moving too quickly!
Comments
-
Well, here's my story. I'm 47.I just got my diagnosis of LCIS on Monday, but things started years ago. First, I have a strong family history of BC & Ovarian Cancer. My first abnormal Mammogram was 5yrs ago, and I have had to go back every 6mos. since then. I moved to Texas 2yrs ago and started with a new doctor. I had my mammogram here & it showed abnormalties, and I was told to follow up in 6mos. During that time a new facility opened with all the newest technology, which has been great. Last Dec. had a biopsy done, and tissue came normal, but my Dr. wanted to see me again in 4mos. So, I was scheduled for an ultrasound and MRI in Oct. There was another suspicious spot, but I was due for a Mammogram in Dec., so we decided to MRI & ultrasound again then. Went in Dec, the spot on the MRI was bigger, and now the mammogram was full of microcalcifications. Dr. did the needle biopsy, and was diagnosed with ALH. She wanted to discuss options with me, so I went back in, & she sent me to a breast surgeon last week. On Tuesday I was told I have LCIS, and have been scheduled to see an oncologist for further options. I am kinda scared because of how quickly each one of my tests progressively changed this past year, but am not keen on taking tamoxifen. If there is a side affect, I tend to get the real doozies. I am also concerned about the risk of uterine cancer- I have had two abnormal paps that came out ok after biopsy, and have the ovarian cancer in my family. Any feedback would be comforting!
-
I'm sorry you're going through this.
First, I'm not certain from your post, but was the biopsy that showed LCIS excised? I think most breast surgeons now advise that the area around a biopsy that shows LCIS should be excised to make sure there is not something worse going on. In studies, about 80-90% show nothing worse than LCIS, but its good to be sure.
It sounds like you have a strong history of bc/ovarian cancer. I would strongly consider getting genetics counseling (eventually) from a board certified genetics counselor (usually found at major institutions.) They would be counseling you whether or not you choose to get genetic testing, but not push you in one way or another. Most oncologists do not specialize in genetics. I got my referral from the breast surgeon after my excision. For more information, you may want to visit the FORCE website. http://www.facingourrisk.org/
I had genetic counseling, but it ended up I have a rather weak family history (all of the bc in my family was postmenopausal), so I opted not to be genetically tested.
It took me about 5 months to get my first appointment with a medical oncologist after my excision, as I was interested in tamoxifen.
Every person is different with tamoxifen adverse effects. Some have a terrible time, and some have no adverse effects at all. I have had mild hot flashes, and increased irregular menstrual bleeding. (I had irregular periods before this.) My onc says he offers tamoxifen to all of his LCIS patients, but some people question if the risk is worth the benefit. It is a very individual decision that no one can make for you.
There is controversy about just about every aspect of LCIS (without anything worse.) Its unusual. In my age group (mid 50s), one paper estimated the incidence as about 1:10,000. But they don't know because they don't know how many women are running around with it and don't know they have LCIS. (Its usually not detectable except from biopsy, and not everyone has a breast biopsy. Its usually an incidental finding.) From the name, the classification, risk, treatment - its all controversial. The reason why I think genetic counseling is important in your case is that most everyone agrees that *if* you are BRCA positive, the risk of bc from BRCA is greater than if you have LCIS alone. You may or may want to make different treatment decisions if you are BRCA positive.
I am sure others will be along shortly with posts.
Leaf (LCIS on biopsy for microcalcs 12-05, LCIS with features of ALH on excision 1-06 (reread as LCIS + ALH), started tamoxifen 7-06, 2 negative biopsies 2-07.) -
Thanks so much for your input. I was so happy to find this website yesterday that I know my post was rambling-I have spent all this past week searching for info, & I can sympathize so much with everyone here. So much of the info is contradictory and unclear! I had the 2nd needle biopsy in Dec. and that said ALH. In Jan I saw a breast surgeon and he excised the area (like another post I now have a lovely 4" scar on top and a 2" on the side). The results were "LCIS extending to 1mm from margins multifocally". The Breast surgeon said he is setting me up with an oncologist and I should hear from them next week.
I did do thr BRAC test, and it came back negative, but the surgeon said that really just means I'm not a carrier. Breast cancer runs in my family- my mom is a survivor and several of her family had it also and her sister had ovarian cancer, both in their 50s. On my father's side all of the women had it at young ages, and several died in their 30s.
