying that she is "smokiin' hot"..WHAT????  Can't see that, either.  Good grief, and I mean that.  

    For the first time I am really scared at the idea of McCain becomng President.....Palin could so easily become his successor....and I find that frightening.

    It seems to me that it is Palin that McCain supporters are actually trying to ellect...She has overshadowed him, for sure.  That's crazy.  It'a all about Sarah now....Although the banking thing has overshadowed  her a bit the past couple of days...thank goodness.

    And...I think all thsoe Republicans..ala Rudy and others.....are simply lying thorugh their teeth when they praise Palin, and assure us that she is,  indeed, ready to become the President of the United States, should that become necessary.  They must hate what they have to do. My sister has a clip on UTUBE where a couple of TV commentators who did not realize that their mikes wer hot when they were expressing their true feelings about Sarah Palin....They were aghast and couldn't believe she had been chosen.

    I am hopping that choosing Sarah Palin will backfire on McCain, and it does look as if some Republican spokespeople are making some noises.....The w hole thing is an ugly farce,. and I just cannot understand why so many people are bieng taken in by it.   

    So...It's Obama for me..and for my husband, my sister and her family..Not sure about my own kids.  The alternative is too scary. Much....

     Thank  you for listening to me ramble on......I hpe that even with my conservative leaningas, I will be welcome here....

    Oh yes..I've been a poll worker for years now, and can't wait for this election!

    Sandy 

  • LAphoenix
    LAphoenix Member Posts: 452
    edited September 2008

    Sandy, you are most welcome here.  I know it can be hard to support and vote for someone whose stands on particular issues diverge from your own.  There are things about Obama-Biden's platform that I'm not crazy about, too, but looking at the big picture, I think they're by far the better choice.  My in-laws are extremely religious and are avid Obama supporters, so I don't think those two are necessarily mutually exclusive.  (I'm volunteering to be a poll worker for the first time this year.  Looking forward to it!)

    I wonder if Fiorina's retort had anything to do with Palin's comment that she's against "golden parachutes" for CEOs.  Fiorina got, what, a $32 million severance package from H-P?  And now H-P is laying off almost 25,000 employees!  You wonder why McCain keeps these controversial people on his team.  Phil Gramm is another one.  

    I think the press is getting tired of the GOP's stonewalling.  What's funny is that there are hordes of reporters around Palin, who won't speak to them, and about 6 who are following Biden, who, as we know, loves to gab to anyone who'll listen.  

    Predictably McCain/Palin are making a big deal about Streisand and Obama's Hollywood fundraising.  Are they going to reveal how much Hollywood money they raised a couple months of ago in Beverly Hills?  Or how much money they've gotten from those golden parachute CEO's?  The GOP needs a new script.              

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited September 2008

    Grace the funniest thing about Carly Fiorina is that she couldn't run an american corporation, so I'm not sure she's the best judge of that. She cut almost 20,000 jobs and Compaq before it merged with HP. Fiorina, who I generally don't dislike, has made several similar gaffes, not about the economy but one about viagra vs. birth control comes to mind.

    There was an interesting letter to the editor in newsweek. A woman wrote in and said if she had a friend with 5 kids including an infant with downs and a pregnant teenage, she wouldn't ask her to bring cookies to a PTA meeting , let alone be vice president. I laughed outloud in the book store when I read it.

  • easyquilts
    easyquilts Member Posts: 876
    edited September 2008

    Hi LAphoenix.....Thank you so much for your welcome.....And what was funny, was that while I was reading your post, and preparing to answer you, the Obama people called, asking me to help out.  Of ourse I said yes.....I will be doing some phoning, and maybe some canvasing....if I can get up the nerve.

     I agree that Obama/Biden is a much better choice than McCain/Palin...And I think the press will soon tire of Sarah Palin.....Already some Republicans are saying aloud what they have thought privately....Sarah is not ready to be president.

    Congratulations for working in the polls.....You will love it.  That reminds me...I have to call the Election Board and make sure they have my name....They usually call before now.  

    I think that this is a very important election...More so than many others...Either way, historoy will be made, and that alone is exciting.  

