Breaking Research News from sources other than Breastcancer.org

Options
16970727475104

Comments

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited July 2020

    Efficacy and Safety of T-DM1 + Capecitabine vs T-DM1 Alone in Previously Treated ERBB2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer

    JAMA Oncology

    The authors of this phase I/II randomized clinical trial of 161 patients with previously treated ERBB2-positive metastatic breast cancer compared trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) with T-DM1 plus capecitabine. The overall response rate was numerically higher with combination therapy (44% vs 36%; P = .34). The median progression-free survival was similar between groups. Toxicity was higher with the addition of capecitabine, and more patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events in the combination arm compared with the T-DM1 monotherapy arm.Chemotherapy adds only modest potential benefit to T-DM1 while increasing toxicity.https://www.practiceupdate.com/C/102841/56
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32584367/
    DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1796
  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited July 2020

    FDA OKs Bavencio as first-line bladder cancer therapy

    Bavencio, or avelumab, Pfizer and Merck's immunotherapy, was approved by the FDA as a maintenance treatment for patients who have locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer whose disease didn't progress after undergoing first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy.

    Avelumab is already approved in bladder cancer patients whose disease has progressed following chemotherapy. Bavencio has been approved for maintenance treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma that has not progressed with first-line platinum containing chemotherapy. Avelumab is indicated for the treatment of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC).

    BAVENCIO® (avelumab) is the FIRST and ONLY FDA-approved human anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy with DUAL ENGAGEMENT of both the adaptive and innate immune systems. BAVENCIO has been shown to release the suppression of the T cell-mediated antitumor immune response by blocking the interaction of PD-L1 with PD-1 receptors in preclinical models. BAVENCIO has also been shown to induce NK cell-mediated direct tumor cell lysis via antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) in vitro.

    https://pharmaphorum.com/news/fda-approves-pfizer-merck-kgaas-bavencio-in-first-line-bladder-cancer/

    {Avelumab is currently being studied as a therapy for HER2+ MBC in the Aviator clinical trial.}

    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03414658

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited July 2020

    Efficacy and Safety of T-DM1 + Capecitabine vs T-DM1 Alone in Previously Treated ERBB2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer

    • The authors of this phase I/II randomized clinical trial of 161 patients with previously treated ERBB2-positive metastatic breast cancer compared trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) with T-DM1 plus capecitabine. The overall response rate was numerically higher with combination therapy (44% vs 36%; P = .34). The median progression-free survival was similar between groups. Toxicity was higher with the addition of capecitabine, and more patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events in the combination arm compared with the T-DM1 monotherapy arm.
    • Chemotherapy adds only modest potential benefit to T-DM1 while increasing toxicity.
    • Adding capecitabine to T-DM1 did not statistically increase ORR associated with T-DM1 in patients with previously treated ERBB2-positive mBC. The combination group reported more AEs, but with no unexpected toxic effects.
    doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1796
    {For the sake of clarity, it seems that HER2+ breast cancer is now being called ERBB2-positive breast cancer. I think it is a more specific reference to the mutation that causes the problem (uncontrolled growth) but I haven't seem a concise explanation for the change in practice.}
  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited July 2020

    EMA speeds review of AZ, Daiichi Sankyo HER2 drug Enhertu

    The European Medicines Agency will fast-track its review of AstraZeneca and Daiichi Sankyo's HER2-positive breast cancer candidate Enhertu, or trastuzumab deruxtecan. The FDA approved the antibody drug conjugate as a treatment for metastatic HER2-positive disease in December.

    http://www.pmlive.com/pharma_news/ema_fast-tracks_review_of_azdaiichi_sankyos_her2_drug_1344455


  • BSandra
    BSandra Member Posts: 836
    edited July 2020

    Wow Lumpie, that is very good news... I think a drug with such profile, if approved in EU, would be compensated in my country pretty soon (I mean in a year/few years). Hopefully... Saulius

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited July 2020

    just got this in my email

    https://www.practiceupdate.com/content/prognostic-value-of-modified-ihc4-score-in-patients-with-er-metastatic-breast-cancer/102320

    so I wasn’t aware of an immunohistochemical prognostic model score. Now there is a modified mICH4 that can possibly help doctors know if they should give hormone therapy or chemotherapy first.

