Her-2 status with DCIS

Options
ccheeseman
ccheeseman Member Posts: 13

Ok - I am having trouble finding info online re: Her-2 status with DCIS.  Looks like many studies say it is not a factor with DCIS.  Others say it can predict a higher percent of recurrence.

Wondering what you all have heard on this topic?

Thanks,

Cathy

------------------------

DCIS 12/07, 2cm, type 2, papillary, lump, re-ex, multi-focal, Mast, E/r+, P/r+, Her-2 ??, pre-menopausal

Comments

  • Sociologist
    Sociologist Member Posts: 237
    edited January 2008

    Hi Cathy,

    I was diagnosed w/DCIS in June. When I asked this same question to my surgeon he told me that he and many other docs don't test for HER-2 status in DCIS. Hopefully someone else will come along shortly that can give you additional info. Take care.

    Margaret

  • labhusky
    labhusky Member Posts: 177
    edited February 2008

    I was diagnosed  in Sept last year with a stereotactic biopsy.  I had my lumpectomy in Oct and they didnt test it for even the hormone stuff.  I requested it from my surgeon and got the whole thing including the her-2, and am glad I did.  Now, I can see why I should do hormone therapy.  I dont think its automatically done, but it doesnt hurt to request it and get it like I did.  My estrogen was 98% which they call favorable, progest, 24% favorable, and her-2 0% which is favorable.  Their was another test that was 18% and it said borderline.  It has something to do with recurrence but I understand that the range in that one could go over 60 or so and that 10 or below is a lower chance of recurrence.  the 18% doesnt bother me too much in that it could be higher.  I had the grade 3 with necrosis and that definitely puts me at risk too.  I just started Tamoxifen 4 days ago and that test helped me a little to sway me to take it.  I say the more info the better.

  • quinnie
    quinnie Member Posts: 221
    edited February 2008

    I also have DCIS and was told HER was not important. I am ER-/PR- so can't take tamox anyway. I am going to ask my onc at next visit again!

  • Blundin2005
    Blundin2005 Member Posts: 1,167
    edited February 2008

    I went back to my lab report.  If Her-2 is 5% I thought that to be negative.  I found another report that considered >1% positive.  In any event, I think that they use this marker along with the rest of the report to determine the best course of treatment.

    BC treatment is an international standard.  Breast conserving surgery is different only in that they take more.  I had a quadrectomy, biopsy of SLN 2, radiation therapy, no chemo and Arimidex.  Other than dealing with hypothyroid and Arimidex SE, I'm doing OK--NED.   

    I think often to the Coesistone aspetti inferiore al 10% di carcinoma in situ con comedonecrosi. Loosly translated that said (Coexist ....appearance inferior to the 10% of cancer in situ with black cells).

    I want to believe that they were all captured in surgery and radiation.  

    I pay more attention to my nutrition and diet these days to help my body along.

    Consider that the lump was not found on an echo mammo 8 months prior....I found it with self exam in August and by Sept began the infamous journey that we are all on.  But there can be many explanations for not to find the lump before then.  

    My labs....

    Quadrantectomia + Biopsia linfonodo sentinella (quadrectomy & sentinel lymph biopsy 2)

    QII Mammella Sinistra:
    5x5x3 cm orientato
    Max di cm 1.5.  Il tumore dista cm 1.2 dal margine superiore
    cm2 dall'inferiore e laterale, cm 1.8 dall mediale, cm .7 dal cutaneo, cm 1.2 dal fasciale.
    Diagnosi:  Carcinoma invasivo duttale NAS, grado 1/III sec. Bloom Richardson.  Coesistone aspetti inferiore al 10% di carcinoma in situ con comedonecrosi.  Itologicamente I margini di resezione sono esenti da localizazione neoplastica.

    Recettori Ormonali:  Estrogeno recettore: presente
    elementi neoplastici negative: 10%, …debolmente pos.: 20%, …moderatamente pos.: 40%, …fortemente pos.: 30%
    Progesterone recettore:  assente
    EN neg: 80%, …debolment pos. 10%, ….mod pos. 10%, fortemente pos 0%

    FATTORI PROGNOSTICI
    Ki67: pos nel 25%,  C-ERB-B2: pos nucleare nel 5%, BCL-2 neg.
    Discorso:  Regolare.

