anyone else going natural - alternative

Joycey
Joycey Member Posts: 7
anyone else going natural - alternative

Comments

  • Joycey
    Joycey Member Posts: 7
    edited October 2007

    1 week after my 50th birthday 11apr07 I was diagnosed with BC.  2 weeks later my right breast was removed, resulting pathology report states 2 tumors of 1.8cm and .2cm which were 1.5mm from nearest margin, ER+. The oncologist recommended no radiation, chemo and Tomaxafin. The "computer" says I have 18% chance of cancer returning.  If I took chemo that would drop by 9.  If I took tomaxafin, it would drop by 10.  If I took both it would drop by 13.  These stats were without the removal of the other breast, which will be done as soon as I can get a surgery date.

    The oncologist said chemo is only effective if administered before 12 weeks after diagnosed.  As that was already week 14 I chose not to take chemo, keeping it "in the hip pocket" as I'd only get one crack at it (or at least so I was told).  I chose not to take tomaxafin as the (15+%) side effects including 2, possibly 3 cancers did not merrit the 10% drop.  I am having a hysterectomy in December (longstanding menstural issues) and will have my ovaries removed at that time.

    So, with the words "garbage in garbage out" ringing in my ears, I have radically altered my diet going raw and green - mostly vegan unless organic - and eating organic whenever I can.  There is a ton of information on the web that I am reading daily and making changes.

    Has anyone else out there chosen the natural alternative?   

    Joy

  • LizM
    LizM Member Posts: 963
    edited October 2007

    Joy, I responded to your post in the no chemo thread and will respond here as well.  Please be careful about making treatment choices based on what you read on the internet especially when you are going against what is recommended by your medical team.  While a 1.8 cm tumor is considered stage 1 it is not that small and while having negative nodes is a good prognostic factor cancer cells can still travel via the blood.  Anytime you have invasive breast cancer it CAN recur.  Your medical team is recommending adjuvant therapy as a prevention.  They are going for the cure and in my opinion your first shot is your best shot at curing it.  I understand that chemo may not be necessary since your nodes were negative but hormone therapy has been shown to be very effective especially for ILC.  Studies have shown that diet has little or no effect on breast cancer recurrence in those whose cancer is hormone receptor positive.  Exercise has some effect because it can lower the estrogen in the body.  I decided the best treatment for me was to get all I could from what modern medicine has to offer combined with complementary medicine.    

  • wallycat
    wallycat Member Posts: 3,227
    edited October 2007

    My oncologist said that in Europe, many docs recommend chemo not necessarily because it is ideal, but it kills the ovaries.  Having an oophrectomy/hysterectomy will sort of do the same thing.

    Estrogen is still made in our bodies from our adrenal glands, fat pads, etc....so most women, without meds, have SOME estrogen circulating.

    How high were you with Er/pr?  (some gals are only 40% while others are 95+%)...if you are highly hormonally affected, it may do you good to use a hormonal drug.


    Have you had the Oncotype DX test to let you know how favorable that would be?

    Have you had the 2D6 test to see how badly you'd be affected by side effects?

    Seems like 10% are unresponsive and 10% or so are high metabolizers that suffer greatly from side effects---but many of us are intermediate metabolizers and hardly notice side effects.

    Once your ovaries are out, tamoxifen is not your only option, though I hear AI's are harder on bones/joints.

    I feel your pain about making decisions that affect your LIFE.

    Some women simply have mastectomy and nothing else and are fine (Julia child is a prime example....having had a radical mastectomy--that was all they did when she was 54---and lived to 90) so how can we know if adjuvant treatment is what prolonged our life or if we'd have been fine without it.

    I detest taking drugs but I am taking Tamoxifen.  I'm an intermediate metabolizer and I hardley notice side effects.  I worry that that is not enough.......

    I wish you much success in seeking your resources and being comfortable with your decision...I know they say we should never look back, but I think if I make it to 90, I'll stop worrying Frown

  • silverbullet
    silverbullet Member Posts: 2
    edited October 2007

    This is my first time in this chat room after having been diagnosed with BC over a year ago. My tumor was so small, they called it pre-cancerous. I had a lumpectomy and radiation and sailed right through both. I have been on Tamoxifen for nine months and have not had my period in 8 weeks. My gynecologist thinks I'm in menopause now which makes me crazy. He suggested I go off it for a month and see how I feel after that. I am seriously considering it because my cousin's wife has been on Tamoxifen for 4 years and now has to have a hysterectomy due to pre-cancerous cells in her uterous. Am I saving my life by being on Tamoxifen or my breasts?  I'd like to hear from anyone who has stopped the hormone therapy or never started it to begin with.  I am a very active 49 year old who has had minimal side effects from the drug, but feels more are coming.