    Can anyone shed some light on this?

    Dee

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited July 2020

    Acquired ESR1 Mutations Predict Poor Benefit from Further AI Therapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer

    Patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive metastatic breast cancer who acquired ESR1 mutations during prior aromatase inhibitor therapy had worse survival when treated with the aromatase inhibitor exemestane compared with fulvestrant, a combined analysis of the phase 3 SoFEA and EFECT trials found. The results were recently reported in Clinical Cancer Research.

    https://www.cancertherapyadvisor.com/home/cancer-topics/breast-cancer/esr1-mutations-acquired-breast-predict-poor-benefit-further-ai-therapy/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=cta-update-hay-20200710&cpn=&hmSubId=nIej-0ANyLQ1&hmEmail=02k_9hvA1kiS6nmG9LnGT5WH-O6RhZf90&NID=&email_hash=f6f19b3bf12938acdd2c69cb86958025&dl=0&mpweb=1323-98397-6515878

    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00065325

    https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00253422

    Turner NC, Swift C, Kilburn LS, et al. ESR1 mutations and overall survival on fulvestrant versus exemestane in advanced hormone receptor positive breast cancer: A combined analysis of the phase III SoFEA and EFECT trial [published online June 16, 2020]. Clin Cancer Res. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0224

  • JoynerL
    JoynerL Member Posts: 1,393
    edited July 2020

    Thanks, Lumpie. This is such good information. I'm glad we have so many eyes scouring the news.

  • Hopeful82014
    Hopeful82014 Member Posts: 3,480
    edited July 2020

    BMI-Related Differential Benefit of Adjuvant Docetaxel in Early Breast Cancer

    Journal of Clinical Oncology



    TAKE-HOME MESSAGE
    This retrospective analysis evaluated the impact of body mass index
    (BMI) in patients with breast cancer treated with docetaxel-based versus
    non–docetaxel based chemotherapy in a large adjuvant therapy trial.

    A higher BMI was associated with worse disease-free survival and
    overall survival among docetaxel-treated patients. No difference was
    seen in the non–docetaxel treated patients. These findings of a
    differential response to docetaxel according to BMI require validation
    in an independent cohort.

    – Paul J. Hampel, MD





    https://www.practiceupdate.com/content/bmi-related...


  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited July 2020

    ASCO develops guideline for management of men with breast cancer

    Research has led to major improvements in breast cancer diagnosis, treatment and survival. However, men with breast cancer represent only 1% of the U.S. breast cancer population and have not been emphasized in this research.

    "Nearly all clinical trial participants have been women," Michael J. Hassett, MD, MPH, medical oncologist at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and lead author of ASCO's guideline on management of male breast cancer, said in an interview with Healio. "When so few men have been included in the trials, it's hard to draw conclusions about how to treat men vs. women. Considering that more than 95% of breast cancers in men are hormone receptor positive, some have suggested that men and women with breast cancer should be treated differently."

    https://www.healio.com/news/hematology-oncology/20200708/asco-develops-guideline-for-management-of-men-with-breast-cancer?utm_source=selligent&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=news&m_bt=6155829948217


  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited July 2020

    Many negative trials presented with 'not-negative conclusions' at oncology meetings

    Increased attention should be paid to the conclusions of formally negative trials discussed during oral presentations at oncology meetings, as many convey a not-negative message, according to a research letter published in JAMA Oncology.

    "During [the 2019] ASCO Annual Meeting, several trials presented were considered formally negative according to their primary analysis, but they were presented with ambiguous and not-negative conclusions," Massimo Di Maio, MD, researcher in the department of oncology at University of Turin in Torino, Italy, told Healio. "My colleagues and I later decided to perform a systemic review to better understand the real magnitude of this phenomenon. We started with ASCO 2019, but later found that the proportion of those clinical trials was not negligible. We then extended the analysis to the [European Society for Medical Oncology] meeting, covering 3 years in total."

    "Our aim was to be provocative," Di Maio said. "We do not want to be considered fundamentalists of clinical research methodology, because we ... know that even in a formally negative trial there could be many potentially important findings and many ideas for further research.

