The Brand New Respectful Presidential Campaign Thread
Comments
-
I didn't mean to imply that no money would be involved, only that the money wouldn't be given directly to individuals in cash. Obama has talked about retraining displaced workers in Green jobs, such as building and installing solar panels for houses, which cuts down on energy costs, which cuts down on dependence of foreign oil. I see this as an investment in future savings on many levels. There is a program called Liheap where low income people get help paying for their heating bills. Imagine if that money was invested into giving the low income people who were displaced when their jobs moved overseas the training to do that. Then they wouldn't need the money from Liheap and if there was a program rather than giving help for heat, but giving help to reduce the cost of heat through the solar panels eventually there wouldn't be a need for Liheap.
-
One more comment. Freedom counts for something. Even indentured servants eventually gained their freedom. Slaves had none. This means no right to maintain a family. Their children belonged to someone else. Now I promise that I will stay out of this forum. I think that government should provide free quality higher education for anyone who is interested not just those who can afford to pay for it.
-
RM-- your ancestors were white so they did have the advantage of not being the same race as the slaves which were brought over here. It was legal for your ancestors to go to school, own land, work for pay, vote etc. Those are all of the advantages your ancestors black counterparts didn't have. Indentured servitude and slavery are apples and oranges. You can say how bad it was and I'm sure it wasn't easy-- but you're comparing a stubbed toe to gangrene. I suppose if all you've ever had is stubbed toes,you might not realize gangrene is so bad and you might even think your stubbed toes are the same thing-- after all, you recovered from that stubbed toe, why shouldn't the person with gangrene also get over it.
Yes, some african americans have come here willingly-- but that doesn't account for this country's history of slavery and of Jim Crow. Yes,this is a country of immigrants who with the exception of slaves, 99% came here willingly.
-
Sushanna, one cannot compare wrongs or who has it the worst. Your worst is your worst and someone else's is the worst that they deal with.
Everyone needs to pull themselves up by the bootstraps at some point.
What was done was horrid. But don't forget that many nations have slaved for other nations and many slaves were purchased from other African tribes.
We can all back in history and find that our ancestors were slaves to another nation at some point in time. It's over now. MOVE ON. We all have to move on and get along. I certainly am not a fan of affirmative actions existance any more ... for white males, it's reverse discrimination at this point. I am also not a fan of putting women in jobs that they don't qualify for simply because of sex ...... I do not want a 130 pound female attempting to pull me out of a window and throw me over her shoulder!! (please you know what I mean, let's not banter about the actual weight/strength thing) I think there should be a standard ...... man, woman, white, black, purple, if you don't meet it, you don't get in, don't get hired, etc. Hell, stamp a number on my neck and use that to id me on tests instead of my cdl.
-
MOVE FORWARD!!! I never owned a slave. I never met a slave. Yes, even after slavery blacks had it bad. I'm sure if they still lived in Africa it would be worse! No all blacks feel "entitled!" Many blacks have made something of their lives. Then there are those who want divisiveness to continue. Why? And IMO it's made worse by people like Wright, Sharpton, Jackson to name just a few. Yes, there is racism. Not only toward blacks, but Jews, Native Americans, Mexicans, Whites, Italians, and on and on.
I know whites who go into black communities to help. Does Wright's church to the same?
Here's something I found very disturbing. Yes, our pastor had his house bought for him BEFORE he retired. Plus a car, insurance and I don't know what else. He lives in our modest neighborhood.
All the money going toward Wright's house could have been used for poor black people. He must have had a bunch of rich black people in his church. And HE preached about the rich whites that ran America!
The four- bedroom, 10,000-plus square foot home that Trinity United Church of Christ is building for Reverend Jeremiah Wright. (FNC Photo)
By Jeff Goldblatt
This was supposed to be the week that the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr. returned to the pulpit to preach for the first time since his anti-American sermons generated nationwide outrage and drew condemnation from his longtime parishioner, Barack Obama.
But, citing security concerns, Wright canceled his speaking engagements in Florida and Texas. A spokeswoman at his former church in Chicago said his schedule is pending.
A two-week FOX News investigation, however, has uncovered where Wright will be spending a good deal of his time in retirement, and it is a far cry from the impoverished Chicago streets where the preacher led his ministry for 36 years.
FOX News has uncovered documents that indicate Wright is about to move to a 10,340-square-foot, four-bedroom home in suburban Chicago, currently under construction in a gated community.
While it is not uncommon for an accomplished clergyman to live in luxury, Wright's retirement residence is raising some questions.
"Some people think deals like this are hypocritical. Jeremiah Wright himself criticizes people from the pulpit for middle classism, for too much materialism," said Andrew Walsh, Associate Director of the Leonard E. Greenberg Center for the Study of Religion in Public Life with Trinity College in Hartford, Conn.
"So he's entitled to be tweaked here. So the question really is, how unusual is this? Somewhat unusual," he said.
According to documents obtained from the Cook County Register of Deeds, Wright purchased two empty lots in Tinley Park, Ill., from Chicago restaurant chain owner Kenny Lewis for $345,000 in 2004.
Documents show Wright sold the property to his church, Trinity United, in December 2006, with the proceeds going to a living trust shared with his wife, Ramah.
The sale price for the land was just under $308,000, about $40,000 less than Wright's original purchase two years earlier.
Public records of the sale show Trinity initially obtained a $10 million bank loan to purchase the property and build a new house on the land.
But further investigation with tax and real estate attorneys showed that the church had actually secured a $1.6 million mortgage for the home purchase, and attached a $10 million line of credit, for reasons unspecified in the paperwork.
There is apparently nothing wrong with that, according to non-profit tax expert Jack Siegel of Charity Governance Consulting, who examined public documents FOX News obtained from the Cook County Register of Deeds and the Village of Tinley Park.
"At least looking at it from a public document standpoint, there's clearly not a problem that jumps out or some sort of wrongdoing," Siegel said.
Siegel characterizes the transaction as unusual, however, because of the way Wright sold the property to Trinity and the way the deal was financed, with the attached $10 million line of credit.
Because churches are classified as private businesses, Trinity isn't required to reveal its intended use for the line of credit. Nor, because it's a non-profit entity, is it required to provide that information to the IRS.
