The Brand New Respectful Presidential Campaign Thread

Options
1679111261

Comments

  • shokk
    shokk Member Posts: 1,763
    edited March 2008

    Ok guys I need some education........when the primaries were getting ready to start and Florida and Michigan decided to have their primaries out of turn and hold them early didn't the DNC warn them that if they did go ahead with their plans that their delegates would not be seated at the convention?  What I don't understand who in Florida and Michigan decided to go ahead with their primaries?  Even after DNC warned them and now they say they are being disenfranchised?  Wasn't it FL and MI own state officials that disenfranchised their own voters?  What am I missing?  Shokk

  • ADK
    ADK Member Posts: 2,259
    edited March 2008

    I believe you have it correct, Shokk.  Florida & Michigan state officials disenfranchised themselves.  What is going on right now is that the race is so tight, the DNC is beginning to think they need them, so they are desperately looking for a way to seat them at the convention (trying to turn a swat on the behind into a slap on the wrist, IMHO).  This is going to be very interesting to see how it plays out. 

  • saluki
    saluki Member Posts: 2,287
    edited March 2008

    Don't think your missing anything Shokk---But if they don't seat them or resolve it neither candidate will be able to get the majority they need to secure the nomination.  Guess no one considered the race could get this close.

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited March 2008

      Florida & Michigan state officials disenfranchised themselves. 

    ADK I am do glad you made this important point, because some of the press seem to forget that the dates were layed out specifically for when Florida and Michigan moved up their primaries to be earlier than the allowed dates. The two states are different though,because Michigan did so with a democratic governor and controlled legislator. Michigan knew what it was getting into and chose to go ahead, hoping the delegates would be seated anyway. It was like a big FU to the democratic party leadership and Howard Dean. The presidential candidates agreed that the votes wouldn't count and were encouraged to take their names off the ballot, as Obama did. Hillary chose not to listen to this and she was the only  candidate other that Gravel and Kucinich who were both polling at less than 1%, who ignored the request. Unlike Michigan, Floridia is controlled by a republican governor and legislator and when the repubs decided to move the election, the dems were powerless to change that- although I'm not sure how hard they tried. All the candidates were on the ballot, but not allowed to campaign, which benefitted Hillary who had the name recognition so early in the race and not Obama who wasn't able to campaign to get his message to the floridians.

    What's ironic though is that Florida officials have said no do-over, which kind of sucks because the democrats weren't totally in control. Michigan was in control of not following the rules and knew the consequences, yet is planning to have a redo on June 3rd, though that isn't set in stone.

    It's such a complicated issue-- voters shouldn't be denied their voice even if their states don't follow the rules, yet candidates shouldn't be penalized for following the rules.

  • ADK
    ADK Member Posts: 2,259
    edited March 2008

    I did a little fact checking and I guess the democrats in Florida didn't exactly fight the setting of the primary so early - some even spoke out in support of it.  So, I don't think Florida can use the "it's all the Republican's fault" excuse.  If that were what happened, that would be wrong in so many ways.

    One point I do want to bring up is that some folks are saying that their right to vote was usurped by what happened in Florida & Michigan.  Please remember, this is a primary and those states will vote in the actual election.  Independents can't vote in either primary in many states.  The rights of the registered Democrats in Florida and Michigan were no more usurped than the rights of Independents in those states that don't allow them to vote in primaries.  JMHO

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited March 2008

    Grace says: 

    Absolutely there is room for improvement in the system. We have treated our Vietnam Vets horribly. These men came back physically and emotionally damaged from that war, and then we didn't even give them the respect they should have gotten when they came home. They were treated not like heroes but like they were criminals. These men did what the government required them to do. They did not have a choice, they had to follow orders, unless they killed their commanding officer one night in the dark.

    Americans have shunned them. and now we expect them to walk meekly into a hospital and ask for care? These homeless vets may use drugs and drink. They are doing exactly what others do who don't get help for their problems--self-medicating.

    Of course there's always room for improvement.

