How many of you actually had a palpable lump?

1356

Comments

  • Little-G
    Little-G Member Posts: 647
    edited May 2008

    Well, just had my yearly MRI and all is clear!  Nash mentioned that I should have mammo's as well.  I'll ask my onc. when I see him next month,but for now..I am VERY happy! 

    g

  • nash
    nash Member Posts: 2,600
    edited May 2008

    Yay, LittleG! Congrats on the clean MRI! Wanted to mention that when I go for mammos this July, I'll be getting digital mammo for the first time. It's supposed to be good for reading dense breasts--something you might want to mention to the onc, too.

    Wishiwere--hoping your mystery lump is nothing, too.  

  • Little-G
    Little-G Member Posts: 647
    edited May 2008

    Thanks Nash!  I will keep that in mind, as I do have dense breasts.  I use to think it was a good thing!  ;-)

    g

  • Rovergirl
    Rovergirl Member Posts: 194
    edited June 2008

    Not only did I not feel a lump, but the lump wasn't detected on a mamo or ultrasound!  I went to my PCP for underarm pain and she ordered a mamo and ultrasound.  The ultrasound showed the enlarged lympnode but no lump.  My PCP thought I might have Lymphoma.  During the lymphnode biopsy the surgeon determined I didn't have Lymphoma but breast cancer.  It wasn't until I had a Breast MRI that the extent of the disease was determined.  I've been having mamograms annually for the last 8 years .

  • Gitane
    Gitane Member Posts: 1,885
    edited June 2008

    Hi Rovergirl,

    MRI is almost the only way to find a lobular. So many of us find that mammos and ultrasounds just didn't find them, and don't show the extent of them either. I had a tumor that wasn't found until it was large. It bothers me that my BSE's, mammograms, and gyn visits did nothing to catch my BC at an earlier stage. I'm sorry that you are joining this group, but I'm glad you came to us and shared your story. I see you were just diagnosed in May. Let us know if you have questions or come to us if you just want to talk. We ILC girls need to stick together.

  • PeggyDixon
    PeggyDixon Member Posts: 125
    edited June 2008

    Hi Rovergirl,

    I had visits with my general practicioner, mammograms and an ultrasound and was told everything was normal. I happily went my way until I noticed nipple retraction 10 months later - didn't really feel anything different but went back to the GP. She sent me for a biopsy and it turned out I had a very big ILC tumor. Perhaps an MRi would have picked it up earlier but nothing else did.

    And I'm not a medical doctor or oncologist but I do know that the vast majority of ILC tumors are ER+. Are you sure yours is ER-? Perhaps there are others with the same diagnosis who will post and clarify this.

    Take care,

    Peggy

  • Rovergirl
    Rovergirl Member Posts: 194
    edited June 2008

    Yep, I'm a triple negative.  Never was one to follow the norm, although this time I wish I was.  I have a long row to hoe and am looking at almost a year of treatment.  I start neo. adju. chemo on Wed.,  June 4.  I'm participating in a clinical trial and started taking sunitinib (the trial drug) last week and add taxol to the mix on Wed.

  • SusanB12
    SusanB12 Member Posts: 54
    edited June 2008

    I had thickening or hardening in the lower left quadrant of my left breast which I thought were cysts. I believe they were there for awhile the doctor didn't seem to be concerned and nothing showed up.  It wasn't until I noticed a definite thickening and hard spot on the top of my left nipple that I still was not thinking cancer but told the doctor about it.  That's when my ILC was diagnosed on ultrasound. 

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited June 2008

    With me it was also a general thickening around the underarm. I didn't notice the thickening and suggested that women be advised that they should be looking for this, as well as lumps, in self examinations.



    Even after the tests the surgeon could not feel the lump knowing were it was. And then surgery uncovered multi focal tumours that were as large as 1.4cm and undetected by any tests. That is the main reason I chose bilat mast.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited June 2008

    I have a thickened area which feels ropey, like a thick strand of licorice.  In Oct. my gyn said it was "normal for the upper outer quadrant to be thicker", and then my oncologist said it felt "fine" in Dec.--my mammo and MRI were clear in March. I go to the oncologist  next Tues for 6 mth f/u and will be showing it to him again. It's on the same side as my lumpectomy, but that was almost 5 years ago, and I've just noticed this more in the last year, so I don't think it's scar tissue. (unless it can suddenly form after all this time?) They keep saying it's "fine", but it sure doesn't fell "fine" to me.