  • Joycey
    Joycey Member Posts: 7
    edited October 2007

    Thank you all for your comments.  LizM - What do you mean by "complementary medicine"? My reports only say HR+ yes, no percentage given.  Also I have not heard about the 2D6 test but it is on my list of questions, along with the Oncotype DX test.  None of this information was offered and the oncologist has kinda shut me out since I told him I wasn't going the Tomaxafin route.  Silverbullet - your relative's (and numerous other people like her) experience is exactly the reason I will not go on Tomaxafin.  Why, after 20+ years have they not corrected at least SOME of the side effects of this wonder drug?  I just cannot get past the damage this one pill does as it passes throughout the entire body after being swallowed.  My medical team (and the research - pharmaceutical - industry) keeps saying that diet does not matter.  My common sense dictates otherwise.  'Course, no money in just eating what Mother Earth has provided is there?  And who's going to fund that research? Oh oh, feel a rant coming on Sealed

    Joy 

  • LizM
    LizM Member Posts: 963
    edited October 2007

    Joy, what I mean my complementary medicine as oppose to alternative medicine is that you take the recommended treatment modern medicine has to offer and combine it some of the things often used in alternative medicine, i.e. diet, meditation, yoga, etc.  The side effects of some of the drugs used for hormone therapy can be scary but most women to not have the more serious ones listed.  Most common being hot flashes, stiff muscles, etc.   Even though studies are showing that diet does not play much of a role in reducing the risk of recurrence for hormone receptor positive breast cancer, keeping weight off does seems to play a role.  I eat a very healthy diet of fruits and veggies and exercise every day because I do think a healthy diet is important for my overall health.  Since you mentioned having your ovaries removed (which is considered a treatment for breast cancer) you may want to check your estradiol level to ensure that it is low if you are not going to take an aromatase inhibitor.  Good luck with your decision. I know that they are not easy.   

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited October 2007

    I would have to echo what another poster said--be very careful what you read and check out everything with your medical team before making any important decisions that will affect your life. I have been on tamoxifen for 4 years with mild SEs--hot flashes, insomnia, achiness--all annoying, but definitely manageable. The most common SE for tamox is hot flashes; the more serious SEs  of blood clots or endometrial cancer (this is the only cancer tamox is associated with, not "2 or 3") are very rare, reportedly less than 1%. Most women do very well on tamox, you only hear the bad reports, those that are doing well rarely post.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited October 2007

    I actually lost my ovaries 2.5 years ago (not by choice---ruptured ovarian cysts) and STILL take tamox and will for another year as it is a very good preventative medication.

  • nbh53
    nbh53 Member Posts: 2
    edited January 2008

    Dear Joycey,

    Sorry to hear aout what you are going through, I was diagnosed with bc and hdd surgery in May 2007 lumpectomy of three locatioin one discovered on a routine mamogram and the other two found on an MRI, in June I needed a reexcision because the surgeon did not remove enough of the two locations found on the MRI.  I tried tamaoifen which almost killed me because I have very hormone sensitive hypertension, I had to stop taking it, they then tried to get me into menopause by giving me injectiions of lupron, I took one and be came seriously ill within one week, four emergency room visits for blood pressure of 250/145, so after eight weeks of trying to stabilize, I had my ovaries removeed to put me into menopause.  Needless to say I am very anxiuos about taking any other hormone related drugs.  It seems that aromasin and arimidex have the same side effects for hypertension.  I meet with my onc in two weeks and would love to know more about goint the natural route.  My cancer was ilc 1.2cm, 5mm, & 7mm, er+,pr+,her2 2+ but negative. 

  • nbh53
    nbh53 Member Posts: 2
    edited January 2008

    Dear Joycey,

    Sorry

    to
  • Little-G
    Little-G Member Posts: 647
    edited January 2008

    I did do the 7 weeks of radiation, but did not do the suggested chemo.  There is a recent study that has shown chemo is only effective in helping 6% of the breast cancers,and they do not know which 6% it helps. I also refused the tamoxifen, due to the side effects and my history, so I had my ovaries removed.  I've also changed my diet.  However, if you read the boards, you see women who have done everything that was suggested, and it still comes back.  And women who have not done what is suggested, and it comes back.  I did what I thought was right for me.  You need to be at peace with whatever decision you make.  I wish you best of luck!

    g

  • SLH
    SLH Member Posts: 566
    edited January 2008

    Hi Joycey,

    I had a stage 1 tumor like you.  I chose bilateral, but didn't have to do rads or chemo.  My oncologist strongly recommended a total hysterectomy, because if you have bc your chances are greater for getting ovarian, endometrial, and uterine C.  So that's good that you had the surgery.

