The Brand New Respectful Presidential Campaign Thread

Options
NoH8
NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
The Brand New Respectful Presidential Campaign Thread
«13456761

Comments

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited February 2008

    How about we try to start over?  Everyone is allowed and encouraged to post (obviously).

  • meliaanne
    meliaanne Member Posts: 682
    edited February 2008

    You know, I mainly stay in the Jan 07 group, but I am really interested in this election and I started to read the other thread about it. But I found the nastiness so upsetting. I have seen that occasionally on other threads here and there. I find it astonishing that, in a group of women who have faced a life threatening illness, there has been any meanness at all. Amy, thanks for starting a new thread on this subject.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2008

    Well Im happy.  I dont have to catch up on whats happened while I was gone.  Im starting from scratch. Laughing

    Nicki

  • nosurrender
    nosurrender Member Posts: 2,019
    edited February 2008

    Look! Up in the Sky!

    It's a bird!

    It's a Plane!

    IT'S A SUPER DELEGATE!!!!!Tongue out

  • OneBadBoob
    OneBadBoob Member Posts: 1,386
    edited February 2008

    A little humor, anyone?   A friend e-mailed this to me, and it sure gave me a chuckle!

    While walking  down the street one day a US senator is tragically hit by a truck and dies.

    His soul arrives in heaven and is met by St. Peter at the entrance.

    "Welcome to heaven," says St. Peter. "Before you settle in,  it seems there is a problem. We seldom see a high official around these parts, you see, so we're not sure what to do with you."

    "No  problem, just let me in," says the man.

    "Well, I'd like to, but I  have orders from higher up. What we'll do is have you spend one day in  hell and one in heaven. Then you can choose where to spend  eternity."

    "Really, I've made up my mind. I want to be in heaven,"  says the senator.

    "I'm sorry, but we have our rules."

    And with  that, St. Peter escorts him to the elevator and he goes down, down, down  to hell. The doors open and he finds himself in the middle of a green  golf course. In the distance is a clubhouse and standing in front of it  are all his friends and other politicians who had worked with  him.

    Everyone is very happy and in evening dress. They run to greet him, shake his hand, and reminisce about the good times they had while getting rich at the expense of the people.

    They play a  friendly game of golf and then dine on lobster, caviar and  champagne.

    Also present is the devil, who really is a very friendly  guy who has a good time dancing and telling jokes. They are having such a good time that before he realizes it, it is time to go.

    Everyone  gives him a hearty farewell and waves while the elevator rises...

    The elevator goes up, up, up and the door  reopens on heaven where St. Peter is waiting for him.

    "Now it's time  to visit heaven."

    So, 24 hours pass with the senator joining a group  of contented souls moving from cloud to cloud, playing the harp and singing.  They have a good time and, before he realizes it, the 24 hours have gone by and St. Peter returns.

    "Well, then, you've spent a day in hell and  another in heaven. Now choose your eternity."

    The senator reflects  for a minute, then he answers:  "Well, I would never have said it  before, I mean heaven has been delightful, but I think I would be better off  in hell."

    So St. Peter escorts him to the elevator and he goes down,  down, down to hell.

    Now the doors of  the elevator open and he's in the middle of a barren land covered with waste and garbage.

    He sees all his friends, dressed in rags, picking up the trash and putting it in black bags as more trash falls from above.

    The devil comes over to him and puts his arm around his shoulder. "I don't understand," stammers the senator. "Yesterday I was here and there was a golf course and clubhouse, and we ate lobster and caviar, drank champagne, and danced and had a great time. Now there's just a wasteland full of garbage and my friends look miserable. What happened?"

    The devil looks at him, smiles and says,  "Yesterday we were campaigning...... Today you voted."

  • JoanofArdmore
    JoanofArdmore Member Posts: 1,012
    edited February 2008

    Thanks, OBB.Humor is always welcome.

    And thank you Amy, for a nice, clean thread.

    I have been whining about living in PA, where our dear governor (for some political reason) endorsed the anti-Obama.

    So I've decided to contact Governor Rendell, and ask/tell him to switch his vote.(And his endorsement)I read last night that SuperDelegates are starting to do this, in droves.

    Makes sense--it is more important to have a candidate who could, possibly, beat McCaine, and since Rendell IS a Dem, it would definately be to his advantage to have a Dem president.

    I think  he realizes by now it aint gonna be hillary.

    I will do this to Michael Nutter, the new mayor of Philly, too, because of his possible influence on Philly voters, even though he's not a SD..

    What made me realize to do this is one SD was quoted as changing her endorsement to Obama, saying "a SD has obligation to consider the wishes of her constituancy".

    LaughingRight!!!!

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2008

    Jane, that was toooo funny!

