Breaking Research News from sources other than Breastcancer.org
Comments
-
Shetland, MO said the pathologist told her she labeled me HER2 negative because there were fewer than 10% cells; the report says 8%. Does that mean non-amplified? MO is keeping me on current tx for now.
-
Reading all the posts in various forums, it is increadible what is covered/what it not, the care, advice etc people get. The denial is being appealed, and one patient support advocate felt confident that insurance would cover all or most of it. Contacting my representatives is a waste of time. I have contacted them on several issues including health, and their replies often do not address what I wrote about, or are non-commital, or tell me why I am wrong. We passed an initiative on the ballot to expand Medicaid in this state, and legislators made an attempt to weaken or get rid of it (they failed). They also made an attempt to make the initiative process much more difficult. ( We know more than you do). So far that has failed as well. I do not celebrate the idea of "Medicare for All", because the focus is on insurance/who pays/how much, and not on health care itself. I know some people have no or poor coverage and this would be a chance to pay for treatment they cannot afford. So Medicare is certianly is part of the equation. The other day there was an interview on NPR with a woman whose surgery for BC had been postponed because of covid-19. Her tumor has grown a lot, and the treatment she now requires, is much more invasive. It sounded less hopeful as well.
-
Dear all, these are not breaking news but we have to keep an eye on Tesetaxel, an oral Taxane. It achieved high response rates in clinical trials even in patients pretreated with other taxanes. I know ow amazing Docetaxel was for my wife, and Tesetaxel (not to mention it is oral) seems very promising:
https://www.ascopost.com/issues/july-25-2018/oral-...
https://www.odonate.com/tesetaxel.
Saulius
-
Saulius, thanks so much for the article. I was not aware of Tesetaxel. I will investigate further with my own MO. Very encouraging!
-
DHA Affects Microtubule Dynamics Through Reduction of Phospho-TCTP Levels and Enhances the Antiproliferative Effect of T-DM1 in Trastuzumab-Resistant HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Cell Lines
May 23, 2020
Publication: Cells (Open access)
Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is an anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibody-drug conjugated to the microtubule-targeting agent emtansine (DM1). T-DM1 is an effective agent in the treatment of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer whose disease has progressed on the first-line trastuzumab containing chemotherapy. However, both primary and acquired tumour resistance limit its efficacy. Increased levels of the phosphorylated form of Translationally Controlled Tumour Protein (phospho-TCTP) have been shown to be associated with a poor clinical response to trastuzumab therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. Here we show that phospho-TCTP is essential for correct mitosis in human mammary epithelial cells. Reduction of phospho-TCTP levels by dihydroartemisinin (DHA) causes mitotic aberration and increases microtubule density in the trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer cells HCC1954 and HCC1569. Combinatorial studies show that T-DM1 when combined with DHA is more effective in killing breast cells compared to the effect induced by any single agent. In an orthotopic breast cancer xenograft model (HCC1954), the growth of the tumour cells resumes after having achieved a complete response to T-DM1 treatment. Conversely, DHA and T-DM1 treatment induces a severe and irreversible cytotoxic effect, even after treatment interruption, thus, improving the long-term efficacy of T-DM1. These results suggest that DHA increases the effect of T-DM1 as poison for microtubules and supports the clinical development of the combination of DHA and T-DM1 for the treatment of aggressive HER2-overexpressing breast cancer.
-
PD-L1 And What It Means In Cancer Treatement
https://www.whatnext.com/blog/posts/pd-l1-and-what-it-means-in-cancer-treatement
{Not research, per se, but an brief and accessible article about PD-L1, a bit of history of immunotherapy research, and a very brief explanation of how immunotherapy attempts to work.}
-
As of May 2019 TDM-1 is now used for residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment in early stage HER2+ BC.
I did also see a study that TDM-1 (Kadcyla) and Perjeta cuts Risk Reccurance in half compared to Herceptin/Perjeta. I'm not sure if that's for very small/low risk BS where they just give H/P without Chemo.
I am wondering if there isn't any eventual plan to replace TCHP and AC+THP with Kadcyla (instead of Herceptin)
-
I am not aware of any standard protocols for giving H&P without a cytotoxin (chemo). (There may be instances in which physicans moderate or minimize the chemo for particularly frail or intolerant patients. There may have been clinical trials on this.)
Regarding "replace TCHP and AC+THP with Kadcyla," I personally think this would have many advantages; however, a recent clinical trial found that Kadcyla did not provide better outcomes than TCHP, nor was it deemed meaningfully less expensive, so they plan to make patients keep on getting TCHP. This assessment makes a huge error in appreciating patient experience, in my opinion. While "everyone is different" my experience of TCHP was on a different planet vs Kadcyla. Kadcyla was much easier for me to tolerate. Plus there is the issue of hair loss vs. not - which has implications beyond mere vanity. The trial was reported on this board. It would probably show up by searching for Kadcyla for early stage BC or something similar.