A spokesman for ShoreBank, the Chicago-based financial institution that secured mortgages for the loans, said the deals were aboveboard.
Wright did not respond to repeated calls for comment, and Trinity United refused to discuss the specifics of the home it is building for him and the way the deal was financed.
The church referred FOX News to its denominational headquarters in Cleveland, which provided a statement of support:
"It is customary and appropriate in many Christian denominations, including the United Church of Christ, for local churches to offer housing provisions for retiring clergy, especially in cases where pastors have served long-term pastorates. We support efforts by our 5,700 local churches to ensure that retiring pastors and spouses have continuing housing, adequate pension and health care, as an expression of our continuing appreciation for their years of service. Each local UCC congregation is free to honor a retiring pastor in ways it feels most appropriate to address the needs of that clergyperson's circumstances," wrote the Rev. J. Bennett Guess, spokesman for UCC's national office.
"This is about how these kinds of churches work," notes Walsh. "These pastors who made big successful churches are real valuable commodities. Is it morally wrong? Well, Protestants don't have the idea that their religious leaders should live modestly or aesthetically. We're not talking Buddhist monks or Catholic priests here. There's no tradition that says they have to live poor."
Tradition at Trinity United centers on a congregation that's unashamedly black and unapologetically Christian, according to the church's website. There are also no apologies from the church for the home it's building for its former senior pastor, who nurtured a religious empire that grew to have more than 8,000 congregants.
-
Shirley,
First let me say that I am no fan of Wright's, but I have to ask: Were similar provisions made for other well known preachers by their congregants/followers, such as Jerry Falwell, Jim & Tammy Faye Baker, Jimmy Swiggert, etc. I ask this honestly, I have no idea, but if I had to hazard a guess, I think I would go to the point that I bet they were amply provided by their followers. So, why is Wright again being singled out and not every preacher who may have had similar benefits granted to them.
In my demonination, Episcopal, if the parish does not provide housing for clergy, they receive a housing allowance to defere their housing expense. I'm not sure how other demoninations handle housing issues with clergy and former clergy. I'd like to hear from others.
Cherryl
-
Amy, you are obtuse. Again, you assume that all my ancestors were white. You're so wrong again.
LOL
-
Anyway, this thread is supposed to be about the election instead of Amy's try, again, at being divisive and using psycho-babble to bully people into not speaking any other viewpoint that doesn't jive with hers.
-
LOL, save your Confederate money, Boys, the South will rise again.
As soon as ya'll quit fightin' the Civil War all over again.
Oh, but down here we called it The War Of Northern Agression. LOL
I just wanted to give my swan song to this discussion. Way too personal and very little about the election.
Have a great week.
-
RM- I've avoided calling you names- even though you sit on your high horse proclaiming how life isn't fair because people who have had it harder than you say they've suffered as much as you have. Even when talking about an article about how poor people suffer with breast cancer, you complained "what about me, I could have lost my house and my daughter's college fund, why didn't they mention me." as if to damn those who the article was written about, people who would consider what you have to be a luxury. I know nothing about your ancestors other than what you've told us and your pattern of seeming to resent those who are more needy than you.
Shirley, people aren't going to move on simply because you want them to, and posting articles about reverend wright misses the point of the discussion. This isn't about Reverend Wright- but understanding how some people could have a different perspective based on their horrible treatment. Maybe that's all you hear on Faux, I know they love talking about him, but Wright is just one man with inflamatory speech that is being heard in 20 second sound bites. I do not think anyone will move on until their struggles are acknowledged. 50 years ago American history books told things from a much more limited (white) perspective, but fortunately now through progress students learn that the settlers were imperfect folks who brutalized the Native Americans, built this country on the back of slaves in addition to all the things they did right in setting up a democracy. Shirley, you don't like it when others criticize your religion, yet you feel free to do that to Wright's church from all the negativity. Is that what you learn in your church-- judging others based on a few u-tube minutes taken out of context. Isn't there something in your bible about judging not lest ye be judged? WWJD?
Cheryl, your point about the uber-churches and their leaders living in mansions, televangilist who are multimillionaires etc.
-
For shirley :
Longer Versions of Problematic Rev. Wright's Sermons Reveal Context Missed in Looped Clips
Date: Tuesday, March 25, 2008
By: Sherrel Wheeler Stewart, BlackAmericaWeb.comLonger portions of sermons that contain sound bites from embattled Rev. Jeremiah Wright flashed across the country in recent weeks and labeled as racist and anti-American by some have surfaced, revealing a broader message in the commentary of Barack Obama's pastor and retiring minister at Chicago's Trinity United Church of Christ.
Nationally noted political columnist Roland Martin and Eric Deggans, a nationally recognized media columnist at the St. Petersburg Times, wrote about the full context of the sermons in recent blogs.
"I saw a lot of people did news stories and commentaries, based on the reporting by ABC and Fox but did not have their own copies," Deggans told BlackAmericaWeb.com. "They took what was reported and built on it. Some missed the boat."
In his blog, Martin said he wanted to see for himself the full sermon Wright preached shortly after 9/11 entitled "The Day of Jerusalem's Fall."
"The point that I have always made as a journalist is that our job is to seek the truth, and not the partial truth," Martin said in his blog. "And let me be clear: Where I believe he was wrong and not justified in what he said based upon the facts, I will say so. But where the facts support his argument, that will also be said."
Longer portions of Wright's sermons, posted now on YouTube, show that Wright's sermon that included the phrase "God damn America" talked about how the "U.S. has failed a majority of its citizens of African decent." The same sermon talked about the suffering of Native Americans and Japanese in America.
The video clip that included the phrase "America's chickens are coming to roost" was part of a sermon "faith footnote" where Wright said he was quoting Iraq Ambassador Edward Peck, who made the statement on a television news interview, referring to a statement from Malcolm X in the 1960s. Wright's sermon came just days after the 9/11 tragedy as he admonished parishioners to take a "self examination" of their relationship with God.
While the sermon sound bites have sparked criticism and prompted Obama to respond with a nationally televised speech on race, Wright's reputation in some theological communities and churches has not been deflated.
