lymph nodes

Options
Sable1
Sable1 Member Posts: 8

I have a question.  I'm getting my surgery Tuesday and having nodes removed.  My question is if the nodes are fine is there any chance that the cancer has metastasized?

Thanks, Sable

Comments

  • CalGal
    CalGal Member Posts: 469
    edited July 2008

    Hi Sable -

    Unfortunately, yes.   I consider this a DIRTY SECRET of bc.  No medical professional told me that bc can also spread via the blood.   It was only after the fact when I asked, that well, yes, of course, it can spread via the blood in addition to the lymph nodes.  While bc USUALLY spreads to the lymph nodes first (before metastisizing elsewhere), it doesn't always.  

    Just over a year after finishing 38x rad'tn (which was after bi-lat lump's and a clear SNB), I was dx'd with recurr bc, mets to the liver and likely unrelated kidney cancer.  It's been 2-1/2 years  since my mets dx and the lymph nodes in my arm area are still clear!  

    I'm sorry to worry you, but I wish that someone had told me the truth on this matter ...for me, the clear nodes were the deciding factor in only doing rad'tn and not chemo.

    Best to you,

    CalGal 

  • Sable1
    Sable1 Member Posts: 8
    edited July 2008

    Thanks CalGal.  So is there a test that they can do of your blood to detect mets or is that not usually done.  I'm doing chemo and rad after my lump. surgery.  I've also been hearing some ladies do chemo first but then you don't know if it's been in the lymphs or not.  I'm just nervous I guess.  At first when I was diagnosed I thought once the tumor was removed I would be cured.  I now know more then I ever thought I would about bc.

    Thanks, Sable  

  • FloridaLady
    FloridaLady Member Posts: 2,155
    edited July 2008

    Amen CalGal, I wish the were more true-full about how bc spreads.  I had cancer in 56 nodes and was give 3 to 6 mths to live, tha was because they felt the cancer would spread to organ or bone mets immediately.  Thank's to God this was not true.  I'm three years out and have multiple mets but no major mets. I don't think they know as much as they think the do:)

    flalady

  • cheranthia
    cheranthia Member Posts: 65
    edited July 2008

    Hi Sable,

    You are right. Getting BC is such an education-especially in the first few weeks when you have to make vitally important decisions. While you are having tests and waiting for results, everything is unknown and very scary. I remember my imagination ran wild with worry, but then I felt better once we had the official staging and a plan. 

    There are no guarantees and we may never be told we are officially "cured" but being node negative is a very good prognostic indicator. For those of us with TNBC, the chance of recurrence drops considerably after 3 years- not so for those with hormone positive BC. Also, our prognosis is particularly good if we have a pathological complete response to chemo, which is not unusual for us 3N girls.

    FYI, ladies who have chemo before surgery can have their nodes checked first. I had a sentinel node biopsy at the same time my port was implanted. No matter the order you receive your treatment, chemo is known to be a very effective weapon against triple negative BC. 

    I will be thinking of you tomorrow.  

    Cheranthia 

  • NarberthMom
    NarberthMom Member Posts: 615
    edited July 2008

    Actually, our chance of recurrence after three years drops down to the same level as non TNBC patients.  The difference is that we have a much higher rate of recurrence for the first three years. After that, our chances are the same as our hormone-positive sisters.

  • slanderson
    slanderson Member Posts: 152
    edited July 2008

    Right, FLALADY!!

    I think each cancer is different and has its own personality, if you will.  Some cancers grow quickly but do not necessarily spread.  Some don't grow fast, but do move around and metasticize.  So I'm with you, I think the doctors are guessing sometimes, too.

    Shannon

  • Shirlann
    Shirlann Member Posts: 3,302
    edited July 2008

    No, no, Tri-Negs, after 2 to 3 years have WAY less chance of recurrence.  While the other types taper off, Tri-Negs just drop like a stone.  Almost to the point of, if you get by the 2 to 3 years, you are not going to met.

    And, yes, I suspect, that a lot of the women on this site know as much or more about breast cancer than a lot of physicians.  Not medical knowledge, but practical knowledge.

    That is the big problem, if you sat a woman down and told her EVERYTHING that might happen to you with treatment, a lot of women would refuse.  A real dilemma for the docs & oncs, and a real mess for us, too.

