The Brand New Respectful Presidential Campaign Thread
Comments
-
I'm not sure why anneshirley changed her name but I understand that she's left the board.
nosey1, interesting that you would ask, since you just joined BC.org today and this is your first and only post. Have you been following this thread anonymously? Tell us more.... inquiring minds want to know.
-
I was going to ask the same thing Beesie.
-
Me three, Amy and Beesie.
-
Me four .... now my post is starting to sound like my tag line!
-
One Mississippi, two mississippi....
-
sorry...it's become more than distasteful....
ciao
-
I wonder what it's going to be like to have 6 weeks w/o a primary or caucus? Will we still be bombarded with politics or will there be a few weeks lull. I'm hoping for the lull and if not a lull, at least more forward progression in the processes of chosing VP candidates. I agree with whoever said it would be nice to know who the candidates would select before the primaries so we could know who we were voting for on the entire ticket.
-
Perhaps it would be better if we had a primary that also selected the VP for each party? I would love to see who would go on the long list, and who would end up the VP. Would that make us want to be a fly on the wall in the Oval Office?
It really seems harsh that we don't get to really know who the VP nominee is until the Prez candidate is selected. And to have the Pres for Dems selected by the super delegates, just too much of a reminder of the electoral college.
grace -
Grace that's not a bad idea-- or even do a first Prez, 2nd VP. Of course, that could set up for discourse if the president and Veep don't get along and have personal agendas.... It's complicated.
-
I think the runner up for President should be the automatic VP ... right, they may not get along but that's not what we hired them for -- just like many who work with people their bosses hire have to learn to get along and make the business profitable!
-
That might work if the boss is the new one who comes in--the people under him may try to get along with him/her, but if they aren't well received by the boss--he's got the power. And I've seen cases where the boss easily built a case against the employee, and got them fired. It often happens when the new boss wants to bring in his own crew. So if management finds profit more important then working relationships, the little guy doesn't stand a chance.
We always have to look at where the power resides. The prez would have the power and the vp would just have to go along. Perhaps that's why Obama is so opposed to being the VP--he would be "under Hillary's thumb," and I'm sure kept quite quiet for 4 years.
grace -
I don't think we can say whether Obama is opposed to being VP, Grace. I think he is opposed to someone in 2nd place insinuating that he might be a good VP when he leads in delegates, votes and states. I think any VP would have a hard time if the first spouse is a former president, particularly one who likes the limelight as much as Bill Clinton, let alone the fact that Hillary's campaign is the type of politics as usual Obama is campaigning against.
-
Obama would be insane to hitch his political career to the Clintons...............he is young and has a long career but to be assoicated with the Clintons would be political suicide....in mho.........Shokk
-
Shokk,
I agree with you totally! I think Bill wants this even more than Hillary does--for her to become prez that is.
Amy,
I still think that Obama is opposed to being a VP under Hillary, as in first place, or even, heaven forbid 2nd place. I just don't believe he would ever play second banana to Hillary. As shokk says, he is young and has his whole career ahead of him.
Guess we will just have to see. Odds are? Anyone want to take a bet?
grace -
Shokk, I agree with you completely.
Grace-- he may be opposed to it-- I think he should be opposed to it-- because the Clintons go against the ideals he believes about uniting red states and blue states. I don't see it happening either way.
-
I think McCain would be a unifier. After all, that's why he's so controversial among the conservatives.
-
McCain has some unifying principles, but he will alienate those who believe in women's reproductive rights and gay equality among other things. He will alienate those who believe that the USA is wrong about Iraq. Of the republicans who ran for president, except for Ron Paul, he is probably the least offensive to most liberals.
-
I heard some commentary on the news channels the other night--think it was CNN--where McCain was asked if the surge wasn't working would that make more voters vote for democrat or republican in presidential campaign.
It was an interesting question, because there didn't seem to be a clear path one way or the other. McCain seemed to think it would hurt him, and yet others were saying it would help him. That more would vote for him so he could keep the war going, and win. While others were saying it would help Obama as more voters would vote for him since the surge wasn't working and we should end the war, like Obama said he would do.