I thought AC was only given for TNBC now, but maybe that is not the case.
Thanks.
-
BlueGirl: I'm still catching up from an overwhelming schedule. I know it is very frustrating. Sorry you are dealing with that. I am very disappointed that your/our legislative representatives are so unresponsive. The interview you mentioned sounds just heartbreaking. We all keep plodding along.
-
" am not aware of any standard protocols for giving H&P without a cytotoxin (chemo). (There may be instances in which physicans moderate or minimize the chemo for particularly frail or intolerant patients. There may have been clinical trials on this.)"
I read a post here or maybe on a Facebook group I belong too where the person mentioned her IDC was so small the MO felt she didn't need Chemo, just a year of Herceprin. But honestly I can't recall if this was recent or an older post.
"thought AC was only given for TNBC now, but maybe that is not the case."
I went to 3 MOs (ended up going with the first one). 2 of the 3 told me TCHP. The 3rd gave me the option of TCHP or AC+THP. She said the results were the same but, TCHP had more toxicity. I was planning on doing Cold Capping which doesn't work well with AC+T. Plus the money of doing weekly taxol with Cold Capping would have been too expensive.😁
I'm happy to hear Kadcyla treated you better than TCHP that seems to be the majority sentiment on the Kadcyla thread. I didn't have any awful time with TCHP, tolerated it well but, I'm worried about 14 Cycles of Kadcyla since it's got Chemo in there. I'm hoping for a pCR when I get my surgery so I can avoid Kadcyla but, I'll do it if I have to, no question
-
morrigan_2575: Good luck! Hope all goes well and you have no repeats!
-
-
Lumpie - thank you so much for posting the results from the FAST-Forward trial aka “Hypofractionated Breast Radiotherapy for 1 Week Noninferior to 3 Weeks“. I just emailed my radiation oncologist about it (I’m still going through chemo but plan to start radiation in late July/August). This couldn’t come at a better time for so many given the costs (both real and time-related) and possible COVID-19 exposure from repeated visits to the clinic for radiation.
-
sunandsea: Glad that is helpful. If widely adopted, that treatment option would be huge news for lots of people. Less travel, less time off work, and away from family and other obligations. Less reconstruction - or less going without reconstruction. Many forgo the less invasive option of lumpectomy because of challenges with accessing radiation therapy. We can hope that this may make the entire array of options more accessible to the people who need them. Good luck with your treatment!
-
Off Target: Investigating the Abscopal Effect as a Treatment for Cancer
The abscopal effect occurs when radiation treatment—or another type of local therapy—not only shrinks the targeted tumor but also leads to the shrinkage of untreated tumors elsewhere in the body. Although the precise biological mechanisms responsible for the abscopal effect are still being investigated, the immune system is thought to play an important role.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0693-8. CC BY 4.0.
-
Lumpie,
This is fascinating stuff. I've read about it before, but this is a great article. Thanks for posting!
-
Pyrotinib or lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (PHOEBE): A randomized phase III trial.
Lillie Shockney's takeaways:
Take-Home Message
- Patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and taxanes and/or anthracyclines were randomized to receive pyrotinib or lapatinib, and both arms received concomitant capecitabine. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.5 months in the pyrotinib arm versus 6.8 months in the lapatinib arm (HR, 0.39; P < .0001). Common grade 3+ adverse events included diarrhea and hand–foot syndrome.
- Pyrotinib plus capecitabine was associated with significantly improved PFS compared with lapatinib and capecitabine in patients with pretreated HER2+ metastatic breast cancer.
Citation: J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 1003)
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.1003 -
Thanks BevJen, I thought so too. I was just this week looking at radiation as a Tx option so it really caught my attention. Sure would be great if they could pin down a way to get that immune response to it work reliably!
-
Heat excites the Immune system and pushes cancer cells into being recognized by causing them to give off heat shock protein....
-
Lumpie,
Thanks for your posts. I just had a chance to read the one about using radiation. That is very interesting and promising. I wish they could get studies\trials going on some of these findings. It just seems like some of the more promising things happening are still in the labs.
-
Simone, I agree there seems to be a lot 'on the cusp' with promise, which is frustrating. Still other things are pretty well validated but hard to make $$ from so they never receive the gold standard of a double blind clinical trial. So they hover at the edge of breaking through to more widespread use but remain "untested".
Hyperthermia/ aka Heat is a very good immune activator, & is safe to healthy cells in a temp range that hurts cancer. And sometimes it can be self administered. If your lump is right by the surface of your skin, a hot hot water bottle will heat it up. External heat can penetrate into tissue, that's how Vets do it for dogs.
