BCO Podcast: Characteristics of Early-Stage BC

Options
Moderators
Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
edited November 2019 in Stage II Breast Cancer

Characteristics of Early-Stage Breast Cancer That Make It More Likely to Come Back

October 25, 2019

Shah chirag

Dr. Chirag Shah is a radiation oncologist and director of clinical research for the department of radiation oncology at the Cleveland Clinic. Dr. Shah received his bachelor's degree from Youngstown State University and his medical degree from Northeast Ohio Medical University. He completed his internship and residency at William Beaumont Hospital from 2007 to 2012 and joined the Cleveland Clinic Staff in 2015. Dr. Shah serves as a reviewer for various medical journals and is a member of various medical societies. His primary research interests are breast cancer, sarcoma, prostate cancer, lymphoma, and innovative radiation treatment schedules as well as lymphedema. He has participated in numerous clinical trials.

In this podcast, Dr. Shah talks about specific characteristics of early-stage breast cancer that make the cancer more likely to come back, which doctors call recurrence, as well as what can be done to lower that risk.

Listen to the podcast to hear Dr. Shah discuss:

  • the difference between local/regional recurrence and metastatic/distant recurrence
  • the characteristics of early-stage breast cancer that make the risk of recurrence higher
  • steps people can take to reduce their risk of breast cancer recurrence

Running time: 15:28

Edited to make changes consistent with main site edits and add:

Editor's note: Please know that Dr. Shah does point out that more research is needed on how diet, alcohol use, and smoking affect recurrence risk because current data are inconsistent. His ultimate point is that a survivorship care plan, which includes monitoring, is the most important tool we have beyond following your treatment plan to reduce the risk of recurrence. A survivorship care plan includes:
• monitoring for and managing long-term physical and emotional side effects
• guidance about diet, exercise, and health-promoting activities
• resources to help with financial and insurance issues
• surveillance

Listen now or read the transcript.

Comments

  • sbelizabeth
    sbelizabeth Member Posts: 2,889
    edited November 2019

    There doesn't seem to be anything new here, as far as "steps people can take to reduce their risk of recurrence." Be compliant with your anti-estrogen therapy and stay vigilant for signs/symptoms of recurrence or mets. Be followed by an oncologist or surgeon.

  • berries
    berries Member Posts: 277
    edited November 2019

    Since you're so far out from your diagnosis, anything special you have done?? :)

  • Hopeful82014
    Hopeful82014 Member Posts: 3,480
    edited November 2019

    I agree, sbelizabeth. This:

    "Jamie DePolo: Ok, and it sounds like, from what you said, having a survivorship plan that includes monitoring of breast cancer recurrence is really the most important thing to reduce the risk of recurrence? Is that fair to say?

    Dr. Chirag Shah: I would say absolutely, yeah. Being vigilant and making sure you're following up and being surveilled for any recurrence is very important in my opinion."

    Plus the advice to remain compliant with endocrine therapy was pretty much the gist of the advice re: lowering risk of recurrence - and I don't see that watching for recurrence equates to reducing the RISK of recurrence.

    Being that most oncologists downplay the need for surveillance (other than mammograms, maybe US and MRI if dense) and that the majority of breast cancer survivors do NOT have a survivorship plan, that leaves darn little other than staying on therapy - which we already know we need to do.

    In some ways, I wish these experts would come right out and acknowledge how little they have to offer us in terms of reducing recurrence risks. I'm at 5+ years on femara, 100% compliant. BMI of 20, work out 5 days a week, don't drink or smoke. Quit nattering at all of us about "lifestyle changes" and give us something concrete, (in addition to endocrine therapy) please. Or just admit you can't help us.

    (I appreciate what BCO is trying to do here, but there's not much there, there.)

  • Scrafgal
    Scrafgal Member Posts: 631
    edited November 2019

    I agree...I was disappointed with this podcast...monitoring for recurrence in NOT lowering the risk!

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited November 2019

    Monitoring for recurrence to lower risk? It's kind of like saying that mammograms prevent breast cancer, which unfortunately too many people believe.

    Uh, no.

  • ShetlandPony
    ShetlandPony Member Posts: 4,924
    edited November 2019

    Yes, I caught that too and was kind of disgusted that the interviewer, who ought to know better, would say that. Knocking my head on the wall here.



  • Cowgirl13
    Cowgirl13 Member Posts: 1,936
    edited November 2019

    Just what we need....not. Another thing to scare those who are newly diagnosed.

  • MountainMia
    MountainMia Member Posts: 1,307
    edited November 2019

    It was a terrible interview. I'll pile on with comments like the others: nothing new here; monitoring does NOT reduce risk. And for those of us with triple negative, we got NOTHING.

  • MountainMia
    MountainMia Member Posts: 1,307
    edited November 2019

    Oh, one more thing, the only thing expressed for increased risk is being "younger." Younger than WHAT? Have you done studies that show age grouping for risk? Is there a way a younger person can get to be OLDER, so they can reduce their risk?? Again, not helpful.

  • Euphoriaa
    Euphoriaa Member Posts: 235
    edited November 2019

    MountainMia: Antihormonals work very well to make we older ... :( Hopefully they will work just as well to prevent recurrences

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited November 2019

    Thank you all for your helpful feedback. We have made edits to the Podcast page to reflect your concerns and have added the following:

    Editor's note: Please know that Dr. Shah does point out that more research is needed on how diet, alcohol use, and smoking affect recurrence risk because current data are inconsistent. His ultimate point is that a survivorship care plan, which includes monitoring, is the most important tool we have beyond following your treatment plan to reduce the risk of recurrence. A survivorship care plan includes:
    • monitoring for and managing long-term physical and emotional side effects
    • guidance about diet, exercise, and health-promoting activities
    • resources to help with financial and insurance issues
    • surveillance

  • sbelizabeth
    sbelizabeth Member Posts: 2,889
    edited November 2019

    Let's get specific. Is there new information to tell us how to decrease the risk of breast cancer ever coming back, either locally or in distant mets?

    Those of us here who are Stage 1 - 3 are hoping to never deal with breast cancer again. An article with "REDUCE THE RISK OF RECURRENCE" is simply click-bait unless there's solid data that indicates "diet, exercise, and health-promoting activities" can help keep any stray cancer cells locked in the dungeon.

    Yes, all the factors described are important factors to a survivorship care plan. Live healthy, live longer (maybe). No new news.

    Not to draw too fine a line, but a survivorship plan does not reduce the risk of recurrence.

  • ShetlandPony
    ShetlandPony Member Posts: 4,924
    edited November 2019

    I believe there is a lifestyle factor with pretty good evidence to show it is helpful, and that is exercise. It seems everyone wants to talk about diet instead.

    (Sorry, I can’t hunt down the citations right now.)

Categories