I say YES. YOU say NO....Numero Tre! Enjoy!
Comments
-
Did not Abbott learn the lesson from the power outage in Tx last year? What a flaming a**hole. Is he the best Tx can find as a leader? He has no leadership skills that are apparent to anyone who doesn't reside in Tx.
The repugnican hypocrisy in claiming the money for projects they voted "no" on is incredible and I love the one who said it was his agenda from the get go. Do they even read what they write or publish? Don't their constituents look at how they voted?
-
WASHINGTON — The Republican Party on Friday officially declared the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol and events that led to it "legitimate political discourse," formally rebuking two lawmakers in the party who have been most outspoken in condemning the deadly riot and the role of former President Donald Trump in spreading the election lies that fueled it.
The Republican National Committee's overwhelming voice vote to censure Reps. Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Adam Kinzinger of Illinois at its winter meeting in Salt Lake City culminated more than a year of vacillation, which started with party leaders condemning the Capitol attack and Trump's conduct, then shifted to downplaying and denying it.
On Friday, the party went further in a resolution slamming Cheney and Kinzinger for taking part in the House investigation of the assault, saying they were participating in "persecution of ordinary citizens engaged in legitimate political discourse."
It was an extraordinary statement about the deadliest attack on the Capitol in 200 years, in which a mob of Trump's supporters stormed the complex, brutalizing police officers and sending lawmakers into hiding. Nine people died in connection with the attack, and more than 150 officers were injured. The party passed the resolution without discussion and almost without dissent.
The censure is the latest and most forceful effort by the Republican Party to minimize what happened and the broader attempt by Trump and his allies to invalidate the results of the 2020 election. In approving it and opting to punish two of its own, Republicans seemed to embrace a position that many of them have only hinted at: that the assault and the actions that preceded it were acceptable.
It came days after Trump suggested that, if reelected in 2024, he would consider pardons for those convicted in the Jan. 6 attack and for the first time described his goal as aiming to "overturn" the election results.
For Republicans in Washington, the party's actions threatened new division as their leaders try to focus attention on what they call the failings of the Biden administration.
Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, wrote on Twitter, "Shame falls on a party that would censure persons of conscience, who seek truth in the face of vitriol. Honor attaches to Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger for seeking truth even when doing so comes at great personal cost." He did not mention that the party chair who presided over the meeting and orchestrated the censure resolution, Ronna McDaniel, is his niece.
Reps. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) and Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) during a hearing of the congressional committee investigating the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Oct. 19, 2021. (Al Drago/The New York Times)
The party's far-right flank has been agitating to boot Cheney and Kinzinger out of the House Republican Conference for months, a push that Rep. Kevin McCarthy of California, the minority leader, has tried to brush aside. And their formal censure is sure to stir up those efforts again.
"We need to move on from that whole discussion and, frankly, move forward and get the House back in 2022," said Rep. Mike Garcia, R-Calif., who is facing a difficult reelection campaign in a newly configured district.
Most House Republicans tried to ignore the actions of the party Friday, refusing to answer questions or saying they had not read the censure resolution. Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas, called it "dumb stuff," while Rep. Mark Green, R-Tenn., lamented the distraction from "this abysmal administration's record."
Democrats, however, were incensed, especially at the censure resolution's description of the Capitol attack as "ordinary citizens engaged in legitimate political discourse" and the ongoing legal investigations of Trump in New York and Georgia "as Democrat abuse of prosecutorial power."
"The Republican Party is so off the deep end now that they are describing an attempted coup and a deadly insurrection as political expression," said Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., a member of the special House committee investigating the Capitol attack. "It is a scandal that historians will be aghast at, to think that a major political party would be denouncing Liz Cheney for standing up for the Constitution and not saying anything about Donald Trump's involvement in the insurrection."
Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., who is also on the committee, said, "Their party has degenerated into a cult to the former president, unwilling to acknowledge the truth, and I think they condemn themselves with their resolution."
In his own defense, Kinzinger said, "I have no regrets about my decision to uphold my oath of office and defend the Constitution. I will continue to focus my efforts on standing for truth and working to fight the political matrix that's led us to where we find ourselves today."
The resolution speaks repeatedly of party unity as the goal of censuring the lawmakers, saying the party's ability to focus on the Biden administration was being "sabotaged" by the "actions and words" of Cheney and Kinzinger that indicate "they support Democrat efforts to destroy President Trump more than they support winning back a Republican majority in 2022."