    Do you watch Rachael Maddow's new show?  She's great...And I enjoy Chris Matthews and Keith Oberman.....And...I love to hear Pat Buchannon talk....He's getting a little nutty, though. 

    Thanks again for your warm welcome.....We all have to pull together now and elect our guy.

    God Bless,

    Sandy

  • easyquilts
    easyquilts Member Posts: 876
    edited September 2008

    Amy....I totally get the thing about the woman with five kids...one a special needs, being overworked already....My daughter has four boys (and a boy of a husband <sigh>....The baby, who is two and  half has a seizuer disorder...and she works.  Christy had to give up doing Cub Scouts with two of th boys, because she just could not do it all.....I can't imagine her being president....or VP.. and I think my daughter has a lot more going for her than SP does.

    When I saw who McCain had asked to be his running mate, I about had a second heart attack... I ccouldn't believe it, and neither can many others.  I still think this decision will eventually be McCain's downfall.

    Sandy

  • djd
    djd Member Posts: 866
    edited September 2008

    Since I can't return to work this week (in Houston) I've been watching the cable news.  Chris Matthews and Norah Odonnell have never been my favorites, but today they were actually doing their job, holding the Republicans' feet to the fire, asking where's Bush (this country happens to be in the worst financial crisis of our lifetimes - shouldn't he be addressing the Nation???), and how can the Republicans possibly claim to be the party to "fix" Washington, when indeed they are the ones who BROKE us, both morally and financially, over the last 8 years.  The only thing they can do is try and blame Pelosi and Reid because Dems have *barely* had control of Congress for the last 22 months!  How lame can they get?

    We will be lucky if can we survive this disaster of an administration for 4 more months, much less 4 more years!

  • sccruiser
    sccruiser Member Posts: 1,119
    edited September 2008

    Welcome Sandy,

    It must be difficult for you to make these choices in voting. I know it would be for me if the positions were reversed. I am slightly heartened by CNN's report today, that on most of the cross country polls, Obama is slowly moving ahead of McC. So, there is 1.5 months left before the election and Obama says not to worry, as he will continue to rise in the polls.

    James Carville stated today that he believes McCain's chances of becoming Prez died on Sept 15th! that makes me feel somewhat optimistic also!

    I knew that Palin had to have a reason for not cooperating with the investigation into Troopergate, and wanting it to be this committee that oversees personnel issues--the reason--drum roll--SHE APPOINTED THE MEMBERS TO THE COMMITTEE. Boy, they must think the American public is really, really stupid. I had that figured out (at least I theorized the reason) when the announcement came about wanting this committee to determine if there were power plays going on.

    I think more and more republicans will find Palin unpalatable, and she will be heading back to Alaska to continue to be the governor. She is now answering questions, more specifically, by not answering questions. She's got the slip and slide down to a science. Guess that works in those rah-rah town halls!! Waiting for the debates. Hope Biden cleans up in that one. I have no doubt that McC will go down in the debates against Obama.

    This country is ready for a change. We will be lucky to survive the next few months. Too bad we can't just remove Bush & Cheney from office.

    Interesting to note, as some are moving from the Republican camp to the Democratic camp, others are moving just the opposite. Did anyone see the interview with Rothschild woman? She's moving to the McCain camp--thinks he will be the best choice for Prez. She claims she came from a working class background where her pop worked 2 jobs to make ends meet, and she grew up in Jersey. Funny how some Republicans think that's the party that cares about the working class. Where ever did they get that idea. Evidently she is (or was) a big Hillary supporter. Guess that might explain the flip.

    She has a law degree. And emphatically stated that the Federalgov't including Supreme Court would never overturn Roe vs Wade. She just feels it's not possible. Hope she's right. I know there are pro-life people here, and pro-choice people here. I just believe that it is the woman's right to choose what happens to her body. And I definitely disagree with Palin on her ideas about rape and incest--that no abortions should be allowed in those cases either. Come on. Why should a woman who has been raped have to carry to term the baby that was forcefully put there by a rapist. That's just not right. As far as I'm concerned, the decision should be the woman's, and there should be no interference from the state or federal governments--hands off is how it should be!