    So....

    c-erb 2:( Her2, erb 2 , c-erb-B2 ) [Mine was 5% so they prescribed Arimidex )

    Si tratta di un fattore di crescita identificabile in una proteina recettoriale di membrana, che ha funzione di dire alla cellula di proliferare.E' costituito da due braccia uno esterno ed uno interno alla cellula:dominio interno ( cb11 ) ed il dominio esterno.
    Nella cellula tumorale i geni che codificano le proteine di membrana c-erb2 positive sono tantissimi e l'indagine immunoistochimica di routine basta da sola per valutare l'overespressione di membrana; ma per capire l'overespressione dei geni si procede con la FISH (Fluorescens In Situ Hibridization) un tipo di analisi quantitativa.
    I tumori iper espressi ( IIC 3+ ) ( FISH amplificati ) non rispondono alle terapie ormonali ma rispondono bene alla chemioterapia.
    Questo perchè c-erb2 amplificata condiziona il tumore nel senso che lo rende più aggressivo:i pazienti con c-erb2 negativo hanno sopravvivenza lunga; viceversa c-erb2 positivo purtroppo no.
    Quindi si cerca un elemento che possa dire a quale tipo di terapia il tumore risponde.
    Es: al paziente c-erb2 negativo si fa l'ormono terapia,se ha gli indicatori estrogenici positivi. Se il paziente è c-erb2 positivo si preferisce l'ormono terapia con aromatasi e non Tamoxifene. 
    Per trovare il suddetto elemento si può usare anche l'HERCEPT-TEST: è una tecnica immunocitochimica semi-quantitativa che determina l'overespressione delle proteine di membrana erb2 nel cancro della mammella.
     

    Recettori Risposta Prognosi
    ER +    PGR +           77 % 91 %
    ER +    PGR -             46 % 93 %  (These are my receptors)

    ER -     PGR +             27 % 88 %
    ER -     PGR -              11 % 77 %

    Bcl 2: (Mine is negative -- so expected that my body will not resist the radiation therapy and hormonal therapy)

    Marcatore citolplasmatico. Si tratta di un proto-oncogene che codifica una proteina la quale è in grado di prevenire l'apoptosi ( morte cellulare normalmente programmata ). La Bcl 2 è un elemento indiretto sulla funzionalità ormonale, nel senso che la sua sintesi è correlata alla funzionalità della via recettoriale.
    Ci sono tumori che al 100 % esprimono recettori ormonali ma non hanno poi una risposta alla terapia ormonale.
    Alla positività di questo marcatore è associata un'elevata resistenza alla chemioterapia e radioterapia.

     

  • ccheeseman
    ccheeseman Member Posts: 13
    edited February 2008

    I talked with the surgeon - he said they only check Her-2 if the DCIS is grade 3.

  • mittmott
    mittmott Member Posts: 409
    edited February 2008

    Hi, did sureon say why he would only check if it is grade 3.. mine was grade 3, with a small microinvasion, and no one checked.  Told me they didn't need to.  Just curious, what your doc told you.

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited February 2008
    Pure DCIS does not need to be tested for HER2 because the results are meaningless relative to treatment.  

    HER2+ is an indicator of a more aggressive cancer for women who have invasive cancer.  Because of the aggressiveness of HER2+ cancer, these women are almost always given chemo and are treated with Herceptin, which is a very toxic drug.  I believe about 20% of invasive cancer is HER2+. 

    For some reason, about 40% of DCIS is HER2+.  No one knows yet why it is that so much more DCIS is HER2+.  What's even more interesting is that there doesn't seem to be a relationship between HER2+ DCIS and the aggressiveness of the cancer, or with the possibility of developing an invasive cancer. In fact one recent study showed an inverse relationship (i.e. HER2+ DCIS was less likely to become invasive), but that was only one small study - nothing conclusive there.  In any case, Herceptin is not approved for DCIS so women who have HER2+ DCIS wouldn't be treated any differently than those who are HER2-.

    Having said that, I suspect that many labs do test the HER2 status of DCIS. I never received my HER2 results but I was treated at a facility that does a lot of breast cancer research, so I'm wouldn't be surprised at all if my tissue samples were HER2 tested, not to provide the results to me and my doctors but rather to help the scientists gain a better understanding of how HER2 and DCIS are related.  I'd guess that sometimes this is why women get HER2 results for DCIS.  And in other cases, it's probably just that the lab does the same standard tests (ER,PR, HER2, Grade, etc.) on all samples, DCIS or invasive.  So HER2 is just part of what's done.  It's confusing, but getting the results doesn't mean that it's relevant. For DCIS, based on current knowledge, it's not.  