    I also didn't take Tamoxifen because I have a genetic blood-clotting factor, but my onc strongly believes in the Aromotase Inhibitors, like Femara and Arimidex.  I've been taking Arimidex for 2 years.

    A good diet is a benefit for everyone, but you might talk to your onc about the AIs.  The studies have been promising.

    Wallycat, won't you start the AIs after your Tamoxifen years are done?

    sally 

  • paige-allyson
    paige-allyson Member Posts: 781
    edited January 2008

    I have done everything recommended in terms of conventional medicine- surgery, chemotherapy (dose dense AC/T), 6 1/2 weeks of radiation, and now an aromatase inhibitor. You could not pay me enough to do otherwise. If my oncologist had told me that another full round of chemo would give me 5 more percentage points toward survival I would have said, "When can I start?" I also follow the research on alternative medicine/lifestyle change and make liberal use of these approaches. Allyson

  • paige-allyson
    paige-allyson Member Posts: 781
    edited January 2008

    Oh- and Lupron every three months- I almost forgot.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2008

    Joy - If you got a reccurence or mets would you still feel confident and comfortable with your decision? If you answer yes, then you're doing what's right for you. I thought long and hard about all this when I was dx'd. I asked myself that question and realized I would most likely regret not doing "everything" possible to prevent it. And, in a way, I would have felt somewhat selfish in regard to my dh and family and friends. Good luck and best wishes!

  • marshakb
    marshakb Member Posts: 1,664
    edited January 2008

    Silver Bullet, you said "Am I saving my life by being on Tamoxifen or my breasts?"  Well I am on Tamoxifen and have had both breasts removed.  So I am not taking it to save the breast but to prevent a recur anywhere else where my hormone eating tumor might decide to have gone.  I guess I am lucky in that the hot flashes are really my only complaint and I would have had those anyway during menapause (my non BC friend has them just as bad).

    As for the original question about what all you are willing to do, I did EVERYTHING.  Right mastectomy, 8 rounds of chemo, tamoxifen for 5 years, 33 rads and prophy left mastectomy.  My reason is that I found myself in the low numbers of having BC in the first place and who wants to screw around with something that is life threatening?  Just my humble opinion.  BTW, I have a friend who eats healthy, no meat, organic, only a glass of red wine every so often, exercises everyday, and just had 5 blocked arteries and had to have major ByPass Surgery.  Go figure. 

  • nagem
    nagem Member Posts: 353
    edited January 2008

    Well, even though I went the whole nine yards with conventional treatment (bilateral mastectomy, chemo, radiation, herceptin), I do know someone who had a similar diagnosis who went the alternative route (hot-and-cold showers, special diet, scrubbing with a brush, enemas, you name it), and her tumor has disappeared (she had refused surgery, chemo, radiation, everything). Who knows which of us will live longest? The trouble with alternative methods is that they are not put to the same scientific scrutiny that conventional treatment receives, so we have only anecdotal evidence of their efficacy.

  • Little-G
    Little-G Member Posts: 647
    edited January 2008

    nagem,

    I agree with what you said.  I don't think there's enough research on either side of this fence.  And Marsha, you made the point too with your friend, even though she did everything "right" she was still hit.  I think you really just have to do your research and then go with what feels best to you, what you will be able to sleep with at night. 

    g

  • GrandmaWolf
    GrandmaWolf Member Posts: 88
    edited January 2008

    For whatever it is worth.... my sister-in -law, passed on conventional treatment for the nuts and berries approach.  She was dead at 45.

    I also have a friend who did conventional treatment, "along" with the alternative therapies, approved by her Onc, who is doing well.

    Be sure you understand the implications of all your choices, before chosing based on "feelings".

    Grandma Wolf  aka Dakota

  • bbmom
    bbmom Member Posts: 391
    edited January 2008

    I'm like allysonw, I did everything conventional medicine suggested, mast., 12 rounds of chemo, 6 weeks rads, and tamox. I've also changed my diet and started exercising. So I feel like I'm doing everything that I can and if I should have to face this again I won't have any regrets.

Categories