I have always been fit and eat very healthy- but my husband was in the military and we lived in Germany when Chernobyl exploded. In 2001 myself, husband and two sons all developed auto immune diseases, my youngest son (whom I was pregnant with at the time) has the worst with Type 1 diabetes. In the back of my mind I can't help but wonder if the radiation we were exposed to as well as my family history is "coming back to haunt me"!
It just seems that since October things have changed so fast-from a shadow, to Alh, to microcalcifications, to LCIS. Is this how it is with most people? I feel like all I have done in the last 4 mos. is have my breasts squished and cut!
Again, thanks for your post! It is good to just share the fears and uncertainty with others in the same situation! I hope and pray things are going well with your treatments!
-
Dear mtbmom,
It sounds to me like you are doing all the right things. Letting one referral lead to another, gathering information, so you can make your best decision regarding your health. Keep moving forward. The answers to your treatment decisions will ultimately start to come together for you.This is a very, very hard period for any of us and you must be as kind to yourself as you can, as you travel down this road.
Wishing you strength and courage.
femme -
It took me 3 months to go from 'suspicious calcifications' on my routine mammogram, to the excision. It was all that was going on in my mind during that time.
Up until say, the early 1990s, most patients with LCIS and nothing else had bilateral mastectomies. They didn't know about the natural history of the disease. (They still don't know a lot.) When they stopped routinely giving modified mastectomies to everyone with early invasive breast cancer (and offered lumpectomies + radiation to some), then breast surgeons thought it was overkill to do bilateral mastectomies for LCIS. You may or may not agree with the above statement, but its in the NCI website. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/breast/HealthProfessional/page6
But from this mastectomy data, they know that *most* LCIS is multifocal (meaning most women have more than 1 area of it in their breast), and that often it is bilateral. But most papers I have read have said this data is of little consequence, because even if you have LCIS in only one breast, it puts both breasts at risk. Different studies claim different risk, but they range from about 65-35% to 50-50% (incidence of breast cancer in the breast where LCIS was found vs the other breast.) So from this reasoning, you can see why some think it is not necessary to get clean margins, though there is one woman here who says her surgeon wanted clean margins. If you want clean margins, you may have to do bilateral mastectomies. There's a lot of uncertainty about LCIS. Many times, LCIS is not found * AT* the 'area of concern', but adjacent to it. Its a weird disease. -
mbtmom---I'm sorry you've been given this diagnosis, but I'm glad you've found your way here. Do you have an oncologist yet? They can help you figure out your overall lifetime risk for bc and your risks and benefits from taking a preventative medication like tamoxifen. I was diagnosed with LCIS about 4 and a half years ago, had lumpectomy, take tamoxifen, and am closely monitored by mammos alternating with MRIs every 6 months, as well as frequent breast exams. For the most part, I do OK living with the high risk (also have family history which further increases my risk), except for some apprehension at test time--MRI and mammo coming up in 2 weeks. I've decided not to obsess about it---- "waiting for the other shoe to drop" and to try not to worry about things I can't control. Feel free to PM me if you'd like.Anne
-
awb- thanks a lot for your post. Like you, I have strong family history (although brc neg). To boot, I have an autoimmune disease that affects my immune system- I am neutropenic. That's one of my concerns with tamoxifen-my white cells are low already, and just how bad will it get on meds. I should hear from the oncologist sometime next week to set up the appt. Like you, I think one day at a time is what I have to accept- otherwise I am "overthinking" everything!!
Just as a ?, does anyone know anyone with LCIS who did not due the oral chemos, and what happens? This is hard to word clearly, but does anyone out there have experience with and without taking meds as and then having it develop into bc? I am feeling "damned if I do and damned if I don't right now". I found an interesting forum here with women who also have auto immune issues, and it's scary, but having bc in two years is also!!
I really want to thank everyone for their support here- this is such a great forum. I pray for all of us! -Denise
-
The NSABP study found that tamoxifen or raloxifene reduced the risk of breast cancer by about 50%, but there are not many details AT ALL about the group of LCIS women (which were about 100 or 200 women, if I recall correctly.) http://www.breastcancer.org/treatment/hormonal/new_research/20051216.jsp
This describes the Port et al study, which I think is one of the largest studies that I've found *that gives detailed data on each person who got breast cancer.* It is the ONLY study that was cited by the American Cancer Society paper about MRI *screening* (not diagnosis.) The springer etc. link listed at the bottom may not work anymore.
