Mistletoe Treatment

Hi,

I am just wondering if anyone has heard about mistletoe treatment for cancer. Any research, any comments etc.

Thank you.

Comments

  • Husband11
    Husband11 Member Posts: 2,264
    edited November 2010

    Was looking into it.  It's available from Naturopathic Doctors.  There are several brand names of product from Europe.  Isquador or something like that is the name of the most well known brand.  Sounds like worst case scenario is the local injection site irritation.  No good clinical trials showing its effectiveness though.  Supposed to train the immune system to attack the cancer.

  • thenewme
    thenewme Member Posts: 1,611
    edited November 2010

    Hi Suzmor,

    Here are a few links regarding mistletoe (Iscador) to get you started:

    Sloan-Kettering

    MD Anderson

  • Husband11
    Husband11 Member Posts: 2,264
    edited November 2010

    That's unfortunately some pretty weak recommendations.  Basically no properly designed study to show it works.

  • mathteacher
    mathteacher Member Posts: 243
    edited November 2010

    Iscador is the most commonly used oncology drug in Germany and is coverered by insurance there. If you want a list of Iscador practitioners contact http://www.iscador.com/index.aspx

  • hymil
    hymil Member Posts: 826
    edited November 2010

    Well i didn't know you could use mistletoe in that way... but seeing the thread title, I was just thinking a pre-seasonal hug could be quite therapeutic.....  :) holistic, complimentary and just a bit alternative.... oh i love this site!

  • thenewme
    thenewme Member Posts: 1,611
    edited November 2010

    Hi Timothy,

    You said, "That's unfortunately some pretty weak recommendations. Basically no properly designed study to show it works. "

    Precisely!

  • LtotheK
    LtotheK Member Posts: 2,095
    edited November 2010

    If it is the most commonly used drug in Germany, there must be studies.  Anyone know where the European ones are?

  • Husband11
    Husband11 Member Posts: 2,264
    edited November 2010

    The studies I've seen have the significant weakness of them "pairing" the results of an individual who is treated with another person of similar diagnostic stage, grade, etc and comparing the two.  This is all done retrospectively, ie after their deaths.  They claim dramatic results, but when you read it they are comparing someone who lived 5 months with treatment vs someone who lived 3 months w/o treatment and saying the two were comparable cases.  Its not the true random assignment of treatment or double blind that is the gold standard for science to make the treatment the only variable.

  • mathteacher
    mathteacher Member Posts: 243
    edited November 2010

    Timothy, the "gold standard" randomised double blind placebo control has never been used for conventional chemotherapy either. It's never been used for radiation either.

    If you want to use a criterion for validation you need to apply it both standard and non-standard medicine equally, no?

  • Mandy1313
    Mandy1313 Member Posts: 1,692
    edited November 2010

    I don't know much about Iscador, but I did have an integrative doctor suggest that I read about it and consider it.

  • Husband11
    Husband11 Member Posts: 2,264
    edited November 2010

    Mathteacher, there are many randomized, sometimes double blind clinical trials for comparing various chemotherapy regimins.  Especially the latest generation drugs.   Many completed, many under way.  Just do a search on clinical trials, you will see comparison of all sorts of drugs from antimitotics to monoclonal antibodies and they are all random assignment, many double blind.  Canada, US, worldwide.  The bisphosponate trial is double blind randomized, so is the upcoming metformin trial.  There are also trial involving new radiation technologies that are randomized assignment.  I think the beef with the iscador data is that they picked and chose who got it, and simply compared it to data from other patients they attempt to match as similar.  Sounds reasonable if the results were outstandingly better, but it sounds weak for the actual data of comparing somone who lived a couple of months longer than another person.  Probably only statistically significant if you have very large numbers, and then its still subject to the weakness of who chose to take it and who you compare them to.  Too subjective to be definitive.  I don't think I'd argue the effectiveness based on other therapies that are also untested objectively.  The question is whether iscador works, not whether old school chemo was tested properly.  New regimins of chemo are most definitely randomized tested for comparison to old chemo regimins.  As I mentioned, just do a search of clinical trials and see for yourself.  There are 100's of randomized trials done and underway.

     As for Iscador, I hope it works for anyone who tries it.  It's probably relatively safe.

Categories