WENT FOR MAMMOGRAM.AREA OF CONCERN IN LEFT BREAST

2»

Comments

  • jenndenino578
    jenndenino578 Member Posts: 75
    edited May 2018

    I don't know, I had the MRI done at the breast center where my doctor is the head surgeon (at his request). I'm not sure if they're doing CT scans and xrays at that center along with the breast MRI's. Maybe my doctor is on vacation this whole week or most of the week.

    anyway I was listening to the last phone conversation I had with him which I taped from my speaker phone where he kept saying it was "complete benign" but now of course my imagination is running wild wondering if the MRI picked something up which the Mammogram and ultrasound and the biopsy didn't...I'm a real nut when it comes to anxiety. I had to take a one mg xanax pill before the MRI and before the biopsy and before the Mammogram because I already have an anxiety disorder to begin with and all of this testing and whatnot is just making it worse. This is actually the 3rd time I thought I was going to be diagnosed with cancer. I already went through this when I was 19 when I had a large dermoid (they called it a teratoma) removed from an ovary along with the ovary and tube. (way back then the general surgeon who did the surgery started yelling at me when I was admitted to the hospital because he said I should have come in sooner, I actually didn't know much about what was going on back then, there was no internet in the 70's, all I knew was that my abdomen was suddenly swelling up, I was still getting a monthly period, going to the bathroom as normal and I was still a virgin at the time. My parents also blamed me for what happened. ) Then when I was 50 they found another, much smaller dermoid on the other ovary but the MRI I had said it was a (small) dermoid and the doctor did a CA125 test. He pretty much knew it was benign before the surgery. I guess I should be counting my blessings but I keep thinking my luck is going to run out sooner or later as my sister died from uterine leiomyosarcoma when she was only 40.

    I thought it was inconsiderate of my doctor to go away on vacation right before the weekend and leave me waiting to hear the results of the MRI. He's kind of a rockstar doctor at the center where I go to....my ob/gyn thinks he is the greatest doctor ever, she is the one who referred me to him. And while he has an awesome personality there are things about him which bother me somewhat. He keeps saying that they shouldn't remove the radial scar which came back benign at the biopsy. This whole experience has been really stressful.

  • jenndenino578
    jenndenino578 Member Posts: 75
    edited May 2018

    So it looks like your instincts were correct, djmammo. I got the results from my MRI from 2 weeks ago (finally) and there was an "area of enhancement" so the breast surgeon I was referred to has decided to go ahead and surgically remove the radial scar/CSL. (why does this not surprise me.) He says the area is about 5 mm. I haven't seen the MRI report so I can't post it. I asked the breast surgeon to forward the report to my OB/Gyn doctor who referred me to him.

    I guess I'll know more about what I'm dealing with for sure after they remove it.

    He said that the area of enhancement could also correlate with the condition still being benign, I sure hope he's right. Thanks for your insights on this matter.

    p.s. - I wasn't sure what questions to ask but I did ask if anything abnormal was seen in the right breast, the answer was "no." I also asked if any lymph node were seen as enlarged, the answer to that question was "no." I asked about possible courses of treatments if dcis is found but then I realized that the B.S. doesn't make those decisions usually. Maybe I'm getting ahead of myself here....

    jenndenino

  • jenndenino578
    jenndenino578 Member Posts: 75
    edited May 2018

    So, my MRI results came back with an 'area of enhancement'. See my previous post for details.

  • jenndenino578
    jenndenino578 Member Posts: 75
    edited June 2018

    MRI REPORT AS FOLLOWS:

    DATE OF EXAM: May 17 2018

    Reason for exam:

    MRB 7004 - MR BREAST w/wo IV CONT BILATERAL B 5568814

    RESULT: MR BREAST w/wo IV CONT BILATERAL BILATERAL: 5/17/2018 3:27 PM

    Accession#(s) 5568814

    Reason for examination: 58 year old patient status post ultrasound-guided biopsy performed at an outside institution of the left breast 12:00 location and dated April 4, 2018 with pathology diagnosis of sclerosing lesion.

    Family history of breast carcinoma, (maternal cousin). Family history of colon (paternal cousin), kidney (paternal aunt) and uterine carcinoma (sister).