To summarize:
This study looked at 125 atypical patients and 262 LCIS patients over 6 years at Sloan Kettering. The patients that were followed by MRI (about half of the group) were compared to those that did not. There were a total of 14 patients (total) that got invasive breast cancer or DCIS. 7 of these were in the group that was followed by MRI, and an additional 7 were from the group that was NOT followed by MRI. A total of 3 out of the 14 patients who got breast cancer/DCIS were taking tamoxifen or raloxifene. These numbers are so small, I doubt if they are significant.
Clearly, in this study, LCIS women had a higher incidence of bc than AH patients. 11 out of 14 of the cancers were found in LCIS patients. (Note there were more LCIS patients than AH patients.) Two of the 14 women had a known first degree relative with bc. In one additional patient, the family history was unknown. The remaining 11 patients did NOT have a first degree relative with bc.
To me, this data does *NOT* strongly support the idea that family history confers a much higher risk versus a negative family history overall (MRI screened + non-MRI screened.) 2/14=14.2%, which is approximately the incidence of genetically determined breast cancer in the wider population.
There were 7 non-MRI screened patients in whom they found breast cancer. 5 of these women had LCIS and 2 had atypia. Their age ranged from 50 to 88. 3 out of these 7 patients took tamoxifen or raloxifene. The stage ranged from I to II. None had a known first degree family member with bc. (6 had no first degree family history, and in one the family history was unknown.)
Of the 7 MRI screened patients who developed cancer, age range 43-57, none used tamoxifen. One of these 7 had atypia. In this patient, the cancer was discovered via a palpable mass after recent negative MRI and mammo. The other 6 had LCIS. One of these 6 LCIS patients, who had a first degree relative with breast cancer, was found to have cancer incidentally on risk-reducing mastectomy. 5 of the 7 patients with cancer had NO first degree relative with breast cancer. The stage ranged from 0-1.
This group may be among the larger studied groups of more homogeneous AH and LCIS patients. I say this because all these patients came from one institution, so likely had more consistent definitions of LCIS and AH (unlike the Li et al paper http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez...Pubmed_RVDocSum
Unfortunately tables do not show up properly, but you can match the age/
menopausal status/family history of the women who developed cancer.
TABLE 2. Profiles of patients who developed cancer
(A) Profile of non-MRI-screened patients who developed cancer
Patient Prev bx Age
Menopausal
status
Family history
(first-degree relative
with breast cancer)
Tamoxifen/
raloxifene use Tumor size (cm)
Lymph node
status BIRADS (mammo)
1 Atypia 56 Post 0 No 4.0 Positive 5
2 LCIS 62 Post 0 Yes 0.4 Negative 4
3 LCIS 59 Post 0 Yes 1.0 Positive 4
4 LCIS 88 Post Unknown No 1.3 Negative 4
5 Atypia 61 Post 0 No 0.7 Negative Negative/palpable mass
6** LCIS 55 Peri 0 Yes 1.2 (lt)
DCIS (rt)
Negative Negative/palpable mass
(lt) 3 (rt)
7** LCIS 50 Peri 0 No 0.7 Negative 4
(B) Profile of MRI-screened patients who developed cancer
Patient Prev bx Age
Menopausal
status
Family history
(first-degree
relative with
breast cancer)
Tamoxifen/
raloxifene use
Tumor
size (cm)
Lymph node
status
BIRADS
(mammo)
BIRADS
(MRI)
1 LCIS 43 Pre 0 No 0.9 Negative Negative 4
2 LCIS 43 Pre 0 No 0.2 Negative Negative 4
3 LCIS 51 Peri 0 No 0.7 (lt)
0.65 (rt)
Negative Negative
(bilateral)
4 (bilateral)
4 LCIS 55 Post 1 No DCIS Not done Negative 4
5 LCIS 39 Pre 0 No DCIS Not done Negative 4
6* LCIS 49 Pre 1 No 0.35 Negative Negative 4 (bilateral)
7** Atypia 57 Post 0 No 2.5 Positive Negative Negative
http://www.springerlink.com/content/p755k56248g052n7/fulltext.pdf
If you want to see the entire conversation, this is the link. http://community.breastcancer.org/topic/47/conversation/653988?page=1#idx_25
The overall incidence of breast cancer in the Port study in LCIS women was about 1% per year. -
Leaf- you have been such a great support to everyone on the boards, and I hope you know how much we all appreciate you and your knowledge. I got my Oncologist appt on Mon- boy am I nervous. I have been researching everyone's comments on the boards and have a list of ?s!!