I find myself in a dilemma as to Afghanistan. I have been watching the news lately on this country. We seem to have forgotten it. After all, this is where the Taliban's main operation is. And evidently, because Bush has put so much into the war in Iraq, that the Taliban are now growing and becoming more dangerous in Afganistan.
Does this mean we should divert troops to Afghanistan to get the Taliban under control? What does this mean? The oil isn't in Afghanistan, so perhaps there isn't a concern on Bush and his cronies part that are invested so heavily in oil.
I hope that the media can do more research and presentation of our troops' experiences in Afghanistan, and what the troops think is important. It is such a quagmire. I fear Bush has set us up for another "war that will never end."
Did I hear correctly, that Congress is going to insist that Bush put more funds in place to take care of our Vets when they return home? We need to do a better job to help our Vets than the government did after the Vietnam War.
Living here on the Central Coast, we have many Vietnam Vets who are homeless and desperately needing medical care. They are unable to access vet care, because they are either not severely disabled enough, or have never been determined as to their disability. They continue to live on the fringe and are homeless and self-medicating with drugs and alcohol. After our brave young soldiers have served in Iraq and Afghanistan, I hope we honor their bravery and giving up of their bodies to the fodder of the war machiine, and provide for them all that they need to be healed as much as we can.
We must all know that we will forever be taking care of hundreds of these soldiers when they are released from military service. Many will never work again, let alone walk or be able to be sole providers for their families. We must do better for them. They are and their children are innocent and should not have to pay the price for this unjustified war over OIL.
grace -
I am curious Grace, how is it that you know these vets are unable to access the care they need? And the V.A. does a good job of taking care of vets and their families when the vet follows through and stays with the program, I KNOW this for a fact. So I am curious how you know the vets in CA. (I am assuming that is where you live) are out of the loop. Do you know all these homeless vets personally?
-
Grace,
If the war was over OIL , how come the price is so high. I am getting tired of this ridiculious accusation. One can argue that perhaps intellegence was faulty and we should not have gone to war. But to say that we went to war over OIL , and meanwhile the oil is over $100.
-
The suggestion that the war is over oil is not an accusation. It is a logical conclusion anyone of us can draw.
Well, if the war isn't over oil, then why haven't we gone into some of the needy areas of Africa where there have been terrible civil wars and holocausts of whole populations of people? Tells me this current administration is more interest in oil.
and why is it so expensive? because people are willing to pay any price at the pump for gas and the ability to drive their large SUVs anytime they want. I see huge SUVs on the road everyday--large enough to hold a soccer team, being driven by one sole driver, and narry a passenger in sight.
Mmmm--sure the oil is over $110. a barrel, as the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. The wealthy probably own many shares of stock in gas companies and are making buckos off of this ridiculous war. As long as the shareholders get their money, and the gas companies can still make billions in profit in ONE quarter, there will be some type of warring presence in the Middle East. It's in the best interests of the oil companies--protecting their fuel--and the wealthy shareholders.
Let's face it. Money talks. -
Grace,
When was the last time African nations threatened us. The point of going to Iraq was for the security reasons. We can argue whether it was the right move from this poit of view but we should not entertain idea of Oil and benefiting the rich people. What's next ? Should we redistribute wealth abd punish the successful people by taking money from them and giving them to the needy ones. Oh wait I remember this, that's what they did in Russia and of course that was a great success.
As far as the oil goes are you aware that American companies are losing money and influence. There is only ONE (!) American Company Exxon that is in top 10 today - http://www.gravmag.com/oil2.html. And Exxon got kicked out of Russia and Venezuela after investing a lot of money into oil infrastructure.
China National Petroleum is #4 now ahead of Exxon #7, does it mean we went to war to protect their interest. Or no wait Venezulian company is up there too, that's right Bush is protecting Chavez since in real life they are friends, they just pretend to be enemies to fool American people.
