please stop minimizing my diagnosis

Options
1246789

Comments

  • femme
    femme Member Posts: 262
    edited February 2008

    I recently went to my dentist for a tooth cleaning. It was on Feb 10th...my surgery was Feb 12th. I toyed with the idea of telling my dentist about my upcoming surgery (we knew a lot of people in common socially; my husband is a retired oral surgeon). I decided, mostly out of whimsey, to tell her about the upcoming surgery. She told me that she would eliminate two steps in the cleaning process (what I call thee "sandblasting finale) She felt it might tax my body unnecessarily before the surgery.



    I realized how important it is for each of us to present the whole picture of our health issues whenever we see a health practitioner. I don't think I would get much sympathy from my docs if I were to complain about tooth sensitivity immediately after my PBM and reconstruction procedure.

    femme

  • dissed1006
    dissed1006 Member Posts: 9
    edited February 2008

    Barbie,

    I know what you mean!  I too am tired of people saying DCIS isn't really cancer.  I feel like saying "Oh really....then why did I have my breast removed? And why do they use the word "carcinoma" in the diagnosis?  And why do my well known and respected breast surgeon and plastic surgeon call it cancer?  I've found that not all people say it's not cancer, but many do.  I even had a nurse tell me I could answer on insurance forms that I do not/ have not had cancer!  My surgeon said "Absolutely not!  That's insurance fraud!"  Obviously, this nurse needs to brush up on her cancer info.  To add to that...I'm also tired of people telling me my pain had nothing to do with my cancer.  That was the only symptom I had. I had no lump...a mass didn't even show up on MRI, the report even says so.  They say it was just "coincidental".  This was a pain that woke me up at night.  It never went away...until over half the area was cut out during my biopsy. Coincidental by butt!  The fact is (and you can even find it breastcancer.org) MOST breast cancers do not cause pain, but SOME do.   I'm tired too of people minimizing my symptoms...I lived it...I knew something was wrong...even when my OB/GYN said it was "nothing"....said it was "fibrocystic changes" and didn't order a mammo until 4 months later.  What exactly was my breast "changing" into.  Is cancer not an "change" in cells...the over growth of cells???  Can you say neglect??  All because "breast cancer doesn't cause pain."  Bull!  Think about this...when a woman has a baby...he milk comes in...her ducts are filled with milk and they ache.....it's painful until she nurses or pumps...so doesn't it stand to reason that if the ducts are full of abnormal cells pressing on the ductal walls, couldn't that cause pain too??  The fact is no woman should be ignored no matter what breast complaint she has.  Wake up docs! 

  • eightblueeyes
    eightblueeyes Member Posts: 30
    edited February 2008

    Amen Sister!  Very well written!!!!

  • mittmott
    mittmott Member Posts: 409
    edited February 2008

    This is a question for Beesie.  I've probably asked before, but since all the surgery and morphine, my brain can't remember anything anymore.  I have the same thing as you, dcis and microinvasion.  Do you see an oncologist.  Mine said she didn't need to ever see me again, since I am not on anything.  ( I don't do tamoxifin, since I got my first cancer a few years ago, while still on tamoxifin). I am going to see a new onc for a second opinion, but I wanted to know from others who have my diagnosis, if they still see an onc. Thanks.

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited February 2008

    mittmott,

    No, I don't see my oncologist any more.  I had a first appointment right after my surgery.  During that appointment the oncologist explained my recurrence risk (about 1%) and my risk to get a new breast cancer in my remaining breast (about 20% - 22%).  We discussed Tamoxifen but he recommended against.  I said I'd think about it.  When I came back for my 2nd appointment, I told him that I agreed re no Tamoxifen.  There wasn't much more to talk about after that.  Although he was going to schedule a 6 month follow-up, I asked whether it was really necessary and he agreed that it wasn't.  So we left it that I can call to set up appointment any time I feel necessary (for example, should I change my mind about Tamoxifen) but we won't continue with any regular schedule of appointments.  That was 2 years ago, and I haven't seen the need to see him since. 

  • mittmott
    mittmott Member Posts: 409
    edited February 2008

    Thanks Beesie, I think you told me this before, but as I said, for some reason, my brain is still foggy, even after all this time.  I happened to be in my regular md's office for a cough, and we were discussing my cancer,and he wants me to see someone local.  He feels that even though he could order tests for me if they were ever needed, he felt that an onc should be seen at least once a year, as they are more up to date, on new things that might come out as preventitives for bc. I'm seeing the new one in 2 weeks, and I'll see if she agrees with the onc from sloan kettering, or my md.