On my path report I am ER+ and PR+, and the margins were "Multifocal". Someone on the boards had similar results and the onc wanted her to have another excisional biop, where they found DCIS also. So I am definitely going to ask if I need another biop.
Does anyone else have any recommendations for ?s ?
I really appreciate everyones input!
-
Multifocal means they found more than one spot of LCIS. This is very common with LCIS. Often they find LCIS in both breasts. They know this (I assume) because before, maybe the 1990s, the standard of care for LCIS women was to have bilateral mastectomies, and of course they looked at the mastectomy specimens. They didn't know the natural history of LCIS (not that they know a whole lot now.)
*******
But ooops - about the multifocal bit - is this multifocal for DCIS or multifocal for LCIS? If its multifocal for LCIS they probably won't be removing it. If its multifocal for DCIS, then they are going to be a whole lot more interested in getting clean margins.
*********
The following only holds if you have LCIS and nothing worse. (In other words if you DON'T have DCIS or invasive.)
From what I've heard, they generally don't do clean margins for LCIS (and nothing worse) for 2 reasons:
a) Its often multifocal, and it usually doesn't show up on imaging, so the only way they would know they had it all would be to get mastectomies. Its also often bilateral.
b) Even if you have one spot of LCIS (and nothing worse) in one breast, it puts not only the entire breast, but BOTH breasts at risk. The risk is probably not equal between the 2 breasts. The breast that has LCIS may have slightly more chance to get bc than the ipsilateral (other) breast. That's one reason why more scientists are opining on a *small* (unknown) number of patients, LCIS may *in some small number of cases* be a NONOBLIGATE precursor for cancer, and not just a marker for higher risk. Non obligate means that these cells are NOT predestined to become cancer, they could stay benign and stop growing, but they are chugging down that cancer pathway.
********
My core biopsy (for LCIS) was strongly ER+ and PR-. Golly knows what that means. I don't have DCIS (that I know of.)
If you got DCIS too, then if you get standard care, you will definitely get treatment.
I certainly don't know about people who have DCIS AND LCIS.
If you had LCIS alone, and nothing worse (DCIS is classified as worse than LCIS), then no treatment and just close screening would be an OPTION. For the 'standard' options, you may want to read this. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/breast/HealthProfessional/page6
**********
ASSUMING you have BOTH LCIS AND DCIS: One question (which I do not know) is whether or not you will be a candidate for hormone therapy.
Another question is: do I need an MRI for my 'other' breast?
Another question I would have is if the LCIS puts my 'other' breast at risk, and if so how much. Does my 'other' breast need radiation?
There have been some studies that opine that women with invasive breast cancer and LCIS are candidates for breast conserving therapy (ie lumpectomy and rads) if that is what the patient chooses. I'm not sure, but I think maybe this is controversial????
Maybe you have a unique situation? I haven't read anything about DCIS with LCIS, but I haven't looked for any info either. I have LCIS with pagetoid spread into the ducts (according to my pathology report.) I once saw a poster who said she had DCIS with pagetoid spread into the lobules. So I guess it can go both ways.
Get a big piece of paper with your questions. You deserve answers to all of them. If they don't know they should tell you that. (That's what I would want anyways.) -
I also had LCIS, but it was not found until after I had surgery for ILC. You are very lucky that they have been able to find it. I had a 3.5 cm ILC for which I chose double mastectomy. I did chemo before surgery to shrink the tumor and it worked great on the ILC, completely destroying the tumor. All that was left was a little pile of dead cancer cells. However, at the time of surgery, where I chose to remove both breasts, once pathology came back, a separate quadrant of the breast, away from the cancer, was full of LCIS. Chemo didn't touch the LCIS because it was not fast growing cells which is what chemo searches for. Because LCIS is so sneaky is the reason I chose to remove both breasts. I did reconstructive surgery and have great looking new breasts.