Tuesday through Thursday, Wright will preach a revival at Bible-Based Fellowship of Temple Terrace, near Tampa, Florida, And on Saturday, he will be honored by the Brite Divinity School in Fort Worth, Texas, during the State of the Black Church Summit and Awards Banquet.
"Those who criticize Rev. Wright have not listened to the full message he preaches," the Rev. Arthur T. Jones, a Tampa minister who has been mentored by Wright for more than 25 years, told BlackAmericaWeb.com. "All he is doing is speaking the truth. But when you hear only sound bites strung together, you don't get the full context. Rev. Wright still is loved and respected, and maybe even more so now."
Jones pastors Bible-Based Fellowship Church where he said Wright preached a revival in the fall. "The reception for Rev. Wright was phenomenal," Jones said. "He comes to us every year."
Wright's planned appearance in Fort Worth has stirred a bit of controversy. The board of trustees at Texas Christian University, the campus on which Brite Divinity is located, asked that the event be moved off campus.
"The executive committee of TCU's Board of Trustees today voted, and Brite Divinity School leadership agreed, to move the Divinity School's Black Church Summit events off campus in light of security issues noted by campus police and the Fort Worth Police Department. The Divinity School will announce the new location of the event," read a statement posted on the TCU website.
"Luther King, chairman of the board, agreed that while the university should be a place where controversial opinions are freely expressed, the safety and security of students, faculty and staff are the primary concern of the board," the statement read.
A new location had not been announced for the summit on Sunday evening. Brite Divinity School, however, posted a statement on website reiterating its mission and confirming its plans to continue with the summit and recognition of Wright.
"In the 1950s, at the dawn of the civil rights movement, Brite professors Harold and Alberta Lunger and Brite student Vada Felder -- the first African-American to graduate from Brite -- provided hospitality to the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. in a Fort Worth, Texas, not yet ready to welcome him," Brite Dean Nancy J. Ramsay and Brite Trustee Eugene Brice wrote in a statement posted Sunday on the school's website.
"Dr. Wright's career and contributions provide an excellent model of ministry and profound theological vision that ensure the ongoing legacy of the historic black church tradition. He served as pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago from 1972-2008. During this period, Trinity UCC grew from 87 adults to over 8700 members. Today, this south Chicago congregation provides numerous ministries ranging from Food Share programs, dance and math tutorials for youth and small groups that benefit families and individuals. The congregation tithes its annual revenues to support other congregations, denominational missions, and agencies supporting mission work in Liberia, Haiti, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Ghana, Brazil, and South Africa," the statement read."Trinity has also birthed four new congregations of the UCC -- two in Atlanta, Georgia, one in Gary, Indiana, and one in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. ... Like the Rev. Dr. Jeremiah Wright, Brite trusts in a God whose love and justice are never divided," according to the statement. In this spirit of Christian witness, Brite Divinity School honors and celebrates a tradition of dialogue, diversity, and finding common ground."
Wright also has been recognized by politicians as a leader. In 1998, when then President Bill Clinton invited religious leaders from across the country to the White House to meet with him, Wright was among the attendees. Last week, a photo surfaced of former President Clinton and Wright.
The campaign of Sen. Hillary Clinton responded by criticizing Obama's campaign for "peddling photos" of former President Clinton and
Obama and Clinton are in virtual dead heat for the Democratic nomination for president. Obama had carried a lead over Clinton before the controversy over his pastor's statements surfaced. The most recent Gallup Poll released on Saturday shows that Obama has regained a slight edge.
"Obama's campaign clearly suffered in recent days from negative press, mostly centering on his association with the controversial Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Perhaps as a result, Clinton moved into the lead in Gallup's Wednesday release, covering March 16-18 polling. But Obama has now edged back ahead of Clinton due to a strong showing for him in Friday night's polling, perhaps in response to the endorsement he received from well-respected New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, a former rival for the nomination," according to a Gallup Poll release.
The poll of likely Democratic voters showed that 48 percent favored Obama and 45 percent favored Clinton. Neither Obama, nor Clinton would defeat Republican nominee John MCain, according to Gallup. McCain holds just a two percentage point edge over both -- 46 percent to 44 percent over Obama and 47 percent to 45 percent over Clinton.
Jones, the Tampa minister and friend of Rev. Wright, said the controversy over the minister's statements have nothing to do with Wright.
"This is an attempt to poison the minds of the public," Jones said. "For once, we have man who can galvanize the support of blacks, whites, Hispanics and other races to bring unity. That's a direct challenge to the white male domination we have seen in politics in this country for years. And there are those who don't want it to change."
-
The divergent opinions on this thread show just why conversations about race need to continue. If half the people are shouting, "Move on." and half the people are shouting, "You don't get it." a dialogue is the only way to move onward. On more than one occasion on this thread I have tried to communicate that I understand wanting to move on as the goal. Shirley, have you ever acknowledged how moving on is harder for some people than for others?
-
Amy...You or anyone for that matter CANNOT force people to accept something in which they or their relatives played no part. All you (and when I say you, I am speaking about everyone with your mindset) do in trying to force issues is make people turn in the other direction. You of all people should know this from psych 101. I for one absolutely refuse to accept responsibility for something in which I or my ancestors played no part. It is ludicrious to even think I should. And I am of the mindset of "get over it" and move on. Life deals some shitty blows you can either stay knocked down or you can get up, your choice. People have been enslaved since the beginning of time, people have been at war since the beginning of time, it's just the way it is. Read The History of the World, it is what it is. Basically if you know anything about history with the exception of science and modern gadgets, as humans we haven't evolved very far, we are a lot like our ancestors in some aspects, here again, you should know this from evolutionary psychology. I believe it is called man's inhumanity to man. Yeah, it would be great if everyone lived in a perfect world and everyones' injustices (and we all have injustices, wether perceived or real) were dealt with in a fair way to all but here again, you cannot force anyone to do anything they do not feel like doing for whatever reason. As a psychologist I would think you would be able to comprehend both Shirley's and Rocktober's POV, it is hard to believe you can be so closed minded and yet earn a living in a field where you are supposed to listen to people. I am pretty sure by now most everyone has listened to or read Wright's sermons and I think you can stop using the analogy of "soundbites" he said what he said and HE should take responsibility for it, real basic, real simple. If you open your mouth to thousands of people, you better be sure you can back yourself up when the SHTF and that goes for everyone, not just Wright. I doubt he thought he would end up in this position but here he is, he can now deal with it. I believe Swaggert and Baker and whomever else Cheryl pointed out got their comeuppance, maybe it is time for Wright to get his. He is no different than the rest of them. He is human and he screwed up...it is what it is.