  • ottawagirl
    ottawagirl Member Posts: 27
    edited February 2008

    I think you know your body better than anyone.  It's unfortunate but you have to be your own advocate.  You cannot depend on anyone else to make decisions for you - no matter how many letters come after their name.  It's frustrating and the research is time consuming but I think we can all agree that in the end it is time well spent.  This is a great place for us all to learn and share.  Keep up the fight!

    As far as minimizing my diagnosis go - I had someone say to me that there are people muchj worse off than I am.  Well of course there are.  If I'm lying in a bed with a broken leg and the person next to me has 2 broken legs, they are worse off than I am, but my leg is still broken!

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2008

    hmmm yup, so maybe they should call it Ductal Condition In Situ??? Let's hope the research brings the answers we need. We don't have bye bye boobie parties for the fun of it.........

  • michmom
    michmom Member Posts: 113
    edited February 2008

    I'm glad there was some discussion regarding an oncologist.  After my mast when path showed no microinvasion or node involvement, my bs felt there was no need for me to see an oncologist as he felt my cancer was essentially gone (for now).  He felt i should be on tamoxifen but said he would follow me. My primary docotr does blood work and I see the gyn every six months.  Am I missing out on something by not seeing an oncologist.???

  • avasmom5
    avasmom5 Member Posts: 10
    edited February 2008

    I think every situation/patient is different.  I am suppose to see my onc once every 9 months.  I rotate visits with my surgeon, rad onc and onc every 3 months.  I rotate mammo and mri every 6 months.  I would prefer to see the docs only once a year or if needed after the mri/mammo because the appointment seems kind of useless to me.  I do regular exams, so I will catch something if it shows up.  I stopped taking Tamoxifen a few months back.   michmom, I'm curious that they do work on you every 6 months.  I asked about that and my rad onc said they didn't do this for any patient who was DCIS.  ??? 

  • avasmom5
    avasmom5 Member Posts: 10
    edited February 2008

    mich mom...I meant to say "blood work"

  • beth1225
    beth1225 Member Posts: 1,061
    edited February 2008

    My turn, I suppose.  I started out December of 2006 researching about getting a bilat mast.  I am BRCA2+ with a strong family history of bc going back in a line to my great-grandmother and two cousins who had OVCA.  So this would be prophylactic.  Fast forward to May 07 and I had the PBM.  Already had the ooph in 2002.  Was on Tamoxifen for a while as preventative.  There were assorted problems with staph infections and I lost the left implant.  In placing the tissue expander, the docs sent tissue for pathology and they told me there was DCIS.  It was not invasive.  Clear margins.  Etc.

    So I already had the bilat mast.  I will be back on Tamoxifen since I am ER+ and so was my dad who had bc.  Based on heredity and the team of docs, it seems like a good idea.  It will be after the final recon is over late May or early June.

    I am so lucky that nobody has ever said, I am lucky, or its just DCIS.  All of my doctors have been there with it is cancer and we caught it before it became invasive and you ARE lucky for knowing the BRCA status and being proactive.  Considering how out of the way the finding was, it may never have been discovered until it became worse.

    Yes, I am lucky I am here to type this.  My grandmother was already dead at this age from bc and my dad was diagnosed with bc about this age.  Never let anyone say its just anything!  To rephrase a prior comment:  Cancer is Cancer is CANCER.  But we are all here to support and help one another understand it.  So we are lucky we get to reeducate the rest of the world!  But we ARE here.

    Love and hugs,

    Beth

  • britbaby
    britbaby Member Posts: 95
    edited February 2008

    Hi I am Yvonne, I just wanted to let you know I am glad you are taking serious DCIS, I was diagnosed with low grade all less that 1cm in 2004, had mastectomy, no lymphnode involvement, was told I wouldn't need chemo, then because they found out I was her2 they suggested chemo as a preventative of reaccurence, well I did chemo and I was very ill, only got through 2 cycles instead of three as I chose the shorter route. I was told I was cured and go home have a long life, I was diagnosed with mets in Sept 2007, so your right don't be fooled by low grade DCIS, as it is not always the case it doesn't come back, most of the mets site are full of women who started out with DCIS. So make sure you get what you need and push for the right treatment...Yvonne

  • louishenry
    louishenry Member Posts: 417
    edited February 2008

    Hi Britbaby. I am so sorry about your situation. Your Dx must be very rare. Did you have an invasive component? Pure Dcis is non-invasive and does not need chemo. Good luck to you.

  • mittmott
    mittmott Member Posts: 409
    edited February 2008

    louishenry, this is what they tell us.  I had a tiny microinvasion also, and I'm on nothing.  I was also basically told, go home, have a good life, after my first bout, small invasive, and again now, dcis, with this micro.  Well, I'm  not going home to have a good life, and forget about it all.  My body made cancer twice,and bilateral or not, I'm not going to sit back.  I am seeing another onc for another opinion, and will hopefully continue to see them at least once a year , just for good measure. The onc in the huge cancer hospital doesn't feel she ever needs to see me again.