More practically, the moves of the party in Salt Lake City will make it easier for the Republican apparatus to abandon Cheney and throw its weight and money behind her main primary challenger, Harriet Hageman.
The censure resolution declares that the party "shall immediately cease any and all support of" both lawmakers "as members of the Republican Party for their behavior which has been destructive to the institution of the U.S. House of Representatives, the Republican Party and our republic, and is inconsistent with the position of the conference."
Kinzinger has already announced he won't seek reelection, as have several other House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump for inciting the attack on the Capitol. Cheney, however, has vowed to stand for reelection.
Earlier this week, the Wyoming delegation to the Republican National Committee submitted a so-called "Rule 11″ letter, formalizing party support for Hageman. The existence of the letter was reported by The Washington Post.
The letter allows the Republican National Committee to send resources to the Wyoming branch of the party to spend on Hageman's behalf — essentially designating her as the party's presumptive nominee. The designations are common in Republican politics but typically are used to support incumbents who may be facing token primary challengers. Florida's delegation, for instance, filed a similar letter months ago that allowed the national committee to funnel resources to support the reelection campaigns for Gov. Ron DeSantis and Sen. Marco Rubio.
Cheney, who faces an uphill battle in her reelection bid against a Republican Party aligned with Trump, said party leaders "have made themselves willing hostages" to Trump.
"I do not recognize those in my party who have abandoned the Constitution to embrace Donald Trump," she said. "History will be their judge. I will never stop fighting for our constitutional republic. No matter what."
Cheney's spokesman, Jeremy Adler, condemned the Wyoming party leadership and its chair, Frank Eathorne, for directing resources to Hageman. Eathorne did not respond to messages Friday; other members of the Wyoming delegation declined to comment.
"Frank Eathorne and the Republican National Committee are trying to assert their will and take away the voice of the people of Wyoming before a single vote has even been cast," Adler said.
Cheney has a commanding financial advantage over Hageman, according to federal campaign finance reports released earlier this week. Cheney entered 2022 with nearly $5 million in campaign cash, while Hageman reported just $380,000.
The censure resolution was watered down from an initial version that called directly for the House Republican Conference to "expel" Cheney and Kinzinger "without delay." That demand was dropped. However, the language condemning the attack on "legitimate political discourse" was then added.
William J. Palatucci, a Republican National Committee member from New Jersey, said those changes were made "behind closed doors." The final language was officially circulated to committee members Friday morning. He called it "cancel culture at its worst."
"The national committee attacking Liz Cheney is distracting and counterproductive," he said. "We should be spending our time shooting at Democrats, not Republicans."
c.2021 The New York Times Company
Oh, they do eat their own so translucently.
-
Despicable!
-
-
-
Betrayal - many of us who happen to live in Texas also know that Abbott is - at best - an idiot. I can't even imagine 'at worst'....but it gets worse every month.
Somewhere I saw a cartoon this week that I can't find again. It was a picture of Abbott saying 'see, i told you the lights wouldn't go out' and waving a flashlight. If anyone has access to that, I'd appreciate seeing it again.
-
MinusTwo: My condolences on having Abbott as your governor and I am sure his lights never go out. No lesson learned from last year's experience and I guess he is also a climate change denier as well? I just feel sorry for those who did lose power. After years of losing power because our electric supplier is not one to brag about either and we were tired of being in a freezing cold house or an unbearably hot one and losing food in 2 freezers. Being without power for up to 5 days in the freezing cold or August heat and noticing that our electric bill never reflected the no power for this time, we did invest in a whole house generator and have never regretted the decision. Considering how I would have to throw away food during the summer we figured this loss alone ended up paying for the generator.
Hoping someone can find the cartoon and post it.
-
Betrayal - thanks for the condolences. Yes, he is a climate change denier, an anti-vaxer, a book burner - better stop or the rant will go on for a whole page. It's sometimes been a challenge living through hurricanes but I find that easier than freezing cold. Fingers crossed that at least I did not lose power last night or today.
Illinois Lady - sorry to see this latest idiot Repub move against Cheney and Kinzinger but thanks for posting. I feel like I want to write each of them personally and thank them for having morals.
-
-
The body has its own way of knowing, a knowing that has little
to do with logic, and much to do with truth, little to do with control,
and much to do with acceptance, little to do with division
and analysis and much to do with union.
Marilyn Sewell -
This man doesn't get a gold star from me for doing the job on one day that he should have been doing all four yrs. he was a VP.