-
Cheryl, no where did I say it was wrong to furnish living expenses, etc., to a pastor. Our pastor's house was bought for him by our church. And it received other "benefits" as well. A pastor of a church should not, it at all possible, have to worry about financial matters. Their mission is to preach the word of God.
I have no problem with pastors having a house furnished to them or bought for them. However, when it gets into the millions I have to wonder.
Jerry Falwell's house didn't cost millions. As I remember and can ask he lives in an older home, perhaps a historical home.
Falwell had a ministry for ALL races. Whether or not you agreed with is belief of religion...well that's up to you. If you believe what the Bible says you'll find many of the things he preached against are in the Bible. It's up to your interpretation.
I find that the house that is being built for a pastor who is so worried about the poor [blacks] would even want this kind of mansion. I'm not saying that he shouldn't have a nice home. And, as far as I'm concerned he can have his mansion, but it seems so hypocritical.
Shirley
-
I am pretty sure by now most everyone has listened to or read Wright's sermons
Paulette, you give the people on this thread more credit than I do, and I sincerely hope that you are right.
I was never talking about you taking personal responsibility for crimes of the past. I was talking about social responsibility for inequity in society that resulted from those crimes of the past. New Jersey recently passed a controversial resolution to apologize for slavery. I thought it was a dumb idea, as did many of the residents, because anyone alive today has nothing to apologize since slavery was outlawed almost 150 years earlier. A black woman who was interviewed said, "They're doing it to make themselves feel better. If they really wanted to apologize why not put some more funds into the poor schools."
Education, job training, and investing in the future (like with solar panels) will pay eventually save the tax payer's and government money.
-
We can start to discuss the issues. If others want to talk about the past, so be it. We can just pass it by and keep to the issues of day that are more important.
I don't know Obama's plan for health care. Someone said his plan was to offer health care for children. I don't know if that is true or not.
We know Hillary's plan, it's for everyone. How they go about it shouldn't be confusing. I've read about the Massachusetts health plan which sounds good enough to me:
http://www.heritage.org/research/healthcare/bg1953.cfm
Why we have to wait for this lame-duck congress to move on this is beyond me.
-
Amy's rants again:
"Shirley, people aren't going to move on simply because you want them to, and posting articles about reverend wright misses the point of the discussion. This isn't about Reverend Wright- but understanding how some people could have a different perspective based on their horrible treatment."
Amy, it's time to move on. Why open old wounds over and over? Why blame this country for all the ills of the blacks? There are MANY blacks who have been extremely successful. I'm not talking about slavery...that was horrible and I TRULY acknowledge that. I am not HEARTLESS, Amy. Also, before the Civil Rights movement the blacks were treated horribly? I acknowledge that. I am not HEARTLESS, Amy. As I have said over and over...there will always be racism. That's the facts.
Amy, are you aware that there are many white families that adopt black children because there's not enough black families to do so?
I don't know what you expect us to do for all the unjust things that happened to the African's brought over here before my time. I don't know what you expect from me for the unjust treatment towards blacks before the Civil Rights Movement. I'm saying "before" because it's the only way to ask without my question being lengthy?
I HAVE acknowledged that blacks have been horribly mistreated. I try to treat them just like any other ethnic group.
WHAT WOULD YOU HAVE ME DO!?
I don't care if these snippets that were on YouTube were JUST snippets from a sermon. It's wrong. Please find me some Bible versus that would back up Wright's "snippets."
"Maybe that's all you hear on Faux, I know they love talking about him, but Wright is just one man with inflamatory speech that is being heard in 20 second sound bites."
I don't care if these snippets that were on YouTube were JUST snippets from a sermon. It's wrong. Please find me some Bible versus that would back up Wright's "snippets."
I realize you hate Fox News. You should watch it from time to time.
What Jeremiah Wright said was horrible. And I'm sure he believes his "snippets" to be true OR why would he be PREACHING it and having his congregation all excited about his words. His words are what they are. You can't change them.
I did a search on Wright's house. However, it was short. So, Fox News showed up. I didn't see if other news outlets reported this million plus dollar house. Wouldn't surprise me if they didn't.
"I do not think anyone will move on until their struggles are acknowledged."
What do we have to do to acknowledge their struggles? Please, Amy, again TELL ME WHAT WE NEED TO DO!!!? Handouts? I can't afford it.
"50 years ago American history books told things from a much more limited (white) perspective, but fortunately now through progress students learn that the settlers were imperfect folks who brutalized the Native Americans, built this country on the back of slaves in addition to all the things they did right in setting up a democracy."
Amy, I have grown over the last 50 years. I have learned more through life experiences over the last 50 years. More than a textbook could teach me.
I'm sorry, Amy, but as I have told you I have not walked in "their" shoes. I can never fully understand the pain that the slaves endured. No more than I can understand being gay (I'm repeating myself). I can never understand or imagine as a white child why black people had to sit on the back of the bus, or drink from different water fountains, or use different rest rooms and more. I have never walked in "their" shoes. I can only try to treat ALL people with respect and dignity.
WHAT WOULD YOU HAVE ME DO!!!? I have ACKNOWLEDGED!
"Shirley, you don't like it when others criticize your religion, yet you feel free to do that to Wright's church from all the negativity. Is that what you learn in your church-- judging others based on a few u-tube minutes taken out of context. Isn't there something in your bible about judging not lest ye be judged? WWJD?"
Amy, please point to me where I don't like it if others criticize my religion. I do have chemo brain mixed with AI brain. Amy, I try not to judge others. But sitting back and listening to hateful venom being spewed toward the whites...I refuse to sit back.
