Biopsy Inter-departmental review?

OK I have a bit more info. I saw the breast surgeon and FINALLY got a copy of my pathology. It say it's a fibroepithelial lesion with increased stromal cellularity. There is also adenosis and the usual focal ductal hyperplasia present. Focally the border with adjacent adipose tissue is infiltrative. (this concerns me a bit). No significant stromal atypia, increased mitosis, or features of malignancy are seen. (this seems good). The differential diagnosis includes fibroadenoma with increased stromal cellularity, complex fibroadenoma, or benign phyllodes tumor. Final diagnosis is deferred to examination of entire specimen.

I can see they also consulted Baylor College of Medicine for a 2nd opinion, so that was the inter departmental review.

I go back and forth between feeling Ok about this, and feeling afraid they will find something more lurking when the whole thing is removed. I don't 'think' its a phyllodes because it does not seem to be growing in this months-long saga.

My surgeon tried hard to get me in by year's end because I wanted to get it on this year's deductible. But of course that did not work out.

I don't yet have a surgery date but am planning for January of course. She will do an excisional biopsy. I elected to have her take a larger margin of tissue in case it is a phyllodes. The mass is 1.4 cm so she will take 2.5 cm I supposed. She says my cosmetic result will be fine because I have large breasts. They are a C cup; never thought they were that large.

She does them on fridays so ladies can be back at work on Monday. I am still not sure about that. I was wiped after the core biopsy and had to call in to work the next day. I kinda feel like surgery/general anesthesia might take more out of me. My job is a mixture of desk work, heavy on phone interaction/customer service, and lifting anything from 2 lbs to 30 lbs. Work has already been told that I will need help lifting for a couple of weeks.