I, like you, am also very sensitive to drugs. Also like you I have a critically low white count. I was very afraid to start Tamoxifen. My normal white count was 2.4 pre chemo. I had constant problems with it during chemo, but thanks to the wonderful white count stimulators, it kept me out of trouble. Now post chemo, my white count has settled at 1.7. It does not cause me any problems unless I get sick. Then it seems like it just takes my body longer to build up the troops to kill off the virus. So I seem to get sicker and take longer to recover. But my body still can fight things off even with such a low white count.
I have been on Tamoxifen for almost 3 years and am handling it great. My oncologist feels that the Tamoxifen may be keeping my white count that little bit lower but who knows, it could have been a side effect from the chemos. Try not to be afraid of Tamoxifen as it really does offer a 50% protection. The only side effect I have are some hot flashes, which I've learned how to avoid. I exercise most days a week, that keeps hot flashes away. I also stay away from red wine and red meat, both hot flash triggers. It did take my body about a month to get used to the Tamoxifen. However I started taking it a week after major surgery, so the stress of the surgery may have contributed to it. The first month I had a lot of hot flashes, so I purchased a chillow pillow, which helped greatly. It is a blue mat, filled with a chemical that keeps it cold. It helped me stay cool. I also had leg cramps, but it may have been due to lack of activity after surgery. Those are the only side effects that I had the first month.
I am doing great now, even having cancer. There really is life after a breast cancer diagnosis. Best of luck to you.
-
Leaf- thanks again, your knowledge is so helpful. I have started a list, and will add your ? to it. As far as I know right now, it is only LCIS, but I have noticed the lymph nodes under my arm on that breast have become swollen and sore. The biopsy was taken from the top, so I'm not sure if it's just post surgery, or if there is something else going on there.
Lisa9753- and thank you. I have been really worried about what the tamoxifen would do to my cell counts, and just how it would make me feel. I have run for 37 years, and I need to mentally, I'm not sure how I'd handle this without being able to physically burn off steam.
I am 47, and from what I've read, you are kept on Tamoxifen for 5 yrs. What happens after that? Do you just wait around hoping nothing ever comes back? Or do you go to a different drug? Are you on meds the rest of your life? My breast dr. says I'm considered very high risk because of family history, I started my period at 10, and I have very dense breasts. I almost feel "damned if I do or damned if I don't" when it comes to treatment options. I hate the thought of going through drug therapy for 5 years, and then 15 yrs down the road having and invasive bc! I'm sorry to sound so whiny! There are so many women here going through much worse, I'm just not sure what the right decision is.
Thanks again for everyone's support, and best wishes to everyone!
-
I don't think they know what happens after 5 years of tamoxifen. I started tamoxifen in July 2006, and my onc said that in 5 years hopefully there would be more info what to do. Maybe I'll be postmenopausal at that time, and an AI or raloxifene will be reasonable.
From what I've read, the effect of tamoxifen, at least for women who have had worse than LCIS, continues beyond 5 years. However, I've seen several papers that opine that the risk for LCIS does NOT go down after 5? 12? years, unlike women with invasive, though of course LCIS women probably have a lower risk for bc than many women with invasive.
Again, I don't think we know AT ALL that additional risk factors such as strong family history, dense breasts, longer estrogen exposure, etc. add anything ADDITIONAL to the risk one has with LCIS. At least one physician opined that on a re-analysis of a study with women with LCIS, they couldn't find any risk factors that could show which women with LCIS would get bc and which would not. He opined that one study said on a re-analysis that women who were DIAGNOSED with LCIS *before* the age of 40 may be more at risk if they have a severe family history, but other than that, they couldn't tell.
These additional factors (such as breast density, etc) did NOT seem to make much of a difference for predicting which INDIVIDUAL women will get bc in the Italian model (see my other post). -
mbtmom---with your family history of bc and oc, at some point you may want to consider genetic counseling and testing. It may help you in making some of the decisions you're facing (I haven't done it as yet, but am considering it with the LCIS and family history).
