What would you do?

Options
Deamo1
Deamo1 Member Posts: 193

3 weeks ago I had a dbl mastectomy. My cancer was lobular, 4.5cm, neg nodes, clear margins. ER+ 93, PR+ 98, HER2-. I took the MammaPrint test and it came back "low". The Mammaprint website says a low score means no chemo needed and/or hormonal therapy. My score came back 7% to 10% possibility of return in 10 yrs if no added therapy used. My Oncologist (who I do not like and I'm going to see another soon) is insisting I have hormonal therapy. I know it's my own decision and I really don't want hormonal therapy. I'm good with those numbers. Dr got pissy with me, disagreed and was very rude. What would you do in this case? Would you go ahead with hormonal if it was 7-10%?

Comments

  • lola12
    lola12 Member Posts: 127
    edited July 2018

    Well, since you are ER+, you can always remove your ovaries, which produce estrogen and lower those recurrence numbers a little more. I am 8 years out. Been on tamoxifen, then AI, now back to tamoxifen and i plan to be on hormonal for 10 years. I want to do all I can to prevent recurrence. I too had ILC and we all have to be comfortable with our decisions. We also do not want to regret our decisions either. I personally would fight with all I have and thats hormonal. I respectfully would take the hormonal.

  • Vera66
    Vera66 Member Posts: 54
    edited July 2018

    May I ask what your concerns are regarding the hormonals? Is it side effects? In your shoes, I have to say that I would go for the hormonals. I have been on them for about a month and a half, and thus far I have had zero side effects.

  • Deamo1
    Deamo1 Member Posts: 193
    edited July 2018

    @Lola12 I doubt it's my ovary. I was born with only 1 ovary and that sucker stopped working a very long time ago. will be seeing my gyno soon though. Thank you!

    @Vera66, Yes it's the side effects. I heard that the side effects don't kick in until 6 months later. Hair loss, nausea, joint pain, weight gain.

  • WC3
    WC3 Member Posts: 1,540
    edited July 2018

    My cancer is aggressive and needed chemotherapy and I am also on targeted therapy. The targeted therapy increases my odds of survival by about 7% or 10% and those are big numbers in the world of cancer and oncology so if the hormone therapy reduces my odds of recurrance by 7% to 10%, following the same logic of the targeted therapy, yes I would do it or I would have my ovaries removed and go on only the aromatase inhibitors if necessary.

  • Snickersmom
    Snickersmom Member Posts: 926
    edited July 2018

    I had a BMX last May, 2017 and have been on Arimidex for a year. I was also told 7-10% possibility of return in 10 years. I have very mild side effects most of the time. But eve if they were worse, I would take the Arimidex anyway. My philosophy is whatever it takes. Each person is different and you might not have problems at all.

  • Deamo1
    Deamo1 Member Posts: 193
    edited July 2018

    Thank you for your advice. Maybe it was the Oncologists attitude that put me off. It was her way or the highway. Wouldn't let me ask any questions. Going to see another Dr soon. Maybe I'll finally be able to discuss this.

  • mustlovepoodles
    mustlovepoodles Member Posts: 2,825
    edited July 2018

    Deamo, SEs are a continuum. Some peope have a lot and some, like me, don't have any. I've been on letrozole for 2-1/2 years. No weight gain, hair looks good, no nausea. My joints sometimes hurt, but i had psoriatic arthritis looong before i ever heard of an AI, but it hasn't become worse. I don't think i would just refuse a well known preventative treatment out of hand without at least trying it.

  • ruthbru
    ruthbru Member Posts: 57,235
    edited July 2018

    I would, for sure, give it a try. If you get bad side effects, you can always quit. A couple things to keep in mind; most people do not have horrible side effects (none of the people I know personally, including myself, had more than annoyance side effects). It is just natural that the people who do have problems are the ones taking about them. And, if we read all the possible side effects of any medication, including aspirin, we'd be too afraid to take anything!

  • Icietla
    Icietla Member Posts: 1,265
    edited July 2018

    >>The Mammaprint website says a low score means no chemo needed and/or hormonal therapy.<<

    Where does it say that?

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    5. WHAT WILL THE MAMMAPRINT TEST RESULTS SHOW?

    MammaPrint is a 70-gene test that will assess your risk of cancer recurrence. in other words, how likely the cancer is to return. You are provided either a Low Risk or High Risk result, with no intermediate or inconclusive results (which can occur with other tests). In patients with the most common type of breast cancer (hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative, lymph node negative [ER-positive / HER2-negative / LN-negative]) a Low Risk MammaPrint result showed an excellent 97.8% chance of being metastasis free at 5 years with hormonal therapy alone (tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor), with no significant benefit of adding chemotherapy. In patients with a High Risk MammaPrint and treated with hormonal therapy and chemotherapy, these women had a 94.6% chance of being metastasis free at 5 years. These results are based on the landmark MINDACT clinical trial and represent the average risk of recurrence for these two groups.1

    A Low Risk result does not guarantee that your cancer will not recur. A High Risk result doesn't guarantee that your cancer will recur. These results, in addition to all other clinical factors, will help you and your doctor make the most appropriate breast cancer treatment decisions.

