Take the Fright Out of Breast Cancer™

Options
1121314151618»

Comments

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited November 2017

    Hi All,

    Yes, we will start a new thread tomorrow for new BCO things coming up, where we could recruit members for feedback. This will include looking for people to review designs, funding campaigns, etc. While we'd love EVERYONE'S feedback on the new design, we hope you understand that this could be seriously overwhelming .

    We had 20 community members user-test the first ideas - in our Philadelphia and New York offices. We are having 20 + members look at some images this week to provide some feedback. We'll be recruiting around 20+ members to user-test a first developed version in the next two weeks, which will be done via Zoom, so we'll be able to open it up to folks outside of our region. And then another 20 members with the next iterations, and so on.

    So, in other words, we really find the 1:1/small group intimate user-testing much more beneficial as we test navigation. This enables us to involve as many invested community members as possible throughout the process, and hear/incorporate their ideas.

    At the same time, we'll be reaching out to community members to gather opinions (again either in small group fashion over Zoom or 1:1) about our funding campaigns, and other going's on we are considering.

    We have a very large, amazing and talented community, and we want to tap into as many people's insights as possible. With great appreciation and admiraton! The Mods and BCO Team

    (and, as always, open to hearing your thoughts!)

  • Traveltext
    Traveltext Member Posts: 2,089
    edited November 2017


    This is excellent news.


  • kathindc
    kathindc Member Posts: 2,042
    edited December 2017

    Just got an email from BCO. They need $2.5 million to rebuild the site over the next 18 months. They want help reaching thei phase one goal of $500,000 by December 31.

  • Hopeful82014
    Hopeful82014 Member Posts: 3,480
    edited December 2017

    Is it just me or does that $2.5 million figure seem awfully high?

  • Traveltext
    Traveltext Member Posts: 2,089
    edited December 2017

    Any amount could be spent on this site. But until we understand what is intended it's impossible to assess that figure.

    My point has always been that a Silicon Valley outfit would do the work pro bono.


  • Spookiesmom
    Spookiesmom Member Posts: 9,568
    edited December 2017

    thought that’s why they had that awful fundraiser.

  • Artista964
    Artista964 Member Posts: 530
    edited December 2017

    why do they need to rebuild this site? I think it's just fine. 2.5 mil? Wow. Does sound too high. Wouldn't it be cheaper to create a new site and when done link it to move people over?

  • Artista964
    Artista964 Member Posts: 530
    edited December 2017

    pro bono or for cheaper..

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited December 2017

    Hello All,

    We would welcome the opportunity to share with you and discuss our plans and reasons for the rebuilding of Breastcancer.org.

    To learn more, please join us for a real-time discussion on Wednesday, January 17th @ 12 noon ET. We will follow-up in early January with video-conference details.

    We look forward to connecting with you all soon and wish you happy holidays.

    Thanks!

    Melissa
  • nihahi
    nihahi Member Posts: 3,841
    edited December 2017

    Wasn't there supposed to be a "boob-fun-filled" Halloween frolic to raise these funds?

    Wasn't there supposed to be a new thread started to continue this conversation?

    Why can't the plans just be "put out there" for the entire community to see?


  • Lisey
    Lisey Member Posts: 1,053
    edited December 2017

    Nihahi, because this is NOT a democracy and frankly when you put something to a large group, EVERYONE will hate something. I advise clients to just stick with the major shareholder/decision makers on things like this because otherwise things would take forever and never get off the ground.

  • Lisey
    Lisey Member Posts: 1,053
    edited December 2017

    I think what bothers me most is everyone posting and complaining are using a FREE SERVICE and not doing any work to actually make it happen. Sure some of us donate, (and I'm one who has) but it's simply to say thank you for the forum. Why do people feel they have a dog in this website when they only 'use' it for their own benefit? If you hate what BCO becomes, leave. If enough people leave, BCO will evolve to the market they are targeting but this community forum is NOT the market... This community is a HUGE donation to US... let's be grateful rather than so damn complaining.

