How do u feel about your over-all chemo trt?

Options
Chelee
Chelee Member Posts: 513
On another post someone mentioned how lots of women feel either over-treated or under-treated which has me curious how your feel about your chemo treatment? This is sort of like a poll except its only in text. lol

For us her2/neu gals do you feel you got aggressive enough treatment and feel totally satisfied? Or is there any one out there that feels they should of been more aggressively treated? (I have a feeling most are completely satisfied.) I only say that because I haven't seen anyone say they feel under-treated...but I may get fooled.

Chelee

Comments

  • juanita63
    juanita63 Member Posts: 171
    edited August 2007

    I'm fine with the chemo I did. I probably should have done the real aggressive stuff again once I switched oncs, but what I did worked for years and at least i did something. So I'm happy.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited September 2007

    I had seven positive nodes, so it seemed as if everything was a given and there were no decisions for me to make. I had a left mast, 4DD A/C and 4DD Taxol, 33 rads (when finished) one year Herceptin (when finished). I am halfway through rads now.

    I feel like I am getting the proper treatment. I hope to say goodbye to cancer forever. This has been a rough year.

    Miss S

    Addendum (9-22): Now I am in CHF, have been permanently taken off Herceptin, and have suffered a heart attack. My LVEF was 33% at last test. My cancer tx (Adraimycin, Herceptin, rads to the left chest) damaged my heart, so I hope that I got enough to keep the big C at bay. Now I have heart disease and cardiomyopathy. Fun stuff.

  • BethNY
    BethNY Member Posts: 2,710
    edited March 2008
    I don't think I did over kill on tx-- getting cancer at age 26, I figured I had to hit it with everything.
    4DD AC 4 DD TAXOL bilateral masts and a year of herceptin...

    seeing as how I'm about to hit the three year mark, and I'm healthy as can be, I've got no complaints.
  • jennid1
    jennid1 Member Posts: 13
    edited September 2007

    I actually wish I skipped the Taxoteer. As my son say's I went from a physically active 43 yr old to a can barely walk 44 yr old.

    I should have reviewed my family history and the drug better as the neuroapthy was bound to happen.

    This is just MY opinion as I'm still not comfortable with the physical limits on the new me.

  • Pharmmom
    Pharmmom Member Posts: 300
    edited September 2007

    CoolHi,

    I'm good with it.  I was diagnosed in 2002 and finished AC plus Taxotere in June of 2003. So far so good.  Keeping my fingers crossed. 

    Barb

  • AlaskaAngel
    AlaskaAngel Member Posts: 1,836
    edited September 2007

    Hi Chelee

    As a HER2+++ diagnosed in 2002 and tested in 2002 for HER2 (which my insurance paid for), at the time when the clinical trial was fully active, I think it was negligent for my onc not to at least briefly discuss HER2 with me. He failed entirely to let me know I was HER2 positive. Needless to say, he was among those oncs who failed to come close to having a mind that believed in a shared relationship with the patient in making decisions. Obviously, he also was far from thinking outside the box about any therapies other than toxic chemotherapies.

    At the time I specifically told him that I was interested in participating in a clinical trial. Even though as a node-negative with a tumor under 2 cm I would not have qualified for the trial (and even if I did, I might have ended up being among those who did not get the Herceptin until the trial proved successful), he should have helped me to explore my options with clinical trials. However, his response to me was entirely negative. Instead of simply directing me to clinicaltrials.gov on the internet, he said "There are thousands of clinical trials."

    Does that sound like an onc who can work with a patient in a cooperative manner?

    Not to me. But at the time I was a typical confused newly diagnosed person who basically believed in doctors, and none of the aids that are available now to early stage breast cancer patients were available to me. Places like this website were in their infancy if they existed at all, and I knew nothing about them. There was no such thing as Adjuvant online, or Oncotype Dx, or approved Herceptin automatically prescribed.

    I accepted the onc's advice and did chemotherapy, followed by radiation, followed by tamoxifen. Within 2 weeks of starting tamoxifen my libido crashed and a rather enjoyable sex life disappeared. Prior to chemo, the sole comment my onc made to prepare me for this was "You will go through menopause." How on earth is a fully functional woman to understand from that lousy comment that her sex life will be devastated, or know what her choices really are? 

    I went to my PCP about the issue of loss of libido. He listened and said nothing. I then went to my onc about this problem. The first words out of his mouth were "Why aren't you talking with your PCP about this?" As far as he was concerned, even though he is the one who should know the most about the side effects of treatment, it was obviously not his problem. HE seemed to think he was being quite generous by being willing to prescribe the Estring. I stood there, in tears, mute.

    I realized then that my trust had been very misplaced. Anyone who is that carelessly dishonest with a patient doesn't have a clue what the patient-doctor relationship should be.

    WHERE are the endocrinologists we need to be part of our diagnosis and treatment plan? The one specialty that would bring intelligence and comprehension to the one-size-fits-all toxic treatment, who could comprehend that breast cancer is an endocrine disease not limited to the practice of oncology, and as such, needs to be analyzed and dealt with comprehensively throughout the body, with constant measurement of hormonal levels for the rest of the patient's life, with medication prescribed to match the patient's needs?

    Yes, I'm 5 years out and NED. So are 60% of those with my diagnosis who never did chemo or radiation or hormonal therapy.  So are an even higher percentage of those who did no chemo but did radiation and/or hormonal therapy.

    Dissatisfied, disheartened, and determined never to trust like that again,

    AlaskaAngel

  • nagem
    nagem Member Posts: 353
    edited September 2007

    I had the full monty—bilateral mastectomy (a year after my initial lumpectomy), AC/T/H, radiation—so I feel I did everything I could. I got second and third opinions about every aspect of my treatment (hence the eventual bilateral mastectomy), and no one questioned the chemo I received (I had a 1.3 cm tumor and 1 micro-met node, so was stage 2a). I feel confident there was nothing more or less that I should have done.

Categories