I didn't agree with Falwell when he made remarks about the Telitubies (sp). I thought it was kinda dumb. And there are other things he has said, and many things for which he has apologized for saying that I didn't agree with. I haven't sat in a racist church. If I did I'd get the heck out of there.
Anything else, Amy?
-
As far as Obama's health plan, there are health plans for children, there is medicare and there is the other one, I forget the name but basically you pay according to your income. I much prefer Hillary's plan and think a health plan should be for EVERYONE, not just children. I also think something should be done about "pre-ecisting conditions" because if you have researched the cost of health care plans you pay out the wazoo if you have a "pre-existing condition" and that is IF they even bother to accept you at all.
-
Shirley- here are some examples of Falwell's racism words quoted.
Jerry Falwell:
I do not believe the homosexual community deserves minority status. One's misbehavior does not qualify him or her for minority status. Blacks, Hispanics, women, etc. are God-ordained minorities who do indeed deserve minority status.
Falwell once announced that the long-awaited "antichrist" would be a Jewish man. He criticized the children's TV show Teletubbies because he believed Tinky Winky be homosexual. In 1997, when Ellen DeGeneres came out as a gay figure, Falwell called her "Ellen Degenerate" and demanded that sponsors yank their advertising from her eponymous sitcom. He claimed that Lilith Fair, the female rock-and-roll collective tour, was named after a demon.
"AIDS", he said, "is not just God's punishment for homosexuals; it is God's punishment for the society that tolerates homosexuals." Falwell also opposed the concept of public schools: "I hope I live to see the day when, as in the early days of our country, we won't have any public schools. The churches will have taken them over again and Christians will be running them. What a happy day that will be!"
Two days after September 11, Falwell fingered those he felt were responsible. "I know that I'll hear from them for this. But, throwing God out successfully with the help of the federal court system, throwing God out of the public square, out of the schools. The abortionists have got to bear some burden for this because God will not be mocked. And when we destroy 40 million little innocent babies, we make God mad. I really believe that the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People for the American Way -- all of them who have tried to secularize America -- I point the finger in their face and say you helped this happen".
When George W. Bush took office as President in 2001 and established a White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, Falwell said it was a great idea, so long as Muslim groups were disqualified from receiving the money because, according to Falwell, their faith teaches hate. "Islam should be out the door before they knock", he said. The following year, Falwell noted that "Muhammad was a terrorist. I read enough by both Muslims and non-Muslims, [to decide] that he was a violent man, a man of war". He later half-apologized, saying, "I intended no disrespect to any sincere, law-abiding Muslim."
Decades before the forces that now make up the Christian right declared their culture war, Falwell was a rabid segregationist who railed against the civil rights movement from the pulpit of the abandoned backwater bottling plant he converted into Thomas Road Baptist Church. This opening episode of Falwell's life, studiously overlooked by his friends, naïvely unacknowledged by many of his chroniclers, and puzzlingly and glaringly omitted in the obituaries of the Washington Post and New York Times, is essential to understanding his historical significance in galvanizing the Christian right. Indeed, it was race--not abortion or the attendant suite of so-called "values" issues--that propelled Falwell and his evangelical allies into political activism.
As with his positions on abortion and homosexuality, the basso profondo preacher's own words on race stand as vivid documents of his legacy. Falwell launched on the warpath against civil rights four years after the Supreme Court's Brown v. Board of Education decision to desegregate public schools with a sermon titled "Segregation or Integration: Which?"
"If Chief Justice Warren and his associates had known God's word and had desired to do the Lord's will, I am quite confident that the 1954 decision would never have been made," Falwell boomed from above his congregation in Lynchburg. "The facilities should be separate. When God has drawn a line of distinction, we should not attempt to cross that line." [Nation]
"I listen to feminists and all these radical gals... These women just need a man in the house. That's all they need. Most of the feminists need a man to tell them what time of day it is and to lead them home. And they blew it and they're mad at all men. Feminists hate men. They're sexist. They hate men; that's their problem."
"I do not believe that God answers the prayer of any unredeemed Gentile or Jew"
Falwell had called the gay-positive Metropolitan Community Churches:
"brute beasts...[and] a vile and Satanic system [that will] one day be utterly annihilated and there will be a celebration in heaven."
"Now, further evidence that the creators of the series intend for Tinky Winky to be a gay role model have surfaced. He is purple -- the gay-pride color; and his antenna is shaped like a triangle -- the gay-pride symbol."
Two days after 9-11, in an exchange with Pat Robertson on the 700 Club program, he is reported as having commented on the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon:
"I agree totally with you that the Lord has protected us so wonderfully these 225 years. And since 1812, this is the first time that we've been attacked on our soil and by far the worst results. And I fear, as Donald Rumsfeld, the Secretary of Defense, said yesterday, that this is only the beginning. And with biological warfare available to these monsters -- the Husseins, the Bin Ladens, the Arafats -- what we saw on Tuesday, as terrible as it is, could be miniscule if, in fact -- if, in fact -- God continues to lift the curtain and allow the enemies of America to give us probably what we deserve.....And I know that I'll hear from them for this. But, throwing God out successfully with the help of the federal court system, throwing God out of the public square, out of the schools. The abortionists have got to bear some burden for this because God will not be mocked. And when we destroy 40 million little innocent babies, we make God mad. I really believe that the Pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People for the American Way, all of them who have tried to secularize America, I point the finger in their face and say: you helped this happen."
Additionally, Jerry Falwell was a criminal.
1) October 1987: The Federal Election Commission fines Falwell $6,000 for transferring $6.7 million in funds intended for his ministry to political committees.
2)February 1993: The Internal Revenue Service determines that funds from Falwell's Old Time Gospel Hour program were illegally funneled to a political action committee. The IRS forced Falwell to pay $50,000 and retroactively revoked the Old Time Gospel Hour's tax-exempt status for 1986-87.
3) 1994-1995: Falwell is criticized for using his "Old Time Gospel Hour" to hawk a scurrilous video called "The Clinton Chronicles" that makes a number of unsubstantiated charges against President Bill Clinton-among them that he is a drug addict and that he arranged the murders of political enemies in Arkansas. Despite claims he had no ties to the project, evidence surfaced that Falwell helped bankroll the venture with $200,000 paid to a group called Citizens for Honest Government (CHG). CHG's Pat Matrisciana later admitted that Falwell and he staged an infomercial interview promoting the video in which a silhouetted reporter said his life was in danger for investigating Clinton. (Matrisciana himself posed as the reporter.) "That was Jerry's idea to do that," Matrisciana recalled. "He thought that would be dramatic."
