freaking out

Options
fredntan
fredntan Member Posts: 1,821

I am going to a RO tomorrow up at johns hopkins and was getting all my cd roms/local reports together and I was looking at my very first initial bx

and it says Her2 2+ by IHC,EQUIVICAL, FISH PENDING.

I'm picking up my reports from my local MO today, and have call out to myMO nurse to look this up for me.

I thought I was ER+,PR+ and Her2 negative. I mean there's nothing wrong with being Her 2+ but if I am I would have liked to be treated for it. 

Does this change with final breast pathologies. I've never actually looked very long at those reports, because I don't have copies.

Comments

  • Alirena
    Alirena Member Posts: 82
    edited February 2012

    My first pathology report came back HER2 2+ but my FISH showed I was HER2 negative. 

  • Outfield
    Outfield Member Posts: 1,109
    edited February 2012

    This result is common.  2+  is on a scale, it doesn't mean the same as simply saying "positive." 

    Lots of things in medicine are graded as 0 (not present), 1+ (a little), 2+ (more) 3+ (a lot).  It's a very vague way of describing something. The 2+ means you had some, but not a lot, of HER2 expressed on your cells.  It's my understanding that a huge number of cancers have a small-medium amount of HER2.  3+ would mean you had a lot, and I don't know if they'd even need to do the FISH, which is a different kind of test.  If you have a 2+ (medium) amount on the cells and are FISH negative, that qualifies you as "HER2 negative" when those terms are used to determine if  Herceptin is to be used.  At this point, cancers with this pattern do not qualify for Herceptin treatment (except in a clinical trial).  

    In a way, it's kind of like saying ER+ or ER-, when really the situation is more complicated.  Some tumours are only 10% ER+, some (like mine) pretty much entirely ER+, but those nuances get lost when the description of the tumour characteristics gets shortened. 

    I hope this is helpful.   

  • fredntan
    fredntan Member Posts: 1,821
    edited February 2012

    oh yes thank you.

  • TectonicShift
    TectonicShift Member Posts: 752
    edited March 2013

    That's right.

    50% of BC is Her 1+ or Her 2+, which is still considered "Her negative" even though it is really in actuality "low Her."

    Only 25% is Her 3+ which is considered "Her positive" and currently eligible for Herceptin.

    There is a clinical trial right now testing whether Herceptin also works on and is warranted for Her 1+ and Her 2+.  

  • fredntan
    fredntan Member Posts: 1,821
    edited February 2012

    Oh I did. I can't remember what it was but I think my her was +1. Crazy how I can work myself into a tizzy. I really have to get a life. Go back to work in march. I am so ready

Categories