    "...It would be interesting to compare the conclusions included in the oral presentation of these trials with the conclusions of their final publication in a peer-reviewed journal. It was too early to perform this analysis when we wrote this letter, but this could be an interesting follow-up."

    https://www.healio.com/news/hematology-oncology/20200710/many-negative-trials-presented-with-notnegative-conclusions-at-oncology-meetings?utm_source=selligent&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=news&m_bt=6155829948217

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited July 2020

    A novel HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate offers the possibility of clinical dosing at trastuzumab-equivalent exposure levels

    Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

    Trastuzumab and the related antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), both target HER2-overexpressing cells. Together, these drugs have treatment indications in both early-stage and metastatic settings for HER2+ breast cancer. T-DM1 retains the antibody functionalities of trastuzumab and adds the potency of a cytotoxic maytansine payload. Interestingly, in the clinic, T-DM1 cannot always replace the use of trastuzumab plus chemotherapy administered together as single agents. We hypothesize that this failure may be due in part to the limited systemic exposure achieved by T-DM1 relative to trastuzumab because of toxicity-related dosing constraints on the ADC. We have developed a trastuzumab-based ADC site-specifically conjugated to maytansine through a noncleavable linker. This construct, termed CAT-01-106, has a drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) of 1.8, approximately half the average DAR of T-DM1, which comprises a mixture of antibodies variously conjugated with DARs ranging from 0-8. The high DAR species present in T-DM1 contribute to its toxicity and limit its clinical dose. CAT-01-106 showed superior in vivo efficacy compared to T-DM1 at equal payload dosing and was equally or better tolerated compared to T-DM1 at equal payload dosing up to 120 mg/kg in Sprague-Dawley rats and 60 mg/kg in cynomolgus monkeys. CAT-01-106 also showed improved pharmacokinetics in rats relative to T-DM1, with 40% higher ADC exposure levels. Together, the data suggest that CAT-01-106 may be sufficiently tolerable to enable clinical dosing at trastuzumab-equivalent exposure levels, combining the functions of both the antibody and the payload in one drug and potentially improving patient outcomes.

    https://www.meta.org/papers/a-novel-her2targeted-a...

    DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-20-0190


  • debbew
    debbew Member Posts: 226
    edited July 2020

    [Tests in mice show] New therapy extends breast cancer survival rate, prevents reoccurrence

    A new immunotherapy developed by researchers at Northwestern University dramatically extends the survival time of mice with triple negative breast cancer, one of the most aggressive and difficult-to-treat forms of breast cancer.

    In a new study, mice treated with the therapy, which comprises two immunity-boosting drugs housed inside a nanoparticle, experienced complete tumor remission for at least 100 days. All untreated mice died by day 30. None of the treated mice experienced adverse side effects or autoimmune responses...

    The research will be published online this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences...

    "It's definitely prolonging survival," Callmann noted. "Even if not all mice were completely cured."

    Mirkin and his team also found that the SNA-based immunotherapy protected the mice from relapsing. After the mice entered remission, the team attempted to reimplant the mice with cancer, but tumors did not grow...

    The researchers believe that, in theory, SNA-based immunotherapies should be an effective treatment for many types of cancer. Mirkin's team plans to explore that next. Mirkin notes that he feels encouraged that four SNA drugs are already in human clinical trials, including a variant of the SNA used in this study in a type of immunotherapy for Merkel Cell carcinoma. That structure also was invented at Northwestern and is in a Phase 2 clinical trial conducted by Exicure, a clinical stage biotechnology startup.

    https://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2020/07/new-therapy-extends-breast-cancer-survival-rate-prevents-reoccurrence/

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited July 2020

    Antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer: the chemotherapy of the future?