    Not knowing what can happen, witness our poster with a lot of positive nodes, they truly do not know what will happen, each woman is so individual and the cancers are not the same and our resistance is not the same and you end up with "I don't know" soup.  That is why it scares people so badly.

    Gentle hugs, Shirlann 

  • cheranthia
    cheranthia Member Posts: 65
    edited July 2008

    In the spirit of sharing whatever good news there is in relation to TNBC, I want to reiterate my understanding of our short and long term prospects. It's especially important for newly diagnosed people to hear whatever positive information is available. While being TN is not at all a good scene, there IS an upside that should not be negated. While we are more likely to have a recurrence in the first 3 years, after that our chances for a recurrence do drop off drastically. This is NOT true for people with hormone positive BC, who remain at high risk. As my onc put it, we're better off in the long run.

    But don't take my (or even his) word for it. Check out the article entitled "Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Features and Patterns of Recurrence" which states, "Compared with other women withbreast cancer, those with triple-negative breast cancer hadan increased likelihood of distant recurrence and deathwithin 5 years of diagnosis but not thereafter. The patternof recurrence was also qualitatively different; among the triple-negativegroup, the risk of distant recurrence peaked at ~3 years anddeclined rapidly thereafter. Among the "other" group, the recurrencerisk seemed to be constant over the period of follow-up."

    Here is a link to the full article: 

    http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/13/15/4429

    Also, listen to the June 4th teleconference on TNBC. Here is a link:

    http://www.cancercare.org/get_help/tew_details.php?tew=breast_060408&ret=%2Fget_help%2Fhelp_by_diagnosis%2Fdiagnosis.php&origin=sendpage</font> 

    Of course, even TNBC is not just one disease. It is a catch-all category based on three things we are NOT. What we ARE is unknown and important differences between us are surfacing. Many of us repond to chemo, but some do not. Some of us have BRCA mutations, some of us do not. Some of us do have recurrences after the 3-year mark and statistics are meaningless if you're the exception. Since what drives TNBC is still a mystery, doctors can only apply their best judgment based on what they DO know. I suppose that's guessing, but it's the best we've got.Frown
    Anyway, I think it's important to maintain a balanced perspective on this beast. 

  • NarberthMom
    NarberthMom Member Posts: 615
    edited July 2008

    Hi!

    Thanks for the citation to the paper.  I've actually read the whole paper and looked at the data.To set the record straight (I actually had it a bit wrong as well), here's a quote from the discussion section:

    "Patients with triplenegative breast cancers experienced high rates of recurrence only in the period from 1 to 4 years after diagnosis. The risk declined rapidly thereafter and no recurrences occurred after 8 years of follow-up. In the other group, the risk of recurrence and death was steady and continued for 17 years after diagnosis. Thus, despite having a high risk of early recurrence, it seems that women with triple-negative breast cancer who are disease-free for 8 years are unlikely to die of breast cancer."

    If you look at the data (Figure 3 in the paper), the risk of TNBC recurrence from 4 to 8 years is the same as that of ER positive.  Prior to 4 years, we are at much higher risk (hazard ratio of between 0.05 and 0.12 as compared to a hazard ratio of less than 0.05 for ER+).  From 4 to 8 years, it is about the same, within experimental error (hazard ratio of about 0.025). After 8 years, it does appear that TNBC recurrence goes down to virtually zero (yay!), while ER positive stays at 0.025.  

    To summarize:

    higher risk than ER+ for the first four years

    same risk as ER+ for the next four years

    home free after that!!!!

    Hugs to all,

    Hillary 

     

     

     

     

  • cheranthia
    cheranthia Member Posts: 65
    edited July 2008

    Yes, that's right. We do share the same odds with our hormone receptive positive sisters for a few years. My point was that our odds of having a recurrence decline over time, while the threat remains more constant for them. May we all reach virtual zero!

    Best to you,

    Cheranthia 

  • Jacquio
    Jacquio Member Posts: 39
    edited July 2008

    Just want to say I am Laughing to have read these posts today. I was diagnosed 1/09/07 with TripNeg and recently finished dense dose 4 rounds AC, 4 rounds Taxol, then 33 rads (last date 6/23) and I do start worrying every so often about recurrence.  I feel better (?) after reading the general odds.  My chemo onc had me keep the port in for the next year for superstition's sake. 

