The Respectfully Republican Conversation

Options
15253555758252

Comments

  • pinoideae
    pinoideae Member Posts: 1,271
    edited September 2008

    Well I don't know what the heck to think here people.  I never even heard of the canada free press until yesterday.

  • shokk
    shokk Member Posts: 1,763
    edited September 2008

    Jeez guys I am really busy here at work.............I do think that the Obama team has moved from offense to defense.............Summer I am going to have to check  your post a bit later.........I thought I might have time at lunch but it isn't working out............I love dialects.........when I was in first grade I had a speech teacher that was from NYC and she was determined that her little Texas first graders that were having a difficult time speaking were not going to speak with a Texas accent so I really don't have much of one even though I can do one............ok I will be back............Shokk

  • pinoideae
    pinoideae Member Posts: 1,271
    edited September 2008

    Copied and pasted. Shirley Hughes found the article.

  • rumoret
    rumoret Member Posts: 685
    edited September 2008

    I told my husband the other day.......watch the Dems send out every woman they could find to attack Governor Sarah Palin. It is funny to listen to these Liberal women attack Governor Palin for having the nerve to be able to have a CAREER, FAMILY, and her RELIGION! If she were  Democrat......she would be SO QUALIFIED and the Liberal Media would be telling you that 24/7.

    I think the Liberal Women are so pissed off that the first WOMAN to possibly make VP would not come from the National Organization of Women........but from those HORRIBLE religious nuts on the RIGHT. How dare any nonliberal women steal the spotlight!

    The finally Crackup for me was listening to SALLY QUINN (I think that is right), Ms. SOCIALITE and DINNER PARTY HOSTESS of Washington D.C. Her distaste for Governor Palin just ooozed from her pores when she tried to express what was in the best interest of Governor Palin's family. She tried so hard to express her concern for the Governor and how raising 5 children would make it impossible for her to do a good job as VP.  I just wanted to reach into the TV and slap this phony Socialite's face!

    I guess only Liberal Women have the right to succeed in the business and political world.....and all the rest of US can stay home, raise our families, and last but not least.....obey our husbands!

    So unless your LIBERAL.......you do not have ANY RIGHTS to call yourself WOMAN!

    Terry - Woman 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited September 2008

    Even NBC, on the Today show, has been biased ... Meredith, Hoda, Kathy Lee ...  But after her speech, I see that Meredith and Kathy Lee have been alot more respectful of Palin.

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited September 2008

    My husband, who still watches MSNBC, tells me that they were all subdued today, and wondered why.  After I gave him the Times' editorial to read, about Olbermann and Matthews, he understood.  But they're like a bunch of kids who were permitted to run wild for some time--for sure it will take them time to return to acting as journalists and not members of a high-school cheer leading squad!

    Rumoret, I'm one of those liberal women and I'm not at all pissed about Palin.  If McCain had to pick someone who is pro-life I'd rather he pick a woman, who actually knows the issue first hand and knows the consequences of keeping a child and raising it.  And I know that many (many)  liberal women feel the same.  We won't vote for Palin, and why should we?  She represents positions that most of us find abhorrent, but none of us question her choices as mother and none of us are accusing her of being a bad mother because she's running for VP.  From the little I know of her, I actually think she's a good mother, but either way I don't believe it should be an issue in a political campaign. 

    I suspect the women you're seeing on TV (I mean the ones questioning Palin's role as mother, not her  conservative positions) are actually from the Obama camp, and were just as nasty to Hillary Clinton.  There are women, on the left and on the right, who hate to see women other than themselves get ahead. 

  • saluki
    saluki Member Posts: 2,287
    edited September 2008

    Women of the World Unite--Except you inauthentic ones..............

    http://proteinwisdom.com/?p=13228#comments

  • rumoret
    rumoret Member Posts: 685
    edited September 2008

    anneshirley........thanks for responding on this subject. I should have clarified that not ALL LIBERAL women are in the Obama Camp. I should know.....I have 5 sisters.....and a few of them are Liberal....but not leaning toward Obama. I was directing my criticism toward most of the talking heads who have been sent out from the Obama Camp. I do agree with your statement about women on left and right who hate to see women other than themselves get ahead....I guess we still have room to grow.

