Calling all TNs

Options
1115811591161116311641198

Comments

  • Dee1987
    Dee1987 Member Posts: 22
    edited April 2019

    Thank you so much for your responses guys I only just noticed as I received no email to say you had replied. I’m feeling slightly less of a failure x

  • MountainMia
    MountainMia Member Posts: 1,307
    edited April 2019

    Fracking, thanks for the link to the prediction tool. Sobering for us, isn't it? I'm still waiting pathology report from my surgery last week. I don't know how many nodes were involved if at all. Appt with MO next week. We'll see. Thanks again.

  • FrackingHateCancerMPBC
    FrackingHateCancerMPBC Member Posts: 41
    edited April 2019

    Good morning all,

    I am off to meet the RO. Radiation Oncologist. Any tips other than stop typing and get out the door so you are not late?

    I guess lowering my expectations might be in order. Don't expect a high end tanning salon, right?OK I'm off!

    Kaiser has farmed this out to another provider, and I don't think that provider is a tanning salon, but ya never know, so here I go!!

    Fracking out! Last stage of this planned treatment other than another post RADS reconstruct. Yay!

  • MountainMia
    MountainMia Member Posts: 1,307
    edited April 2019

    Good luck at the RO, Fracking.


    QUESTION FOR ALL TNs: chemo or not? Regardless of tumor size, lymph involvement, etc, did your MO recommend/insist on chemo regardless?


    I meet with my MO next week. I don't have the pathology report yet but the nurse did call yesterday to tell me NO lymph involvement. That much is a relief but I don't think it's determinate in itself. Nurse said MO may order another test prior to recommending, which I assume would be MammaPrint.

  • Farfalla6
    Farfalla6 Member Posts: 105
    edited April 2019

    I had no nodes, 1.4 cm tumor and I was told definitely chemo and am doing it. They said with TN I would have avoided chemo only if tumor had been less than 5 mm.


    So I expected going into my lumpectomy that I would need chemo.

    I think they done use mammoprint for hormone negative tumors.

  • MountainMia
    MountainMia Member Posts: 1,307
    edited April 2019

    Thanks, Farfalla. I did check into MammaPrint and they do use it for ER- tumors. Oncotype isn't good for ER-, though.

    Anyway, no good way to guess what MO will tell me, even if I want to. Thanks.

  • PiperKay
    PiperKay Member Posts: 173
    edited April 2019

    The information on this website says that MammaPrint can be done on hormone receptor negative tumors, but I didn't have that test. Didn't know about it until later, although apparently the test can be done on tissue preserved from surgery if that's still available. The OncoType test, though, is only done on hormone receptor positive breast cancer, also according to this webiste, see below.

    When I was first diagnosed, my surgeon basically told me that chemo was necessary given the TN status, but that radiation might not be necessary even with lumpectomy depending on the size of the tumor which prior to surgery looked right on the line between radiation recommended and radiation not recommended. As it turned out, the actual size put me over the edge into radiation recommended territory. But there are a lot of factors to consider in making these decisions, and everyone has a different combination of circumstances.

    Who's eligible for the MammaPrint test?

    MammaPrint can only be used to analyze early-stage breast cancers. MammaPrint can be used on cancers that are:

    • stage I or stage II
    • invasive
    • smaller than 5 centimeters
    • in three or fewer lymph nodes
    • hormone-receptor-positive and hormone-receptor-negative

    The MammaPrint test can be performed on a sample of preserved tissue that was removed during the original biopsy or surgery.

    Other genomic tests

    There are other genomics tests used to analyze breast cancer tumors. To learn more, click on the links below.

    • The Breast Cancer Index test is used to predict the risk of node-negative, hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer coming back 5 to 10 years after diagnosis.
    • The EndoPredict test is used to predict the risk of distant recurrence of early-stage, hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer that is either node-negative or has up to three positive lymph nodes.
    • The Oncotype DX test is used to predict the risk of recurrence of early-stage, hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, as well as how likely it is that a woman diagnosed with this type of cancer will benefit from chemotherapy after surgery. The Oncotype DX DCIS test is used to predict the risk of recurrence of DCIS and/or the risk of a new invasive cancer developing in the same breast, as well as how likely it is that a woman diagnosed with DCIS will benefit from radiation after surgery.
    • The Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay (formerly called the PAM50 test) is used to predict the risk of distant recurrence for postmenopausal women within 10 years of diagnosis of early-stage, hormone-receptor-positive disease with up to three positive lymph nodes after 5 years of hormonal therapy.
  • Volleyballmom2008
    Volleyballmom2008 Member Posts: 54
    edited April 2019

    Hello ladies. I am wreck. I finished radiation 2 weeks ago. After chemo and surgery, which I was "pcr". Went f I r check up Monday with oncologist. She felt around as did her nurse practioner, said all was good. Last night I felt a lump about the size of a dime, under my incision scar close to surface. I called my surgeon I can't see her until May 9th. I am freaking out. I am hoping scar tissue. My puppy who is also 20 puns jumped on my nreast also the other night, but I am grasping.