-
Grace says:
"Living here on the Central Coast, we have many Vietnam Vets who are homeless and desperately needing medical care. They are unable to access vet care, because they are either not severely disabled enough, or have never been determined as to their disability. They continue to live on the fringe and are homeless and self-medicating with drugs and alcohol. After our brave young soldiers have served in Iraq and Afghanistan, I hope we honor their bravery and giving up of their bodies to the fodder of the war machiine, and provide for them all that they need to be healed as much as we can."
And I say WHAT!? My father had no disability. He got care at the VA hospitals. We have friends who have no disability, but get care at the VA hospitals. My dh has never signed up, but if he does he can get care.
The vets do not want care. I'm sorry, but there are some who would rather remain homeless and drink and do drugs. Yes, they need mental health care. And they don't want to go into rehap to kick their habit.
I'm not saying that all vets are treated well. I'm not saying the VA hospitals are perfect. But there is help for them if they want it and there's also room for improvement of the system.
Shirley
-
You can't generalize from knowing one person how everyone else in that group.
I agree with whoever said Afghanistan is the big problem. Obama has talked about that from the beginning. The taliban has come back full swing since we abandoned that effort for the nonWMDs in Iraq.
I agree that the war was in part about oil and the price of oil right now has a LOT to do with China and India requiring more oil and that OPEC won't increase production to meet the needs. It's a supply vs. demand issue -economics 101.
-
Inna,
I disagree with you. I still say it's all about the OIL! The only African nation we have attempted to help with troops is Liberia, a country where US citizens decided to return to and start their own country.
We have allowed millions of people in African nations be slaughtered and stood by and done nothing. Of course, you or anyone can say that what am I talking about. Maybe we didn't go into Africa, but we went into Bosnia, etc. Well, the proximity of Bosnia to the Middle East can be very telling. We are going to do everything we can to keep the glut of oil coming to this country. And the cost will continue to rise, as our consumption continues to rise. More and more countries are moving out of their "third world" designation. They are driving more cars, have more technology, and need oil to provide their power and fuel their power plants. As the use of oil increases around the world, the cost of oil will continue to rise.
The American car companies could have done a lot by now to reduce our reliance on oil. They have stalled and played the waiting game. The oil companies have reaped the largest profits ever in the history of this nation. And we are paying for it. At the pump and every time we go to the grocery store. The price of foods that need to be trucked from one side of the nation to the other is continuing to jump up in price. So, we, the large group in the middle, and the poor get poked all over. Most of us aren't getting revenues from stocks. Most of us aren't driving those gas-guzzling soccer team sized SUVs and writing them off on our taxes as a business expense, and most of us are not getting write-offs of taxes from the federal government. We pay our fair share of taxes. The wealthy and the businesses in this country don't.
Shirley,
The services your father and my father received at the Vet Hospital did not require a disability. After the Vietnam War, the Vet Hospitals were understaffed and had too many patients to serve. The Vet Hospitals (or Federal Govt if you want to be particular) were told to assign a number to each Vet who came to the hospital for service. In fact, the armed services ended up identifying who would receive service at their Vet hospital. The more disabled you were, the sooner you were seen. Your father may not have had to have a disability then, I don't know his case obviously. But I'm not talking about 1 man, I'm talking about a large group of men. I am not applying the case of one man to all men.
I don't know if you realize it, but all the time this war in Iraq has been going on, Bush wanted to reduce the amt of money for Vets Hospitals and suggested that they continue to serve less and less patients--only the most severely disabled were to get service.
Absolutely there is room for improvement in the system. We have treated our Vietnam Vets horribly. These men came back physically and emotionally damaged from that war, and then we didn't even give them the respect they should have gotten when they came home. They were treated not like heroes but like they were criminals. These men did what the government required them to do. They did not have a choice, they had to follow orders, unless they killed their commanding officer one night in the dark.
Americans have shunned them. and now we expect them to walk meekly into a hospital and ask for care? These homeless vets may use drugs and drink. They are doing exactly what others do who don't get help for their problems--self-medicating.
We see the Hollywood stars doing the same thing. Oh, but they have the money to pay privately for their rehab. Who's going to foot the bill for the Vets?
And there isn't room for them if they want it. We can't even adequately take care of the soldiers injured in Iraq now. The system is broke. It's time for a change.