I had a lot of the same concerns as you when I was first diagnosed with LCIS, about 4 and a half years ago, at age 46. At first, my oncologist thought maybe he'd put me on arimidex after tamox, but then back-pedaled on that, saying the AIs haven't been tested long enough with LCIS. Last time I saw him, he said I might not be on anything after finishing tamox, although with the new studies out on Evista, my pcp said that was a possibility after tamox. I don't relish the idea of another 5-year med (and the possibility of new SEs), but at least it would help prevent osteoporosis (another concern as I have early osteopenia). Supposedly, Tamoxifen continues to "work" for up to as much as 10-15 years after stopping; I don't know in what percentage of the people taking it, but my mom took it and is now a survivor of over 21 years without a recurrence, so that says a lot to me and gives me hope. Please feel free to PM me if you/d like to talk.
-
mtbmom- my onco told me that 5 yrs on tamoxifen will protect me for 20 years. According to her they have been prescribing it for 30 years. I have no idea, but I know I have to listen to them, as I have a strong family history and was diagnosed with LCIS. Which by the way is pissing me off. I have no idea how to "classify" myself. Did/do I have cancer? As leaf and awb know, it is considered the "sneaky" one, and nobody knows how many women are walking around with it. Were we lucky to catch a stage 0 cancer? If it isn't cancer, why does it affect both breasts, raise your overall risk and why did they used to do bilateral mast for the diagnosis of LCIS?? Was it ever going to turn into an invasive cancer? All I know is, I went through 4 months of hell getting diagnosed, I am still not back to normal physically and some doctors say it isn't "cancer".
Sorry....a little grouchy tonight..... -
Kimber- don't apologize for being cranky-I think we've earned a little cranky time! I saw the onco yesterday. He seemed very nice, he listened to my concerns, and answered my ?s. However, the ladies here had already given me the same answers. He wouldn't say how long the tamoxifen will protect me- he said the studies aren't there to give any evidence, that "hopefully by the time I'm done in 5 yrs, there will be other alternatives". I'm afraid I'm one of those people who lives by clear objectives- tell me to prepare for a marathon, and I can set up a schedule to reach that goal. The whole idea that no one can give any set answers or definitions is killing me. I felt like asking for my check back when I left the Dr- I'd rather donate to the ladies here! At least we are all going through the same thing, and not on the outside looking in!
The waiting stinks as well. This weekend I started with a discharge from the breast that I had surgery on, and the lymph nodes on that side have remained enlarged (I think they have actually gotten bigger), and he told me we need "to watch it" and to notify him if it changes at all.
At least give me some idea of what you think it could be!!!!Then as a topper, my husband is upset with me because I don't want to do the tamoxifen. I seriously do not do well with drugs. For years I had gyn's try to put me on the pill for irregular periods and ovarian cysts, and I would get severe migraines and nausea everytime. My rheumatologist put me on plaquinil for my "undetermined autoimmune disease", and my blood pressure would drop causing me to pass out (once while driving), and I walked around dizzy and sick all the time. My ortho just tried pain therapy on me for a torn hamstring that has caused chronic sciatic inflammation, and I wound up with migraines and feeling severely depressed and disoriented. The thoughts of being on tamoxifen for the next 5 years, especially since they can't guarantee anything, makes me angry. If I can't continue to be active and live life the way I enjoy it, why live it at all? I think I'm really just at a bad point right now, and haven't come to grips with how to handle this.
I'm really sorry you've had to deal with all of this too, especially with it taking 4 mos to get answers. That too sucks! If it makes you feel any better, my onco says I am now a cancer patient (lovely!), although no one can say if it will become invasive or where or when or if.........
Sorry if I'm a wet rag with this post- I have come to feel that this is the one place where you can say what you're feeling, and no one judges, just supports and understands! hugs to everyone! Denise
-
I have LCIS and have been taking Tamoxifen for 3 1/2 years now.
-
Have you had any problems? Has your dr. given any idea about what to do after?
-
hi well i have had all the side effects they tell u about, but i figure it beats getting cancer, no?
i am getting mixed ideas about after, someone said aromatase inhibiters, someone else said i was done after 5 years, i guess i haven't really pushed for an answer, i figure i'll get it when i'm done....
-
by the way, the reason for the confusion about LCIS is because most doctors haven't treated anyone with it, only DCIS, i get the strong feeling we are the experiments...
of course i had to find this out on my on over the last 4 years...
-
Oh good, we get to be unlabeled guinea pigs! Thanks for sharing, I guess I now have to decide just what to do!