    Terry 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited September 2008

    I found Gloria Steinam's opinion piece SOMEWHERE.  I googled it.  Anyway, I didn't take the time to read it...a waste of time.  I read a few sentences.  However, I thought I'd read what the reponses were.  The few I skimmed over were very unfavorable for Steinam.  I think it's time for a younger person to move into her office.  These "feminists" are not for women.  They are only for LIBERAL women who hold their ideas.  The rest of us are probably bitter, gun toters who cling to our religion and thump our Bibles.  Those women do not care on thing about the conservative woman. 

    It's really funny how MSNBC had put Olberman and Matthews in their place.  I don't think they give a darned, but what they care about is their ratings.  How long as Olberman and Matthews acted like idiots?  And they just discovered they wer biased?  At least on Hannity and Colmes we having two biased people who have totally opposite views..that's called "fair and balanced." Wink

    Darn, ladies.  We should have some kind of conference call where each of us could hear each other's accents.  I don't know what "frog's hair" means either.

    In Texas (or San Antonio) we called soft drinks, soda water.  I think they still do.  Here we call them soft drinks, Coke, Pepsi, Sprite, etc.,  There's quite a mix of people who come down south.  You know..those "snow birds."  I never heard that until about two years ago.

    Well, getting fired up to watch O'Reilly interview Obama.  I wish he'd just show the darn thing all at once instead of spreading it out over four days. 

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited September 2008

    WomenCount is basically a Democratic organization but it is trying to counter the sexist stuff for all women.  This is the message I just received.  If you want to send a message to MSNBC, click on the section at the bottom or if that doesn't work paste the URL into your own search engine.  And remember your message can be about Hillary and Palin, or just Palin if that's your preference.

    Note to msnbc - it's about time

     

    Dear Supporter,

    They were two of the biggest perpetrators of sexist comments during this election - MSNBC's Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews - and now they have been dethroned from their anchor posts and returned to commentary roles at the network.

    Their displays of extreme gender bias were not cited as even a factor in the reshuffling, but WomenCount heralds the move as a victory in the fight to stamp out sexism on the campaign trail. Our efforts specifically call on party leaders - or corporate chiefs, as the case may be - to “stop the silence” on sexism. Booting those in high-profile media posts is a good step.

    Olbermann famously suggested that someone should take Hillary Clinton “into a room and only he comes out.” His attack reached a new low in its threat of violence.

    Chris Matthews called Hillary a “she-devil” and “witchy” and lamented that the reason she was a United States Senator and candidate for president was that her “husband messed around. We keep forgetting it. She didn't win [the Senate race] on her merit.”

    Offensive is an understatement. The only thing worse is that Olbermann and Matthews sat in their anchor chairs for as long as they did.

    We find it mysterious that no one's talking about their well-documented patterns of gender bias as a factor in their dismissals. In today's news coverage of their removals, we could not find any mention of their sexist and offensive behavior, from the New York Times to NPR. These are news organizations that know better.

    Such a lack of recognition of their role in this year's sexist treatment of candidates proves our work is far from finished. Congratulate MSNBC for dropping Olbermann and Matthews but remind them we are still watching closely!   We will forward your message.

    Here's the URL.  http://womencount.org/let_msnbc_know

    Terry--

    I'm glad you recognize that it's only a few women, mainly hacks in my view, who have been hitting Palin on her role as a mother. Most of us think it's just as bad as what they did to Hillary.  Mind you, we will hit Palin on those positions that have nothing to do with her role as a wife or mother. 

    I posted the above because I think that women on both sides of the divide have to work together, as I think we once did, to get rid of sexism, particularly in the media.  After that, we can fight about the other stuff, but first, last, and always we're women and we must support each other in the fight against sexism.

