Breaking Research News from sources other than Breastcancer.org

Options
13536384041104

Comments

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited June 2019

    The Arc of Therapy: From Cure to Humbling Legacy

    {This is not research, but is a very insightful reflection on the experience of long term survivorship. The physician-author has a history of Hodgkin lymphoma, radiation therapy, breast cancer, a thyroid nodule, and lung cancer. It acknowledges the uncertainty of living with long term survivorship in ways that may speak to others similarly situated.}

    https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.19.00666

    In a similar vein, here is a commentary on the frustration physicians experience as a result of "not having a crystal ball."

    https://connection.asco.org/blogs/modern-day-cassandras-reflections-asco19

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited June 2019

    ASCO 2019: SOPHIA Trial Shows Promise for Margetuximab in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

    This is the first trial to use CD16A genotype as a predictor of response

    The HER2-targeted antibody margetuximab was associated with better progression-free survival (PFS) rates than trastuzumab for the treatment of HER-2 positive breast cancer, particularly among carriers of the low-affinity CD16A-158F allele, in the SOPHIA trial, presented here at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, which took place from May 31 to June 4.

    The primary endpoints of the trial were central blinded PFS and overall survival (OS), assessed sequentially. Objective response rate (ORR) was a secondary endpoint.

    Among 524 patients with baseline measurable disease, the ORR was higher with margetuximab versus trastuzumab.

    Safety profiles were comparable in 529 patients who received study therapy.

    "This is the first prospective analysis of a CD16A genotype as a predictor of efficacy from anti-HER2 therapy. said Dr. Rugo, "and we demonstrated that an enhanced PFS benefit with margetuximab in patients carrying the low-affinity CD16A-158F allele."

    Interim survival analyses did not yield significant differences between the two treatment groups. A second interim OS analysis will be available late in 2019.

    https://www.practiceupdate.com/C/85100/56?elsca1=emc_enews_topic-alert

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited June 2019

    Pyrotinib Plus Capecitabine for HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer

    Interview with Lee S. Schwartzberg MD, FACP Interview by Farzanna S Haffizulla MD, FACP, FAMWA
    one of the key studies presented this year looks at the novel compound pyrotinib for HER2+ breast cancer.
    Double-blinded, double randomized controlled study in patients who were HER2+, metastatic breast cancer, had previously been exposed to taxane and trastuzumab, and the results of the study showed that the progression-free survival, the primary endpoint was more than doubled, to about 11 months, from four months, with the addition of pyrotinib. That was quite good, and has a ratio of less than 0.2, so more than 80% improvement overall, highly statistically significant, and that was a very positive result, I think, we can say.
    Not a very large study, under 300 patients, so by phase III standards it was somewhat small, but the results are very strong
    Pyrotinib, like other ERBB inhibitors, tend to have diarrhea as a common side effect, and that was also seen here as the most common toxicity, and of course capecitabine, of course, is hand-foot syndrome, which was the other common toxicity here.
    ... this will be, potentially, the third small molecule TKI that would come to market, potentially. What we don't know, though is the relative benefit of one versus the other{s}. ...where does pyrotinib fit? I don't think we know ....It has attractive biochemical properties and it could potentially find a place in the armamentarium of HER2 therapy.
    https://www.practiceupdate.com/C/84876/56?elsca1=emc_enews_topic-alert
  • MargaritaMS
    MargaritaMS Member Posts: 199
    edited June 2019

    Lori, thanks for the follow-up information on the DS-8201 study results.

    And Lumpie, thanks so much for all the interesting information that you post.

    This is really helpful!

    Margi

  • santabarbarian
    santabarbarian Member Posts: 3,085
    edited June 2019

    Three Cheers for Lumpie!!

  • Spoonie77
    Spoonie77 Member Posts: 925
    edited June 2019

    !Hip hip hooray!

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited June 2019

    NIH Leader Shuns All-Male Panels. Many Applaud the Gesture, but Not All.

    Francis Collins won't participate in those so-called manels anymore. Many scientists see that as a constructive move toward inclusiveness, but a critic calls the stance unscientific political theater.

    https://www.chronicle.com/article/NIH-Leader-Shuns...

