Oncotype DX score Large West German Study...Interesting!

Options
voraciousreader
voraciousreader Member Posts: 7,496
edited June 2014 in Stage I Breast Cancer
Genomic Health Announces Multiple Studies Highlighting Important Role of Oncotype DX® in Treating the Underlying Biology of Early-Stage Breast CancerThis press release is provided by the company detailed in the release.
The information has not been verified by MedPage Today.

SAN ANTONIO, Dec. 13, 2010 /PRNewswire/ -- Genomic Health, Inc. (Nasdaq: GHDX) today announced results from seven new studies focusing on its multigene Oncotype DX(®) breast cancer test, which has helped guide treatment decisions in more than 175,000 breast cancer patients worldwide.  The data, presented this past week at the 33rd Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS), further confirm the clinical value associated with the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in accurately predicting chemotherapy benefit and recurrence risk in early-stage breast cancer patients. 

"We provide optimal care to breast cancer patients when we treat the underlying biology of their individual tumors," said Steven Shak, MD, chief medical officer of Genomic Health.  "Over the past seven years, multiple studies have established the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score(®) as the most accurate prognostic and predictive measure of the underlying tumor biology, identifying high Recurrence Score and low Recurrence Score disease across the continuum of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.  The data presented at last week's meeting confirm that traditional clinical, pathologic and biological parameters cannot predict the Recurrence Score."

Highlights from the seven studies presented this week by Genomic Health and research collaborators include:

Meta-analysis of Seven Studies Reinforces Significance of Recurrence Score in Changing Treatment Decisions in Early Stage Breast Cancer

  • A meta-analysis of seven studies with a total of 912 patients presented in a poster session demonstrated a consistent and large impact of the Recurrence Score on breast cancer adjuvant treatment decisions.  In these studies, physicians who use Oncotype DX in clinical practice changed their treatment decisions in over a third of patients, leading to an overall reduction in chemotherapy use of approximately 28 percent with the use of the Recurrence Score.  It is equally important to note that the Recurrence Score led to the addition of chemotherapy to hormonal treatment in approximately 4 percent of patients who, prior to the Recurrence Score, were considered low risk but, were subsequently identified as having high Recurrence Score disease.  The results of this meta-analysis indicate that the Recurrence Score provides key information for treatment decision-making that cannot be ascertained from traditional measures. 

Oncotype DX Recurrence Score is the Best Predictor of Chemotherapy Benefit in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer

  • An analysis, presented during a general session on Friday, December 10, showed that the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score used alone remains the recommended method to predict relative chemotherapy benefit in estrogen receptor-positive, node negative breast cancer.  Researchers from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), a Pittsburgh-based research network, together with Genomic Health, analyzed the value of the Recurrence Score-Pathology-Clinical (RSPC) risk assessment in predicting chemotherapy benefit.  The RSPC integrates the Recurrence Score and clinical-pathologic factors, including tumor size, tumor grade and age to assess distant recurrence risk in early-stage patients.  RSPC has been shown to refine Recurrence Score assessment of distant recurrence risk or prognosis, especially for intermediate risk Recurrence Scores.  The findings demonstrated that the Recurrence Score (interaction p=0.037) predicted chemotherapy treatment benefit, while the RSPC (interaction p=0.10) did not improve prediction of chemotherapy benefit over Recurrence Score alone.  Neither tumor size (interaction p=0.32), tumor grade (interaction p=0.65) nor patient age (interaction p=0.22) was a significant predictor of chemotherapy benefit. Thus, while incorporation of traditional clinical and pathologic factors can improve the prognostic value of the Recurrence Score, these factors do not improve the ability of the Recurrence Score to predict relative chemotherapy benefit.

Patient Age Does Not Predict Individual Tumor Biology

  • In a study to determine whether age helps predict individual tumor biology, researchers examined the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score and the molecular expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor , HER2, and the proliferation-related genes among 145,236 estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers.  While study findings presented in a poster session showed that the Recurrence Score is slightly higher in breast cancers from younger patients (<40 years old) and lower in older patients (>70 years old), a wide range of Recurrence Score results were observed in all age groups.  The results demonstrate the importance of standardized quantitative gene expression measurement delivered by the Recurrence Score, and that patient age alone does not capture the differences in the underlying individual tumor biology as the Recurrence Score does.