    Shirley

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited February 2008

    Joan, as of today, every poll of voters in PA gives a significant lead to Clinton.  So in endorsing Clinton, your dear governor is in fact considering the wishes of his constituency. 

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/pa/pennsylvania_democratic_primary-240.html

    No opinions, just the facts.  (This is my new tag line for any contributions I make to this new thread.)

  • Blundin2005
    Blundin2005 Member Posts: 1,167
    edited February 2008

    Loved the joke .... so real!  We get all caught up in the campaign...but real life comes back with a vengeance.

    Beesie....Very good point.....but.....polls are a good point of reference, and they can be wrong, no?  So I guess it's the vote that will tell the story?

    So Obama's business plan is similar to "The New Deal"?  I think that's what it was named.  Roosevelt put people back to work during the depression building dams, roads, railroads...infrastructure that needed maintenance to carry the country forward....supporting the construction industry that is collapsing after the housing bubble broke.  Ending our military presence in Iraq ...talking to Iran who are talking to Russia and the Eastern EU as they are now known who are talking to the EU who are talking to Africa and India and China.   Sounds good to me....but I want to read details...that's where you find the devil. 

    His health plan too is designed not to collapse the health system with abrupt change, but transition it through programs to support redistribution of wealth....I think.

    This is my biggest issue with Sen. Clinton.  When she was first lady, she introduced a proposal that turned health care into a disaster.  I never forgave that mistake.  Simply put, you can not layer a social system over a private system and expect that it survive....doesn't happen...because people in US want choice....and they don't want to pay for it....it's the same everywhere.  Probably of equal weight is the fact that she did this without to be held accountable...although the Clinton administration bore that weight.  Her plan created the existence of HMO's that went public for funding thus "for profit".  The HMO's beat down the system to basement prices and expected it to provide the same level of care....doesn't happen in a capitalistic society...it created poor services, high malpractice and legal medicine, and boutique medicine to capture income....because people with money pay...and people got rich investing in the health care industry segment on the NYSE.  The CEO's of the HMO's wanted private care when they came to the hospital for themselves at HMO prices....doesn't happen...unless you legitimize extortion.

    I'm prejudice and I admit it....much of insurance company motivation is legitimized extortion if you think about it....I suggested this to an insurance co. executive who I negotiated with at one time.  The same operation by the mob is criminal.  I think that mob is in the Clinton pockets...they want to control computerized medical records...what a nightmare to think that insurance companies gain that control.  I hope I'm wrong about that...I really do.

    The worst part is that I don't trust the Clintons...never did..didn't vote for him the first time because of that.  He had some really good advisers who I liked a lot...but no him.  And remember their slogan then..."two for the price of one"...and we'll get that again.  This worries me.  We need a clean house with a capable leader to walk forward not only in our own country but around the world.  A bully female dealing with cultures in other countries does not sound to me like a viable idea.  An earnest female...without a doubt a good idea...but I'm not seeing this in Sen. Clinton...and as a woman, that saddens me.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2008

    Insurance in the USA is awful right now.  I remember when HMO's became popular.  It was in the early 1980's.  I worked for physicians and they treated patients on HMO's like second class citizens.  No kidding.  If you went for a physical and you were private insurance or medicare they would schedule an hour.  If you were HMO they would schedule 1/2 hour.  The insurance industry has sure changed and has only gotten worse.  While they are making record profits, they are denying needed tests and procedures - then getting a bonus for keeping their spending down!

    I heard one thing on the news yesterday that I didnt like.  They likened Obama's wife to Jackie Kennedy! 

    This whole concept of Super Delegates is intersting.  Hate to think that the peoples vote could be taken away by manipulating the system.

    Nicki

  • Blundin2005
    Blundin2005 Member Posts: 1,167
    edited February 2008

    Hi NNN,

    I'm not too concerned with the labels that TV commentators put on the candidates....they are looking for ratings.  The US is conditioned to packaging and respond to the jargon.  Mrs. Obama didn't strike me as a Jackie K-O....she is more her own person and less the corporate wife of days gone by.  It would be interesting to know Jackie K-O by today's standards.  In the sense of presence and intelligence, I agree...they are similar.

    Isn't it great that this election everyone in the country seems to understand better the election process including the SD.  What a great byproduct.

    Last week I responded to a Washington Post article to ask who the SDs were and how we can contact them....then I found the information for myself.  It seems they need to hear from us if they are going to represent us.  Presumably, they will follow the votes, but from what I've read too, it is possible to manipulate the process..."for the greater good".  I get nervous when people think they know for everyone else what the greater good is in absolute terms.