    {Requires subscription. I will see if I can find a free report on same subject matter.}

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited June 2019

    The NIH director is tired of all-male panels at scientific conventions. So he's doing something about it

    https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/13/us/nih-director-male-panels-trnd/index.html

    N.I.H. Head Calls for End to All-Male Panels of Scientists

    Francis Collins pledged to decline to speak at conferences that do not include enough women in prominent speaking roles.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/12/health/collins-male-science-panels.html

    {NYT generally allows a limited number of free accesses per month.}

  • marijen
    marijen Member Posts: 3,731
    edited June 2019

    Shame on the FDA, is there any agency we can trust?

    HEALTH

    Published 12 hours ago

    Breast implants linked to rare form of cancer, but FDA declines to ban


    https://www.foxnews.com/health/breast-implants-lin...


  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited June 2019

    I have thought about this many times and want to get feedback from thread followers: much of what is posted here is research news. But some things that I post fall more into the category of healthcare related news. Does it go here or should we have a separate thread? Thanks for sharing your thoughts. And also for your consistent, generous encouragement.

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited June 2019

    Clinical Challenges: Lymphedema in Breast Cancer

    Risks have been reduced, but condition remains problematic

    Article discusses standards of care, "prehabilitation" -- that is, maximizing patients' physical functioning prior to treatment; efforts toward education "about the procedure they are undergoing, as well as lymphedema risk reduction principles"; non-treatment risk factors; diagnosed and treated in a timely manner. "And that's important because chronic lymphedema is thought to be a condition that can be irreversible and lead to quality of life altering changes like infections and hospitalization, and other morbidities."

    There are links to "results of an interim analysis of the PREVENT trial, a randomized trial evaluating bioimpedance spectroscopy versus tape measurement in the prevention of lymphedema following treatment for breast cancer."

    https://www.medpagetoday.com/clinical-challenges/asco-challenges-in-breast-cancer/80471?xid=nl_mpt_DHE_2019-06-15&eun=g1278169d0r&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily%20Headlines%202019-06-15&utm_term=NL_Daily_DHE_Active

  • MinusTwo
    MinusTwo Member Posts: 16,634
    edited June 2019

    Lumpie - in response to your question, I would not like a separate thread. I think the research news & health care news you post here are both appropriate. I like that there is a place to come get information without lots of discussion about personal issues.

  • trinigirl50
    trinigirl50 Member Posts: 343
    edited June 2019

    This is a great thread. No need to separate the issues. Please continue as is. I am very grateful that you take the time.

  • ShetlandPony
    ShetlandPony Member Posts: 4,924
    edited June 2019

    Lumpie, regarding the thread, please Keep On Doin’ Whatcher Doin’

  • Nkb
    Nkb Member Posts: 1,436
    edited June 2019

    Lumpie- i agree, keep together.Thank you

  • Karenfizedbo15
    Karenfizedbo15 Member Posts: 717
    edited June 2019

    YIP... keep this tread going Lumpie

  • Beaverntx
    Beaverntx Member Posts: 3,183
    edited June 2019

    agree, together is better

  • Ingerp
    Ingerp Member Posts: 2,624
    edited June 2019

    Moi aussi. General health news/research is interesting to all of us.

  • leftfootforward
    leftfootforward Member Posts: 1,726
    edited June 2019

    thank you lumpie

  • AMP47
    AMP47 Member Posts: 200
    edited June 2019

    Lumpie

    Thanks for posting he two articles.

    Between the Stanford oncologist suggesting that giving false hope by suggesting treatment for recurrent breast cancer is like treating a chronic disease, and now this doc who is sort of saying the same thing when accessing past performance for survival prediction is like looking into a crystal ball.

    Being recently diagnosed where are we really in predicting our future? Do we have a “day by day promise", “month to month luck" or just a plain “crap shoot" for survival with one median outcome for success - you and how you handle all these drugs?

    Both oncologist seem to be saying past stats are like leaves blowing in the wind hard to know what tree they came from, hard to know where they will land with central tendency of no value. May be opinion - but very discouraging read.

    My MO subscribes to a long survival cure-who to believe-a question now in my mind.

  • Kanga_Roo
    Kanga_Roo Member Posts: 333
    edited June 2019

    Hi Lumpie,

    Love this thread, and come here often to catch up with what is new in research and healthcare. I think that is what makes it different to other threads - it is News rather than specific topic content. I have noticed that if you think content is relevant to other threads, you will post it there too.