    6. WHAT IF I AM IN THE LOW RISK GROUP?

    Based on data from the MINDACT Trial, if you are Low Risk by MammaPrint you are at low risk for cancer relapse and not likely to show a significant benefit from chemotherapy.

    As a Low Risk patient, you have an average of 2.2% risk of distant recurrence at 5 years, on hormonal therapy alone (average risk of recurrence for ER-positive / HER2-negative / LN-negative patients).1
    About MammaPrint
    MammaPrint is a FDA-cleared, CE-marked in vitro diagnostic test, performed in a single laboratory, using the gene expression profile of breast cancer tissue samples to assess a patients' risk for distant metastasis. The MammaPrint result is indicated for use by physicians as a prognostic marker only, along with other clinical-pathological factors. MammaPrint is not intended for diagnosis, or to predict or detect response to therapy, or to help select the optimal therapy for patients. Results should be taken in the context of other relevant clinical-pathological factors and standard practice of medicine

    http://www.agendia.com/patient/breast/faqs/

  • SpecialK
    SpecialK Member Posts: 16,486
    edited July 2018

    icietla - I was surprised to read that as well - saw this on Agendia’s site. This is not to say that anti-hormonal therapy won’t improve that percentage downward -as is laid out in your link -but I think this is where the OP’s info is coming from.

    image

  • Icietla
    Icietla Member Posts: 1,265
    edited July 2018
  • Ingerp
    Ingerp Member Posts: 2,624
    edited July 2018

    What is your probability of recurrence with an AI? My BS told me it has “the biggest bang for the buck” in terms of all tx possibilities. He also told me if he had a female family member who was refusing it he would grind it up and sneak it into her oatmeal. He is a *very* strong believer. I will absolutely at leasttry when my time comes based on that one conversation.

  • JoE777
    JoE777 Member Posts: 628
    edited July 2018

    I had good numbers all around after testing. Had lumpectomy no node involvement no chemo 16 rad treatments given femara then eximistane. The side effects were bad for me. Quality of life diminished. Two of my friends had small to no side effects. Started in 2012 and stopped in 2014. In February of this year I was diagnosed metastatic BC In my left sacrum lower back. Distant metastasis. Go figure. It is possible the inhibitors could have helped but not even the doctors know. Now I'm back on femara with kisqali to block cancer cell growth, zometa infusions once a month to clean up hypercalcimia and get the calcium back into my back and strengthen my back and pelvis. Like one of the ladies said, give it a try. No guarantees. No 100% cure rate. But it adds time until the new medicines hit the doctors office and you're there. At my stage it's not curable but manageable. I might get a couple of years and be in line for some of the new stuff. It literally changes everyday:-) the AIs work. I've gone from wheelchair to walking-slowly. Keep in mind statistics are just statistics. Mine was a 5% recurrence rate but now I'm 100%. You have nothing to lose and everything to gain. Be bold in your thinking and as lots of women say- put on your big girl panties and kick some *#€. Hugs and good vibes your way. Lots of us are walking ahead to clear that path of healing for you.
  • Runrcrb
    Runrcrb Member Posts: 577
    edited July 2018

    Deamo1,

    As you’ve noted, a bad experience with an oncologist could very well be a big piece of your thinking now. Don’t swear off AI until you talk to an oncologist that listens too. My mammaprint was low too but my lymph node involvement drove me to chemo too. I've been on AIs since April 2017. The first one left me feeling very fatigued; i switched to another and have had minimal side effects since. As others said, you can try it and then choose to stop; you can try a different one if the first doesn’t agree with you. Estrogen comes from the ovaries (or ovary in your case) but after menopause, the adrenal gland and fat are the sources of estrogen. The role of fat is one of the reasons that many post-menopausal women gain weight, even without an AI. I have found that weight loss is harder - it’s not that I’m gaining weight but that it’s harder to loose so that couple of pounds that goes on in the winter doesn’t easily fall off like it did in my 40s.

    And as previously mentioned, those of us who are doing fine with AIs aren’t typically on the message boards. I have better hair post chemo and on AI than I had before cancer.

    Let us know how it goes with your next oncologist conversation.


  • Deamo1
    Deamo1 Member Posts: 193
    edited July 2018

    Thank you. I agree. My new Ocn appointment is next week. Hoping to find a better Dr that will at least talk to me.

  • ruthbru
    ruthbru Member Posts: 57,235
    edited July 2018

    Yes, go to a different oncologist. You want a feeling that you are on the same team, for sure.