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited February 2008
    I worry about the pundits prematurely declaring Obama to be the candidate. Bill Clinton was the original comeback kid and Hillary's people seem to come out strong for her when  they see her faltering. My 98 year old grandmother wants Obama to win because he seems like a nice young man, but when you're pushing the century mark 99.9% of men are young Tongue out . She voted for Hillary because she said Hillary's feelings might be hurt if she doesn't get too many votes. When I asked her if she's feel the same if Hillary was a man she said no. She can remember a time when women were fighting for the right to vote and was in college at the time when we were granted that vote. She remembers proudly voting the first time. I was a bit concerned when she told me that at the polling place she thought Hillary and Obama were the republicans and wanted to change her party affiliation Surprised but it sounds like she was steered in the right direction.
  • Bugs
    Bugs Member Posts: 1,719
    edited February 2008

    LOL, sorry for chuckling Amy...but I am imagining your Grandmother telling you she voted republican and the look on your face.  She sounds like a character.

    Take care,

    Bugs

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited February 2008

    It's a good thing those looks can't be seen over the phone Bugs-- as my eyes were bugging out of my head. I would never try to convince her who to vote for, at 98 she's earned the right to decide-- but I'm gonna make damn sure she knows who she's voting for if I can help it LOL.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2008

    Amy:  Thanks for the chuckle.  I liked the story about your grandmother.

    Nicki

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited February 2008

    Marilyn, yes, you're absolutely right.  Polls can be wrong.  New Hampshire certainly proved that!  Polls are simply point-in-time data. And every poll has a built-in error margin.  That's why I was careful to say that "as of today, every poll of voters in PA gives a significant lead to Clinton".  The results could be different with the next poll.  And the results could certainly be different by April 22nd, when PA goes to vote.  But for now, based on the best available data at this time, it can't be said that the governor of PA, by supporting Clinton in his role as a SD, is not voting with his constituency.  

    It will be very interesting to see what happens over the next weeks and months, particularly in Texas, Ohio and Pennsylvania, where Clinton currently leads in the polls.

    - Will voters, seeing the recent strong results for Obama, decide to join in and switch from Clinton?  Will they be caught up with Obama-mania? Or if they believe that Obama is the inevitable winner, will they want to support the winner? 

    - Or will the voters in these states be frustrated by what seems to be a coronation of Obama before they've even had a chance to vote, and will they react by voting even more strongly for Clinton?  Will they try to influence the results the other way, or a least, make it a close race once again?

    - Or will it be something in between, possibly with some voters going one way, some going the other way and the results ending up in the middle?

    Anything is possible.  How fascinating it will be to watch.

    (Still no opinions.....)  

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited February 2008

    There's been a 16 point turn in superdelegates toward Obama since super tuesday. Hillary lost 3-- he gained 13 to make a net gain of 16! This is getting more and more interesting.

    I read in a political blog that Edwards wants to be Attorney General of an Obama cabinet if our dreams come true. Can you imagine that? What polar opposites between Ashcroft/Gonzalez to Edwards if that happens.

  • JoanofArdmore
    JoanofArdmore Member Posts: 1,012
    edited February 2008

    Oh WOW, Amy!I had not heard that!It sounds wonderful!!

  • Blundin2005
    Blundin2005 Member Posts: 1,167
    edited February 2008

    Hi Beesie,

    I understood you clearly before and your writing is well done...I was only jesting with you a little bit.  Hope you weren't offended.  I also have a sad spot for the loss of good journalism (thus polls) and I express that frustration sometimes.

    You outlined the mystery votes very well.  It is understood that the voters have sifted through most of the issues that differentiate the candidates and now, as you listed, they seem pulled more by emotion rather than issues.  It seems a backlash to the world since 911....frustration...helplessness to do something about the mess we find ourselves in. 

    If I'm honest with myself, probably all of the candidates would be effective leaders so I'm not as concerned for the country in general as I was before. I was watching Bloomberg business news last night and I had the impression that there was just a hint of favor toward Clinton.  I don't know if Robert Reich is still counsel to them...I liked him very much when he worked for the Clinton Administration.  I guess I want Hillary to prove that a Hillary President, that she really did learn from the mistakes of the past regarding health care and that she will not stand in her husband's shadow.  Gee maybe that's me talking? (lol)

    I agree, anything is possible.

    I really hope that I'm wrong about my instincts.  But whenever I didn't trust my instincts, they proved me wrong not to.  I know this is not the best reason in the world for voting...but it is a reason that I've learned to listen to over the years.

    And I admit to be leaning heavily in the Obama direction...I even sent a small donation.  So to think that the state of PA is leaning toward Clinton took my attention. 

    I just looked out to see what Robert Reich was doing these days and found this....http://robertreich.blogspot.com/2008/02/obama-vs-mccain-and-four-stories-of.html

    His writing on the topic of Obama vs McCain is confirming my instincts it seems. I really do like this man and hope he returns to help the country again.