Reports: Pence to Address Trump's Order to Reverse Election
Trump finally said the quiet part out loud. That's what he wanted, he simply wanted the election overturned at any cost and he wanted it done that day. Today, reports are that Pence will address the matter,
Read more »I do feel for those who have to live in Texas with Abbott. He is a walking, talking commercial for making O'Rourke the Governor next time. I hope it happens. El Paso didn't go with the rest of Tx. and went with securing their part of the grid with winterizing. I'm sure it would be one of the things first on O' Rourke's list if he became Governor. There is hope for Texas, but not with Abbott left in place.
As to Pence, there is no way I'd let him off the hook. He just knows if there be any hope at all he has too, finally and for once call a spade, a spade. At some point you have to quit kissing the guy who wouldn't care if you were strung up on the White House lawn. What would people think of you and who would want to hire you if you continue to kiss up to the guy who was okay with your demise. No one wants to hire a weasel who shows himself to be a creature of the moment. He is more like the Loon than he knows -- just taking advantage of what he thinks will work. I think it's a bit late. Greed, power and avarice is all the Reps. party stands for -- and a lot of them truth telling would just as soon you hadn't done your job that day Pence. They won't welcome you now as their "candidate" in '24.
-
MinusTwo: I hope you still have power and do not have to suffer in the cold. This is weather we are used to but not you. We are currently at 27 and it is windy so the chill factor lowers how it feels.
As far as Pence, now that he has finally grown a set it is as the adage goes "a day late and a dollar short". The fact that he continued to support the man who did not take exception to the fact that the "alleged patriot visitors" wanted to lynch him is beyond the pale. His allegiance did him in and as far as his political career? I think it is behind him and I hope he enjoys being a political has been hack. What a loser on more than one scene. Do you think mother made him do it?
-
-
-
-
And the real Mike Pence:
-
What a coward.
-
I can assure you that if my boss sent rampaging mobs through my place of work trying to kill me, it wouldn't take me two years to express my disapproval over his or her actions!
-
Why celebrate a birthday only one day out of the year? Why not celebrate life every day? I can! I can make every day a day for giving thanks! -unattributed
-
A big part of Pence appears to be as demented as his boss if he thinks people on his side of the aisle see him as a viable candidate. They are not looking for the has-beens from '16.
-
Love the quote because it reminds me of my BFF's mother whose birthday was at the end of July. She loved snowballs so the family would form them in winter and place them in the freezer for her big day in July. She celebrated her birthday every day in July and on the actual day we all got to toss the (rock hard) snowballs at a large oak in her yard. She lived well into her late 90's and we loved her parties. Loved how she felt she was entitled to a month long celebration and not just the one day. I do miss her zest for life.
-
Life is short. Each year passes more quickly than the previous one. It's easy to deny yourself many of life's simple pleasures because you want to be practical. Forget about practical and decide instead to become a joy collector. Always be on the lookout for gifts without ribbons. God is strewing them across your path right now. His gifts come tagged with a note: "Life can be wonderful. Do your best not to miss it!" Enjoy what it is before it isn't anymore. . . . Dare to slip on a pair of bunny slippers once in a while! Surprise yourself! Enjoy the little things because one day you'll look back and realize they were the big things! -Barbara Johnson
-
This is so true:
Well said.
-
Got a great chortle out of the Loon speaking about Pelosi tearing up his speech (State of the Union) because it was a government doc. and was against the law to tear up. As if he really knew for sure or cared. Maybe her actions are why he felt compelled so often to tear up his 'government' docs. I have to wonder about the ones that were not found or the ones that couldn't be taped back together. Even with what I'm sure is likely missing Colbert is so right. The Loon began before ever taking ofc. of being one of the worlds' worst humans -- no matter what he was doing. The hell he put us and so many through for 4 yrs. defies description almost. The fact that so many still seem so tethered to him does too. I do think he could likely finish ruining the Rep. party.
In other news -- David Bossie wants to replace Rona McDaniel, and K. McCarthy, weak-willed spinless human that he is, will not become SOTH. Chris Christie also opined that the Loon really did inspire and cause the 1/6th. riot. Just like the others, expediency shows up when the chips are looking all negative. Who could fail to see this along with the others, transparency? Always get on the winning side like you were there the whole time. Easy to make a list of those you despise, when they show you who they really are.