Four years after the Supreme Court's Brown vs. Board of Education outlawing segregated public schools, Falwell gave a speech titled, "Segregation or Integration."
His message was unmistakably clear:
"If Chief Justice Warren and his associates had known God's word and had desired to do the Lord's will, I am quite confident that the 1954 decision would never have been made. The facilities should be separate. When God has drawn the line of distinction, we should not attempt to cross that line."
"The true Negro does not want integration... he realizes his potential is far better among his own race."
-
Paulette,
I think if there is a universal health plan, there won't be the pre-existing clause. How can there be? Everyone is covered to see Dr.s, go in to hospitals, medications. What would be important in my book, is to make sure the plans aren't being overcharged for services. If you don't have health ins. the bill is tremendous, but those with ins. coverage, watch how that bill gets trimmed by the ins. carrier. It's sad what goes on out there.
I was listening to a woman who came in from the street to ask how much a mammo and ultrasound would cost because she was uninsured. The price was way out-of-line. I know my ins. carrier doesn't pay that much for me getting the same services. For crying out loud, it's just a digital picture. I know a radiologist has to read it. Right. I saw mine, I could of read it.
-
Shirley, when you criticize Wright over and over again for the same 20 second sound bite and post new articles on that, are you also not moving on?
I believe that we've all moved on from a racist society towards a better one-- but that we are not there yet. When Obama gave his historic speech, he started off, "We the people, in order to form a more perfect union..." the key being more. People who believe as Wright does speak harmful words, as did Jerry Falwell and others who marginalize a segment of the population.
Most of the teens who are racist, whether white or black have learned that from their families to think that way, as are most of the people who are antigay. If a minister is preaching hate and not love, that's wrong, in my opinion.
You have positive things to say about Falwell and I believe that to some people, including you, he was a kind man. If I were only to look at the horrendous quotes me made, I would not think so and more than if people listened to the sound bite of Wright, they would think he was a kind man. If you stop posting negative things about Wright, I'll stop responding to them. You can go on thinking Wright is pure evil, but if you go on posting about it I'm going to respond to it.
I do not think you are racist even though you have some bias.
An interesting tidbit about whites adopting blacks, the push is now to disallow that, because agencies believe that blacks lose their cultural identity when this happens. In some states it was even outlawed, which I think is ridiculous, it's much better for a child to have a home than not have one.
-
Let me just say about racism and Falwell. He must have evolved because there are many black students in his schools. Plus there is interracial dating...allowed.
As far as homosexuality...it's in the Bible. I let God be the judge because God knows I have many things for which I will be judged. As a minister he was anti-homosexual. That is not uncommon.
About Ellen DeGeneres, he apologized. I remember him saying something about her and I cringed.
I'd have to look up ALL the apologies this man has made. Inasmuch as you know where I got my info about Wright's new million dollar home, where did you get yours?
BTW, has Wright apologized after the world heard his words?
Read this (Jerry's wasn't all that mean).
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-op-flynt20may20,0,2297247.story?coll=la-opinion-center
From the Los Angeles TimesLarry Flynt: My friend, Jerry Falwell
How the pornographer found himself in the embrace of the reverend who sued him.By Larry Flynt
LARRY FLYNT is the publisher of Hustler magazine and the author of "Sex, Lies and Politics."
May 20, 2007
THE FIRST TIME the Rev. Jerry Falwell put his hands on me, I was stunned. Not only had we been archenemies for 15 years, his beliefs and mine traveling in different solar systems, and not only had he sued me for $50 million (a case I lost repeatedly yet eventually won in the Supreme Court), but now he was hugging me in front of millions on the Larry King show.
It was 1997. My autobiography, "An Unseemly Man," had just been published, describing my life as a publisher of pornography. The film "The People vs. Larry Flynt" had recently come out, and the country was well aware of the battle that Falwell and I had fought: a battle that had changed the laws governing what the American public can see and hear in the media and that had dramatically strengthened our right to free speech.
King was conducting the interview. It was the first time since the infamous 1988 trial that the reverend and I had been in the same room together, and the thought of even breathing the same air with him made me sick. I disagreed with Falwell (who died last week) on absolutely everything he preached, and he looked at me as symbolic of all the social ills that a society can possibly have. But I'd do anything to sell the book and the film, and Falwell would do anything to preach, so King's audience of 8 million viewers was all the incentive either of us needed to bring us together.
But let's start at the beginning and flash back to the late 1970s, when the battle between Falwell, the leader of the Moral Majority, and I first began. I was publishing Hustler magazine, which most people know has been pushing the envelope of taste from the very beginning, and Falwell was blasting me every chance he had. He would talk about how I was a slime dealer responsible for the decay of all morals. He called me every terrible name he could think of - names as bad, in my opinion, as any language used in my magazine.
After several years of listening to him bash me and reading his insults, I decided it was time to start poking some fun at him. So we ran a parody ad in Hustler - a takeoff on the then-current Campari ads in which people were interviewed describing "their first time." In the ads, it ultimately became clear that the interviewees were describing their first time sipping Campari. But not in our parody. We had Falwell describing his "first time" as having been with his mother, "drunk off our God-fearing asses," in an outhouse.
Apparently, the reverend didn't find the joke funny. He sued us for libel in federal court in Virginia, claiming that the magazine had inflicted emotional stress on him. It was a long and tedious fight, beginning in 1983 and ending in 1988, but Hustler Magazine Inc. vs. Jerry Falwell was without question my most important battle.
We lost in our initial jury trial, and we lost again in federal appeals court. After spending a fortune, everyone's advice to me was to just settle the case and be done, but I wasn't listening; I wasn't about to pay Falwell $200,000 for hurting his feelings or, as his lawyers called it, "intentional infliction of emotional distress." We appealed to the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, and I lost for a third time.
