Is my oncologist doing everything possible

Options
LBG10
LBG10 Member Posts: 34
edited June 2019 in Stage I Breast Cancer

I had my double mx on 6/7/2018 for Stage 1 IDC I've been taking tamoxifen since and see my oncologist every 6mos now. My question, is my oncologist doing everything that should be done? He does lab work and a manual exam when I see him. I asked at my last visit what labs were done, he said to check my liver function since Iam on tamoxifen, so just a basic CBC and CMP panel. Are there lab tests to check tumor markers? Should I be getting these? Also, I have Never had a CT scan, is this usually a standard of care?

What tests do you do routinely with your oncology follow ups??

Comments

  • MCBaker
    MCBaker Member Posts: 1,555
    edited June 2019

    What is your hormone receptor status and your HER2 status? I suspect it is all appropriate, not knowing the rest.

  • Salamandra
    Salamandra Member Posts: 1,444
    edited June 2019

    That sounds like my protocol. Through my surgeon's office, I also have imaging every 6 months (hopefully, we are trying to get the insurance to cover rotating MRI and mammogram).

  • Fairydragonfly
    Fairydragonfly Member Posts: 194
    edited June 2019

    My oncologist told me that there are no tumor markers for breast cancer, so no blood test to check.

  • dtad
    dtad Member Posts: 2,323
    edited June 2019

    Hi everyone...this is the 60,000 dollar question! The theory behind not doing any scans or MRIs is that by the time something shows up on them, you will be symptomatic and thus stage 4. Really? Can't we do better than that? Yes there is bloodwork to check tumor markers. However they are not done for stage 1 because they are thought to be invalid. Some docs do use them for more advanced stages.

    Salamandra...the reason you have imaging done is because you still have your breasts. MRIs and mammograms are done to check for a recurrence in them. They are not routinely done if you had a mastectomy.

    Hope this answers some questions. Good luck to all.

  • Betrayal
    Betrayal Member Posts: 1,374
    edited June 2019

    dtad

    My Mo does tumor markers and I am stage 1. I asked why and she said she uses it as an early warning system. It is done in conjunction with other routine blood work so no harm done. So I think the decision to do these, no matter the stage, is based on the MO's experience. In this instance I defer to her decision.

  • salasila
    salasila Member Posts: 41
    edited June 2019

    I just saw my oncologist last Friday for our regular quarterly appointments. Since I finished active treatment (chemo, Herceptin) mid last year, I don't even get my blood checked by her anymore. I come in, she does her manual checks (she's very thorough), asks 10,000 questions, then declare I'm still in remission. I see my breast surgeon every 6 months, same deal. I get sent to do my pelvic exam once a year (because I'm on Tamoxifen)and I think that's it. I have no mammo because I had a mastectomy.

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited June 2019

    For hormone positive, HER2- breast cancer, here are the NCCN Guidelines for follow-up monitoring. I've boxed in red their recommendation with regard to screening for mets.


    image

  • gb2115
    gb2115 Member Posts: 1,894
    edited June 2019

    Yup sounds about right!!!

  • exbrnxgrl
    exbrnxgrl Member Posts: 12,424
    edited June 2019

    Ladies,

    My mets were found completely by accident (long story), about six weeks after my BMI, staged II b. I had no symptoms. According to studies, I won’t live any longer due to finding mets early, I’ll just know about it longer. I think you can look at vigilant monitoring both ways. Constant scanning and bloodwork are very stressful for many. People forget to live while they “fight”.

    On the other hand, some find vigilant monitoring comforting. I think you need to go for whatever comforts you, and doesn’t heighten your anxiety and stress. It took me a while, but I have greatly reduced the frequency of my scans and my mo never did tumor markers. I’m good with it now and my stress levels are way down

  • dtad
    dtad Member Posts: 2,323
    edited June 2019

    Betrayal...I don't want to contradict your MO but tumor markers for stage one are not reliable. My MO and BS at a major NYC university teaching hospital both told me this. The study above also points that out. As long as you understand that you can get false positives I guess there is no harm done. IMO there is no reason to get alarmed for nothing. There are other factors besides recurrence that can elevate these markers. Any kind of inflammation is one of them. So maybe just talk to your MO about this. Good luck to all.

  • edj3
    edj3 Member Posts: 2,076
    edited June 2019

    exbrnxgrl, I love what you wrote: People forget to live while they "fight".

  • sflow
    sflow Member Posts: 297
    edited June 2019

    Every doctor is different. When I was diagnosed in 2006, my oncologist did chest X-ray, nuclear bone scan & abdominal scan every 6 months for first year or two after. Also they took tumor markers. As I understand, that is a traditional approach, but it did give me peace of min

Categories