    Americans have shunned the Viet Nam vets.  I wonder why.  Sort of reminds me of the Berkley crap that's going on.  Sad, isn't it?

    Here's just a little clip about a soldier that served in Afghanistan.  I was fortunate to see the entire hour.  This soldier and his wife are incredible.  This soldier loves his country.  I wished everyone had seen this show.  It would bring tears to your eyes just how much this man loves his country and what he's willing to do. 

    Try to tell this guy that the troops need to come home.

    http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2008/03/12/beck.saluting.a.hero.cnn

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited March 2008

    Great points ADK and Shirley.

  • Paulette531
    Paulette531 Member Posts: 738
    edited March 2008

    Shirley...SSDD! Exactly where our troops are concerned! I have been trying to reiterate the same thing. People who espew "bring our troops home" are not doing it because they support our troops they are doing it because it is what THEY want! Ask our troops what they want and you will see the majority of them know what their job is and are dedicated in doing it. They are the armed forces, it is the civialians who don't seem to grasp this and at that it is usually the liberals who protest to protest!

    Shirley...I admire your courage and patience in standing up for your principles against others on this board through their insinuations and direct insults towards what you believe in, you are awesome!  

  • acarr
    acarr Member Posts: 104
    edited March 2008

    duplicate post

  • acarr
    acarr Member Posts: 104
    edited March 2008

    Shirley,

    Thank you for posting this link.  What an amazing man and what a moving video clip.  I know others in my small home town who have served in Iraq

  • acarr
    acarr Member Posts: 104
    edited March 2008

    Shirley, thank you for posting this link.  What an amazing man and what a moving video clip.  There are several men and women in my small home town who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan and have reinlisted because they believe in what they are fighting for. 

    I agree with Paulette...you are an awesome person!

  • sccruiser
    sccruiser Member Posts: 1,119
    edited March 2008

    Paulette, I'm so glad I am able to amuse you. There is so little humor on these threads these days. And I thank you for your definition of a crone, and accept it as my own--a wise, old elder. Woo-hoo. You make my day!



    Oh, I can't believe that the majority of those troops sitting over there wouldn't want to come home! Unless of course, they continue to be entertained by the likes of Jessica Simpson (who just came back from a rally to keep up the troops' spirits)



    And I do not "generalize" as you accuse me of doing to others, I offer MY PERONAL EXPERIENCES as a differing point of view. I do not think many of these women, including yourself, are very open to reading points of view that differ from yours. And so, I in turn find you and other women on this thread amusing to me.



    Isn't it delightful we can amuse each other? So no offense taken by your posting to me above! Isn't it nice we can disagree and amuse each other at the same time.



    As far as not answering your question about knowing these vets personally, this is the first time I have seen you question as I was at the hospital yesterday and unable to come to this site.



    The vets I have met, and yes, spoken too personally, since that seems to be a real issue for you; are off the grid, so to speak. They ask for money from passerbys in our downtown. They get food, when they can walk from their unauthorized campsite to downtown where a church serves them a meal each day, and they have expressed to me and others that they feel America has turned their back on them. They feel ostracized and angry that the government and the American people think so little of their service in Vietnam (after all, we didn't give them any parades when they returned, did we). So I am not generalizing, but I 'm sure you won't believe me. I'm not even sure affidavits from thsese fine men would satisfy you or others on this site.



    Now, hopefully we have settled the personal here, and can get back to the political her.



    Respectfully (as the thread title says)

    grace

  • sccruiser
    sccruiser Member Posts: 1,119
    edited March 2008

    Amy,

    I have no idea how this will fall out. It looks like Mich is going to have the same problem--unable to get a 2nd primary finished by end of June.



    MMM....wonder if the voters in those 2 states will stage massive protests and demand the right to vote for a primary candidate--with all the candidates names on the ballot!



    This country seems to do a very good job at times of disenfranchising pockets of particular groups of people in this country. Wish all these government & political entities would get their act together. Makes the DNC look like idiots.



    grace

  • sccruiser
    sccruiser Member Posts: 1,119
    edited March 2008

    Yes, that was very moving.