    I have to say that I came to Als from a totally different perspective. I was initially diagnosed as triple negative. After the tests were re-run (a long story) and I turned out to be estrogen positive; I screamed for joy, jumped off the table, and hugged my oncologist because I was so thrilled there was something I could take after the initial treatments that would really reduce my chance of recurrence on a long term basis.

  • Deamo1
    Deamo1 Member Posts: 193
    edited July 2018

    That's great that you have that relationship with your Dr. I do not. She writes everything out on paper and that's about it. If I ask a question, she gets mad and pretty snarky. I asked what type of checkups/lab work does she do at future visits "I don't do any. I wait until there are symptoms but by then it's too late" WHAT???

  • IamNancy
    IamNancy Member Posts: 1,158
    edited July 2018

    Don't be afraid to take the hormone therapy pill - if you have side effects, and not everyone does and no one has them all, you can try a different pill or stop taking them... at least you will have tried everything you could to prevent the return of cancer... 7% to 10% possibility of return in 10 yrs is IMHO 7%-10% too high.

    Side effects sometimes seem to start right away, not after 6 months, but sometimes by 6 months your body has adjusted to taking the meds and side effects go away -- everyone is different.

    and you really do need a different oncologists - she sounds awful!!

  • ruthbru
    ruthbru Member Posts: 57,235
    edited July 2018

    I would switch and probably complain to her supervisor, personnel director. NO patient needs a doctor with that kind of attitude (and what a thing to say....good grief!).

  • Deamo1
    Deamo1 Member Posts: 193
    edited July 2018

    My husband was close to punching her. lol NOT going back.

  • BrooksideVT
    BrooksideVT Member Posts: 2,211
    edited July 2018

    Deamo, the mammaprint test result are valid for those who DO TAKE anti-hormonal  meds.  If  the test is similar to the oncotype, nixing the AI would more or less double your risk of recurrence, so your chance of recurrence would be about 15-20%.   Recurrence is not nice.  AI's can be annoying, but most of us deal with them (or with tamoxifen, to which I switched after a couple of years).  Side effects do not appear right away, and may not appear at all.  A bonus Is that the anti-mets work of the AI continues quite a while after you stop the drug.  

    I never had nausea.  Sometimes I lost weight, sometimes gained, neither, I think, related to the drug.  I did, much of the time, find more hair in the shower drain, but experienced only minimal thinning.  My joint issues began after about six months and were only mildly annoying for quite a while after that.  My onc had several strategies to manage these, but eventually I switched to tamoxifen and the annoyance faded away.

    I do urge you to meet with another onc, and maybe also your primary care, to discuss your mammaprint, his or her experience with patients with your diagnosis, and the degree to which he or she believes the drug will benefit you.

    By the way, I loathed my onc at first, but I had been warned that he would come across very authoritarian, but would mellow with time.  He did, and now I love him.  I suspect this happens a lot as part of their job is to make certain we understand the disease and its risks.

  • Deamo1
    Deamo1 Member Posts: 193
    edited July 2018
  • BrooksideVT
    BrooksideVT Member Posts: 2,211
    edited July 2018

    Oops.  I just re-read the meaning of low risk at mammoprint.com and it says 10% chance of recurrence in ten years, without any adjuvant treatment, including hormonal meds.  Sorry.  Don't know how I misread that, but I did.  

    The website also says, on the oncologist tab, in carefully chosen wording,  "Hormonal therapy alone (e.g. Tamoxifen) may be sufficient to further reduce her risk if your patient is Low Risk by MammaPrint, when combined with traditional risk factors."   Hmmm.  It appears the apparent crisp, clear, yes-or-no result becomes a little fuzzy when applied to individual patients.  

    Will you let us know your new onc's thinking on this?  And I very much hope your new doc will be absolutely wonderful

  • Deamo1
    Deamo1 Member Posts: 193
    edited July 2018

    Will do! Thank you

  • bhansen66
    bhansen66 Member Posts: 7
    edited August 2018

    I agree a new doctor for sure, this path is hard enough without the support of a good health team. I think everybody has a different opinion on hormonal blockers and which one to use, age, menopause, pre menopause, post menopause, ugh. My was E 100% pro 40% in a 2cm mass that had infiltrated my left breast, did a Double mast, 5 months of chemo, 5 weeks of radiation and now have been on anastrozole for about 5 months and have had very minimal side effects. I do have OA in my knees but have not noticed a significant change. The first few weeks I did have trouble sleeping but now I sleep basically without a top on and one of those "cool" type pillows and have not had any trouble now. My thinking was anything that can help keep this from coming back is a step forward. I did have concerns about the joint pain, and my doctor was super nice, he was like what if you just try it for a month and see how you feel? So for me it has been good, so I will continue, hope that helps

Categories