Awaiting Biopsy

Options
Chuck0731
Chuck0731 Member Posts: 3
edited June 2018 in Not Diagnosed But Worried

Hi all,

I'm looking for some common knowledge info about the process on behalf of my mother. She tends to not ask questions at the doctor and has a bit of a wait ahead of her. Getting info is a bit like pulling teeth but this is what I've got.

She's mid-60s and has dense tissue. She had a mammogram recently and was called a couple of days later to go to the breast center clinic for an ultrasound as something new showed up that wasn't there last year. They did an ultrasound, called her back in from the waiting room and did another ultrasound. They pointed out micro-calcifications to her which they described as "like sprinkled from a salt shaker." I asked her if they looked clumped or were in lines. She said she could see a shadow and implied there may have been a clump but was then unsure.

They scheduled a stereotactic biopsy for seven days out, and scheduled an appointment with the surgeon for 13 days later to discuss the results. She said it would take 7 days for the results to come back, which seemed extreme to me, and even with the 4th of July holiday that seemed a bit far out. Her appointment card said the appointment was with the nurse practitioner however, so I'm not sure if she misunderstood.

She's a bit nervous not knowing for up to three weeks what the results are. I am hopeful that if it is good news they will call sooner but am not clear on her policy. I'm going to take her to her next two appointments, but just speaking generally, is there a rule of thumb for micro-calcifications a year after a clear mammogram? Worst case scenario, is this generally considered "catching it early?"

Many thanks!

Comments

  • Chuck0731
    Chuck0731 Member Posts: 3
    edited June 2018

    Bumping this one. Apologies, just looking for input. Thank you

  • mobscene207
    mobscene207 Member Posts: 44
    edited June 2018

    Hi Chuck,

    No apology necessary - your mom is lucky to have you advocating for her.

    The waiting is the worst. The early days of my diagnosis were similar to hers (dense breasts, call back, etc). Biopsied two calcification sites, one was benign the other was DCIS (stage zero, non-invasive (they later found some other stuff, but that's a different story). The fact that there's not a palpable lump is a good sign of early detection, as well as the "grain of salt" description.

    Protocols are different everywhere. My docs are very aware of the torture of waiting, and have more than once called me at 7pm to give me information about test results. I often see the nurse practitioner instead of the surgeon or medical oncologist.

    I hope this helps. Keep posting here whenever you need to. You will find lots of good information, and support. Best of luck to you, and to your mother.

  • Chuck0731
    Chuck0731 Member Posts: 3
    edited June 2018

    Thanks very much for responding! I hope you are well!

    In reading up on microcals, some of the material differentiated between powdered, crushed and linear appearance. Would the salt shaker description seem to match one of those and does that tend to mean anything in terms of anything?

    Since she had nothing to do but wait, as you hinted, does the microcalcificafion finding without a palpable lump tend to indicate a scenario likelihood of DCIS, or as in your case it can proceed slightly? I am gathering that a horrific finding isunlikely?

  • mobscene207
    mobscene207 Member Posts: 44
    edited June 2018

    I wish I could give you a good answer, but I would just be guessing. Hang in there

Categories