    Thank you for sharing that with us, Shirley.



    The majority of the troops may know their job and want to finish it, however they have been sent there under a false premis by a President and his yes men to do this. Sad, that young people can be hoodwinked by lies in the guise of patriotism and democracy, of basically telling another country what they need. Perhaps we need to rethink how we help other nations in the future. Maybe this is a history that we can learn from.

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited March 2008

    Grace,

    The DNC members are idiots.  Everyone keeps talking about throwing people under the bus, and I keep thinking why not Harold Dean.  If we lose the election this year, and he winds up under a bus, you can count me in as a suspect.  This was our election to lose, and I'm so afraid it's going to happen.  I wish Obama and Hillary, for the good of the country, not the Party, would agree to give all their delegates to Al Gore, and he would agree to take them.  At this stage, having the first black or first woman president is far less important than putting a Democrat back in office.  I heard someone say yesterday that "Democrats fall in love and Republics fall in line."  Appears to be true and considering how many marriages fail in this country, we all know where love usually gets us--my husband excepted, of course. 

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited March 2008

    Regardless of how it came to be that the Florida and Michigan primaries were moved up, regardless of why it is that revotes can't be done (assuming that ends up being the decision in Michigan as well as Florida), and regardless of the rules of the DNC, the problem for the Democratics is that it's been government and party officials who've created this mess but it's the people in these states who are being disenfranchised. 

    It's certainly true that the people of Florida and Michigan can still vote in the election in November, but if the Democratic party doesn't find a way to allow them to participate in the nomination process for the Democratic candidate (particularly since it's such a close race and their input could actually impact the nomination), do we really believe that these voters will rush out to vote for the Democrats in November?  The Democratics need Florida and Michigan to win in November, and yet only a small percentage shift (or even a fraction of a percent) in the votes could result in a victory for the Republicans in both states.  That would give the Republicans the White House. 

    If the Democrats continue down the current path and don't find a way to ensure that the voters of Florida and Michigan are fully accounted for in the nomination process, they are fools.

  • sccruiser
    sccruiser Member Posts: 1,119
    edited March 2008

    Well anneshirley & Beesie,

    You got it right. They are idiots and fools if the DNC thinks they can not count the general votes from these states. Part of the issue is that only Hillary remained on the Michigan primary ballot, correct?

    That makes it a huge problem, as they didn't have a choice who to vote for, and I am assuming that most voted for Hillary.



    Of course, I keep hearing that the Clinton election machine is pushing for Mich & Fla to be counted as is without revotes. Whether it's true or not, I could care less. I do think, however, that the voters should be able to vote again for whichever candidate they think should be the demos nominee.



    Yes, I know many of us will be madder than H$$$ if we lose this election to a Republican. Because if we do, we can be assured we will have more of the same--less jobs, less money, more war, more taxes. There's no way this govt can afford to keep that war going for another 4 years. By that time, China will own us completely. it's getting utterly ridiculous.



    And I agree, how can we have a President who has little or no experience w/international issues & the economy. i recall that McCain is planning to bring Carly Fiorina on board as his economic analyst! WTH this woman almost single-handedly destroyed HP before she was forced to step down. Scary.

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited March 2008

    I don't think that Hillary should get the Michigan delegates as it stands today, although I will point out that the voters could vote "uncommitted" and Obama's people actually campaigned in Michigan to get supporters to vote "uncommitted."  Quite a few of them did.

    In Florida, if we don't have a redo, then Hillary should get her delegates.  It was the Republican legislature that moved the primary up, and it's not true that all the Democrats agreed to the move, a very few did. The majority of Democrats told Dean it was a disaster waiting to happen if he refused to seat the delegates.  And since neither Clinton nor Obama, supposedly, did any campaigning there, it's a fair election and should be counted.  Obama actually ran some national ads in Florida (he says he was forced by the Cable news to run the ads in Florida) and Hillary did some fund raising (with permission of DNC) but did not campaign there.  So the reasons for not counting Florida, as is, is not valid as presented by MS-NBC.  But to be fair, both states should have a redo.  It really does appear that the DNC wants to lose this election.  