  • santabarbarian
    santabarbarian Member Posts: 3,085
    edited April 2019

    Seems way too big / too fast to be another BC lump. It might be a seroma, or fat, or a scar...? I know it's hard to be in suspense but it seems there are many little lumps post surgery so don't leap to a bad conclusion but do get it checked...

  • Valstim52
    Valstim52 Member Posts: 1,324
    edited April 2019

    Hello All

    Chiming in on so many thoughts. Looking at everyone's signature, I can't believe I"m approaching 4 years. I had lifetime Red Devil, cytoxan, taxol and 36 rads. In the beginning there is so much coming at you. Articles, statistics, you should eat this, oh no don't eat that. Soy makes cancer grow, green tea makes chemo ineffective. It goes on and on.

    For me, chemo, surgery and rads went ok. chemo was a breeze(except for my first one which landed me in the hospital) , so was surgery. Rads burned me terribly and a month after finishing I had a mild stroke due to radiation scatter to my carotid artery. From there my hip arthitis has gone from mild to end stage. I just had a procedure on my hip to help, and it turned into a disaster. I was allergic to the dye had a reaction that put me in the hospital for 3 days. So i'm wobbly and on a cane. Due to advanced arthritis. Which now we hear many bc patients are suffering with some form of arthritis.

    Before BC, I was a runner, so very active, ate well etc... now ..... but I'm happy to be here, and will cope with the new normal I did not expect or ask for.

    What have I learned, if it comes back (just had friend was tnbc, stage II, had recurrence in same area 9 years later) or it advances, I will choose a way to go, and not second guess it with every article or what someone says. That almost made me insane.

    I love this forum. We can bounce things off one another, help those that are just starting, or the rest of us who are coasting along with this cloud over our heads. The cloud does get further away. Truly there are more days I DON'T think of BC, than when I do think about it.

    Welcome to those that have joined, and plow on to those that are working through treatment or just finishing.

    Val

  • moth
    moth Member Posts: 4,800
    edited April 2019

    Val, I didn't know about the arthritis risk. That's interesting and worrying. I had some osteo (one thumb, one toe) just starting before dx and so I guess I can expect a progression?
    I'm sorry to hear that your hip repair was not successful. That's a shame. I hope your doctors can find another solution for you.

    Also had a question about your friend's recurrence - my MO said that after 5 years she would consider me cured and if I had any cancer after that would be a new one and not a recurrence? Is that correct?

  • LoveMyVizsla
    LoveMyVizsla Member Posts: 813
    edited April 2019

    Mountain Mia, I was told to do chemo regardless of anything, but rads was dependent on lumpectomy or mastectomy.

    As far as testing for TN’s, I had the Ki67 test done. It’s a cellular marker for proliferation, how fast growing your tumor is. Anything over 20 is considered high. https://www.breastcancer.org/symptoms/diagnosis/rate_grade

    Volleyballmom, I had the same thing, it was scar tissue. Try to relax. You can do some massage on it if it does turn out to be scar tissue, to help break it down.

  • rockymountaingirl
    rockymountaingirl Member Posts: 78
    edited April 2019

    Volleyballmom, don't rule out the puppy. I got tripped up a couple of weeks before my first post-treatment mammogram by a clumsy horse that I was leading, and I happened to fall onto my left side, which of course included my left breast -- the one that had the tumor in it last year. It wasn't a bad fall at all, and I didn't think anything of it, but later I found that I not only had a bruise on my skin, but also a lovely little hematoma about the size of a robin's egg in my breast. So when I turned up for the mammogram, I had a LUMP, which I had to explain to every single person I ran into. It was embarrassing. Also inconvenient, because they made me have an ultrasound to prove it was a hematoma, and I have to go back in eight weeks to have another to prove that it's gone. Anyway, if a very minor fall can produce a hematoma, I suspect that a 20-pound puppy landing on you might be enough to do the same thing.

  • MountainMia
    MountainMia Member Posts: 1,307
    edited April 2019

    LoveMyVizsla thanks for the link. I've looked at a lot of the material on the site but had missed this and some of the other pathology links. Taking a look now.

  • anotherNYCGirl
    anotherNYCGirl Member Posts: 1,033
    edited April 2019

    Volleyballmom, - I bet it's scar tissue!

    Val, - you've been through so much. I hope your discomfort eases, and your days of "no cancer thoughts" expand (and are contagious here ;)

  • LoveMyVizsla
    LoveMyVizsla Member Posts: 813
    edited April 2019

    MMia, happy to be of assistance.