    Thanks. 

  • saluki
    saluki Member Posts: 2,287
    edited September 2008

    Shirley--I lost respect for Steinam earlier this year when she attacked McCain's military record.  ------

    “Suppose John McCain had been Joan McCain and Joan McCain had got captured, shot down and been a POW for eight years. [The media would ask], ‘What did you do wrong to get captured? What terrible things did you do while you were there as a captive for eight years?’” Steinem said, to laughter from the audience.

    Incidentally, my sister was sent the Steinam article by a friend.  The friend didn't know she is a McCain supporter.  She said of Steinam

    "A good piece to have up one's sleeve if one ever meets a Palin supporter, which I doubt I ever will."

    What makes these people so supremely arrogant, venomous, and condescending? 

  • badboob67
    badboob67 Member Posts: 2,780
    edited September 2008

    FYI: my understanding of the "FINE AS FROG HAIR" response when someone is asked how they are is that, because frogs don't HAVE hair, being FINE as frog's hair means REALLY fine. LOL!

    I was transplanted to the south 19 years ago this month. I have finally reached the level of acceptance wherein the "natives" don't say, "You ain't from around here, are ya?" after they hear me speak.

  • pinoideae
    pinoideae Member Posts: 1,271
    edited September 2008

    Shirley you have a talent for finding stuff even major news cannot come up with. 

  • pinoideae
    pinoideae Member Posts: 1,271
    edited September 2008

    But hey, they are all in Alaska now aren't they.

  • Rosemary44
    Rosemary44 Member Posts: 2,660
    edited September 2008

    Obama's campaign seemed to be caught off guard by McCain's surprise pick of Palin on Aug. 29. Obama's spokesman initially blasted her as a former small-town mayor with zero foreign policy experience who wants to continue Bush's policies. But Obama quickly walked the statement back with more congratulatory words about Palin as a compelling addition to the ticket.

    Voters, particularly women, seem to agree, according to new polls. An ABC News-Washington Post survey showed white women have moved from backing Obama by 8 points to supporting McCain by 12 points, with majorities viewing Palin favorably and saying she boosts their faith in McCain's decisions.

    Obama campaign manager David Plouffe said there's no doubt Palin is helping excite the GOP base, but what remains to be seen is how she plays with swing voters over the remaining two months of the campaign.

    "There's no question they believe Governor Palin has given them a surge of energy in the short term," he said. "We'll see where we stand eight weeks from now."

    ----------------------------

    The women are jumping on.  It's really good to see. 

  • FEB
    FEB Member Posts: 552
    edited October 2008

    It seems the women on the View, sans Elizabeth of course, are not on board. Surprise, surprise. They were introducing a new tactic to discredit Palin: she is too religious. They were saying that her references to God all the time is a direct conflict to church and state. I just do not get the liberal line. Obama can talk about God, Clinton can talk about God, Carter can talk about God. They can take their campaigns to the church pulpits, but if republicans do, they are stepping into the whole separation of church and state.  You never see George Bush going to church, but every Sunday, we saw Clinton doing so. I just don't get this at all. When one mentions God, why do they infer that it is only a Christian God? God is God no matter what your religion is. What is wrong with politicians talking about their belief in God? It is what gives us an idea of who they are. Even our forefathers wrote "In God we Trust". The separated of church and state was so that churches would not interfere with our government, not our belief in God. Why do the dems keep beating this dead horse and use some common sense on the issue?

    Did you see now they are selling Sarah Palin dolls with a miniskirt and a gun. The sexism continues. More women will be disgusted and vote for McCain if they keep it up.