Everyone was certain this was the end. We never thought the U.S. Supreme Court would agree to hear the case. But it did, and though I felt doomed throughout the trial and was convinced that I was going to lose, we never gave up. As we had moved up the judicial ladder, this case had become much more than just a personal battle between a pornographer and a preacher, because the 1st Amendment was so much at the heart of the case.
To my amazement, we won. It wasn't until after I won the case and read the justices' unanimous decision in my favor that I realized fully the significance of what had happened. The justices held that a parody of a public figure was protected under the 1st Amendment even if it was outrageous, even if it was "doubtless gross and repugnant," as they put it, and even if it was designed to inflict emotional distress. In a unanimous decision - written by, of all people, Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist - the court reasoned that if it supported Falwell's lower-court victory, no one would ever have to prove something was false and libelous to win a judgment. All anyone would have to prove is that "he upset me" or "she made me feel bad." The lawsuits would be endless, and that would be the end of free speech.
Everyone was shocked at our victory - and no one more so than Falwell, who on the day of the decision called me a "sleaze merchant" hiding behind the 1st Amendment. Still, over time, Falwell was forced to publicly come to grips with the reality that this is America, where you can make fun of anyone you want. That hadn't been absolutely clear before our case, but now it's being taught in law schools all over the country, and our case is being hailed as one of the most important free-speech cases of the 20th century.
No wonder that when he started hugging me and smooching me on television 10 years later, I was a bit confused. I hadn't seen him since we'd been in court together, and that night I didn't see him until I came out on the stage. I was expecting (and looking for) a fight, but instead he was putting his hands all over me. I remember thinking, "I spent $3 million taking that case to the Supreme Court, and now this guy wants to put his hand on my leg?"
Soon after that episode, I was in my office in Beverly Hills, and out of nowhere my secretary buzzes me, saying, "Jerry Falwell is here to see you." I was shocked, but I said, "Send him in." We talked for two hours, with the latest issues of Hustler neatly stacked on my desk in front of him. He suggested that we go around the country debating, and I agreed. We went to colleges, debating moral issues and 1st Amendment issues - what's "proper," what's not and why.
In the years that followed and up until his death, he'd come to see me every time he was in California. We'd have interesting philosophical conversations. We'd exchange personal Christmas cards. He'd show me pictures of his grandchildren. I was with him in Florida once when he complained about his health and his weight, so I suggested that he go on a diet that had worked for me. I faxed a copy to his wife when I got back home.
The truth is, the reverend and I had a lot in common. He was from Virginia, and I was from Kentucky. His father had been a bootlegger, and I had been one too in my 20s before I went into the Navy. We steered our conversations away from politics, but religion was within bounds. He wanted to save me and was determined to get me out of "the business."
My mother always told me that no matter how repugnant you find a person, when you meet them face to face you will always find something about them to like. The more I got to know Falwell, the more I began to see that his public portrayals were caricatures of himself. There was a dichotomy between the real Falwell and the one he showed the public.
He was definitely selling brimstone religion and would do anything to add another member to his mailing list. But in the end, I knew what he was selling, and he knew what I was selling, and we found a way to communicate.
I always kicked his ass about his crazy ideas and the things he said. Every time I'd call him, I'd get put right through, and he'd let me berate him about his views. When he was getting blasted for his ridiculous homophobic comments after he wrote his "Tinky Winky" article cautioning parents that the purple Teletubby character was in fact gay, I called him in Florida and yelled at him to "leave the Tinky Winkies alone."
When he referred to Ellen Degeneres in print as Ellen "Degenerate," I called him and said, "What are you doing? You don't need to poison the whole lake with your venom." I could hear him mumbling out of the side of his mouth, "These lesbians just drive me crazy." I'm sure I never changed his mind about anything, just as he never changed mine.
I'll never admire him for his views or his opinions. To this day, I'm not sure if his television embrace was meant to mend fences, to show himself to the public as a generous and forgiving preacher or merely to make me uneasy, but the ultimate result was one I never expected and was just as shocking a turn to me as was winning that famous Supreme Court case: We became friends. -
An interesting tidbit about whites adopting blacks, the push is now to disallow that, because agencies believe that blacks lose their cultural identity when this happens. In some states it was even outlawed, which I think is ridiculous, it's much better for a child to have a home than not have one.
Well, we do agree on something! I do believe that some white parents try to learn about the background of blacks so they can teach their children their heritage. I think a good mom and dad would do that.
Shirley
-
Larry Flynt and Jerry Falwell-- strange bedfellows don't you think LOL -- makes me think of the odd couple, Larry being Oscar and Jerry Felix.
-
Amy said: even though you sit on your high horse proclaiming how life isn't fair because people who have had it harder than you say they've suffered as much as you have. Even when talking about an article about how poor people suffer with breast cancer, you complained "what about me, I could have lost my house and my daughter's college fund, why didn't they mention me." as if to damn those who the article was written about, people who would consider what you have to be a luxury.
I sit on a high horse because I have financial problems because cancer wiped out my savings and I am upset about it? How is that a high horse? I never damn those people, I have asked what about the middle class victims of bc? Pretty soon it will end up getting like Mexico, 2 classes instead of 3 if nothing is done about helping the middle class. I never said, " how life isn't fair because people who have had it harder than you say they've suffered as much as you have." YOU MISQUOTE, MISREAD AND BULLY.
What are you doing about any situation? What volunteer work do you do to better anybody's situation? What help do you give to others? What community efforts are you involved with? Do you visit the elderly with me and my daughter? Do you go and bring new toys and new clothes to the battered womens shelter with me and my daughter? Do you drive your gently used and sometimes new things to the homeless shelter across town with me and my daughter? Are you handing out money to homeless people on the corner with me? Do you make sure that several children are provided with several gifts and a special outfit for Christmas? Me and my daughter scrimped on our Christmas to make sure that 6 children had toys and an outfit, complete with underwear and socks, that they could wear for Christmas and casual enough to wear to school so they had a new outfit after Christmas vacation.
You constantly berate and bully and don't see the good in any of us who have a conservative viewpoint. Why don't you GET OFF YOUR COMPUTER WITH YOUR HIGH HORSE AND GO DO SOME REAL WORK FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANOTHER HUMAN BEING even if they are white.