    Current Opinion in Oncology

    Abstract

    Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent an interesting new class of anticancer agents, capable of exploiting the specificity of monoclonal antibodies toward cellular-antigens for a targeted release of potent cytotoxic drugs, with a potential increased activity and reduced toxicity compared with traditional chemotherapies. The aim of this article is to review the efficacy and safety of ADCs in breast cancer. Following the approval of T-DM1 both in early and advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer, novel anti-HER2 ADCs have been investigated. Some of these compounds, such as the recently FDA-approved trastuzumab deruxtecan, have shown relevant activity in T-DM1-pretreated patients, possibly thanks to the so-called bystander effect, namely the ability to exert cytotoxic activity also against antigen-negative cells. Such feature allows to overcome the HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity in breast cancer and could explain in the preliminary activity demonstrated also in HER2-low breast cancers. However, several ADCs targeting other cancer-associated antigens than HER2 are under development, representing a promising strategy for the treatment of triple-negative tumors, exemplified by the encouraging results of sacituzumab govitecan. ADCs are innovative and effective therapeutic drugs in breast cancer. Research efforts are ongoing to identify novel targets and combination with other treatment modalities, particularly with immunotherapy, to further improve patients' outcomes.

    https://www.meta.org/papers/antibodydrug-conjugate...

    DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000656


  • santabarbarian
    santabarbarian Member Posts: 3,085
    edited July 2020

    As always, Lumpie, we appreciate you!!!!!

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited July 2020

    T-DM1 in Patients With HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases

    Annals of Oncology
    This exploratory final analysis of a phase IIIb trial was designed to evaluate the benefit of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases. Reduction in the sum of major diameters of brain metastases >30% occurred in 42.9% of patients. Significant intracranial responses were observed among 49.3% of those who had not received brain metastasis–directed radiotherapy.T-DM1 has good activity in this population, and further study is warranted.

    CONCLUSION: This exploratory analysis of patients with HER2-positive MBC and BM enrolled in a prospective clinical trial shows that T-DM1 is active and well-tolerated in this population. T-DM1 should be explored further in this setting.

    https://www.practiceupdate.com/C/103466/56?elsca1=emc_enews_topic-alert
    https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39930-0/fulltext#
    DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.020
  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited July 2020

    I found this article about specific mutations

    MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex alterations and DNA damage response: implications for cancer treatment

    https://molecular-cancer.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12943-019-1100-5

    I’m sharing it with my MO because I have MRE11a somatic mutation.

    Dee

  • debbew
    debbew Member Posts: 226
    edited July 2020

    'Liquid biopsy' tech contributes to successful clinical trial for detecting breast cancer recurrence

    "These circulating markers were more predictive of relapse than any other commonly used clinical marker on the planet," Radovich said. "It's more predictive than tumor size, grade, stage or lymph node status."

    "This is the largest clinical study ever published on the use of circulating markers and minimal residual disease," Radovich said. "This really puts it on the map."

    https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2020/Q3/liquid-biopsy-tech-contributes-to-successful-clinical-trial-for-detecting-breast-cancer-recurrence.html

  • morrigan_2575
    morrigan_2575 Member Posts: 824
    edited July 2020
  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited July 2020

    I’m glad liquid biopsies are getting traction!

    I have had 2 liquid biopsies with zero results, since metastatic. Very odd but I guess it happens. Had to move onto a tissue biopsy.

    Dee

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited July 2020

    Neratinib Plus Capecitabine in HER2+ MBC Previously Treated With ≥2 HER2-Directed Regimens

    Journal of Clinical Oncology
    This international, randomized, phase III trial was designed to evaluate capecitabine with either neratinib (an irreversible pan-HER TKI) or lapatinib (a reversible dual EGFR and HER2 TKI) in 621 patients with HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer, including approximately 16% with brain metastases. Patients must have been previously treated with two or more HER2-directed regimens for metastatic breast cancer, although only 35% had received prior trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and T-DM1. Neratinib plus capecitabine led to a significantly improved progression-free survival (a co-primary endpoint) compared with lapatinib plus capecitabine (HR, 0.76; mean PFS difference of 2.2 months). There was no significant difference in overall survival (a co-primary endpoint) between groups (mean, 24.0 vs 22.0 months). Time to CNS disease intervention and duration of response also favored the neratinib treatment group. Diarrhea and nausea toxicities were numerically higher in the neratinib group, but discontinuation rates and quality-of-life assessments were similar.This trial is the first to demonstrate superior clinical outcomes of a particular HER2-directed TKI compared with another in the metastatic setting, and establishes neratinib plus capecitabine as an appropriate treatment option for this patient population.
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.20.00147 Journal of Clinical Oncology

  • Bliss58
    Bliss58 Member Posts: 1,154
    edited July 2020

    Fascinating about the liquid biopsies. Thanks, Debbie for sharing.