  • Artista964
    Artista964 Member Posts: 530
    edited December 2017

    i think this site is easy and fine as is. Adding more bells and whistles which usually is when doing overhaul. I like simple, not so many go here for this and that then trying to get back to where you were is more steps. Jmo

  • Hopeful82014
    Hopeful82014 Member Posts: 3,480
    edited December 2017

    I agree with Rosabella. While there are a few tweaks that might be welcome, I don't see that a major overhaul is needed, nor do I see the value of investing $2.5 million in doing so. That seems almost obscene to me.

  • Traveltext
    Traveltext Member Posts: 2,089
    edited December 2017

    We're being asked to help and make suggestions on a site revamp, so those of us who want to will no doubt do this. That the existing site is OK is another valid opinion. Lisey, we are making the community section of this site interesting, informative, and popular by being active participants in all the many threads. That is the work that makes this site happen. In any case, BCO is a charity that receives funding from the very pharmaceutical companies that supply the drugs that treat us, so I don't believe we have to feel guilty about whether we are financial supporters or not.


  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited December 2017

    $2.5 million, for something that most likely could be done pro bono? $2.5 million, to rebuild a site that is not broken and is in fact working quite well? Yikes, that does bear explaining.

    I agree with Nihahi that if BCO are interested in sharing information about their plans, it would be preferable if they could post the information here on the discussion board so that everyone can easily access the information at the time of their own choosing. Of course it's BCO's choice to share this information or not.

    Lisey, as someone who has been on the board almost 12 years and who has over 8,900 posts, I can assure you that I have not been using this site for my own benefit. That may have been true for the first 6 months I was here, but since them, most of my posts have been written for the assistance of others. The time and effort I have put into my responses over these years has been my 'donation' to this site.

    This discussion board would not exist but for the contributions of people like Traveltext, nihahi, BarredOwl, marie5890, MTwoman, MelissaDallas, djmammo, Annette47, SpecialK, ElaineTherese, Exbrnxgrl, Binney4 and the dozens of other people who selflessly take the time to write posts that offer advice, support and comfort, and who do the research and digging to provide helpful and accurate information to all the men and women who come to this site every day with their questions. To suggest that these people, and all the others who contribute here, are "not doing any work to actually make it happen" is astonishing.

    No offense to the people who run breastcancer.org, but frankly when it comes to the rest of the site, I've found other sites that I feel have more thorough, accurate, up-to-date, and helpful information about all the various aspects of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. So to me, this community forum is what BCO is all about and the forum simply wouldn't exist as it does today, as a thriving discussion board, without the active participation of the board members. Therefore we are the biggest stakeholders in this community forum. We are the community. That's why I agree with Nihahi that BCO should put the information out in a way that it can be easily accessed by all of us who participate on this discussion board. And that's why I think we have every right to voice our opinions, raise concerns when we have them, and offer suggestions as to what we believe will and won't work as the site is updated and changed.

    In the end, however, BCO own this site, and they make the rules and they get to decide. Of course.

    Edited to Add: I notice that this thread does not appear in "Active Topics". I guess that's BCO's way to limit discussion on these issues.


  • Traveltext
    Traveltext Member Posts: 2,089
    edited December 2017

    QUOTE:

    Nov 13, 2017 08:44AM - edited Nov 13, 2017 09:06AM by Moderators

    Hi All,

    Yes, we will start a new thread tomorrow for new BCO things coming up, where we could recruit members for feedback. This will include looking for people to review designs, funding campaigns, etc.


    Mods, did I miss this new thread?


  • ceanna
    ceanna Member Posts: 5,270
    edited December 2017

    traveltext. Yes, they did start a new thread in Nov. I missed it too as I was out of town for a couple of days and it only had 2 replies. I privately asked the moderators after a couple of weeks of not seeing they had started a new thread. Here's the link Provide feedback/advice about our site and campaigns?! It might be beneficial if this discussion moved to that thread so we can retire this particularly unpopular thread subject line. I'll post this same message to that thread to put it in the active list.