-
Rosemary...I got the bill for my last mammo and it was $485.00, there was a screw up with my insurance but in the end insurance paid. That $485.00 did not include the radiologist reading. It was also done at my local hospital. I think they are cheaper at imaging clinics. It would be nice to have some consistancy in billing. I was getting a blood test last week and a lady without insurance had to fork over $185.00 (she had no insurance) but get this, it was at Quest Diagnostics, and Quest has a plan for uninsured people for $10.00 a year they get a reduced cost, the reduction saved her$85.00. I thought this makes no sense to me whatsoever!
I think with a universal healthcare plan there will have to be some consistancy with prices because everyone would be on a level playing ground. I suppose though the lobbyists for the insurance industry will come up with a million reasons why prices will automatically go up.
-
Paulette,
And when your insurance paid for your mammo, I am sure the amount was a fraction of the billed amount. My surgery was like 75K, and the insurance ended up paying 15K or so.
So as the first step , I would demand a right to pay as much as the insurance does. I mean it should be even better for doctors, as they don't have to do any insuramce paperwork.
-
Wow, trying to pick my way carefully here on this thread, and avoid entering into religious/bible-quoting conversations... not to say that's not fascinating as well, but.....
Regarding the Presidential Campaign.... I am also concerned with health care (duh, having expensive cancer) but actually I feel pretty pleased with both Hillary and Barack's plans. I need to be updated on what McCain's health plan is. Anyone know?
But I'm mostly concerned that neither democratic candidate seems to be speaking much at all on global warming. Why is that not discussed more?
-
Wow. I don't even know where to begin.
First of all, I began my comments not about SLAVERY, but RACE. slavery and white plantation owners was a way to see how this great country was built by WHITE MEN. White men are in power and will continue to be in power. As white women we get privileges by being connected to these white men.
I am not suggesting handouts for any other race or ethnicity. I am suggesting that we need to have a serious talk about RACE. What is racism and how is it perpetuated in this country. And don't try to tell me that reverse racism exists--because it doesn't--there is no such thing. The people in power, or who have the most are the racists. Racism is used as a method to keep the "others" meaning other races, or by skin color DOWN. It is a way of maintaining power. It is a way of keeping the wealthy rich, and the poor poorer.
And if you think the middle class is slowly disappearing in this country, you are so right! It is disappearing, and not because of Mexicans, or other poor people. It is the rich. The rich pay less in taxes, corporations are owned by rich people who get wonderful tax breaks from our government. Then they take the jobs from americans and send them overseas, or bring people here from third world developing countries on international visas to work for about 1/3-1/2 what they would pay an american for doing the same job.
I will give one example--this is your federal government at work--in 2006, Yosemite hired 600 international visa workers (most of whom did not speak much English, and had NEVER worked any of the jobs that they were hired for)--but they came cheap. Unfortunately, because of the changes with 9/11 the workers did not arrive until June. By then the season had already started. So, all the accountants and administrators at Yosemite were put to work making beds and cleaning rooms and serving what little food was available (most services remained closed due to shortage of workers). Amazing, huh?
Well, there is good news in this. The end of the article in the newspaper stated that the government (at least the federal park system) learned its lesson--this year they advertised locally and were able to fill all 600 positions in record time--from local central valley workers--I'm sure it included farm workers. The jobs are low paying, but for some it is a step up--not middle class step up--and never to be middle class.
The middle class is disappearing because Bush declared war on Iraq--now known as Bush's War. A fitting name I think. And it is costing us trillions of dollars. And it will continue to cost us trillions of dollars if McCain is elected president. McCain is Bush's third term! The tax breaks for corporations, and the tax breaks for the millionaires will continue.
And we will continue to borrow money from China, and to bring in most of our goods from China. If you shop at WalMart or any other large cheap chain store, look at where the goods are made. How many are made in the good old USA? We are slowly losing our middle class. Many of those in our middle class, are the hardworking people you speak of. Your dollar is becoming worth less and less.
Look at the price of gas? In California it's over $3.71 per gallon, and that's for unleaded--the cheapest type. And who's making all the dollars on this--look at the profits for the oil companies. And Halliburton gets all the contracts in the middle east to rebuilt what we have bombed out--without a bidding process by the feds.
So, don't tell me the poor, or the people of color (and by the way, they are not all poor) are responsible for the ending that is coming of the middle class.
I, for one, am appalled at the intolerance on this board. Obama opened the discussion about race, and it amazes me how little most people want to spend discussing it. And while I have been accused of continually bringing up slavery, I beg to differ. I have been continually trying to bring in another view and opinion about RACE. That is the discussion this thread must have, and the women on this thread must have if you expect this country to move on.
I fear, that if the women here are an example of what exists in other parts of this country, we are not ready for a black president or a woman president. We will continue to have white men in power running this country. And Bush's War will go on, and we will continue to borrow to keep our economy afloat, greedy people will continue to offer mortgages to those that can't afford them, and our government will continue to bail out the rich money companies and offer bids to companies like Halliburton without having competing bids.
As long as people continue to believe that everyone in this country, no matter the color of their skin, is treated equally and has the same privileges and rights granted to them without even having earned them, well then racism will continue. Not only that, but blacks and others will continue to dialogue about race, and they are the ones that will be moving on as the whites refusing to discuss race will be left in their dust. -
Grace, I don't think the poor are to blame for the disappearance of the middle class, it's the rich, the politicians, the social programs that the middle class and poor must fund (because the rich don't pay taxes). People need to earn their living ... even if they have to work from home but I am tired of working my butt off and others, who are sitting at home, could be doing SOMETHING, even watching other's children, so that another may work. I think communities need to get together instead of the government paying out.
Me and two other families get together and go over our calendars and see where we have to make adjustments so we can get our kids to and from school/daycare. I usually take 2 additional kids on Mondays especially school holidays and they pick up on the nights I work late. Lots of mom's on assistance can't get back to work due to the expense of childcare. There is state assistance but still, it's expensive: my point is that if some families would get together and help each other out then more than one single mom, or single dad, can get back into the workforce or college or trade school.
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team