-
yeah, except they don't tell u that, they just say the treatment is "up to you"....great, huh?
amyway, after some reasearch, my family doctor said to DEFINATLY take the tamoxifen....so i do, and like i said, it's better than cancer....
by the way, it's nice to have someone to talk to about this, since NOBODY know what it is....
thanks : )
daisy
-
I have found that if you ask a doctor, "what would you do if I were your wife or mother or sister" Being personal, you might get an honest answer. That has been the technique that many women with difficult decisions, including treatment of LCIS, ask. Yes, there are some bastards who are so worried about being sued, that they will never give you an answer, no matter what you say. But there are many doctors who do give you an answer when you preface it all with.."this is a personal question, I want you to speak from your heart." It seems to get them off the "legal hook." This "it's up to you" bullsh*t is very destructive our mental and physical health!
femme. -
It is very nice to have someone who is in the same situation to share with! You ladies have certainly helped me!!!! I really am having a hard time dealing with the lack of knowledge from the medical community on this, and fear the big pharms are just pushing the docs to tell us to take drugs, with just their profits and not our health in mind!
Femme- I am glad you said that. My doc did say (without me asking) that if I was his sister, tamoxifen was the course he would recommend. He was very upfront with everything, and with the help from this forum, I went loaded with ?s, some I had answers already for just to compare his answer, and some that no one seems to be able to answer, like long term solutions and effects.
I went and picked up the med today. Once I finish glaring at the bottle, I will try to swallow one, and convince myself this is really the best choice! I just hope I don't get donkey ears or some such extremely rare side effects!
Thanks again for all the support- hugs to all- Denise PS- I keep you posted on the ears
-
glad u got the meds, lowering ur chances of invasive b.c. is the most important thing....
-daisy
-
Hi, Denise, I remember how hard it was for me to make the tamoxifen decision. My doctor didn't push me; in fact, she gave me the option at one appointment and said that she didn't want me to decide anything until the next appointment, about 6 weeks later. I ultimately did decide to take it, but the side effects ended up being too much for me and so after 19 months I took a break. Six months after that, I tried again, for 5 more months, and then went off for good. I didn't have hot flashes but did have lots of fluid retention. It wasn't serious, medically speaking, but was a quality-of-life issue for me. I am glad that I tried it, and I probably got some benefit from taking it, even though I didn't make it the whole 5 years.
I am not trying to scare you with my story, only to reassure you that taking tamoxifen is not an all-or-nothing thing. You can try it, see how it works for you, and then decide whether to continue it or not. If you are going to have hot flashes or other mild side effects, they'll probably show up in the first few months--mine did. And there's nothing wrong with discontinuing the medication if you can't tolerate it. As my oncologist said to me, "We need better drugs." It sounds like you have a good doctor too.
I understand what you are saying about Big Pharma. In fact, I heard part of a radio program on NPR earlier today about that very issue. Regarding tamoxifen, though, I think it's important to remember that this is not a new drug. It's been around for many years and has been extensively studied. It has been proven in clinical trials to substantially reduce the risk of invasive cancer, so that's why it is offered to us. The rare side effects are just that--rare. It's unlikely you'll have any of those, and I'm sure your doctor will follow you closely, so you'll be able to take care of anything that does pop up.
I'm so sorry that you had to join us here, but as you've found, this is a wonderful group of ladies. It is frustrating that there isn't more known about LCIS, but eventually there may be. If you live near an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center, you may want to call and see if they have a high-risk breast program. I'm in one, and my doc's PA is of the opinion that all LCIS patients should be. (Easy for her to say.) Anyway, the most up-to-date research is done there, and they can let you know of clinical trials you may qualify for. Just a suggestion, but something you may want to think about.
Good luck to you. Remember, you can always stop the tamoxifen if it isn't for you.
-
I am sorry so many of us are going through this anxiety and turmoil. We all make the best decisions we can, taking the knowledge we have, following our hearts and mind. Each person's decision is valid and precious.
My onc, who has been in practice for at least 25 years, says he has treated some, but not many, women with LCIS and nothing worse. Note, that if an LCIS woman chose prophylactic mastectomies or screening alone instead of tamoxifen or raloxifene, they would probably not be followed by an oncologist (at least at my hospital).