  • Dee1987
    Dee1987 Member Posts: 22
    edited April 2019

    My tumour was 1.5cmand I have done 4 dose dense EC and currently still on taxol and carbo

  • Dee1987
    Dee1987 Member Posts: 22
    edited April 2019

    hey I noticed you have a similar diagnosis to myself and was wondering why you don’t have carboplatin

  • LoveMyVizsla
    LoveMyVizsla Member Posts: 813
    edited April 2019

    Dee, are you talking to me, or to Mia? I didn’t take carboplatinbecause my immune system couldn’t handle it.

  • MountainMia
    MountainMia Member Posts: 1,307
    edited April 2019

    Yep, and other than that I am TN (because I'm here,) I haven't posted about my diagnosis and currently am post-op and pre-any other treatment. Dee isn't talking to me this time. :)

  • Dee1987
    Dee1987 Member Posts: 22
    edited April 2019

    sorry guys I was talking to Farfalla🙈 I’m still new with all this tec

  • Farfalla6
    Farfalla6 Member Posts: 105
    edited April 2019

    hi Dee;

    Yes, looks like same diagnosis, they called me 1B instead of 1A because of being triple negative: gives you an automatic promotion even if no nodes! The standard at Memorial Sloan Kettering, where I am, is ACT: 4 dose dense Adriamcyin/Cyclophosphamide, then 4 Dose dense Taxol. I'm 3/4 done with AC with minimal side effects. I did have a bad week last week but it was sort of my fault: I didn't hydrate enough, got my period also, and then ate the wrong stuff (hot and spicy) when I was vulnerable to developing mouth sores. That then developed! I have been able to continue to work and to go to the gym even (though i stopped running, definitely less energy and Im a bit anemic) And I definitely need more sleep and naps when I can.

  • Volleyballmom2008
    Volleyballmom2008 Member Posts: 54
    edited April 2019

    Thank you, ladies. I called my surgeon again today to see if I can get in sooner then May 9th because I knew I would of wasted the next week and half worrying instead of enjoying finally my free days after 10 months of treatment. They fit me in today.

    Surgeon took an ultrasound and I have a sernoma, which she said is normal after rads. Breathing sigh of relief. Also set up port removal for June 10th. I can not say enough about how great my team of doctors are.

    Thank you all on here also for always being here.

  • santabarbarian
    santabarbarian Member Posts: 3,085
    edited April 2019

    Yay, so glad they got you in so fast! Great news.

  • anotherNYCGirl
    anotherNYCGirl Member Posts: 1,033
    edited April 2019

    Volleyballmom, - so happy to read your update!! =)


  • moth
    moth Member Posts: 4,800
    edited April 2019

    recurrence prevention - what are you guys doing to decrease risk of recurrence?

    I was hanging my hopes up on exercise but some of the studies I read - which show quite dramatic reduction in recurrence - if you dig deep it seems that the big impact is for ER+ and thus probably related to decreasing BMI (because fat makes estrogen). So what about us hormone neg people?

  • kber
    kber Member Posts: 394
    edited April 2019

    Moth - great question! I'm wondering if some of the positive things I've read about certain diets are similarly linked to BMI.

    I think looking into melatonin is worthwhile.  There have been some studies on TNBC specifically.  

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3552359/

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/01/140128103117.htm

    (linking to these studies is not an endorsement!  Just a resource for those inclined to do further research on the web and with their medical teams.)

  • MountainMia
    MountainMia Member Posts: 1,307
    edited April 2019

    LOW FAT. What I've seen (sorry I don't have links at the tips of my fingers, but I'll try to find them) says a low-fat diet is valuable for prevention for TN. The focus would be on high-quality carbs and lean protein. Lots of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, Omega-3 fatty acids, low-fat dairy.

    As for me, I already eat a pretty healthy diet (as compared to the average person in the Western Hemisphere!) but I'll be shifting more toward the lower fats, more veggies and fruits, more whole grains. It won't all be easy but I believe it's the best way for me to go.

  • VL22
    VL22 Member Posts: 851
    edited April 2019

    I will always agree that a healthy diet and exercise are important. However, as a lifelong runner and vegetarian ( the healthy kind!) who has never been overweight, rarely sick and just overall in good health, I lack faith that it prevents cancer. If in the past you’ve been an unhealthy eater and didn’t exercise I would definitely do those things, but as one who always has- it’s discouraging to say the least.

    Two thingsI did change was I stopped drinking alcohol and our public water.

  • moth
    moth Member Posts: 4,800
    edited April 2019

    MountainMia - I'd love to see those links when you find them because all the ones I saw were directly related to the link between low fat & low estrogen.
    I'm vegan for ethical reasons and not changing that though I can tinker with macronutrient ratios.

    I exercised, ate well, didn't drink alcohol and breastfed my kids for many years. Those things all reduce the risk of breast cancer but risk reduction is clearly not the same as risk elimination. Who knows - maybe if I hadn't done all those things I would have got it younger or got an even more aggressive case.

    I think there were some studies teasing out prevention of primary vs prevention of recurrencef because these are not the same thing - & iirc identified different risk factors but last I looked there weren't any super clear guidelines.



Categories