    Anne 

  • KKing
    KKing Member Posts: 425
    edited June 2008

    Yes, i found a thickening on the side of my right breast..went to the doc last Nov.... she said it was nothing and should come back in the new year.  Didn't go back until March and now I just started chemo... Lesson learned.. go for a second opinion if you dont agree right away.    Thank god the second time I did get on it.

    Karen

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited June 2008

    I have to say that I was lucky that when my doc found the thickening she insisted that I have it checked out. She said it is probably nothing but we won't know until we do the tests. And the rest is history.



    If only we had a crystal ball! This site is full of women who were told the same thing. I'm sure that the docs are right about it sometimes being nothing, but I wouldn't want to bet my life on it. Personally, I would pursue this until I was comfortable with the outcome.

  • sharalou
    sharalou Member Posts: 223
    edited June 2008

    I felt a lump.  Mammogram did not show anything.  Then ultrasound and it was right there.  It's been almost three years since my last radiation.  Had left mastectomy, chemo (6), and rads.  Live in Michigan.

    Shari

  • momonjava
    momonjava Member Posts: 10
    edited July 2008
    Found a lump during BSE...pretty small but it felt quite hard and different than surrounding tissue. I still can't believe I found it.  I followed it through a menstrual cycle to see if it would disappear (plus it was time for my routine yearly physical in a month) and of course it was still there.  My doc couldn't readily find it and really downplayed it (he did insist on immediate followup but told me it was most likely benign).  It showed up on mammogram but only on a tangential view (so a screening mammogram would likely have missed it).  However, it lit right up on ultrasound and the radiologist was immediately suspicious.  Quite the stunner, to say the least.  I guess I was pretty lucky all around (all things considered), since the lLC was low grade and less than a centimeter, with negative SNB.  Now, I do have annual MRI's and mammograms, staggered so that I have one or the other every six months.  I'm told that the MRI is much more sensitive for ILC but the digital mammogram is better at picking up calcifications, so both have their respective advantages.
  • GaPastor
    GaPastor Member Posts: 7
    edited July 2008

    no lump- never felt anything and the Dr did not either

    the IDC was found with routine mammagram- digital! they had just begun using the digital equipment a few months before and i am convinced the higher resolution and detail allowed them to find it.

    only 1.2 cm- and tubular- not easy to detect! 

  • rzxcd
    rzxcd Member Posts: 35
    edited August 2008

    I found a lump and my nipple had started to invert. Had a mamo nothing showed up ultrasound saw it and they hard a hard time finding it with the ultra as it was hiding under the nipple. I'm really upset after surgery it turns out the tumor was 5cm and had all my nodes removed and 14 out of 15 tested bad. I'm off to chemo next week.

  • Jane_M
    Jane_M Member Posts: 1,549
    edited August 2008

    I noticed a very large palpable lump on the inner side of my left breast on August 8.  I even woke my husband up to confirm.  I had mammo and US on August 11.  5 cm lump showed up on both; BI-RAD 4.  Had core Biopsy August 13.  Informed by MD on August 15, I have ILC.  Pathology still not back on HER-2, etc.  Saw surgeon 8/19.  She said the tumor is so extensive, I will need radical mastectomy (sheduled for Sept. 8). At that time, she will also put in a port for the chemo.  Had PET scan today and am scheduled for MRI, Bone Scan, Chest X-ray and pre-op blood work on Friday.  This will hopefully tell her if there is any lymph node involvement.  I am a good example of why women with dense breast should folliow their Drs advice exactly.  The last MRI I had, I ended up with mastitis, so I haven't gone back for 3 years, 4 months.  Who knows how long this has been brewing inside of me.  In just 3 weeks, the mass has grown to where it is visible from the outside and feels like it is about the size of a tennis ball. I also work 2 jobs (about 55 hours/week).  Has anybody else had to try to work while going through treatment?  How did it work?