  • mittmott
    mittmott Member Posts: 409
    edited February 2008

    Thank you Beesie, good explanation.  

  • Jude
    Jude Member Posts: 8
    edited April 2008

    In Nov. 05 I was dx with extensive high grade ductal carcinoma in-situ with comedonecrosis -- Nottingham grade III.(poorly differentiated) - Invasive tumor diameter 1.5 cm- 7 out of 12 nodes cancer - Her2/neu3.4 overexpressed - p53 66% overexpressed. I had a partial mastectomy followed by 12 Chemo . 1st 6 - every 2 wks. were Adriamycin and Cytoxan - then #7 to #12 were Taxol and Herceptin. I then continued herceptin for 12 Months. 1xmonth.  After #12 chemo I had 34 radiation treatments.  I am now out of treatment for 1 yr. and waiting for the "other shoe" to drop. Very anxious.  I found this web site 2 weeks ago. Wish I had found it in 2006.  My doc says we will breath again after 5 yrs. The words he used were" fast growing very advanced" Soooo what do you ladies think?????

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited April 2008

    Jude,

    From your description, it sounds as though you had DCIS along with invasive cancer.  When you have invasive cancer along with DCIS, because the invasive cancer is more serious, the DCIS in effect becomes irrelevant - it gets taken care of with whatever treatments you have for the IDC.  So that's a very different situation than having DCIS alone.  For DCIS alone, HER-2 status is not relevant, and chemo & Herceptin wouldn't be required.   With IDC, HER-2 overexpression is a sign of an aggressive cancer and chemo and Herceptin are the standards of treatment. 

    I wish I could offer some advice or even some comments, but I really don't have any experience with HER-2 positive cancers.  As a suggestion, to 'talk' to women who have a similar diagnosis to yours, you might want to repost your question in the HER-2 Positive discussion forum.  (((((Hugs)))) to you! 

  • Jude
    Jude Member Posts: 8
    edited April 2008

    Thanks Beesie -- Is there a way to forward my comment on to the Her 2 positive forum?

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited April 2008

    Jude, I don't think you can forward your post, but you should see the words "[Edit][Delete]" in the bottom left corner of your post.  If you click on Edit, you'll get the text box back.  From there, if you just highlight all the text and 'copy' it, you can then paste it into a new post in the HER2 forum. 

  • thetrumumshow
    thetrumumshow Member Posts: 72
    edited April 2008

    Hi from the UK!!  The hospital that are treating me (The Royal Marsden) always test for Hormone Receptors whenever they do surgical biopsies in case that info becomes relevant further down the line.  I have DCIS  that is ER positive, PR positive and HER2 positive 3+.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2008

    Hi Truman......I'm Canadian. Interesting how things are done differently in another country. Tell me....what has your experience been with how you've been treated in the UK. Is it the same as here?

  • thetrumumshow
    thetrumumshow Member Posts: 72
    edited April 2008

    Hi Crazydaisy, In February 2006 I had WLE for LCIS. Following surgery I was told the margins were clear and needed no further treatment. I've had 6 monthly mammograms since then. Last July my mammogram was clear. In January my mammogram showed "changes" so I was called in for Core Biopsy which showed all sorts of atypical cell changes including radial scar, adenosing sclerosis.... So my Consultant decided to do another WLE to get a definitive diagnosis. This was performed on February 29th and the Pathology report has showed DCIS in the margins. It is ER positive, PgR positive and HER2 positive. My Consultant is recommending Mastectomy as she feels that my breast may well develop an Invasive Cancer in the future and that she's not sure how much of the breast is affected by the DCIS. It seems very drastic to me to remove my breast. Does anyone else have experience of similar surgery for a similar diagnosis? Has anyone else undergone any other form of treatment for this?

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2008

    Trueman......the most important thing is getting wide clear margins. Here they follow that up with radiation to kill of any stray cells. Some people choose to go for 2-3 rexcisions to get good margins. When that fails they only good option then is mastectomy. Thats what I had to do. It does seem drastic but does end up this way sometimes. There are good options though for reconstruction if you want that done. Good luck.

  • Lisa75
    Lisa75 Member Posts: 137
    edited January 2012

    wow, I found my answer just now by going through the old threads here about HER2. Beesie has some great info

Categories