    McCain is flip-flopping on the economy issue. now he wants to make it clear that he said the economy was fundamentally strong and was referring to the workers. HUH?? Is he nuts? Where has he been for the past 8 years? He has no clue what working class and middle class people are going through. And the day before Hurricane Ike, McCain had a swanky fundraiser in FL--and raised over 5 million dollars!! And I do believe he has had some fundraising dinners in LA. So, living in glass house, he should not throw stones. Oh, that's right, if he doesn't know how many houses he has, he probably doesn't know if they have glass? HA HA HA 

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited September 2008

    Sandy, I love rachel's show. I thought it got off to a bit of a slow start, that she seemed a bit stiff, but she seems a lot more comfortable now. My next door neighbor has 5 kids and an on again off again husband who's financially always off. her youngest is autistic and she has no time and energy to give him the stimulation and attention he needs, instead often plopping him in front of the tv'/babysitter. No man or woman can do everything and do it well.

    djd, I love Norah O'donnell (and Chris, Keith and Rachel). Norah has come into her own on MSNBC. I never realized how bright she was when she was on the today show. I hope people realize the reason the dems in congres couldn't do more is that bush vetoed everything they tried to push them and they didn't have the number of folks to override.  I hope you get back home soon. I  was out of my home for 6 weeks after the fire in June and it was really hard.

    Grace, that Lady Rothschild woman is really scary and it's hard for me to believe she was a Hillary supporter/fund raiser for anything other than gender. She's probably even richer than the McCains, married to some Lord from europe. She said she didn't like Obama, in part, because he's an elitst---- hello?????  http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-trailrothschild18-2008sep18,0,529074.story   You just can't make this stuff up.

  • shokk
    shokk Member Posts: 1,763
    edited September 2008

    Good morning Obama supporters.............I am not here to bash Obama because this is not the place to do that but I do have a few questions for Sandy aka Kermit................Sandy as a pro life advocate I do not understand your posts............for pro life is my fundamental principle that I base my political beliefs..........how can you honestly say that you are pro life and vote for Obama or for that matter anyone that is pro choice.............now I do understand that there are liberal Republicans that believe in liberal social ideologies such as pro choice, gay rights, etc but are fiscal conservatives that believe in lower taxes and smaller government.........which I accept just like there are conservative democrats............but to say that you are pro life and vote for someone that not only is pro choice but has voted not only for late term abortion and if the child survives the abortion to "not to attend to" which allows the child to die I really question your stance on pro life beliefs..........I think for many Catholics this is a very big conflict because many of the younger generation of Catholics are pro choice which goes against their very basic beliefs in the which they were raised..........in other words they actually believe in pro choice but would never tell their parents or even say it out loud............but with that said Sandy I just wonder if you are truly pro life or is it you are just suppose to be but in reality you are pro choice?..........Shokk

  • Iza
    Iza Member Posts: 117
    edited September 2008

    Shokk, I am not Sandy, but let me give you my opinion. I am pro-life too (not for religious reasons, because I am not religious; but for my own ethical reasons. Incidentally, it is entirely possible to have high ethical standards and be an atheist at the same time). This is why I chose to not have an abortion. But I don't see why other women should have to adhere to my own ethical stance. I don't judge women who have chosen abortion, I am just not one of them. Therefore, I am pro-choice.

    Women who are pro-life should not have abortions. Women who are pro-choice should be free to choose. As simple as that.