I would argue that almost everyone who gets cancer is, in some degree or another, an experiment. There are often many, many unknowns. People with identical cancers, from what we can detect, can have different outcomes. I have heard our knowledge base of cancer described as a flashlight in a very dark room - there are glimpses of things we know, but most is unknown. We, with LCIS, are not alone in this plight, but our risk for invasive cancer and death from breast cancer is probably less than the VAST majority of our breast cancer sisters.
This is the main data that I know of about the risks and benefits of using tamoxifen or raloxifene for LCIS users. First was the NSAPB trial which indicated that tamoxifen can be useful for high risk women. Then it was the STAR trial, which compared raloxifene and tamoxifene for high risk users http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/pressreleases/STARresultsApr172006 .Also, the NSABP study that was done that showed that tamoxifen can be useful for women who are high risk was done in the mid-1990s, with results in the late 1990s, and the STAR results came out in 2006 I believe. These studies only looked at the outcome in 5 years or less, if I remember correctly. So they don't have data for longer than that.
“9.1 percent (1,792) of the women who joined STAR reported a previous diagnosis of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), a condition that is not cancer, but which indicates an increased chance of developing invasive breast cancer.” http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/digestpage/STAR/page4 . However, I cannot find information about the outcome of the LCIS women as separate from the entire group. Maybe its out there, but I haven't found it yet.
Why does LCIS seem to affect both breasts? I don’t know. LCIS is a strange condition, and there are many unknown questions.
Why did they used to do bilateral mastectomies? I suspect (but do not know) it was because :
LCIS was first described in 1941 by prominent pathologists Foote and Stewart. http://www.thedoctorsdoctor.com/Diseases/lcis.htm
At that time, they did not have chemos, and just about everyone at that time who had breast cancer got radical bilateral mastectomies (as far as I know, I may be wrong about this.) The first cancer-related radiation was probably for a breast cancer patient about 1900 (the documentation for this may be controversial), but I don't know how common among all breast cancer patients in 1941. ) http://www.annalssurgicaloncology.org/cgi/content/abstract/1/2/141 I’ve read articles that opined that Foote and Stewart named LCIS because of its resemblence to DCIS, and made assumptions about its natural history. I've seen it opined that they didn't change the name of LCIS because of the prominence of Foote and Stewart.
I do know that there is still at least some controversy about almost all issues concerning LCIS. -
i have the hot flashes and the weight gain from the tamoxifen but i stick it out even though it SUCKS(!) i'll do anything to not get cancer, i've seen close friends go through that, and what i'm going through is nothing compared to that.
-daisy
-
You guys are all so great!! My onc also said to try it and see. So, I choked down the first one today!
(no ears yet) He also went over all the studies and said the same, they only have data for 5 yrs. He does seem good (although both my husband and myself thought he looked younger than our 25yr old!).Leaf- I've read your posts in other sections as well-God has blessed us all with you and your knowledge. I was seriously prepared with plenty of well documented ?s because of many of your posts. I think that was the only problem I had with my first visit- I had all the med info already! He discussed all the studies with me, and was very honest about what is and isn't known. He also told us he considers this an early form of cancer (even drew us little pix). So like you said, we all have to make the decisions that seem right for us, and each one has value!
Lucky32-thank you! It is also helpful to hear from someone who chose not to continue. Your reasons have been my real internal debate-quality of life. And thanks for the info on the NCI centers- after reading your post I checked and my onc and clinic and they are part of this group. I am also very lucky in that he says the imaging clinic I go to is one of the best in the world- it's new and has all of the newest technology. The woman in charge is also so awesome, she spends time with me after each test showing me the pix(it's all digital) and explains whats she's seeing and compares them to my last ones. I give her the credit for finding everything so fast, setting up all my appts, and just for lending an ear!
See, you guys have actually helped me see some good with this! With so many of my family having bc, I kinda saw this as the beginning of the end, but you all have given me hope! Hugs to all-Denise
-
Denise, that's wonderful. It sounds like your doctor is top-notch, and the imaging center too. It really makes a difference when the techs are compassionate as well as knowledgeable.
I realized after reading through my post that I made a mistake. When I was taking tamoxifen the first time, I took it for 14 months, not 19. Sorry about that! I guess I was thinking about the total time I took it, which was 19 months.
You may be one of the many women who has few or no side effects from tamoxifen. Good for you for trying it! Keep us posted, and best of luck to you.
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team