In clinical settings, ultrasounds can bring heat as well or probes or heating the whole body externally or heating the blood and recirculating it, or medically inducing a fever. Whatever the method, if the cancer cells hit 108+ for an hour, they die or get very damaged, giving off heat shock protein, and due to HSP they become recognizable by the immune system. Normal cells are good to about 112. So there is a range of temp safe to us but not cancer.
I did this to the point of magenta boob and armpit (mildly burned but not painful) throughout chemo. It took me about four months to fully go back to normal after chemo but healed perfectly. I think it helped me and it was easy to do while watching TV or chilling.
-
Santabarbarian, Simone80 and others: It can seem discouraging that there is so much promise from bench research but things don't move to the clinical trial phase. As many of you know, Metavivor funds research on metastatic breast cancer. Someone from the organization said within the last week, there are promising proposals, just not enough funding for all of them. Other organizations fund promising research, too. Unfortunately, I am not able to fund much beyond lunch! But I try to do my part with small donations here and there and fundraising and advocacy work where I can. I don't have to tell readers here how important research is. I think if we all do a little, we can accomplish a lot.
-
Important new research from England on DCIS:
Study Gives New Data on Long Term Risks of DCIS
(If that link doesn't work, please speak up and I'll provide another.)
-
"Still other things are pretty well validated but hard to make $$ from so they never receive the gold standard of a double blind clinical trial. So they hover at the edge of breaking through to more widespread use but remain "untested"."
Isn't that the worst part?! 😕
-
Liver Metastases–Directed Therapy in the Management of Oligometastatic Breast Cancer
- This study was designed to evaluate the outcome and toxicity of liver metastasis–directed therapy in the management of oligometastatic breast cancer. The rate of liver progression-free survival (LPFS) was 52.4% at 1 year and 38.8% at 2 years. The number of metastases predicted LPFS while PFS correlated with the use of systemic therapy prior to metastasis-directed therapy.
- Combination liver-directed therapy and systemic therapy resulted in durable disease control in patients with breast cancer and liver metastases.
-
Surgical Intervention for Isolated Breast Cancer Liver Metastasis
- The authors of this study evaluated 148 women with isolated breast cancer liver metastases, comparing outcomes between the 95 patients who underwent intervention (hepatectomy or radiofrequency ablation) and the 53 who did not. After a median follow-up of 36 months, there was no significant difference in progression-free survival between the treatment groups in the overall population. Subgroup analyses suggested a benefit with surgical intervention among patients who received systemic therapy and did not have preoperative progression.
- Hepatic surgery should be considered as a treatment option for select patients with isolated breast cancer liver metastases.
-
this is a better link to the British study on DCIS long term risk of invasive bc posted above by Hopeful82014 https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1570
-
New Clue to Anti-PD-L1 Activity in Breast Cancer?
— Survival benefit with durvalumab in patients with PDL1 copy number alteration
A novel biomarker identified a large subgroup of metastatic breast cancer patients who benefited from an immune checkpoint inhibitor....
Almost a fourth of patients with no identified actionable mutations had copy number alteration (CNA) in the PD-L1 gene. Patients without PD-L1 CNA had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9 months when treated with the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab (Imfinzi), whereas median PFS had yet to be reached in patients whose tumors had copy number gain (three or four copies) or amplification (more than four).
Data for the CNA analysis came from the SAFIR02 Breast Immuno trial...
https://cslide.ctimeetingtech.com/breast2020/attendee/confcal/session/calendar/2020-05-24
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02299999
-
First-Line Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy Improved PFS in PD-L1–Positive mTNBC
Combining pembrolizumab with chemotherapy resulted in significant improvements in progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy alone among women with previously untreated PD-L1–positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), according to results from the KEYNOTE-355 trial.
Cortes J, Cescon DW, Rugo HS, et al. KEYNOTE-355: Randomized, double-blind, phase III study of pembrolizumab + chemotherapy versus placebo + chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Presented at: ASCO20 Virtual Scientific Program. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(suppl):abstr 1000.
ASCO conference reporting here:
{Seems like there are lots of PD-L1 studies in the news right now!}
-
HCQ Linked to Harm in Cancer Patients
— Combination with azithromycin associated with three-fold risk of mortality, registry study shows
Use of hydroxychloroquine in cancer patients who are also diagnosed with COVID-19 provided no benefits, and may have worsened outcomes, researchers suggested.
Treatment with the combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin to treat COVID-19 in cancer patients was associated with a 2.89-fold greater risk of 30-day mortality than use of neither drug, reported Jeremy Warner, MD, of Vanderbilt University in Nashville, in a late-breaker abstract at the virtual American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meeting.
ASCO conference coverage here:
https://www.medpagetoday.com/meetingcoverage/asco
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team