    Anne shirley, it is great to see that your group is putting aside political issues in defense of sexism. I use to feel that I was a feminist. I fought for the right for girls to have access to sports in our state when we weren't allowed to play. Girls today have such wonderful experiences because of sports. They learn to be teammates with each other, instead of just rivals for cheerleader or boys. They are so lucky. On the other hand, organzations like NOW have become so one sided in their mindset, that women like me no longer support them. It is too bad they only back the liberal point of view. I burned my bras with them in the 70's. Now I think they are a bunch of bigots.

    badboob, thanks for clarifying the " hairless frog". I love all those southern adages. Any more you want to enlighten us yankees about will be welcome.

  • Rosemary44
    Rosemary44 Member Posts: 2,660
    edited September 2008

    They only show snippets of Palin's speeches.  So far I haven't heard her reference God.  I still see a cover in my supermarket with the picture of Obama standing in front of church stained glass window.  Looking very reverent.  That's ok to do though.  How shallow and trite those women are becoming.

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited September 2008

    Linda, I agree with you somewhat in your comments on God.  It is a double standard to hit Palin for talking about God and not other candidates. So that's the some part. The what: why should any of them talk about God?  Our government is supposed to honor separation of church and state, but we see very little of it with either Republicans or Democrats.  I don't watch the View so I'm going by what you wrote, but if they're hitting Palin for talking about God, I suggest someone send them a copy of the speech Obama gave in Texas during the primaries. If they don't like references to God, that speech should have them gagging! 

  • shokk
    shokk Member Posts: 1,763
    edited September 2008

    I always thought that it was separation of church from state..............that the State was not allowed to have it's own church...........in that we are guarantee to worship how ever we see fit or not worship...........i.e. The Church of England.............this country was founded on pseudo Christen beliefs hence our currency "In God We Trust"...........I have not understood for years why the left goes around shouting separation of church and state............that's not what is stated in our Constitution............or is it our Bill Of Rights..........jeez.........Shokk

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited September 2008

    I believe the expression "separation of church and state" was coined by Jefferson in a letter to certain baptists, as follows:

    "Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State."

    Madison, author of the Bill of Rights, used the expression, "separation of church from state" in his writings, but it's usually Jefferson's expression which is referenced. Also the Supreme Court has used Jefferson's term in most of the cases that have come before it.

    The First Amendment, the Establishment Clause, does not use either term. 

    But to amend what I wrote earlier, let me ask if anyone here believes that if Obama or McCain were non-believers that either would have a chance of getting elected president in the U.S.?  It is possible in other countries, but not here.  So those who want to attain high office here are forced to lie.  And why should that be, considering the secular nature of our government?

  • suzfive
    suzfive Member Posts: 456
    edited September 2008

    I think you are right Shokk - the state cannot sanction its own church and make the rest of us attend it.

    All this talk about Palin's church is getting ridiculous. The media are the ones who brought it up - trying to dig up something that she has done wrong. They are looking for another Rev. Wright and they have not found one. They are pulling at straws. She is religious - so what! It would worry me more if her pastor was her spiritual adviser and like a member of her family. She goes to church - so what! So do a lot of other people - is that a crime now?

    Rosemary - I haven't heard her reference God either.

  • FEB
    FEB Member Posts: 552
    edited October 2008

    anne and schokk, thanks for the clarifications. You are right anne that an atheist would have a hard time getting elected in America. We are a country founded by the faithful and we associate belief in God with good moral judgement, which is a big issue for most Americans. I am not a deeply religious person, but I have a strong faith in God and I could never vote for an atheist. I just cannot see how anyone can deny that God exists when looking at the face of a child, planting a seed that grows into a flower, or even the beauty of a sunny day. Too me things just do not exist, there is a reason that they are, or what purpose would there be to life at all? To me life would not be worth living is their was no purpose. And everything that happens to us has a reason and a purpose. When people say that getting cancer is just a crap shoot, it upsets me because I do not believe it just happens. There is a reason it happens. It may be different for all of us, but the answers are there, even if we do not know it yet. And for those of us who are lucky enough to beat cancer before it beats us, we can learn from this experience and change our lives for the better. Having cancer puts us in touch with our faith, and our soul in a way that can make us wake up and become better people, or it can make us turn bitter and resentful. The choice is up to us.

