Forefront of Research for - - -

Options
birdies
birdies Member Posts: 8

My insurance company will actually send me to Sloan-Kettering or MD Anderson.  Since I'm triple negative with grade 3 cells, I'm anxious to go anywhere or try anything.  I'm getting 6 rounds of TAC here locally since the chemo is SO important for us - - - ladies.  Do you know of any other treatments available to us, possibly at these locations?  Will I just get told the same thing there as here in western Georgia nowhere?  Thoughts?  Anyone been to Sloan-Kettering?  I'm actually thinking of going there. 

Comments

  • TenderIsOurMight
    TenderIsOurMight Member Posts: 4,493
    edited March 2008

    Hello Birdies,



    I have actually received wonderful care at MSK, and feel I can recommend it. For medical oncology, Larry Norton, MD and Cliff Hudis, MD are two stars, but that's unfair in the sense that, I believe at this institute, most are stars. Also, one of our sisters is seeing a woman oncologist Dr. Modi. Since these fine physicians see so many patients, they often recommend one of their colleagues.



    Some more info: there is a wait period if not emergent need (this is negotiated by communication with your local oncologist as to your specifics), especially if you are waiting for a specific physician. If emergency, then an opening is worked in via add on or cancellation or to new doctor or maybe even fellow in training with oversight which often gets you to the right place.



    MSK has a wonderful breast center where you see their doctors. It is convenient to hotels, and they have arrangements for patients.



    MSK is detail oriented, and I found I did not get lost in the shuffle, and was responded to reasonably on followup phone call.



    Do they do different then elsewhere? Yes, they would like to think they do, I believe. That is why their reputation is so good. (BTW, I am not affiliated with anyone, just a patient like you who went there, and this is not to lesson MD Anderson Hospital work in any way).



    And of course, they offer clinical trials, with on the pulse research clearly not available in my town.

    I would return there in a heartbeat if needed, but that's just my experience.



    All the best,

    Tender







  • CalGal
    CalGal Member Posts: 469
    edited October 2007

    Hi Birdies -

    While I have not been to either MDA or MSK, I really hold MDA at the top for being one of the first to recommend aggressive treatment against bc mets (and yes, I'm trip neg too).  My impression was made due to doing tons of internet research. 

    For example, I had to fight my HMO to get radio-frequency ablation (RFA) of my liver mets ... but it appears that if I had been at MDA, it would have been OFFERED!

    Right now, I'm trying to get an appt scheduled at MDA ...

    Both MDA and MSK are top cancer centers.   Whichever one you choose, I recommend that you do some research and ask for a specific onc who you think fits your needs best.

    CalGal 

  • FloridaLady
    FloridaLady Member Posts: 2,155
    edited October 2007

    Birdies,

    I have been to MD Anderson (6mths this year)...Lets just say my experience was bad start to finish.  But I was in Phase I trials due to poor chemo response.  The bc center would not even see me.  (also took me 3 mths to get a appointment.)  They do a few newer trials but I hate to say not that many for triple negs.  (Her2 is the big deal)The girls I met were getting the same drugs that I could get at home.   As for trials you must have advance disease to take part in 90% of them.  Check their website for trials and also clinicaltrials.gov. It worth the trip to get second opinion but check was available at home first. Bigger does not mean better.  I know someone who has her test ran at MDA but hasntreatment at home.  This way she always has a second opinion.

    I have found after 3 cancer center and two were research hospitals that there is standard protocol for Stage I through Stage III that you must complete before anything can be tried outside of their box.  I have completed Adrian/taxotere/cytoxin, Gemzar/Carboplatin & Avastan (this is the new mircle combo! Not for me) Trial for  Aroplatinum.  Last trip they offered Dasatinib(Lukiema drug my local doc got approved to do.) and a new form of taxotere (I can't remember the name)and that was it.  Again you must have advanced disease to do these drugs. Of course they use Abraxane for other mets.   Do your research... be prepared.  And don't stop searching for answers.

    Living in hooe.

  • stage4
    stage4 Member Posts: 31
    edited October 2007

    Calgal... how did you get RFA? what size were your liver mets? I heard they also do them for lung mets too... I was turned down my Johns Hopkins, instead of flying out there they told me to to send most current ct scan (which just happened to be 1 month old) then they called and said they were to big, weird cuz there were 2 of them one was 3mm and one 5mm. Got me thinking.. this was right after that special ran on TV, so maybe they just humored me and said they looked but didnt. I down to last chemo combo RFA was my last chance.. any infor you can give me would be greatly appreciated. I've been to Stanford, but that and OHSU inPortland is pretty much as far as I've been. Cant afford it if my insurance wont cover it.

  • CalGal
    CalGal Member Posts: 469
    edited October 2007

    Hi Stage IV -

    Initially, my HMO dismissed my requests for RFA.  (I found out about RFA during internet research - it was NEVER mentioned, let alone offered by my HMO).  I already felt like I had two fights on my hands, bc and my HMO ... 

    So, I went to an interventional radiologist (IR) at UCLA (since previously I had a 2nd opinion at their bc clinic, and at that time, I asked him for a referral to the IR, which he did).  At the time the IR agreed to do it, I had 4 chemo-reduced liver mets.  However, once I had the IR done, only 2 could be found!   (I think the 2 smaller ones continued to shrink into oblivion due ot the chemo).  I don't recall the size of the mets, but the biggest was still on the smaller side ... 2 cm or smaller, pre-chemo.

    Unfortunately, I was a "cash-pay" which was quite a bit for a CT scan,  ultrasound and appt with the IR.  Even when my HMO used the CT scan from them (I bought it on disk), my HMO would not reimburse me.   They said I would have needed authorization first.

    If your tumors are 3 mm and 5 mm, you should definitely qualify for RFA!!   That's well under the maximum size and quantity for RFA!  

    What did Stanford say?  I'm guessing you're in Portland ...

    PM me if you want additional or more specific info.

    Hopefully, the PARP inhibitor clinical trial that I'm on will work .. and my lung met(s) will go away ... Otherwise, I'll be looking for RFA on my lung too!  (Besides my liver, I've already had it on my kidney!) 

    CalGal 

Categories