  • TXBadboob
    TXBadboob Member Posts: 597
    edited August 2008

        I felt the lump when I took off my bra one night.  I'm good about self exams cuz my grandma had bc, and I knew it hadn't even been a month since the last one.  It was already like 2cm., and has grown since to 2.5cm. My skin is also dimpled around it. It did not show on the mammo, but it did on the US.  I've had a biopsy, PET scan, and a port inserted, and I'm now on my 3rd chemo(Abraxane, every week for 12 weeks).  I'm surprised how little effect it is having on me.  I am working during treatment 3.5 days a week,  I usually only work 3 days(12 hrs. ea.), but I feel alright and want to work a little extra, since after this 12 wk treatment, I'll start the harder chemo for the next 12 weeks, and I probably won't be able to work as much.  My chemotherapist says that I am doing well because I work out 3 days a week, and to keep it up.  Jane,I don't think that I would work both jobs, though.  You will need time to let your body rest and heal.  That just sounds too stressful.  I know it's a hard decision, but you probably won't have a choice depending on the type of chemo you get.  I wish you luck.

  • lolmarsha
    lolmarsha Member Posts: 107
    edited August 2008

    hi everyone, No lump, but showed some ridges,on bottom half.I had to wait two months for my manogram. The weekend before i went in I  was on the computer. So typed in breast ridges, went to the breast cancer SITE. Didn't know anything about ridges. So while getting my mano, the tech said you know your right breast dosen't look the same. I said yes. That's why I was there.The radio dr came in. Just jumped out YOU GOT BREAST CANCER. Said no bisopy, go straight to surgrey. Oh! by the way the Dr. did ask if I came with someone. When I said No, he didn't have much to say.Two weeks later it was GONE. Then no NO chemo, just femara and zometa. Did rad's to back & hip.Just waitting for the other shoe to fall. lol.Can't work as I had . 22/31 lymnodes removed.The arm swells alot if I over use the arm. But everyone have a nice day. If anyone wants to talk, just let me know. I can BE there for you. We don't have to do this alone. always lolmarsha

  • Kleenex
    Kleenex Member Posts: 764
    edited August 2008

    Hi - I had a lump, but it was waaaaaaaaaay up at 11 o'clock on the left breast - not what you'd think of as a "breast" lump, but I've learned that breast tissue extends all the way up to the collarbone. It was outside the field of mammography, which I'd had faithfully since a baseline at 39. (I'm 45.) Also, if I were to lay down, it would blend in with the surrounding breast tissue - I had to sit up to locate it for various doctors and techs. My gyn thought it was just a rib. It seemed to change size with my cycle, so at first I wasn't that worried. Mammo tech really tried to scraaaaaape that section into the field for a diagnostic mammogram, but it was just too far up. It was imaged by ultrasound - BIRAD4, approximately .7 cm, so I was scheduled for a biopsy. I had an ultrasound-guided, vacuum assisted biopsy that confirmed it was ILC. Then I had breast MRI's - that area was the only suspicious thing that lit up and it appeared to be more like 2.02 cm. I had lumpectomy and SNB - the tumor was 2.1 cm, and we got "okay" margins, due to the location. I will allegedly be followed up with alternating digital mammos (to detect OTHER things) and MRI's. I'm glad I pursued getting this little globule checked out!

  • notready
    notready Member Posts: 5
    edited September 2008

    I had a thickening that my husband found.  Went to GYN doctor and she ordered mammo & ultrasound, both of which were negative.  She didn't like those reports so she made me see a breast surgeon, who took it out, and sure enough it was ILC. 

  • mreilley99
    mreilley99 Member Posts: 149
    edited September 2008

    i had thickening of the breast tissue which "they" said was normal for age. ok..so then i wake up one day and there was clearly a lump at 2:00. it felt like a sebacous cyst. a year later it was finally correctly dx and here i am today 2 yrs out of bi lat mast-chemo-rads..and one week ago i began the processof recon with surg for tissue expanders! i feel very fortunate that i survived it all!

