Conflicting path reports

Options
SunCrystal
SunCrystal Member Posts: 14

I am 48 and diagnosed with BC 2 months ago and had a mastectomy 3 weeks ago.  The path report from the needle biopsy said I was HER-2 positive (FISH results=3.3) but the path report on the tumor following surgery says I am HER-2 negative (FISH=1.46).  We are having both sets of slides retested with a 3rd lab.  Both labs confirm I am ER- and PR-. Has anyone ever of such different path results?  Are false positives or false negatives for HER-2 more likely?  This has major implications for treatment and so we've had to delay the start of chemo until we know whether it should include herceptin.  

Comments

  • ReadingMama
    ReadingMama Member Posts: 573
    edited October 2011

    My reports were also conflicting.  First one said no, secong one said yes.  My MO said as long as there was ANY indication of Her2+, I should take Herceptin. As I understand b/c these tumors are so aggressive and Herceptin really substantially increases the trmt response.  I don't know my FISH numbers off hand.

  • SpecialK
    SpecialK Member Posts: 16,486
    edited October 2011

    suncrystal - different parts or areas of the same tissue can yield different path results.  Generally speaking, the post-op path report is more conclusive than the biopsy because the biopsy samples are so small.  I don't even know if I would feel comfortable with a 2 out of 3 thing, if you did have a positive Her2neu at some point. 

  • lovetosail
    lovetosail Member Posts: 544
    edited October 2011

    I had HER2+ and HER2- sections in my tumor.  I agree with thoughts above, I'd push for Herceptin if you have had a + her2 result, even if some results were negative. good luck with your treatment!

  • SunCrystal
    SunCrystal Member Posts: 14
    edited October 2011
    Well, due to a bunch of screw-ups at the labs who were supposed to send unstained slides for the 3rd independent pathologist to repeat the FISH test, I had to start chemo without a definitive answer on whether I am HER+ or HER-.   I am taking dose dense AC every 2 weeks for 4 sessions with Taxol to follow for 12 weeks and they can add the Herceptin in with the Taxol if the final results indicate I am HER2+.  My oncologist felt that we should not go more than 6 weeks after my surgery to start chemo and she would have had me start chemo in Week 3 had the initial biopsy indicated I was HER2-.This has been the most stressful week of my life.  Even more stressful than finding out I had breast cancer.  It's the not knowing the results of tests which make you unable to persue the best course of treatment but have to go with a compromise.  At least I will be able to add Herceptin if the final tests indicate it is warrented.
  • bak94
    bak94 Member Posts: 1,846
    edited October 2011

    I know my onc would push for the herceptin. He wanted to do herceptin even though mine is +2 or mayb e it was +1, I forget now!, he said there is some thought that it still can do some good. I did neo chemo and my path report will be redone after my surgery to confirm. I don't think my insurance will pay for herceptin if I am negative.

  • SunCrystal
    SunCrystal Member Posts: 14
    edited November 2011

    I've now had 5 FISH tests done and the final conclusion is that my tumor is heterogeneous.  The 2 FISH tests (at 2 different labs) of the post-op tumor were HER2- and the 3 tests (at 2 different labs) done of the biopsy were HER2+.   My oncologist initially thought that the biospy results were wrong but when an independent lab confirmed HER2+, she has changed her mind about my treatment and will be adding Herceptin to the Taxol.  I'm glad to finally have this resolved and glad to be getting Herceptin.

Categories