ADH with ALH

Options
missz
missz Member Posts: 55

Comments

  • missz
    missz Member Posts: 55
    edited January 2008

    I had an excisional biopsy of a 1 cm mass in May. Not cancer but both ALH and ADH present. Recommended was a screening schedule of alternating mammos and MRIs every six months. My insurance company is refusing to cover the MRI. I am trying to find every avenue of what it means to have both- seems to definitely elevate risk. Any advice? My family history isn't too scary- but mom with colon cancer at 55 and grandmom with BC at 70. Insurance will cover me if I test positive for BRCA - but I truly believe that would be enormous trouble with insurance later.

  • leaf
    leaf Member Posts: 8,188
    edited January 2008

    Yes, it does elevate risk, but the amount of risk may be difficult to assess.



    I have LCIS, ALH, and DH ( the DH being without atypia), and a weak family history. Grandmom had postmenopausal bc, aunt (other side) had postmenopausal bc.



    The ACS recommendations for MRI are in this article. http://caonline.amcancersoc.org/cgi/content/full/57/2/75

    This is their recommendations

    Insufficient Evidence to Recommend for or Against MRI Screening

    Lifetime risk 15–20%, as defined by BRCAPRO or other models that are largely dependent on family history

    Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) or atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH)

    Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH)

    Heterogeneously or extremely dense breast on mammography

    Women with a personal history of breast cancer, including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)



    This is probably why your insurance company is refusing.If you want to find some information about the risk of bc in a study, you may find this interesting.

    http://community.breastcancer.org/topic/47/conversation/653988?page=1#idx_25



    It is the SOLE reference given in the ACS paper about MRI screening.



    Note that at Sloan Kettering, even for women with LCIS, which almost certainly imposes a higher risk for bc than women with atypia only, the monitoring is yearly mammos and biannual clinical exams.



    BTW, I went for genetic COUNSELING (not testing), and she opined that my risk for BRCA was about 2%, which is about the risk of an average Ashkenazi Jewish woman.



    As you see from the conversation, I was told I shouldn't have MRI even as a baseline from a major university due to too much scar tissue.

  • cayenneblue32
    cayenneblue32 Member Posts: 78
    edited January 2008

    My sister was just diagnosed with ALH, and because of the fact that I have bc, they will be doing the screening your doctor recommends (Mammograms and MRI's, alternating every six months) I don't believe her insurance questioned it, but maybe that's because of my diagnosis.

    From what I've read, and what they have told her, and because of the ALH and my diagnosis, her chance of developing bc is 45% for lifetime risk! Definitely something that an insurance company should pay to monitor.....

    I'd see if your doctor can intervene at all - for you to have both ALH and ADH, I would think that would certainly raise your risk, and need to be monitored. (and I am a strong supporter of MRI's, since my second lump was only found on an MRI (which wasn't even recommended by my doctors), and not seen on the mammogram I had just had two months prior)

    Theresa 

  • missz
    missz Member Posts: 55
    edited January 2008

    Thanks ladies! My doc went to war and got it approved. Love him.

  • cayenneblue32
    cayenneblue32 Member Posts: 78
    edited January 2008

    Excellent!!

    Good luck and I'll be sending CLEAR vibes your way!!  Let us know when you'll be having your scan so we can be there "virtually" with you!

    Theresa 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2008

    missj----ADH and ALH are both precancerous conditions;  they are said to raise your risk by 4 to 5x, or about a 20 to 25% risk.  (I don't think it is raised any further by having both conditions rather than just one or the other).   Most often,  biannual breast exams and yearly mammos are the recommendation, but some docs are now starting to also recommend tamoxifen for prevention of an invasive bc in the future. (depending on any other risk factors that you may or may not have).  You're lucky to have had MRI recommended; I have  a much higher risk (LCIS--8 to 10x--and mom had bc) and it took me nearly 3 years to get my oncologist on board with MRIs.  I've had no problems with insurance coverage, but I'm sure that's because of the elevated  combined risk.
     Talk to your doctor about your overall risk and the risks and benefits of preventative meds.  The good news is you now you know ahead of time and can be vigilant and proactive.
  • missz
    missz Member Posts: 55
    edited January 2008

    Screening is tomorrow morning. Crossed fingers.

    I found studies indicating that both conditions did elevate risk, but others were inconclusive. I will just keep a close watch on the ta-tas.  I am not taking tamoxifen- too many side effects and I want to get pregnant soon.

  • Peaches70
    Peaches70 Member Posts: 210
    edited January 2008

    The other factor in whether MRI may be recommended is density. If you have very dense breasts, MRI is often used.

  • missz
    missz Member Posts: 55
    edited February 2008

    Clear!! Thank G-d. Thanks everyone......

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2008

    that's wonderful news! Just remember to keep up with your breast exams and mammos.

  • cayenneblue32
    cayenneblue32 Member Posts: 78
    edited February 2008

    Wonderful news!!

    Make sure they test you at least yearly!  Like I wrote in my message above, my sister who tested positive for ALH has been told by two separate doctors that her lifetime risk (with my history thrown in) is 45%.......  

    Theresa 

Categories