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited September 2008

    Neither I nor the nurse at the breast screening clinic could feel any lumps.  However, digital mammo found something suspicious, with further confirmation by an ultrasound.  It was in the same location as a fibroadenoma I'd had removed 30-odd years ago.  Scar tissue maybe?  No such luck.  A week later a core biopsy was performed, which showed "highly suspicious cells".  A lumpectomy uncovered 2 small "lumps", officially labelled LCIS.  I'm post-menopausal, hence breasts are no longer as dense, so digital mammo could see things more clearly. 

  • snicklefritz
    snicklefritz Member Posts: 66
    edited September 2008

    Unfortunately, those of us with Lobulars don't usually have our tumors discovered by mammogram until they are larger.  Some of the ductals they find are incredibly small because they are calcifications.  Not true with lobulars.  Dense tissue in lobulars often hides larger tumors.  This was the case with me certainly and also with many of us here.  The only blessing for us lobular girls is that most of these types of tumors are not Her/2 positive therefore maybe not as aggressive.  A one inch lobular vs. a one inch ductal, no contest, the ductal is almost always a more aggressive tumor.

  • unique
    unique Member Posts: 554
    edited September 2008

    Hiya!

     No, never felt a lump - it was all of a sudden ridges and hardness on the side of the breast. Seemed like a huge lump all of a sudden.

  • becky1970
    becky1970 Member Posts: 17
    edited October 2008

    I have a palpable lump on my left breast.  i had my first mam today along with an ultrasound.  The lady that did the ultrasound sound I had ALOT of cysts and told me to wait to see if the Dr. wanted anything else.  She came back and said i will get the results in about a week.  Should I be worried?  I have had a lot of pain in my left arm that just started about a month ago.  I am getting a little worried, but I don't want this to take over my life.  I had brain cancer 5 years ago and I became obsessed with finding all the info I could find on that.  I feel myself doing it again. 

  • Seabee
    Seabee Member Posts: 557
    edited October 2008

    If I had had a lump I would certainly have noticed it when I put on my bra, because of the size of my breasts.

    Mine was discovered by a routine mammogram. The radiologist thought he saw a suspicious area of dense tissue which looked differnt from my previous mammogram, and ordered some additional views. Even at this point he couldn't be sure, so they followed up with an ultrasound, which showed a 9mm mass. A biopsy confirmed the diagnosis.

  • Little-G
    Little-G Member Posts: 647
    edited October 2008

    This is switching up the subject a bit, but I have been wondering are there many ILC women that have gone to stage 4?  If so, were you dx at that stage?  I suppose I am wondering how often ILC goes to stage 4.  Is it more or less than the other types? 

    g

  • ck55
    ck55 Member Posts: 346
    edited October 2008

    I never felt a lump. Although for a month or so before my diagnosis that part of my breast was kind of sore, like they used to get before a period.

    I had been having mammograms since my early 30's since my mother had bc. I was sure that if it ever happened to me I would catch it early. HA! At 51 I had a mammogram that showed a small organized area of microcalcifications, so of course a biopsy was scheduled. I somehow new it would be cancer, but I was sure I had caught it very early - DCIS. The area that had lit up was indeed DCIS, but ILC was also found. The biggest shock was that it was 9 cm!, and in 2 nodes!!! It was never felt in a breast exam, even after we knew it was there the breast surgeon was unable to feel it.

    Lets just say I don't have a whole lot of confidence in mammograms anymore. Although it was the DCIS on the mammo that led to my diagnosis (and oddly enough that was the only DCIS found in the entire breast). I now rely on MRI's for my remaining breast.

    Cyndi

  • Seabee
    Seabee Member Posts: 557
    edited October 2008

    MRIs pick up more detail, so in that respect they're more reliable. They're also supposed to be more reliable in estimates of size, but that may not be saying much. In my case US showed a 10mm mass, MRI showed an irregular area estimatef at max. 6.6 cm, but the final pathology report placed it at 2.2 cm.  The mammogram succeeded in spotting a problem area, but the skill of the radiologist may have had something to do with that. 

Categories