And I do support the troops in Iraq, if you might question my politics. I have a bumper sticker on my car that says: Support Our Troops Bring Them Home Now
and it will stay on my car until all the troops are safely back on US soil.
grace -
Grace...you think by putting a bumper sticker on your car that says "support our troops bring them home now" is supporting them? But of course you do, and I am sure you can justify that a million different ways, just like you do the rest of your pompous rhetoric.
And WE have allowed millions in African nations to be slaughtered? You are too much! You talk about the work you are trying to do on this board, are you trying to educate us because we don't think like you do? Isn't that the same as "telling someone how to raise their children"? But of course it isn't because YOU are the one doing it and we should all know by now, YOU are always right and we (with the exception of a couple of your cronies) are always wrong.
And one more time, YOU ARE WRONG ABOUT THE V.A!
-
Wow pompous rhetoric--must have really hit a nerve. Perhaps I should simplify my support of our troops: that is not the only thing I do, and I don't have to justify what I do or don't do to anyone on this thread. I am not wrong about the VA. I have seen the papers, and read the awful conditions our soldiers were in. It was only because it was brought to light that our Iraq vets have since gotten the treatment they deserve.
You don't like what I write on the board, so instead of having an intellectual discussion you call me "pompous," and that I'm trying to tell you what to do. That is so wrong!
You don't have to attack me, you can express your own opinions on this site without personally attacking people because you disagree with them. This isn't about you or me, this is about our country which as I can see from this thread and the other presidential thread is in serious trouble. People are more concerned about making sure their point of view prevails by making attacks "below the belt."
I have never said I am right, or anyone else is wrong. If you could calm down and read my posts you would realize that I am just offering my own experiences to this board. I have not invalidated one other person's experience on this board. I just disagree to how the experiences are applied.
I am not here to change anyone, just offering a different point of view. I hope we can all be adults and stick to the issues, and drop the personal attacks. That's why this RESPECTFUL thread was established.
Sorry if I offend you, but I'm not going away.
Oh, and who are these cronies? Nice description--personal again! I don't even agree with my supposed cronies--and by the way--they have their own opinions--they haven't adopted mine! sorry to disappoint you, but there's no conspiracy here. LOL -
Well, no second primary in Fla just announced.
Wonder what will happen?
This is a mess. Now it's up to the DNC to figure what to do. Let's see if they can come up with some brillant plan!
I feel sorry the voters--must be frustrating to think your votes won't count. How can we have a fair election if voting rights are trampled on by a state government and the DNC not being able to resolve this BEFORE Fla had it's primary! -
Grace, you do not in any way shape or form offend me, I actually find you amusing! You do exactly what you accuse others of doing! You generalize. Also, I did not attack you, I called your rhetoric pompous, now if I had called you pompous, that might be attacking! Also, calling your supporters "cronies" could actually be a compliment. As I am sure you are aware, a crone is a "wise woman, elder", it's one of those words that can be used to denote a lot of things!
Your bumper sticker does not support the troops, it supports YOUR view of the war and what YOU think the troops need. Did you ever ask the troops if they want to come home? If not, being the supportive person you are, perhaps you should ask the troops if they want to come home before you use that bumper sticker. Otherwise you are generalizing again!
I asked you earlier if you knew these homeless vets you see all over the place personally. No answer! Don't you think YOU might be generalizing where this group is concerned? If you have not personally spoken to them, how can you possibly know their situation? Isn't that making assumptions about that group? I bet if you talked to them you might find out most of them receive benefits and that is how they pay for their drugs and alchohol, interesting hunh?
And Grace, when you say this isn't about you and me, this is about our country, well guess what? You and me (I know it is supposed to be you and I) are our country as well as millions of others! So...nice try!
I am not into conspiracy theories, nice touch though!
-
Grace- I wonder how FLA will be resolved. This is such an interesting primary cycle. I think Howard Dean needs to step aside and let someone else chair the democratic party-- we need a fresh approach. I'm going back to the campaign office to work for a little while this morning-- you'd love being around like minded people working toward hope and inspiration through changing politics as usual.
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team