Implant's shape & texture

Options
HOOT
HOOT Member Posts: 7
edited June 2018 in Breast Reconstruction

I did double mastectomy in April ( preventive), no active cancer. i have a very hard time with my expanders ( above the muscles ) as I can't lay flat on my belly. I am debating on having round and no texture implants which I like the look or the drop shape textured one. My surgeon warned me of the link between textured implants & ALCL. since the entire surgery was done to prevent cancer, it would just make sense to go with the safest possible way and away from textured one. I have the feeling that the drop shape textures ones feel more natural and more cushiony than the round clear firm ones. If that is the case, may be I should take the risk for the exchange of comfort?Or the drop shape is very droopy and I will end up with two hanging baskets than firm breasts?

Anyone has experience with texture drop shaped implants after mastectomy?

If yes, above muscle or under?

And how it feels when sleeping on your belly? Is it flexible enough to give you a sense of real breast rather than 2 hard balloons on your chest wall?


Comments

  • Meow13
    Meow13 Member Posts: 4,859
    edited June 2018

    What about fat grafting around the implant? I had DIEP and fat grafting. Another younger lady at work had implants with fat grafting. She looked great.

    My abdomen incision is what can be uncomfortable sleeping, DIEP is fine sleeping.

  • NotVeryBrave
    NotVeryBrave Member Posts: 1,287
    edited June 2018

    I have the textured anatomical implants. They are above the muscle. I have not done any fat grafting.

    My PS recommended the shaped ones and I just did what he said. I had to sign something about knowing about the very slight risk of lymphoma associated with them. I wish that wasn't true, but it is a really small risk.

    Since my surgery, I've read a lot and come to the conclusion that shaped implants aren't really any better at looking like "real" breasts than the round ones. They seem like they should be, but you still end up with a "step off" at the top edge. Mine look good straight on, but the side view looks kind of "hunched" or something. Fat grafting would help that.

    Also - one of my implants has turned so that the thin top piece is at the outside of the breast. It's not super noticeable, but I wish it hadn't happened. The PS said it would be easy to fix during fat grafting, but I think I'd maybe make some other changes if I do surgery again - like maybe getting round implants with a smaller diameter.

    Have you been able to compare the feel of the implants, side by side? I think mine feel fairly realistic to touch. Some real breasts are firmer than others. It took me a while to be able to lay on my stomach comfortably, but I think that was more related to the surgery than the implant. It's fine now.

    I went with direct to implant surgery so as to avoid multiple operations so I'm not too keen on having more. And I always worry that I'll trade what I've got (which is pretty good) for a new set of problems.


  • beach2beach
    beach2beach Member Posts: 996
    edited June 2018

    I also went direct to implants. Like NotVeryBrave mine also look good straight on, side view I can see some rippling. Mine are under the muscle. I was small breasted to begin with and my skin was too tight to give me much bigger but now I'm a baby B. Some cleavage and looks good in a bikini top. I was offered revision surgery but since I'm not a year out and last summer was a bummer with the dx and surgery I'm not contemplating going a bit bigger at this point. My PS also said the risk of lymphoma is very small. Mine are Natrelle Inspira smooth surface and low profile.

    All in all..I'm good with them. Impatiently waiting for the scars to fade.

  • LisaK12
    LisaK12 Member Posts: 107
    edited June 2018

    My PS stopped using the anatomical (teardrop) shaped implant recently because in several patients they rotated or flipped. With the round implants if they do that it doesn't matter. Also, apparently there was a study done that showed that even breast surgeons looking at photos can't tell whether patients have had round or teardrop implants. I assumed they would look very different, but my PS showed me post-op photos of some of her other patients and I couldn't tell the difference either. Also, when I held the implants in my hand in her office to see how they felt, I thought the teardrop ones felt harder and the round ones seemed more soft.

    I got Mentor smooth rounds above the muscle. If you hold up a smooth round implant vertically, you can see that gravity pulls more of the silicone toward the bottom of the implant, so you end up with kind of a teardrop shape anyway. You can choose various levels of cohesiveness also -- to me the most cohesive ones felt too firm and the least cohesive felt too soft so I went with the middle option. Also, my PS did some manipulation of the pectoral muscle at the top to help it look smooth where it meets the implant.

    I was a little worried about rippling with the smooth rounds, but I don't have any ripples unless I am leaning forwards -- then I can see a tiny bit. Overall I'm very happy. And I can sleep on my stomach too.

    Good luck with whatever you decide.

  • VegGal
    VegGal Member Posts: 507
    edited June 2018

    I had teardrops under the muscle originally and hated them.  They were wide and flat and looked like burger buns. Last September I switched to round, extra firm, extra high profile implants above the muscle.  While they are indeed firm, I really like them. I also had 2 rounds of fat grafting in Sep and Dec. 

Categories