    And above and beyond, I find it ridiculous that two small states like New Hampshire and Iowa should decide the nominee, which happens quite often, as the momentum starts to build and can't be stopped.  This method of selecting the nominee has to be changed, and I feel strongly that the popular vote should always count.  How can Wyoming with 60,000 primary voters have a greater say over the nominee than Florida with 1,700,000 primary voters.  I don't care if you're for Obama or not, make a case for that one!

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited March 2008

    I'm a Clinton supporter but I  agree that there is no way that the Michigan primary results should be counted as is.  My understanding is that Clinton's team has been pushing for a revote but Obama's team has been against it. 

    Similarly in Florida, it was Clinton who was leading the push for some sort of a redo, while the Obama campaign was putting up roadblocks.  Given the decision to not have a revote in Florida, I do think that the previous results for Florida should be counted.  I happened to in Florida on the day of the primary and while there were Republican signs and supporters everywhere, there was not a Democratic sign or supporter to be seen.  So there certainly didn't seem to be any active campaigning by any of the Democratic candidates.  And all the names were on the ballot.  So as these things go, it was as fair as anything.  Latest I've heard, the proposal is to seat the Florida delegates with a 50/50 split between Obama and Clinton.  That, frankly, is outrageously unfair.  While some may question the size of the victory by Clinton (47% to 33% for Obama), you have to consider that Florida is made up almost entirely (I exaggerate only a bit) of Clinton's strongest constituencies - older women and Hispanics.  Given that, the results are reasonable and consistent with voting patterns in other primaries.   

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited March 2008

    I am not posting tonight.  Well, I'm sorta not posting...hmmmm...wonder how that's done. LOL

    I'm tired.  It's been a long day.  Perhaps that's why after watching that clip again and remembering what he and his wife said and stood for..well, there goes the mascara.  Nope, haven't cleaned my face yet. 

    Thanks Paulette and acarr for the "pat" on the back.  Sometimes we just need that.  I feel like I've been through a battle.

    I just feel like many citizens don't get how very fortunate we are to live in this country.  Inna has a real experience.  I believe she knows more than any of us.  I thank her for her participation and her allowing us to "walk" a little in her shoes.

    I still believe that by rehashing the horrible injustice(s) that African Americans went through only hampers one to move forward.  I believe that if Martin Luther King, Jr. had lived through the civil rights movement and beyond things would be different today.  His message was "I have a dream."  His message wasn't divisive.

    Yes, there is still racism.  How do we truly get beyond the anger?  What do we need to do before we, the whites, are forgiven.  Perhaps the Jewish community could help heal some wounds.  The Holocaust was real.  Horrible (beyond) inhumane treatment happened to the Jews.  Children were snatched away from their parents.  I cannot imagine!  Have you seen pictures of the bodies piled on top of each other?  Have you seen film clips of the "skeleton" like men and women behind barbed wire fences?  Yep, there really were ovens.  My father saw them.  I would love to know how the Jews have been able to forgive.  We still have Jewish people alive today that endured beyond what we could comprehend.

    I was watching a while back a special that Oprah had on.  I believe it was of a museum Auschwitz (not sure).  There was hair that had been piled up that was shaved from men, women and children's heads.  There were shoes, baby shoes.  So much atrocities.  I cannot imagine walking through the museum and feeling the horror these people went through.

    How do we move beyond slavery that happened centuries ago?

    I loved the movie, "Roots."  I cannot believe how human beings can treat other humans.  I cried watching that movie, did you?  Some scenes I couldn't watch.  And it's been said that I'm scarier than a skinhead. 

    There is absolutely nothing wrong with speaking out and criticizing our country.  That's what we call freedom of speech.  But a war is going on.  Just like the Viet Nam war.  The marching starts.  The hate begins.  And our military suffer.  Our vets who have returned home are suffering, I'm sure, from what they have endured, seen, and done.  Our enemies LOVE it!  And the politics begin.  How do we keep our politicians honest?