    I am very disappointed BCO has made no effort to update us (those of us who participated in the last online video conference) and everyone else after the Nov. video chat, but I hope to attend the proposed Jan. video chat to learn more, and, I hope, encourage BCO to actually, meaningfully, hear our voices. They keep talking about how much it will cost, but we still do not have an idea of what they are changing, after telling us in November we would have opportunities for input. I, too, think this model works well for us, and like several have mentioned, we little use the medical portions of the BCO site and keep coming back to the discussion boards to help others newly diagnosed.

    Edited to make the link work.

  • kathindc
    kathindc Member Posts: 2,042
    edited December 2017

    Thank you ceanna for the link. It would have been nice if the Mods had put that info here and then made this thread unavailable for posting. Keeping those of us who were active on this topic in the dark was one way not to get the feedback they are asking for from us.

    While I found this site useful, I must say that I, too,found the same information on other sites. What attracted me to BCO is the help so many members were willing to give. What keeps me coming back is the camaraderie.

  • nihahi
    nihahi Member Posts: 3,841
    edited December 2017

    Thank you ceanna for the link.

    Lisey...there is so much in your 2 posts that I disagree with, on so many levels, that I sense there is little benefit to even attempt to respond to you, other than to say this...shut up and blindly accept what "decision makers" want to do is a dangerous policy...and not just on BCO. FYI...on the new thread, the mods specifically ask for conversation and input.


    Beesie...thank you for another well written and insightful post.

    Mods...if you want to move this topic to a new thread, I agree that locking this thread and providing a link is the best way to do so.


  • Traveltext
    Traveltext Member Posts: 2,089
    edited December 2017
  • Spookiesmom
    Spookiesmom Member Posts: 9,568
    edited December 2017

    not everyone is on FB.

  • Hopeful82014
    Hopeful82014 Member Posts: 3,480
    edited December 2017

    Well, I took a look at that video on facebook and did not find it compelling in the least. If that's a sample of the caliber of work they intend for this site I can state right now that I wouldn't expect to find it any more useful that its current form.

  • Wildplaces
    Wildplaces Member Posts: 864
    edited December 2017

    ... the "decision makers" are not going to be able to make ANY decision if they do not achieve at least a good chunk of the projected donation funds.

    I think that is the nuts and bolts of this case.

    And saying ignore all opinion of those with breast cancer and the men and women who treat them is absurd.

    Worse, it does not work!

    Back to two questions:

    1. What if any changes would benefit the site?

    2. What is the most cost effective and time efficient way of achieving this?

    Adding a note on future direction - can BCO, and does it want to as part of its mission, expand its role outside the site in a meaningful and above all measurable, transparent way?



  • kathindc
    kathindc Member Posts: 2,042
    edited December 2017

    Lisey, if this bothers you so much, why do you come back to it. Are we not allowed to voice a differing opinion if we find something like this campaign distasteful? I was going to ask this before when you didn't like the way the discussion was going and came down on everyone but thought twice about it but now I must ask: Do you or did you or a family relative work for BCO? Your negativity toward those who voiced valid concerns leads me to that conclusion. Just saying.

  • Spookiesmom
    Spookiesmom Member Posts: 9,568
    edited December 2017
  • Artista964
    Artista964 Member Posts: 530
    edited December 2017

    exactly. It's one thing to make changes, it's your site, but to ask us to help you get 2.5 mil is nuts. Most of us are in a financial crunch and with possibly cuts to the so called entitlements which we as workers paid into, i find this absurd. Like i said, imo the site is fine. Raise funds to donate to metavivor.

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited December 2017

    Locking now. To continue this conversation, please go to: Provide feedback/advice about our site and campaigns?!

Categories