  • louishenry
    louishenry Member Posts: 417
    edited February 2008

    mittmott, In another post, you mention that your doc took you off tamox and felt that it may have started the other cancer. Can you give me more details? I am on tamox for a small dcis, no invasion. Thanks, Nada

  • mittmott
    mittmott Member Posts: 409
    edited February 2008

    I had lcis 8 years ago. I had another lump a year later (benign).  They started me on tamox, said i was high risk.  After a full year on the tamox, I developed a small invasive cancer in the same breast as the previous lcis, and benign lump.  I had a lump. and rads.  Onc, took me off tamox.  said she felt it worked the opposite on me, and might have caused my cancer.    She said a tiny cancer like my first one, should not have broken through while still on tamox.   Fast forward 6 years later, and I just had a bilateral mast.  Found a new cancer in my same left breast, this time dcis, and a small microinvasion.  clear nodes. 

  • mradf
    mradf Member Posts: 398
    edited February 2008

    I was diagnosed with DCIS prior to bi-lateral mastectomy surgery, and the pathology confirmed DCIS.  Every doctor, nurse, or specialist I saw discussed my "cancer".  It was not minimized in any way.  I was found to be BRCA1&2 negative, despite a strong family history.  On the plus side, because it was confirmed true DCIS, I do not need any treatment, unlike my sister who had chemo, radiation, metastasis, and is still a survivor.    I feel very blessed to have caught it early (hooray for mammograms!) and to have found the best BS/PS team to get it all out.

    It is not a contest.  Cancer is cancer is cancer.  The outcome is what's important.

    Maria

  • Marian61627
    Marian61627 Member Posts: 226
    edited March 2008

    It helps me to remember that until we know otherwise DCIS IS cancer waiting for an opportunity to take hold and I took its opportunity away.

    Was I ever going to get invasive cancer well it's clear to me that NO ONE has that answer yet.  There was so much confussion with every doc I saw even between breast surgeons.  And I trust the scientific evidence to a point - I like to know who funded the studies before I include it or toss it.  Very often the funding of these studies are by drug companies and I am very concerned that we are running low on good scientific studies, studies that have no bias (or at least as little as possible).

      

    Oh and Mark, I am really glad to see you here as it's time to throw out the image of women and breast cancer and see it as a human  breast cancer.  My Dad was also included in some studies at UCLA - and his cancer was Stage 2 invasive ductal carcin. Because he lost his battle in 2001 - when I was given the news of DCIS in 2007 I let his life guide me and I did the best I could to take CANCER's opportunity away..

    Best to all

    Marian

  • beth1225
    beth1225 Member Posts: 1,061
    edited March 2008

    Marian, so well put.  When my dad was dx'd with bc in 1984, it raised eyebrows.  At the age of 25, a year later, the gyn convinced the insurance to pay for my 1st mammo.  He passed away from mets to the liver in 1989.  My decision to have the bilat mast was because of what he went through and I know in my heart he would not want me to go through it too.

    Mark, glad you post to wake up people to see that men are bc survivors too.  The BRCA gene mutation is not gender related and some medical professionals still think that.  I still feel like I am re-educating the world!

  • Marian61627
    Marian61627 Member Posts: 226
    edited March 2008

    Beth - Good point!  I also had to educate the doc's on the probability of BRCA gene being present in someone whos FATHER was the one with breast cancer.  Now in my case it was mute, my BRCA came back negative and still there was DCIS.. I have had a great deal of trouble trying to get other members of my family to take the test BECAUSE mine came back negative and they still found cancer.. so I think I have at least encouraged them to have breast MRI's..  My insurance company flat turned my bill down, and it took months to clear up, not only that but a PET scan to make sure that there wasn't any other sites in the body.  But BRCA is now done under MEDICARE if a male member of the family is diagnosed - my God when I showed them that they had to approve it becase normally Medicare is the last approver of any procedure! 

    And for anyone other there that needs to know the cost it is approx. $4K (American) for just the BRCA 1/2 test!

  • beth1225
    beth1225 Member Posts: 1,061
    edited March 2008
    Marian, we were very lucky (again, ??) that my uncle, dad's brother, got us into a research study at Fox Chase Cancer Center.  Testing was free.  I also donated several vials of blood for further tests being done worldwide.  I learned alot more about BRCA 1/2 gene mutation at FORCE, www.facingourrisk.org.  There are other research studies still being done and when one does, a post goes up on the message board there with details.  If anybody has questions about FORCE or BRCA, PM me.
  • michmom
    michmom Member Posts: 113
    edited March 2008

    Avasmom5.. I see the gyn every six months because of tamoxifen and risk of uterine cancer.  I'm not sure exactly how often i will have blood work but my last test showed elevated liver enzymes which the doctor is following.  I don't see an oncologist but MRI and mamos are recommended yearly.