    Stage 2, tripneg, grade 3, 1/10 nodes positive

  • Jacquio
    Jacquio Member Posts: 39
    edited July 2008
    Actually diagnosed 11/05/07.  Not sure why I typed 1/9/07... Undecided
  • lemonld
    lemonld Member Posts: 114
    edited July 2008

    I am TN diagnosed 3/31/07.  Had mast, 4 A/C tx, 4 Taxol tx, 33 rad tx that ended 10/25/07.  In Jan 08 found small lump went to surgeon who said looked like small cyst and did not remove.  The area did grow on the skin and looked like it was forming a boil like cyst.  When I saw my onc in Mar 08 he said to have removed and I scheduled removal with onc.  On the day I was to have removed in Mar I found another small round lump and notified my surgeon before the surgery and they were both removed.  He told my family after the surgery that he was 99.9% sure that they were just cyst and not to worry.  I went for my follow up visit on 4/14/08 and was told that the cancer had returned there were cancer cells in the tumors removed.  Later that week I also found a swollen lymph node in my neck.  I returned to the doctor and am now on chemo again one year later and that sucks big time.  I was originally put on Xeloda  (pill form chemo) 2wks on and 1 wk off and after the lymph node was swollen I started receiving Taxotere which is an IV infusion every three weeks.  This time around has been pretty rough but I will make it.  My point in this is that I only made it 3 months before the cancer was back.  My onc has given me the impress that TN is harder to fight than hormone+ and Her2+ because they have drugs that can be used after the chemo is done.  I knew that feeling I had at the last chemo tx was "What do I do now?" and my answer was now we wait and see, we didn't have long to wait.

    Linda

  • FloridaLady
    FloridaLady Member Posts: 2,155
    edited July 2008

    lemonld,

    Hate to say this, but I hope I don't have to Welcome you to my world.  I see my history on my signature line.  This is how I started out also.  The same week I finished rads I had a recurrence in the skin on one side and another tumor on my non-mast. side.  It is rare for TN to recurr on chest wall a 2nd time.  But I was told this is a good sign, because it show's our tumor's do not really have a big desire to travel in to distance places like most TN mets do.  So it Good news Bad news kind of a thing...  Did you have a bilt-mast?  Is there any way they can add Avastin to your treatment plan?  This is agreat drug for TN ladies.

    Sorry it back...but be glad it not a more serious met. I hope you treatment causes little side effect's.

    Flalady

  • CalGal
    CalGal Member Posts: 469
    edited July 2008

    FlaLady -

    You had bc in 56 nodes?!   I didn't even know we had that many nodes! 

    Good for you that you proved the odds wrong!

    As already posted, trip neg is very heterogeneous.

    Do you mind telling us where your mets are located? 

    CalGal 

  • FloridaLady
    FloridaLady Member Posts: 2,155
    edited August 2008

    Here I go..taking a big breath of air....ready set go....

    First my nodes history:  Had right mast first. 3/06 - 26/27 than 2nd mast. 6/7- 27/27 than and experimental PET Probe surgery removed 4 more on right chest wall/lower shoulder and under my right armpit. 4/4...OH NO! That's 57 nodes.

    1. 1. Dx 11/5 very large tumor right side mast. - bc all the way up to my collarbone, but not in collarbone. Chemo ACT (bc triple on this) - taken out with 1st mast.
    2. 2. 7/6 - One week after completing rads, I found two small tumors in left breast.
    3. 3. 7/6 later inflammatory bc on right chest wall. (Can not do 2ndmast must do chemo first) tx with Gemzar, Carbo & Avastin. Respond with IBC not left breast. Ship off to MD Anderson 01/07 for a really bad Phase Drug trial. Six months later still have cancer in left breast  Finally had left breast removed in 06/07. Had concern of possible met to my saliva gland. Turn out just swollen due to chemo. Also had concern of supraclavicular nodes.  Turned out a blood clot from chemo.
    4. 4. 09/07 Recurrence on right chest wall high above the breast but below the shoulder. Also deeper in the axilla on right chest wall. This is where I had the experimental Pet Probe surgery a Moffitt Tampa.
    5. 5. 12/07 Recurrence's in left axilla deep in chest wall. And on the right side in the same place. Scan in Mar 08 PET scan showed left side resolved and right side reduced in size while on a natural protocol.  Possible new place showing "next to" rib and the right lung. I should have left well enough alone and stay on this protocol I had setup for myself.  No...but I had to go and change everything and within one month...