-
WARNINGS OF 'CIVIL WAR' RISK HARMING EFFORTS AGAINST POLITICAL VIOLENCE
ANJALI DAYAL, ALEXANDRA STARK, AND MEGAN A. STEWARTJANUARY 18, 2022
COMMENTARYA year on from the Jan. 6 insurrection, experts warn of catastrophic political violence, while political commentators invoke the specter of the 1860s and throw out sensationalist headlines about a second U.S. Civil War. "The unimaginable has become reality in the United States. … [T]he basic truth is the United States might be on the brink of [a civil] war today," read one such argument.
The emerging cottage industry of speculation and alarm specifically about a civil war in the United States worries us. The shape and content of this debate — covered in venues as mainstream as NPR — risks mis-framing an urgent problem for non-specialist audiences. Rather than asking whether the United States will have a new civil war, commentators ought to be asking: What kinds of risks for political violence does the United States face? What forms might that political violence take? Who might perpetrate this violence, and which communities will be most affected by it? Retraining our focus on political violence allows us to consider the real risks ahead for the country, to work alongside the many groups already actively trying to push back illiberal violence, and to protect its most likely victims.
Scholars of civil war typically understand the concept as one specific manifestation of violence among many. Although researchers may disagree on the particulars, they agree broadly that civil wars are conflicts within a country between the ruling government of that country and named, politically motivated armed groups that commit violence against one another above some threshold of battlefield casualties. For expert audiences, civil war violence is not one-sided violence — where an armed group targets civilians or the government with no organized retaliation — nor is it simply one-directional state repression. It is not indiscriminate terrorism aimed at the population, or even systematic, targeted campaigns of violence against minorities or specific groups. Rather, to be categorized as a "civil war," violence must be part of a meaningful contest over the central government of the country, or a meaningful effort at secession.
BECOME A MEMBERCivil war scholar Barbara Walter, who has been a prominent voice in this debate, has been careful to note she wants to avoid "an exercise in fear-mongering." When she warns of a civil war, she points not to something akin to the U.S. Civil War — still the most destructive war in the country's history — but rather to something with the intensity of Northern Ireland's Troubles or Italy's Years of Lead. "The next war is going to be more decentralized, fought by small groups and individuals using terrorism and guerrilla warfare to destabilize the country," Walter told Vox's Zack Beauchamp, adding that "We are closer to that type of civil war than most people realize."
In our own work, we have researched political violence that can occur in the absence of civil wars, or alongside them. Our concern with the frame Walter and others offer — and with the attached "civil war or not" headlines — is that it misses the wide array of other kinds of political violence the United States has not only historically experienced, but is currently experiencing. Crisp scholarly definitions belie the lived experience of political violence, which can be pervasive without ever rising to the level of civil war. And these forms of violence tend to fall disproportionately on specific sectors of the population while leaving absolutely no mark on other sectors. Political violence can also become easily and slowly normalized over the course of years. It is exactly this normalization that civil war scholars are trying to guard against when they raise the alarm, as warning signs from weakening democratic institutions to increasing societal polarization indicate that political violence could be on the rise.
We think the question of "civil war or not" is simply the wrong question to ask. When observers speculate about an imminent civil war, they risk steering the terms of our debate away from resurgent currents of subnational violence and repression, and toward a popular conception of civil war as an altogether distinct and incontrovertible shift in the nature of our lives. We do not think a clearly identifiable, explosive moment of crisis that suddenly breaks with ongoing trends is imminent — but priming people to expect a spectacular, ultimate calamity could obscure the ongoing slow boil of political violence. Focusing on the rates, forms, and targets of political violence provides important nuance. Indeed, just shifting the terms of our conversation toward political violence — which includes, but is not limited to, civil war — allows us to consider our present political crisis as more clearly continuous with other strands of American history.
In the past, Americans have faced indiscriminate violence or terrorism against civilians (such as the Oklahoma City Bombing), electoral violence (the 1898 Wilmington Coup), the assassinations of civil rights workers, mob violence and riots (like the Tulsa Massacre), and interpersonal violence (including lynchings and hate crimes). Today, according to the Washington Post, "dozens of religious institutions — including mosques, synagogues and Black churches — as well as abortion clinics and government buildings, have been threatened, burned, bombed and hit with gunfire over the past six years." CNN reports that, in 2020, hate crimes in the United States rose to the highest rates in 12 years, with Black and Asian persons the primary targets. According to research from the Center for Strategic and International Studies, "the number of domestic terrorist attacks and plots increased to its highest level since at least 1994" and "White supremacists, extremist militia members, and other violent far-right extremists were responsible for 66 percent of domestic terrorist attacks and plots in 2020." Both researchers and U.S. government officials point to the rising threat of white supremacist, right-wing extremists, and militias as "the greatest domestic terrorism threats in 2021 and likely into 2022." Together, these data suggest that political violence is creeping upward and also tell us who the most likely victims of future violence are likely to be.