    Thanks too, Lumpie, for the Neratinib trial. Always on the lookout for tx possibilities.

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited July 2020

    Gussy: Thanks for sharing that - it does sound interesting.

    For others who want highlights:

    Larotrectinib is an oral drug that received accelerated breakthrough status after it displayed remarkable success in treating adult and pediatric cancers that currently have no satisfactory alternative treatments or have progressed following treatment. This is the second ever FDA-approved drug that treats cancers based on a certain genetic trait, regardless of the patient's age or cancer type, and it is the first drug to ever treat cancers that contain the specific NTRK gene that is present in several common forms of adult cancer and many forms of rare pediatric cancers. NTRK fusions are rare, but can occur in salivary gland, lung, breast, and thyroid cancers, as well as soft tissue sarcoma – and prior to this week's FDA approval, there had been no treatment for many of the cancers that frequently expressed this mutation.

    Here is the FDA announcement: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-oncology-drug-targets-key-genetic-driver-cancer-rather-specific-type-tumor


  • moth
    moth Member Posts: 4,800
    edited July 2020

    Lumpie, do you know if any of the common genetic tests (foundation etc) look for the mutation that Larotrectinib targets?

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited July 2020

    Yes. Looks like Foundation One screens for it.

    Here is their list:

    https://assets.ctfassets.net/w98cd481qyp0/YqqKHaqQmFeqc5ueQk48w/0a34fcdaa3a71dbe460cdcb01cebe8ad/F1CDx_Technical_Specifications_072020.pdf

    I also found all 3 NTRK alterations on the Strata Oncology test list - so it appears that Strata tests for these alterations as well.

    Addendum: These tests generally recommend drugs that treat cancer with the genomic finding. So it would be interesting to hear whether this drug is now being recommended. I looked at my results from Strata but, since I did not have any of these alterations, I didn't get any associated recommendations. Strata (in theory) tells you drugs in clinical trial for the alteration, but... that part did not appear to be a perfect process. I know of one drug off the top of my head that was in stage 3 trials at the time my test was run but was left off the list of clinical trial drugs (DS-8201a AKA Enhertu). In fact, they did not recommend any clinical trial drugs. In fairness, Strata was still in clinical trial phase at that point so maybe they had not fully implemented that function yet.

  • moth
    moth Member Posts: 4,800
    edited July 2020

    Thank you! You're a gem keeping us utd on all this!

  • JoynerL
    JoynerL Member Posts: 1,393
    edited July 2020

    Lumpie, thanks so much for this.

    Two things: I went back and checked the list of genes for which Foundation One tested in Jan of 2019 on my own results, and it appears that the number is the current number tested is the same on the link you provided. I was hoping that they might have added a lot of new genes, but it doesn't appear to be the case. Here's the list from my Jan 2019 test. Maybe I didn't look carefully enough:

    image

    Second, on my own test results, I found that I have NTRK1 amplification. I got excited and thought that this might be an option for me. However, per the article below I found, this drug works most specifically to fusions rather than other modifications:

    https://www.cancernetwork.com/view/larotrectinib-demonstrates-limited-benefit-patients-ntrk-alterations

  • BevJen
    BevJen Member Posts: 2,523
    edited July 2020

    Interesting article from Science News today about the effectiveness of an immunotherapy plus a vaccine currently being trialed (phase 2) at Duke -- currently for Her2+ use.

    https://scienmag.com/investigational-breast-cancer...

  • BlueGirlRedState
    BlueGirlRedState Member Posts: 1,031
    edited July 2020

    JoynerL - That list is huge. I need to go back and look at results from genetic test my DR ordered Sept 2019. No known markers were found, but I thought she said 20-30 known markers were looked at. Your list looks much larger. I think she said the test was specific to BC. Insurance so far has denied to claim, saying it is not relevant to diagnosis or treatment. I think the lab is going to pick up most of the cost.

Categories