    6,7,8,9  06/08  Recurrence right and left axilla, right and left superclavicular and higher up on my neck. Also area by rib and lung grow larger.

    1. 10. 06/08 Later in the month... recurrence of inflammatory a 2nd time and much worst than the first time.

    So right now of have 7 different places and also inflammatory.  Has anyone every spoke to anyone like me?

    I still can't believe how I have been living for the past 2 ½ years.  I have worked pretty much full time through all of this.  I have the most terrific boss in the WORLD!  I have been blessed by God not to have everything happen that my doctor's predicted for me.  That I would live only three to six month's after first mast. I have done 18mth of chemo (not counting this round) with 7 different kinds of chemo's.  (I chose to repeat Gemzar, carbo and Avastin again because I found it very doable.)

    Well there is my story and I'm sticking to it.

    Flalady
  • CalGal
    CalGal Member Posts: 469
    edited July 2008

    FlaLady -

    OMG!!!  You have been through it ... and all in 2-1/2 years.   Geez.   And you've worked through-out?!   You're amazing!  Talking about being a fighter!

    Thanks for sharing.

    Hope this is your lucky combo! 

    CalGal

  • FloridaLady
    FloridaLady Member Posts: 2,155
    edited July 2008

    Thanks from one fighter to another.  CalGal in all the ladies you have spoken to, have you ever meet anyone who had this many recurrences in the chest wall area only?

    Flalady

  • CalGal
    CalGal Member Posts: 469
    edited July 2008

    FlaLady -

    No!  Of all the women I've met on bc boards, bc conferences I've attended or my mets support group, I've never met anyone who had near the recurrences in the chest wall area only!

    CalGal 

  • KCM
    KCM Member Posts: 4
    edited July 2008

    When do you start the time count?  At time of diagnosis or when treatment is complete?

  • Jacquio
    Jacquio Member Posts: 39
    edited August 2008

    Hi! What is your 'natural protocol' you mentioned?

  • FloridaLady
    FloridaLady Member Posts: 2,155
    edited August 2008

    Jacquio,

    I researched by reading over 40 books on alternative treatments.  Many of these books repeated the same things on diet and other easier changes.  While not in treatment I did everything recommend and felt GREAT and lost my chemo weight. Big things is getting educated about vitamen's and supplements.  I also used a product that is made near me a part of my protocol.  If you would like some of my notes and book list please PM me a note, and I would be glad to share with you.  Natural prevention and treatments is about detoxing the body and rebuilding it. 

    If your not in treatment this is the time to take back control of your body.

    flalady

  • Vickan
    Vickan Member Posts: 54
    edited August 2008

    Hi Flalady - fighter!!!

     You are amazing I have just read your story that you have shared to us.

    Do you mind share how to detok and rebuild the body, that sounds so interesting.

    Keep up the spirit!

    Vic

  • FloridaLady
    FloridaLady Member Posts: 2,155
    edited August 2008

    Thanks Vickan,

    I on chemo #5 this round and still working full time.  I still take most of my vitamins and supplements.  I will email some of my notes.  Please note some you do not do while on chemo.  Your doctor will not agree...but you have to make the call.  I chose to treat the rest of the body while they treat the cancer.  Please research on the internet about detoxing the liver and colon.  You really need to understand the why too fully decide on doing this.  I do not do enemas like a lot of patients do.  Yuck!  You can not do a hard detox while on chemo.  Save this for the first break you get.  I am convinced that it help me to loss the 25 lbs I gained from chemo, lower my high blood pressure and cholesterol.  I no longer take any of these meds.  My fatigue was gone in fours weeks.  Please find some good books to read.  I do have a list I found most helpful.

    Flalady

  • Shirlann
    Shirlann Member Posts: 3,302
    edited August 2008

    Hey gals, your WHOLE BODY has thousands of lymph nodes, not just in your breasts, all over the body.  Ever seen people with an "elephant leg"?  That is trouble with the lymph system in the leg or trunk area.  They are all over and their job is to stop things from moving on to vital organs.  So while we don't like positive nodes, they are truly doing what they are supposed to do.

    Gentle hugs, Shirlann 

Categories