Preliminary Findings from Large West German Study Group Trial Indicate that Oncotype DX Recurrence Score Cannot be Predicted by Other Biomarkers

  • Initial data from the prospective, multicenter West German Study Group (WSG) Plan B trial presented in a poster session examined the relationship between tumor grade and the tumor immunohistochemistry biomarker, Ki-67, and the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score.  As reported previously, there was a very weak correlation between central grade and the Recurrence Score as well as between Ki-67 and the Recurrence Score (correlation coefficients less than 0.40 for both).  There were many patients with high grade and/or high Ki-67 and low Recurrence Score values.  Neither tumor grade nor Ki-67 can predict the Recurrence Score status.
  • An additional analysis of preliminary data from the WSG Plan B trial was presented in a separate poster session, and for the first time, compared risk groups using the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score and the invasion markers uPA (urokinase-type plasminogen activator) and its inhibitor PAI-1 (plasminogen activator inhibitor 1).  uPA/PAI-1 was available in 131 of the 1,534 patients who had Recurrence Score results.  Preliminary findings demonstrated a weak correlation between both uPA and PAI-1 and the Recurrence Score (correlation coefficients less than 0.30 for both).  These initial results indicate that uPA/PAI-1 cannot predict the Recurrence Score.  Additional recruitment and outcome assessment of the ongoing multicenter WSG Plan B trial will address the clinical significance of these initial findings.

"Based on my experience using Oncotype DX in clinical practice for the past six years, it is clear that by using only standard pathology variables, you often cannot predict the Recurrence Score without this well validated, standardized quantitative gene expression test," said Kathy S. Albain M.D., FACP, Professor of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Health System, Maywood, Il.  "Just as it is critical to identify every HER2 and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patient for treatment selection, it is equally important to identify every patient with high Recurrence Score disease so that they can be considered for chemotherapy, and every patient with low Recurrence Score disease so that they can avoid chemotherapy and consider treatment with hormonal therapy alone."

In addition to the studies highlighted above, Genomic Health presented findings from two other analyses in poster sessions at SABCS, including:

  • A study analyzing the patterns of gene expression measured by Oncotype DX observed in classic and variant forms of lobular carcinoma in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients identified a wide variation in gene expression in each histologic subtype.
  • A study evaluating whether the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score evolves following exposure to neoadjuvant chemotherapy suggests that use of the test to provide prognostic information for breast cancer recurrence in this setting warrants further study.
About MedPage Today®MedPage Today is the only medical news service for physicians that links consumer medical news and the professional medical analysis needed by clinicians. Through our daily coverage of breaking medical stories and topics widely reported in the consumer media, we provide clinicians with the real-time information they need to address their patients' questions and to find out how new developments might impact their clinical practice.
Hematology NewsASH: New Agent Helpful in Rare Bleeding Disorder 12/7/10
ASH: Compound Cuts Death Risk for Sickle Cell Kids 12/5/10
FDA Okays First RANKL Bone-Strength Drug 11/19/10
Off-Label Use of Clotting Factor Remains Unproven 11/19/10
Blood Doping Now a Problem in Cancer Trials 10/20/10
ESMO: First-Line Erlotinib Improves NSCLC Outcomes 10/10/10
Rituximab Ups Survival in CLL 9/30/10
MDS Remission Often Isn't 9/9/10
WFH: Cost of Clotting Factors Affects Treatment 7/15/10
WFH: Bone Mineral Density No Problem in Hemophilia 7/14/10
Mo

Comments

  • LtotheK
    LtotheK Member Posts: 2,095
    edited December 2010

    Hello, voraciousreader, as am I!  This is fascinating.  What is doesn't address, and I'm dying to know, is where Oncotype stands on the shift in scores.  My score of 12 was considered borderline low/intermediate thanks to the Tailor X trial shift.  They don't mention that in this study!

Categories