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited February 2008

    I guess I want Hillary to prove that a Hillary President, that she really did learn from the mistakes of the past regarding health care and that she will not stand in her husband's shadow. 

    I didn't think of that myself, but that was in part what I was looking for. Bill did some great things for the country and created some not so great scandals. I want change and hope not the same old back biting because that is a hinderance to getting things done for the people.

  • saluki
    saluki Member Posts: 2,287
    edited February 2008

    I find this down right peculiar--If its true--I haven't seen frenzy like this since I was sixteen in the middle of a Beatles concert.

    http://www.breitbart.tv/html/48404.html

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited February 2008

    How about that "secret" meeting between Edwards and Obama? Note to the media--- it's not a secret meeting if helicopters are hovering over trying to figure our what the hug at the end meant....

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited February 2008

    Saluki that's how intense I feel about Obama....

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2008

    I heard "info lite" today about Obama's pull-out plan for Iraq. Before, I just kept hearing that he had a plan to end our occupation in Iraq, but couldn't (and still can't) find information on the particulars. Anyone know where I can find more info on this as well as his health care initiative?

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2008

    I still do not know what Obama's going to "change."  He hasn't set out a plan.  He speaks wonderfully.  However, I don't need someone who inspires me.  I need someone who will get the job done and not raise taxes. 

    I don't believe anyone knows anything about his health care plans or when he's going to pull out the troops.  I still say we CANNOT pull out our troops now.

    Isn't it funny how the surge seems to be working and the dems won't acknowledge it? 

    We can't leave the Iraqis in a mess.  We must stay and see this thing through no matter how anyone felt about this war. 

    Shirley

  • JoanofArdmore
    JoanofArdmore Member Posts: 1,012
    edited February 2008

    Felicia--Have you gone to his site?All the info n all the issues  is there.

    Hmmmm.

    Barackobama.com

    Should take you into the main page.

    And Susie-w/out checking the link, like Amy, I feel that way whenever I see him speak.And so do my daughters and friends (repubs included!Obamacans, I should say!)

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2008

    Shirley, I completely agree with you (except the part about the surge working, lol). Obama is a heck of a orator, but I'm not sure I'm actually hearing a whole lot. His plan for getting troops out of Iraq doesn't seem quite plausible to me and I'm not quite sure I even understand his healthcare reform package...



    In any event, I wish the election was tomorrow - just so I could stop hearing about the campaign already. The intense coverage of all things political is absolutely maddening. Too many obtuse observations and opinions. I wish my fellow journalists would just stop trying to analyze everything to the nth degree and remember that there are other things happening in the world besides an election that is still nine months away...

  • Poppy
    Poppy Member Posts: 405
    edited February 2008

    I'm not crazy about anyone but I am so interested and excited to be a part of this election. Historically speaking, it's incredible and a huge step in the right direction. I guess I'd classify myself as liberal on social issues and conservative on economy/immigration (which I don't consider a "social issue")/international issues.

    For me, ultimately, I really just want someone in office who will unite this country instead of keeping it so divided as it's been for so many years.

    I'm sure I'll have more thoughts later! LOL
    Erica

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited February 2008

    Part of what I see Obama  changing is the  back biting and negativity between the president and congress and in washington. If Hillary's campaign is indication of how she's act among the colleagues she's be working with, particularly those she disagrees with-- I want no part of it. Everytime Bush makes a speech when he disagrees with congress he blames them and tries to make the public believe that the country is at grave risk for terror because of it.  I can just see her wagging her finger and doing the same thing.

    Shirley, what have you read Obama's website and looked over his plan? What makes about his plan says he doesn't have one?

  • JoanofArdmore
    JoanofArdmore Member Posts: 1,012
    edited February 2008

    <staggers in, cross-eyed, from watching CNN for hours>

    Hi Amy!OMG!How awesome was THAT?

    I think mz hillary should pack it in--save this $ she is trying to raise--did you see her shamelessly pimping her website?- andthe silly NYC lunch (does she not realize NY aready voted?) Oh, of course, she intends to hit the womn up for checks!Hard times when one is trying to force herself in, unwanted.(Becase it is "her turn".

    Well as the CNN commentator said, the simple fact is, we are REJECTING her, and EMBRACING him.

    So why not retire w/dignity?Oh.Too late for that.Way too late, after the Bill&hill act.And last night she was  all baggy-eyed and swollen-faced in Youngstown, from crying.

    Obama was awesome!!He combined a campaign speech with a revelation of his policies!Oh!How wonderful!This man is totally brilliant!

    I'm very glad hillary isnt being nominated.Because I'd hate to vote for McCaine, and "embrace the policies of the failed past"

    Tired but happy, j

Categories