    Good night.

    Shirley

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited March 2008

    I agree, Beesie, a fifty-fifty split in Florida is outrageous.  Basically, it's no different from saying that Florida doesn't get to vote, since 50/50 is equivalent to 0/0--not even, as it could theoretically put Obama over the top. Perhaps they think Floridians are stupid--old brains won't figure it out for themselves.  I'm also not too happy with the way the Democratic Party has decided that seniors really don't count, mainly because the Party thinks it can always count on us.  I really wish this country had a viable third party, one that consistently received about 25+ percent of the vote. 

    Anne (ADK)--not yet talking to myself.  With respect to your point that the folks in Michigan and Florida can still vote in the general election.  True, but the point here is they want to help pick the nominee of their party.  If they're true Democrats who vote platform, they know who they'll vote for in the fall--the Democrat, but they want to help pick that Democrat, so their votes are being usurped.  Independent voters are not having their votes usurped. They've elected to stay independent and not join a party.  They could vote in the Democratic primary if they joined the Democratic Party. What surprised me is that some states actually let independents vote in the primaries and also permit Republicans to vote in Democratic primaries. That I don't agree with. If someone wants to be a Democrat or a Republican, it's easy enough to register in that party.  If you stay an independent, it's because you're not committed to either party, so why should one get to pick the party's candidate.

    Whether Hillary had won Florida or Obama, it wouldn't matter to me in this argument.  To disenfranchise Florida, one of the most populated states is outrageous.  I read a poll yesterday that says 1/4 of the Florida Democratic voters say they won't vote for the Democrat in the fall if their delegates are not seated as represented by the January vote.  If the Democrats lose Florida, they can kiss the election goodbye.  It's madness and nobody wins:  neither Hillary or Obama.  Actually, McCain wins. 

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited March 2008

    What to do about FL and MI is such a complicated issue. On one hand both states went into the primaries with eyes wide open, even if disagreeing with the consequences of having their primaries too early. All of the candidates agreed to this, whether it was fair or not. I think that Hillary thought she'd have the nomination wrapped up and that the DNC thought the votes wouldn't be needed. I don't know if any of the politicians had a what if scenario in mind at the time of the this decision when agreeing to the rules and consequences. The voters were told their votes wouldn't count, so we don't know how many people stayed home that day because of it. I don't believe in changing the rules mid game-- because I think doing so puts the fairness of the whole game in jeopardy.

    On the other hand, what about the voters in these states? Most of the time the nominations are locked up by spring, so all of the states afterward really don't count, since the decision has been made. Is that fair that they didn't get to vote earlier, before some of the candidates had dropped out.

    I think the only positive that may come out of this whole mess is that hopefully the DNC will get it's act together and smooth out the problems by the next election.

    Whoever gets the nomination is going to have an asterisk by the name if one candidate is perceived as having the rules bent to get that nomination, unless the two candidates can come up with a solution before the convention and show the unity necessary to bring the party together.

  • shokk
    shokk Member Posts: 1,763
    edited March 2008

    Grace just so you know that there is always a percentage of homeless people whom are vets.........has been since the Revolutionary War.......also many of the homeless guys will have signs that "say" they are vets and need your help and simply are not.......they are just panhandling and usually trying to get money just to buy more booze......how could you possible know if the "homeless" people you encounter really are Vets?  You can't believe everything you hear when some one is trying to swindle you out of the money you have worked for........jmo......Shokk

  • Paulette531
    Paulette531 Member Posts: 738
    edited March 2008

    Shirley...I lived in Germany for six years. One of the concentration camps we toured was Dachau, it's near Munich...it was the most sobering experience of my life, mostly I remember the dead silence of the tour even though all the things the Nazis used for torture were still in tact, the showers, the ovens, OMG the ovens, there were large ones for adults and on the side of those were small ones for the children. How in Gods name could a human being do that to another human being is beyond me, it was HORRIBLE. There were many people touring but nobody said a word, it was HORRIBLE,HORRIBLE, HORRIBLE. When we were walking to our car, still silence, the silence was deafning (sp)...I cannot even explain it. You really have to experience something like that to even begin to understand the complexities of what happened.