  • shokk
    shokk Member Posts: 1,763
    edited September 2008

    Iza my beliefs in being pro life is not based in my religion it is based in science and when does life begin.......I believe that life begins at cell division.........just like my orginal cancer cell that was not alive until it started to divide..........with that basic understanding of when I believe that life starts then of course it is not whether or not I can pass my beliefs onto someone else.........that is not my place...........even Joe Biden has stated that he believe life begins at conception.......what I don't understand is if you do believe that life begins at conception regardless of what you think about women having a right to chose becomes not the issue...........life is life............its not about a woman having a choice about whether to end life or not..........its about if life begins at conception then abortion is ending life.............many pro choicers are also against the death penalty but they have no problem in giving the death penalty to a unborn life because it's not their place to impose their beliefs onto someone else............I personally think that is a way of not really taking a stand..........jmo............Shokk

  • LAphoenix
    LAphoenix Member Posts: 452
    edited September 2008

    Yeah, the wheels seem to be coming off the GOP wagon, at least this week.  McCain can't figure out which past president to quote--Reagan or FDR.  He can't decide if the fundamentals are strong, or in the tank.  He can't figure out if government should get out the way of the market, or have stringent oversight.  So much for clear vision and a steady hand. 

    And don't you love McBush's explanation for why his ads are so nasty?  It's all Obama's fault because he didn't want to do town hall meetings.  That's like the bully saying that if only the smart kid had given him his lunch money like he demanded, he wouldn't have had to beat him up.  And this is the kind of temperment we should want in our leader?  

    Palin's numbers are slipping fast, as more people are figuring out that there's not much "there there" and they really do want their leaders to have some understanding of how the economy works, not just an ability to repeat the campaign talking points.  But I'm sure she'll continue to energize the religious right base and might help local GOP candidates in close races. 

    Amy, I agree that Rachel's show has improved.  It was nice to see sidekick Kent Jones with her again.  He was on her radio show, then left a few months ago.  I'm getting a little tired of Keith's anti-O'Reilly-Murdoch-Limbaugh rants though.  Those guys are such paper tigers to me. 

    As far as I can see, the only difference between Lady Rothschild, the working class aristocrat, Cindy McCain, the beer heiress, and Barbra Streisand is that Barbra can sing.  You get music with your donation.  Wow, that's bad.  Those Hollywood types should be ashamed. 

    And I guess it's bye-bye to poor foot-in-mouth Fiorina.    

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited September 2008

    Shokk-- didn't you once say you weren't into science or was that just humor that you added to a conversation.(not trying to be combative I just didn't think science was something you'd use to make your point). I believe the science that suggests a fetus is parasitic and not life until it can exist outside of the womb without medical intervention (machines). I don't see my cancer cell dividing as life, but as part of my body that has begun to divide. I don't see my cancer as a separate entity any more than I do the cells that form a scab when I get a cut. I am one of those prochoice people who is against the death penalty- because it's not applied fairly and there are racial and economic divides in the type of legal access to alleged criminals. I'm also anti death penality at this time because so many people on death row have been cleared through DNA evidence through groups like the innocence project. I don't think the death penalty is a deterrent, but a form of  vengence. I think life in prison without the possibility of parole is a harsher punishment. People are on death row for sometimes up to 20 years, prolonging the pain of the victims' loved ones. Putting someone to death costs more than warehousing them in prison too. I just don't see any positives for the death penalty. There's nothing to celebrate about the loss of a life, even Sadam Hussein. I don't think anyone celebrates abortions or is glad to have on. They are perhaps relieved, because it's usually the least bad option available at the time. I am NOT trying to change your mind, just giving you insight into my line of thinking.

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited September 2008

    LA- I never liked Keith's rants against O'Reilly, Murdoch, Limbug etc.- why give them energy. I don't mind when me mentions the moronic things they say but Keith doesn't need to stoop to their level because that waters down the message. Mcbush's excuses are similar to a kindergartener saying, "i hit him because he made me mad." We've already had a president that takes no responsibility for his mistakes.

  • Iza
    Iza Member Posts: 117
    edited September 2008

    Shokk, you are contradicting yourself in the first line of your post. You *believe* that life begins at cell division. You quote Biden as believing something similar. Fine. But what about women who do not share that belief, or who share it with many qualifications?

    And assuming life does actually begin at conception, that doesn't necessarily mean it is entitled to protection. A living human cell (or a group of cells) is not the same as a human being. We all kill living human cells all the time (think surgery, for example). So the discourse really should not be about when life starts, but rather about when that life becomes a human being--a purely ethical and subjective matter.

Categories