    Beth  I have a silly question.  If you had a double mast, which I thought included removal of the ducts and breast tissue how (where) did they find DCIS?

    Michele

  • MAGBH
    MAGBH Member Posts: 1
    edited September 2009

    At last I have found someone that has experienced the same feelings that I am dealing with. My first hint of this was not being treated well by my doctor. I visited her 3-4 times in a space if 4 years telling her I had an abnormal discharge from my left nipple. She took a test of the discharge and told me all was negative. The last time I visited her in June 2009 I got the distinct feeling I was making a fuss about nothing. Fortunately I had my daughter with me. She was shocked at the doctors attitude and found me a second opinion the following week. Long story short I have had two surgeries to remove my nippple and some breast tissue.

    My problem is that I constanly hear how lucky I am as it is ONLY DCIS. Of course I feel blessed that my cancer is curable but occasionally I want to allow myself to feel that I have had an operation,  I am starting radiation and that this is not something I am doing to get attention! I have cancer and have been on the same emotional roller coaster as anyone getting this news. I do not feel sorry for my self but I am not faking either.

  • Westcoastgirl
    Westcoastgirl Member Posts: 13
    edited September 2009

    Well I too got 'if your'e going to get Breast Cancer DCIS is the one to get" !!  The biopsy indicated DCIS, but surprise surprise the pathology from the lumpectomy was IDC. Seems the little bastard cells had already broken free from the milk duct sometime between the biopsy and the surgery!  You can imagine my shock when I was referred to a Medical Oncologist and heard I had to have aggressive treatment including 8 rounds of chemo, followed by Radiation and a year's worth of Herceptin - 15 months of drug therapy!  The chemo just about killed me and they stopped it 3 sessions short of the full 8.  I had every side effect they said I would get, could get and may get!  I start Rads Oct 5 and continue with Herceptin until July 2010!

    So don't underestimate little DCIS!  Things change as the full pathology reveals itself.

  • changing_woman
    changing_woman Member Posts: 23
    edited September 2009

    Barbie7,

    A #1 high-class rant! Spot on.

    Like you, my doc is not doing this to me, but one of the first peer-reviewed papers I saw was investigating why on Earth those with DCIS felt bad at all. Duh. That should have never been funded or published. They completely discount loss/fear/complications and only look at a better prognosis.

    It is a very good thing to stand up and howl occasionally. You did it well!

  • Sunone
    Sunone Member Posts: 151
    edited February 2012

    I too have DCIS, just had my lumpectomy and will have to start radiation. As I was waiting to have my surgery the anesthesiologist came in to talk to me and as she started to put info into the computer she commented that I didn't have breast cancer. Why? What was the purpose of this, it was more of a mumble to herself, she said it without looking at me. I wanted to ask her why I was having part of my breast removed and then having radiation treatments if it wasn't cancer, but I decided to just let it go, didn't want to go into surgery feeling any worse than I already did. I guess I was just kind of shocked at the callousness of her attitude, nice bedside manner.

  • NancyNJ
    NancyNJ Member Posts: 128
    edited September 2009

     YOU GO GIRL!!  I can't thank you enough for saying how I feel - you are not alone!

  • cookiegal
    cookiegal Member Posts: 3,296
    edited September 2009

    I totally get where you all are coming from, and you have opened my eyes.

    While I have invasive cancer, my husband keeps on saying we are so lucky because it's very early and tiny, only 1.4cm.

    I have to have surgery, I have to have rads, and I may have to have chemo. If I decide to skip chemo, I may be gambling my future survival. And I have really pretty hair :(. When I talk about coming to terms with the fact that my life may be shorter, my friends say, you only have a "little" cancer. They have said "it's not serious".

    So sorry you have to go through all this, having bc is isolating, and you guys get a double dose.

    I do realize someone with stage 4 would give anything to trade places with me, that helps me find some balance.

  • Barbie7
    Barbie7 Member Posts: 386
    edited September 2009

    Hello ladies.  I was a little surprised when I saw this thread had bumped up to the top.  I wrote it back in 2007.  At the same time, I wasn't surprised, because so many others have been diagnosed with DCIS since I wrote that post.

    Over the last two years (I'm approaching my 2 year anniversary), I've realized that most people who say "at least..." or "its only..." are just trying to ease my fears, and in some cases, calm their own fears as well.  For those of you heading into radiation or surgery, I wish you well.  For the others who found invasive disease on their final pathology I wish you well too.  Heck, I wish everyone well!

    This board has been a Godsend to me.  Keep posting ladies, and vent when you need to!

    Barbie

Categories