  • sccruiser
    sccruiser Member Posts: 1,119
    edited March 2008

    I don't agree that Obama is putting up "roadblocks" when it comes to Fla & Mich. He has stated time and time again that he will abide by whatever rules the DNC set up and if they change he will abide by that. He is clearly saying that Dean is to be held responsible for this. it is not up to Obama and Hillary to solve this problem. to do so by their one would look like a "bought election."



    The Vets in this area band together. They know who is real and who isn't. I don't give money to anyone on the street, so no one is swindling money out of me that I have worked for! I help them in other ways, often just as a pair of ears to listen to their story. Also, we have quite a number of homeless in our area. Santa Cruz is known for all it's social services. The university students are very strongly committed to community service as part of their education. This county has one of the best groups of non-profits to serve the homeless. It is amazing what has been done for this population. It's too bad we have a war going on, we could use that money in this country to provide universal healthcare, and well built and maintained lower income housing. When the minimum wage is $8.00 an hour here, and a one bedroom appt can cost $1700-2000. a month, even a family is strapped to keep a roof over their heads. Our country and all of us could do so much more.



    I do agree with you shokk, that there are swindlers out there. Our county has an ordinance that forbids them from panhandling on the sidewalks. Some have moved to street corners, but the police keep them moving on. Sure, there are young people that think it would be great to live off of others--and unfortunately there are many citizens who feel sorry for them and give them money which goes towards dope & alcohol. Not smart!



    I have a close African American friend who made a trip to Africa. She went to one of the "castles" that were built by either the Portuguese or the Spanish to hold the slaves waiting for the ships to arrive and be loaded. These blacks were put in a dungeon like space, often piled one on top of the other, and many died before the ship came. She and the group she was with went into the dungeon. They felt the presence of their ancestors. Many heard the voices. She said there was not a dry eye in the group, and that visit has stayed with her for years. Even the tour guides say the spirits of those who died there are still present. There too was utter silence from anyone visiting as they heard and felt the horrors that we find unimaginable. Even on the ships, the dead were tossed overboard like a sack of bad potatoes. On arriving in America some slaves ran back into the water and rather than live in slavery drowned themselves. All of the slaves who died on American soil during that period of time, have no resting place in this country. The slaves have no headstones, and no names to be recalled.



    We have gravesites, cemetaries and mausoleums for our dead. Most of the blacks whose ancestors were slaves do not have a place to go and visit like we do.

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited March 2008

    What's particularly sad is that this country does not yet have a national slave museum nearly 150 years after slavery was abolished. I believe one is planned, but when will we see it? Nor have we paid reparations to the children of slaves.  Germany has paid raparations (3 billion marks paid over  fourteen years to the State of Israel; 450 million marks were paid to the World Jewish Congress.)  We all know that money can't purchase a return to honor, but it's at least an attempt to atone, if atonement is ever possible.  I suspect it's not.

    Shirley--you asked how Jews who lost families in the Holocaust were/are able to forgive. I thought I'd turn it around to ask how Europe (more than Germany was at fault) sought forgiveness.  Germany, so far, is the only country that's made a determined effort to open up its history and to make amends. I think that some countries in Europe (France, Italy, Switzerland, for example) are in a rush to forget their history of complicity in the same way that the U.S. is trying to forget its history of slavery.  Other countries in Europe are guilty as well but most of them just recount the good stories, of the heros who went against the norm. Plenty of heros as well.     

    Not that we're free from shame concerning the Holocaust:  the ships with Jewish refugees that we refused to let dock and which had to return to Europe, where many of the original passengers were sent to concentration camps to die; the U.S. Congress that voted not to accept the children of German Jews when their parents were desperately trying to get them to safe harbors (Kindertransport); the Nazis we accepted here after the war, and with great honor, so we could build rockets and weapons of mass destruction. 