    I hope you keep the two together and share your discoveries with us here.

    Cheers,

    Jackie

  • marijen
    marijen Member Posts: 3,731
    edited June 2019

    I like it all in one place Lumpie, plus there is no other place to post related healthcare news. And when BCO posts a study we are not allowed to discuss it at their threads. I like that we can make comment here. You know as long as we don’t start talking about puppies and tights :)


  • illimae
    illimae Member Posts: 5,710
    edited June 2019

    I vote to have one common thread too but if puppies somehow landed here on occasion, I wouldn’t mind 😀🐶

  • Rah2464
    Rah2464 Member Posts: 1,647
    edited June 2019

    Lumpie I vote to continue the thread as you have been doing it. It is so informative and I thank you so much for all your efforts!

    Illimae once again you made me crack up!

  • Karenfizedbo15
    Karenfizedbo15 Member Posts: 717
    edited June 2019

    YIP Lumpie.. you rock with this and we very much appreciate it

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited June 2019

    Thanks SO much, everyone, for your input. Everyone seems to be in favor of keeping things in one place - which sounds good to me. I have a couple of additions to post. Thanks again!!!

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited June 2019

    The Worst Patients in the World

    Americans are hypochondriacs, yet we skip our checkups. We demand drugs we don't need, and fail to take the ones we do. No wonder the U.S. leads the world in health spending.

    {Present company excepted, I am sure! But it's an interesting perspective.}

    https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/07/american-health-care-spending/590623/?utm_source=feed

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited June 2019

    Never Say 'Die': Why So Many Doctors Won't Break Bad News

    After nearly 40 years as an internist, Dr. Ron Naito knew what the sky-high results of his blood test meant. And it wasn't good.

    But when he turned to his doctors last summer to confirm the dire diagnosis — stage 4 pancreatic cancer — he learned the news in a way no patient should.

    The botched delivery of his grim diagnosis left Naito determined to share one final lesson with future physicians: Be careful how you tell patients they're dying.

    https://khn.org/news/never-say-die-why-so-many-doctors-wont-break-bad-news/

    This story also picked up/reported by NBC:

    https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/never-say-die-why-so-many-doctors-won-t-break-n1016876

    {"Bless their hearts"... my doctors take turns giving me bad news. I know it's not fun... and I know that they don't have crystal balls. But as a patient, I need a raod map, even we don't know how fast we're going.}

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited June 2019

    ASCO 2019: KRISTINE Suggests Role for Chemotherapy-Sparing Regimen in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

    Combining trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) with pertuzumab may be an effective chemotherapy-sparing regimen for some women with operable HER2-positive breast cancer, but identifying which women are good candidates for this approach and which would fare better with chemotherapy remains a challenge, according to the results of the KRISTINE trial presented here at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, which took place from May 31 to June 4 (2019).

    https://www.practiceupdate.com/C/85097/56?elsca1=emc_enews_topic-alert

    ---------------------------------------------------


    Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab Plus Chemotherapy Versus T-DM1 and Pertuzumab in HER2+ Breast Cancer

    Interview with Lee S. Schwartzberg MD, FACP Interview by Farzanna S Haffizulla MD, FACP, FAMW
    https://www.practiceupdate.com/C/84837/56?elsca1=emc_enews_topic-alert
    {includes video}
  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited June 2019

    Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab in HER2–Positive Breast Cancer

    Journal of Clinical Oncology
    PURPOSEThe KRISTINE study compared neoadjuvant trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab (T-DM1+P) with docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab plus P (TCH+P) for the treatment human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive stage II to III breast cancer. T-DM1+P led to a lower pathologic complete response rate (44.4% v55.7%; P = .016), but fewer grade 3 or greater and serious adverse events (AEs). Here, we present 3-year outcomes from KRISTINE.
    CONCLUSION

    Compared with TCH+P, T-DM1+P resulted in a higher risk of an EFS event-free survival events owing to locoregional progression events before surgery, a similar risk of an IDFS event, fewer grade 3 or greater AEs during neoadjuvant treatment, and more AEs leading to treatment discontinuation during adjuvant treatment.

    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.00882 Journal of Clinical Oncology

Categories