These forms of violence could become even more pervasive and could stay that way for decades without ever rising to anything either scholars or lay people would call civil war. They are worth naming and attempting to address in their own right, not as waystations to an all-out conflagration — particularly because international relations research tells us that priming people to expect a civil war could actually increase political violence. Canonical models indicate that rhetoric overstating the threat of violence — such as fear-inducing claims about the onset of a new civil war or mass violence — can become a self-fulfilling prophecy. Recent work demonstrates that exaggerated misperceptions about rivals' support for violence can make groups more likely to support violence — put another way, if you believe that your political rivals are actively seeking a civil war, you, too, may become more committed to violent strategies. But, if the political violence of today has echoes through American history, then so, too, do transitions out of crisis moments. Treating these forms of political violence as dynamic leaves open the possibility that the actions Americans take now could reverse the course on which the United States finds itself — especially because conflict research also shows us that even processes as extreme as genocide, ethnic cleansing, and lynching are never inevitable because they rest, ultimately, on the choices individuals make. When people choose differently, they can resist or interrupt violent processes. Choice by choice, a different, less violent politics can emerge.
A year ago, the United States lost the peaceful transfer of power — a core attribute of democracy itself. Democracy in the United States is at its most perilous moment in a hundred years, and analysts, journalists, and scholars should be clear-eyed about the forces that threaten the country. When they do so, however, they should avoid doing so by asking whether the United States is on the brink of a civil war and should instead ask who is in danger of what from whom. This might make for a poor tagline, but it is a more whole assessment of the threats the United States actually faces. The stakes are too high for Americans to be anything less than precise.
-
Illinois...You and others keep opening stores of reliably intelligent information that I both do and do not want to enter. I do because of they offer complex analysis and I do not because of the same that requires a level of intellectual fortitude to dig deeply into the arguments. Thanks to all you deep thinking divers.
-
One thing you can count if nothing else. The Reps. will find every way under the sun to cheat period. I hope something comes of this -- I'd like more but might be happy if these de-frauded registrants could get back to their Democratic status free and clear. Sort of makes me wonder how much possible cheating by that side that was possibly covered up well enough that it wasn't discovered.
The one reason that I feel the Democrats are not ruthless enough. I don't mean to break the law, but just take it to the outermost limits. We seem to stop long before the Reps. have ever thought of stopping.
Rep. Charlie Crist Requests Merrick Garland Investigate Florida Republican Voter Registration Fraud
Rep. Charlie Crist (D-FL) has requested that the DOJ investigate reports of Republicans changing the voter registration of seniors without their consent in Florida.
Read more » -
Charlie is such a good guy. He’s been our Ed Comis. AG, and Governor. Rep then, changed parties to Dem. Hope he kicks DeathSantis in the Gulf.
-
I second your strong sentiment.
-
(The Hill) — The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) retrieved multiple White House record boxes last month that were improperly kept at former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago property, The Washington Post reported.
The boxes repotedly contained important records of communication, gifts and letters from world leaders, which, according to the Post, is a violation of the Presidential Records Act.
The newspaper added that the boxes retrieved from the Florida estate included correspondence with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un as well as a letter from former President Barack Obama to Trump.
The Post noted that recent administrations have all had some Presidential Records Act violations, including the use of unofficial email and telephone accounts as well as the destruction of e-mails.
But a source told the newspaper that the transfer to Mar-a-Lago was "out of the ordinary… NARA has never had that kind of volume transfer after the fact like this."
The Hill has reached out to the National Archives and Trump's office for comment.
The Presidential Records Act, which was put in place following the Watergate scandal, requires administrations to document and maintain records of the White House decision-making process.
The new development comes just a week after the National Archives and Records Administration handed over some Trump White House documents to the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection that were reportedly torn up and taped back together.
The National Archives said last week that documents "included paper records that had been torn up by former President Trump."
The former president had sued to stop the committee from being given certain documents, with his attorney claiming it was illegal and that Trump wanted to preserve privileges over certain documents.
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team