More Vit. D may not be bone-better

Options
wallycat
wallycat Member Posts: 3,227
edited September 2019 in Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/09/1909...



· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • ceanna
    ceanna Member Posts: 5,270
    edited September 2019

    wallycat, thanks for sharing. It's always interesting to get another perspective and as we know, medical knowledge/research changes our approach to issues constantly. What's good today is bad tomorrow, and then cycles around again. I'm also sure that Vit D by itself is not the total answer to osteoporosis, but a piece of the puzzle. More research desired!! All the best to you. Ceanna

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited September 2019

    It might not be bone better, but higher (not megadoses!!) of Vit D seem to be more beneficial to our survival. It's all a balancing act. My MO checks my Vit D levels once a year, and I'm grateful. He believes that anything around 60 - 70 is good.

    https://www.breastcancer.org/risk/factors/low_vit_d

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ksusan
    ksusan Member Posts: 4,505
    edited September 2019

    This seems like big news, yet I haven't heard this. I wonder if there's been an empirical study.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Categories