    Review is made of submitted mammogram and ultrasound examination from March 29, 2018 as well as imaging from ultrasound guided core biopsy dated April 4, 2018. Review is also made of accompanying reports.

    Technique:

    A 3 Tesla and dedicated breast coils were utilized. Noncontrast T1 and T2-weighted imaging as well as STIR imaging was performed. Following the intravenous administration of 12 cc of Dotarem to the left hand vein, sequential axial T1 weighted fat-suppressed imaging was performed. High-resolution three minute axial and sagittal images were also performed. Postprocessing fat suppressed imaging and 3D MIP images were acquired. CAD stream was utilized in interpretation of this study.

    FINDINGS:

    Breast Density Heterogeneous

    Breast enhancement: Minimal

    Right breast:

    No abnormal enhancement is identified.

    Page 2:

    There is a 5.7 mm nodule identified in the right upper outer breast region approximately 11:00 axis, posterior depth demonstrating high signal on T2 weighted imaging and central fat on precontrast T1 weighted signal on T2 weighted imaging and central fat on precontrast T1-weighted imaging. This nodule is most suggestive of a benign apearing IM lymph node.

    Cystic duct ectasia is identified.

    Left beast:

    At the 12:00 axis, 3 cm from the nipple there is a spiculated 6.7 mm area of enhancement below the threshold for kinetics. This finding was probably corresponds with mammographic area of distortion based on location and morphology. Please note however that on review of tomographic imaging performed at an outside institution dated March 29, 2018 region of distortion measures approximately 2.4 cm in greatest diameter.

    There is no adenopathy.

    Visualized areas of anterior lung fields demonstrate dependent atelectasis.

    Visualized portions of the anterior liver parenchyma is unremarkable.

    IMPRESSION:

    Patient is status post ultrasound guided biopsy of poorly circumscribed nodule in the left breast 12:00 axis approximately 3 to 4 cm from the nipple with reported diagnosis of sclerosing lesion. On review of tomographic imaging from outside institution this region however measures 2.4 cm in greatest diameter.

    Surgical consultation is recommended.

    Localization for excision may be performed under stereotactic guided or ultrasound guided.

  • jenndenino578
    jenndenino578 Member Posts: 75
    edited June 2018

    I keep reading the MRI report over and over and I don't understand it. Can anyone help me to interpret this?

  • jenndenino578
    jenndenino578 Member Posts: 75
    edited June 2018

    Update, had excisional biopsy last Tuesday, June 12th to remove the radial scar. Just heard from my doctor at 5:30 pm tonight. No cancer was found in the radial scar tissue removed as per the pathology report. Thank Goodness, I really feel I dodged a bullet. Thanks for all your support everyone who responded and special thanks to djmammo for all his good advice.

    Follow up appointment with my breast surgeon is on Wednesday morning.

    Love and hugs to all,

    jenndenino

    xoxoxo

  • Meg101
    Meg101 Member Posts: 175
    edited June 2018

    That's great news! Congratulations.

    Meg

  • jenndenino578
    jenndenino578 Member Posts: 75
    edited June 2018

    Thank you, Meg101.

  • jenndenino578
    jenndenino578 Member Posts: 75
    edited June 2018

    Update Surgical Pathology Report

    Clinical History

    Left Breast Radial Sclerosing Lesion with enhancement on MRI rule out radial scar vs DCIS

    Specimen(s) received

    Breast Lumectomy

    Pathological Diagnosis

    Left Breast Lesion Lumpectomy

    Radial Sclerosing Lesion

    Focal Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia (ADH)

    Usual Ductal Hyperplasia (UDH) and Adenosis

    Microcalcifications present in benign breast lobules

    Note: Immunohistochemistry for SMM and P63 has been performed on multiple slides and highlights preserved myoepithelial cells.

    The appropriate controls performed as expected. Staining and interpretation performed at Medical Center, Bklyn, NY.


    Follow up treatments:

    Repeat mammogram in 6 months, Followup with annual MRI's as per breast surgeon's advice.

  • jenndenino578
    jenndenino578 Member Posts: 75
    edited February 2019

    Hi all,

    Had my 6 month follow up mammogram a few weeks ago in January on the breast that had the radial scar removed. Doctor said that everything looked fine and to come back in July for another follow up mammogram and sonogram on both breasts.

    Best regards,

    jenndenino


Categories