Cancer 10+ years survivors no chemo during thirties

Options
Raysal
Raysal Member Posts: 45
edited December 2019 in Young With Breast Cancer

are there any cancer survivors who had IDC er/pr+ in their thirties, declined chemo, and currently a survivor 10+ years out? So basically looking for women who survived cancer over 10 years despite not taking chemo even though they were in their thirties when cancer hit.

Just looking for inspiration and hope. I know many women move on once they go past treatment so even if you know someone please mention it. Many of the survivorship stories I read are for women who had cancer when they were over 40.


Comments

  • JoE777
    JoE777 Member Posts: 628
    edited November 2018

    are you taking AIs

  • Raysal
    Raysal Member Posts: 45
    edited November 2018

    joe777 I havent started treatment yet. Its suggested by my BS that most likely I'll be on tamoxifen and take rads but they need to do the oncotype testing once I transfer to the oncologist. They're waiting for my lumpectomy re-excision pathology report.

    I'm just curious because I keep reading how the outlook for those under 40 isnt so great and how it's more aggressive. So I'm wondering whether how hard I need to fight the cancer. I want to be around and watch my kids grow.

  • BCFighter2017
    BCFighter2017 Member Posts: 45
    edited November 2018

    I was 34 when diagnosed and initially i was also looking to avoid chemo.

    My onco told me that in younger age cancer tends to be aggressive and in my case chemo worked as it shrunk the tumor in 2 treatments (neo adjuvant) that resulted in more breast conservation ( I had lumpectomy)

    I know my friends mother denied chemo and she is doing fine but again she is over 60's and her cancer was stage 1



  • Dreamers1989
    Dreamers1989 Member Posts: 26
    edited November 2018

    I think it depends on your pathology really. Younger women tend to have more aggressive cancer because their pathology is more aggressive or because they were diagnosed when things had progressed. Younger women are less likely to have regular mammograms etc especially if not genetically predisposed. So by the time we find it or feel it it’s progressed beyond stage 1. I’m in my thirties but I didn’t decline chemo. My MO actually advised against it.

    Having said that I do know a lady that’s 10 years out and had radiation only!!!:)

  • Palesa2018
    Palesa2018 Member Posts: 140
    edited January 2019
  • nem126
    nem126 Member Posts: 109
    edited April 2019

    I'm 34 and 2 years out... did not have chemo. I had a lumpectomy, radiation, and am now on tamoxifen.

    I was stage 1, oncotype score of 16 I believe, and my oncologist advised against chemo. There have been a lot of recent studies saying chemo is not usually necessary for stage 1, as it hasn't moved into your lymph nodes. (however, tumor type and her 2 etc also play into that decision... and it's all very personal).

    For me, they thought the benefit was very little compared to the risks and side effects.

    Again, I'm only 2 years out but I'm doing very well. Looking at taking a break from tamoxifen to hopefully conceive this year. We shall see.

    I'd love to hear from 10+ year survivors too! I know they are out there!!


  • Salamandra
    Salamandra Member Posts: 1,444
    edited April 2019

    I could be wrong, but I think that 10+ years ago, chemo was pretty much standard of care for younger women with breast cancer. The genomic tests like Oncotype and mammaprint weren't so well proven/common then. That might make it harder to find the women you're looking for.

    Did your doctor offer you chemo with the 13 oncotype score? Mine did not. She said she would have insisted on it if I'd had any node involvement though.

  • Adelozier
    Adelozier Member Posts: 84
    edited April 2019
  • Valentina7268279
    Valentina7268279 Member Posts: 74
    edited April 2019

    I also didn't have chemo... they said, it was not necessary..@nem126 how big was your tumor?

  • MirandaPriestly
    MirandaPriestly Member Posts: 28
    edited April 2019

    I am 2 years, 8 months NED and also did not have chemo (agree with previous poster who said you will have a hard time finding 10+ year survivors who did not have chemo since it was the standard of care back then for young women). I was dx'd at 31 years old with IDC ER/PR+, HER2-, Stage 1B, Grade 1 and my oncotype was 0. My mammaprint was low, as well. I think I remember my MO saying that for oncotype 0-18 he would not recommend chemo. I decided to get a BMX in order to avoid radiation and the regular scans which went with the lumpectomy and I also will take tamoxifen for 10 years, but am going to take a break soon to try for a baby.

    I do know a few women who were diagnosed in their early 30s who are now mid 60s and early 70s. I guess I'm not sure if they had chemo (probably yes?), but either way they are well and have not had a recurrence.

  • VioletKali
    VioletKali Member Posts: 243
    edited May 2019

    I was DX 3 weeks shy of my 32nd birthday. I quit chemo.AND eventually stoppes Herceptin. I had a bilateral nipple sparing mastectomy. I declined Anti hormonals...i am still alive and well.

    I will be 37 in July.. :)

    5 YEARS survivor.

  • Margun
    Margun Member Posts: 419
    edited May 2019

    violetkali- your story is so encouraging. You had Her2positive timoré and survived it without even completing chimo. But you did mastectomy. How long was the recovery time? My surgeon suggest lumpectomy. She says no difference in outcome with her2

  • Mabs
    Mabs Member Posts: 36
    edited May 2019

    hello girls, i was dx at 36, while doing my medical check up to ger pregnant again (i have a girl that was 2 at dx and is 7 now). I am 40 now. Bmx, no rads, no chemo, tamox and zoladex. Oncotype 11. Almost 5 years since dx and doing fine. Confident that i made the right decision not to do chemo. I hope to live a lot, to see my girl grow up and have her own babies... i will try to conceive again if my periods came back after ending treatment september this year! Wish you all the best! Live long and prosper!

  • Margun
    Margun Member Posts: 419
    edited May 2019

    mabs- your Mo gave you the option or you went agains it’s recommandation to do chimo

  • Tmh0921
    Tmh0921 Member Posts: 714
    edited May 2019

    Dx at 27 years old in 1999. Had a few scares along the way, and currently waiting for a biopsy on a new lump, but I'm at 19+ years and counting


    BTW, I've also had two babies post BC Dx

  • Palesa2018
    Palesa2018 Member Posts: 140
    edited May 2019

    thanks for sharing tmh0921. That is really encouraging. I feel insecure sometimes about no chemo. It was discouraged due to low oncotype (12) in my case.

    All the best and I wish you well with your tests. Let us know how it goes.

  • Tmh0921
    Tmh0921 Member Posts: 714
    edited May 2019

    In 1999 they didn't do oncotype testing, and were just starting the HER2 testing. I was honestly shocked when my oncologist (and tumor board) recommended no chemo. At the time, I felt like they were ripping a safety net away from me. In the long run, however, it appears to have been the right decision.

  • Mabs
    Mabs Member Posts: 36
    edited May 2019

    Margun, my doctor said no chemo for me. Oncotype of 11 was decisive on that.

  • Margun
    Margun Member Posts: 419
    edited July 2019

    what is the difference between the nipple sparing mastectomy and Goldilocks mastectomy

  • Lvp84
    Lvp84 Member Posts: 6
    edited December 2019

    this is a really interesting thread, want to bump to see if we get anymore? Recently diagnosed at 35 and waiting on Oncotype to make an informed decision

  • Mabs
    Mabs Member Posts: 36
    edited December 2019

    This year at SABCS, they released another part of TAILORX, confirming that oncotype test predicts recurrence in younger women as well as in older women.

Categories