    There are a few slave museums here and there and some restored slave plantations where visitors can see how the slaves lived, but nothing that equals a national effort to inform the national conscience.  I suspect it's easier to look at the shame of other nations than to acknowledge our own shame. You can't force forgetting; it comes only when the bitterness is gone.  Fewer than 50 years have passed since the Civil Rights Act was enacted--that's a very short time in the history of human suffering, shorter even than the passage of years since the Holocaust.

    I'm sure someone famous has said the following beautifully, but I don't have time to look up quotations at the moment, so here's my stab at it: Only a nation that knows its history, the good and the bad, and strives to atone for the bad, can ever ahieve and retain greatness.  

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited March 2008

    Hi all,

    Amy's passion for Obama is admirable (we should all be so passionate about our own candidates), but now that she's designated the "respectful" thread as strictly an "Obama4president" thread, I'll do all my posting on Susie's original presidential debate thread. Hope to see you there.

    May the best man (or woman) win!  

  • shokk
    shokk Member Posts: 1,763
    edited March 2008

    Anne there is no way that any country is going to be perfect and not experience its own shame the same thing with people............there is no perfect nation......all countries have made mistakes........and will continue to do so.................as young as America is we are still the most generous country in the world............we provide more aid around the world then any other country in history............are we perfect absolutely not..........I have never heard anyone deny or imply that we are somehow a perfect nation....but one thing is for sure there is more people worldwide that come to our nation then any other place in the world.....we have more people trying to become American citizens then any other nation in the world.......we have more people that have been suppressed in their native countries and come here to be free.........no we are not a perfect nation.......there is no perfect country..........I just don't get why the left always sees the glass half empty and complaining about all the wrong in this country instead of seeing our nation in spite of it's flaws is still one of the greatest countries in the world............Shokk

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited March 2008

    Shokk, to answer your question before I stop posting on this thread.  It's half a glass, whether empty or full.  That is, we have good things and bad things in our history.  To stay with your metaphor, if we only celebrate the good and don't try to repair the bad, the glass will be less than half full and eventually it will be empty.  If we recognize the bad (and as you say, most countries have both) and try to make repairs, then we're filling the glass, not emptying it.  A bit of an extended metaphor, so I apologize for that.

    We have a history of slavery and discrimmination in this country. Now that we no longer have slavery, the only enduring shame is if we don't acknowledge the past.  Remember, there are many people still alive in this country who lived a good part of their lives under Jim Crow laws.  You can't ask these people to forget their history, in the same way that you and I cannot forget our history.  Who would have thought in the year 1939 that we could have had something happen like the Holocaust.  In 1939 we were so very civilized, yet it did happen, and in one of the great technological nations in the world.  If we bury that history or bury our history of slavery and discrimination, then we up the chances of both happening again.  Memory is one of the defining aspects of the human psyche.

    Actually, and I mentioned this earlier, here or in the other post, the United States does not provide more aid around the world. We're fairly low in the list of industralized nations in that respect.  I won't look it up again, but it's easily enough found via Google.  I believe we give about $33 per person versus some countries (Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, etc., etc.) that give hundreds per person.  Perhaps back in the 50's we gave more, but those days are long gone.  Also, do you know for sure that more people are trying to get here.  I suspect more people are trying to get into the EU, which is about our size, but I have no figures on that.  I will look it up, however.  

  • sccruiser
    sccruiser Member Posts: 1,119
    edited March 2008

    I don't get it? The thread is still the Brand New Respectful...I don't see that it's only Obama4President. I think Amy just changed her name. Did I miss something here?



    As far as the South goes, and museums, you can go to any state in the south, and they have restored many many wonderful plantations that you can tour. There is very little mention of the slaves or their quarters. So, historically we are really still good at putting forth the same old, same old history--and leaving out the history of hundreds of thousands of African Americans whose ancestors started their history in the south over 150 years ago. you would think that each state would have at least one true Slave History Museum.

Categories