    Well, I guess now we have progressed from our accents to our religion! What a leap of faith!

    I also wanted to add to you Anne, that I respect that you can offer you opinion, although different from most of us here, without trying to put others down or make it seem like you are right and we are wrong. You have added a lot of food for thought to our discussion and I appreciate that.

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited September 2008

    Linda, I've looked at many a child's face, I love gardening, and I particularly love sunny days (after all I live in Maine), and I'm an atheist. But I really wasn't pushing for a discussion of God's existence, as we all have our reasons for believing or not believing, just wanted to point out that although our government pertains to be secular, it would be impossible for anyone who declares as an atheist to get to the White House.  And this forces politicians to claim beliefs which they may not have.  So I'm not at all surprised when politicians, whatever party and whatever they believe--or not--talk about God on the campaign trail or permit themselves to be seen going to church.  They are, after all, politicians! 

    And thanks for the nice words, and the same to you.  This is, after all, your thread and you all tolerate me, and graciously. 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited September 2008

    Summer, that piece was send via email.  I'm not all that good!  LOL

    Shirley

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited September 2008

    I was half listening to the news (Fox) and heard someone say something about Palin's pastor...something controversial that he said.  But it was a church she attended years ago and ceased going there in 2002 IF I HEARD THAT MUCH CORRECTLY.  I'm sure there'll be more reports on it.

    Shirley

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited September 2008

    Does anyone know when Palin is supposed to have her interview with Gibson on ABC?  I would like to watch it. 

  • suzfive
    suzfive Member Posts: 456
    edited September 2008

    Shirley - Charles Gibson will be interviewing her in Alaska on Sept 11. I thought I read somewhere that they were going to air the interview over two days Thurs and Friday. Can't find a time though. For the story about her pastor go to www.wasillaag.org. She left that church in 2002 - the sermon in question was in 2004.

    Anneshirley - I would vote for someone who was an atheist if they were a good person and would uphold the right for others to believe in God - like you!

    Speaking of voting - we had our primary election today. In the primary you can only vote a straight ticket which really bothers me because the congressman from my district has been in congress for the last 30+ years. He is a Republican. No Democrat is running for his seat this year. This is the FIRST time another Republican has had the guts to run against him. I would have liked to have voted for some of the Democrats in other races but I figured that would be a vote for the incumbent, so I had to vote Republican and voted for the brave soul who was running against him. I WANT CHANGE!

  • Naniam
    Naniam Member Posts: 1,766
    edited September 2008

    I've been gone all day and just walked in - it is 9:30 pm.  My brother just called me and told me to watch Fox news they are reporting on a comment that Obama made today.  I have read the last page and don't see it mentioned - here it is.

    BO:  "You can put lipstick on a pig; but it is still a pig"  

    What!!  The man has totally lost it.  He said he was talking about McCain - get people to believe that one, at least I don't believe the lipstick remark was about McCain.   

    Anyway, you may have talked about this already - I just didn't see it on this page.  Gonna go watch and see what else has happened today.

    Brenda 

    Just heard that OB camp is sending 30 people (lawyers) to Alaska to "check out" Palin.   I don't think this is going to help him - think it is going to turn lots of people off. 

  • suzfive
    suzfive Member Posts: 456
    edited September 2008

    Brenda - I get the impression that BO does not like women, especially women who get in his way. I think it will backfire on him. Yeah right he was talking about McCain - he was referring to the comment Palin made about the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull being lipstick.

  • Rosemary44
    Rosemary44 Member Posts: 2,660
    edited September 2008

    You know, there's that one defining moment in a campaign that you kinda wish you could.... cut your tongue out, and today was that day for Obama. 

    He keeps setting that bar lower and lower.  When I heard him say it, my jaw dropped.  I wasn't given any set-up, I was passing through the room, and there he was tossing his campaign in the dumbster, just like that. 

Categories