Being sent to breast surgeon

Options
Heather8791
Heather8791 Member Posts: 8
edited February 2018 in Not Diagnosed But Worried

Hey everyone,

This is my first time here. Here's my back story.

I had a abdomen/chest CT done in Dec due to rapid weight loss for no reason. They found a 13mm mass in my left breast. The radiologist recommended for adiagnostic mammogram. Life has been crazy and I didn't follow up as soon as I should have until I started having pain In late Jan. I saw my primary doc who then felt a second mass. On Thursday I was sent for my diagnostic mammogram where the second mass was confirmed in my left breast. They took my straight to ultrasound and as I was watching the tech do a Doppler I notice do blood flow going to both masses. I asked her "is that blood flow going into them?" She said yes. She then told me to get dressed and said the radiologist would come speak to me.

As he came in he said that both scans were Abnormal and indeterminate and he wanted me to have a biopsy of both lumps asap. He said he had to call my doctor to have him put in the order.

Yesterday morning the doctors office called and said they were sending me a breast surgeon. They said this was recommended in the radiology report by the radiologist. Is this normal? The breast surgeons office can't see me until feb23rd. Thought the radiologist would do the biopsy as that Is what was origionally told

Comments

  • ChiSandy
    ChiSandy Member Posts: 12,133
    edited February 2018

    This is appropriate. Yes, radiologists, not surgeons, usually do core needle biopsies, but seeing as how your first mass was >1 cm on CT, there was a delay on getting diagnostic mammography, you were having pain & rapid weight loss and diagnostic imaging showed two masses with blood flow to each other, your doctor is right to be concerned. If you were asymptomatic, core biopsy would have been indicated; but the pain, weight loss, and second mass appearing would indicate you would be safer having the masses removed ASAP. The fact you're seeing a breast surgeon tells me they believe it's more than just atypia and you will need at least a lumpectomy anyway; and that if there are various surgical options, a breast surgeon would be best equipped to explain them and obtain a good cosmetic result from what would likely be more extensive than a single small lumpectomy.

    They're being proactive and you are in better hands than if they had a radiologist do a couple of core biopsies, wait for the path report and then send you to see the surgeon. Many patients aren't even offered a breast surgeon, but rather a general surgeon who does other stuff like appendectomies, hernias and the like.

    The 23d is less than 2 weeks away—and good breast surgeons are in high demand and book even further out unless they feel a sense of urgency, which your doctors apparently do. See if you can get in sooner, but two weeks is still okay. They'd like to enable you to start adjuvant treatment sooner rather than later if the masses turn out to be malignant.Hang in there!

  • Heather8791
    Heather8791 Member Posts: 8
    edited February 2018

    ChiSandy- thank you for your response. I haven't really been able to talk to anyone about all of this. I wasn't really worried until Thursday when the radiologist came to talk to me.

    I'm only 30 so when all this began I just figured it was nothing and put off the scan which I regret now but I'm hoping it's b9 lumps regiardless. I'm glad to know that this is a proactive step!

  • MexicoHeather
    MexicoHeather Member Posts: 365
    edited February 2018

    Yes. This is the normal step to take. Remember that you can choose your own surgeon. Also, it can take time for each of these steps.

  • Heather8791
    Heather8791 Member Posts: 8
    edited February 2018

    thank you! I'm so glad to hear this is common!

  • BrooksideVT
    BrooksideVT Member Posts: 2,211
    edited February 2018

    My thought is because of your age and the indeterminate finding of your mammo, your primary is hoping to spare you the headache of a biopsy by first sending you to a breast surgeon, who is the best person to (non-radiologically) assess a breast lump.  Lots of docs examine breasts, but the breast surgeon only examines those with lumps and bumps.  Most likely, your doc is hoping the surgeon will feel the biopsy is unnecessary.  The only way to be sure, of course, is with an actual biopsy.  Chances are your new surgeon will either recommend timing for your next mammo, or send you back to the radiologist for that biopsy.  If not, you now have a lumps and bumps expert on your team and can call on him or her with future concerns.  If the biopsy is still in your future, no problem.  As Sandy indicated, you have only delayed the test by a couple of weeks and in the world of breast cancer, that is considered insignificant.

  • Heather8791
    Heather8791 Member Posts: 8
    edited February 2018

    thank you for your response! Is it possible they will decide against the biopsy? The radiologist was saying both lumps needed to be biopsied. Sorry for all the questions ive just never done this before

  • BrooksideVT
    BrooksideVT Member Posts: 2,211
    edited February 2018

    Well, they don't exactly decide; they recommend.  Whatever your surgeon thinks, your radiologist is in favor of the biopsy, so it is probable that your surgeon will say something like, "I am not concerned about this lump, but as your radiologist recommends a biopsy, you might want to schedule the procedure just to be sure there is nothing worrisome going on."  Yes, lots of nothing and you have to make the decision.  I would add here, that if it were my lump, I'd want the biopsy.  Statistics tell us, by the way, that something like 85% of biopsies turn out to be negative.

  • BrooksideVT
    BrooksideVT Member Posts: 2,211
    edited February 2018

    You think you have questions!  You ain't got nothin' on me!  I had to discover that everything I thought I knew about breast lumps, breast cancer, and cancer in general was way off base, verging on superstition.  Yes, me with all my education and all my reading/study about health issues.  If you haven't yet done so, I think you'll find the main part of this website has lots and lots of information to get you started on answering some of those questions and clearing up the bits of misinformation that all of us discovered we had when we realized we needed to know more about our lumps.

  • Heather8791
    Heather8791 Member Posts: 8
    edited February 2018

    yea I've tried not to google too much. I'm not putting the cart before the house however I'm still worried of course. I've looked through some of the post on here which has been very informational with even stuff that I never even thought of

  • BrooksideVT
    BrooksideVT Member Posts: 2,211
    edited February 2018

    Do keep in mind that the posts reflect individual experience while the main website presents vetted information.  Without jumping ahead of yourself, you might want to read there under the, "Screening and Testing" heading.

  • djmammo
    djmammo Member Posts: 2,939
    edited February 2018

    Heather

    Often the biopsy by the radiologist and the followup by the breast surgeon are scheduled at the same time as a practical matter. If the biopsy is benign the surgical appointment can be cancelled. If you wait for the path to come back before scheduling the surgical appointment, you can expect to delay the process for weeks.

    ==============================

    "......and you are in better hands than if they had a radiologist do a couple of core biopsies"

    None of the breast surgeons I have worked with in the past 30 years did their own image guided biopsies. They don't have the time, proper equipment or a tech certified in breast US. There have been a few general surgeons over the years that have done their own FNA's by palpation in their offices but many of those come back as "inadequate sample for diagnosis" and come to us in the end for a definitive diagnosis.

Categories