Fears, frustrations, and waiting

Monique72
Monique72 Member Posts: 9
edited January 2018 in Waiting for Test Results

I have had mammograms for 15 years, starting at age 30, due to family history (older sister diagnosed at 35, mother at 60). Regular screening mammograms never found my palpable lump. My doctor found the lump, which was painful, as I was near my period, and honestly felt no different to me than usual.

I have had two mammograms within the past year, 9 months apart, neither showed any abnormality. Only a manual exam and doctor-prescribed ultrasound found my lump. My insurance does not cover US as a preventative procedure, only mammography, and only one a year, at that.

The lump is 2cm, near the nipple, BI-RADS 4. I am currently waiting for core biopsy results.

My breasts are heterogeneously dense and fibrocystic. They're like a sack of marbles most of the time. Mammograms look like a picture of clouds in the sky, where any monster or creature of fantasy can be projected.

Regardless of what the biopsy finds, regular screening mammograms did not help me.

As for navigating the system, I've already put in hours of phone calls between primary care doc, hospital, insurance, and medical group, to fix insurance authorization mistakesand other errors made by pencil-pushers, billing clerks and schedulers who know nothing of medicine, yet whose ineptitude negatively impacts my access to care.

I can understand clearly why my mother refused all care and died of cancer. It's hard to trust a system that feels like a lumbering, careless juggernaut that runsover you, then bills you for the service.

My sister was not given a timely diagnosis even after her biopsy, because her old-school patriarchal moron of a primary care doctor didn't want to worry the poor lady.

Fear and ignorance directly impacted their care.

Another sister, a histologist, has been blacklisted by her local hospitals for whistleblower activity uncovering ineptitude in their oncology departments such as hiding clear false-positives & negatives, and terrible interpreting skills by unskilled pathologists. She now only works with a team of histologists and pathologists who travel to train new departments in other towns and cities far from the rural area where she lives.

I'm hoping since I live in a city where I have access to a recognized NCI-Designated Cancer Center, my care will be better. And I'm hoping that sharing my fears and frustrations will help me get a handle of my worry and anger. And I'm trying to understand that we're all human, patients and medical professionals alike.

I've communicated my frustrations to official complaint departments in the hopes that my feedback will help patients receive better care. But already I've encountered evidence of CYA mode & passing the buck. Again, nobody's perfect, but stupid and lazy should not be tolerated.

I won't give up on fighting to receive my care. I won't give in to negativity and fear, but I won't be fooled, either. Educate yourself, you're your own best advocate

Comments

  • marie5890
    marie5890 Member Posts: 3,594
    edited January 2018

    Have you had genetic testing done with your family history? What is your state laws regarding MRI's and dense tissue? In some states, insurance cannot deny coverage of an MRI if a woman's breast density is dense.

    I hear your anger and frustration. And yes, we do have to be our own best advocate.

  • SavedbyGrace1972
    SavedbyGrace1972 Member Posts: 105
    edited January 2018

    I am so sorry you are having to deal with the foolishness of the insurance companies. It makes no sense that we pay them yet they don't want to pay for our healthcare. Isn't that the point of insurance in the first place? Sorry about your mother. Hopefully you get the assistance you need soon.

  • Monique72
    Monique72 Member Posts: 9
    edited January 2018

    First, thank you, SavedbyGrace1972, for hearing me. It's been challenging and I'm not even in the thick of it.

    marie5890, the one BRCA-1 gene marker anomaly found in my mother and sister was not known to be correlated with higher risk at their time of diagnosis. I will need to ask my sister for her results to pin down the specific SNP.

    I am participating in gene research for bipolar disorder with 23andme, where I downloaded my results and then uploaded them to a site called Promethease, which takes the raw genetic data and matches your results with existing research linked to SNPedia, a wiki-type site. I have some markers that have weak correlation with higher risks for cancer, matched with some that are actually protective. But no serious BRCA markers are noted.

    I'm pretty sure California has the protective laws you mention, but I have not been proactive enough regarding demanding additional screening. I've tended toward the “no news is good news" approach. Nothing seemed amiss with the lump to me, but the ultrasound showed not-so-good signs. So here I am. I suppose I should demand an MRI, as I think I've met both my deductible and out-of-pocket maximum in one procedure. I will ask all of these questions when the biopsy results come in.


  • Monique72
    Monique72 Member Posts: 9
    edited January 2018

    Actually, California law is just the requirement that the screening results let you know if you have dense tissue and how that affects your risk and the accuracy of the mammogram.

    It does not impact insurance coverage of MRIs.

  • Monique72
    Monique72 Member Posts: 9
    edited January 2018

    Here is the BRCA detail. It's not the worst variant to have, but it is something.

    rs1799950(A;G)

    very slightly increased breast cancer risk

    This SNP, a variant in the BRCA1 gene, is 1 of 25 SNPs reported to represent independently minor, but cumulatively significant, increased risk for breast cancer. For details of all 25 SNPs in this group, along with the two methods used to calculate overall risk estimates for breast cancer, refer to the SNPedia breast cancer entry. This particular SNP, rs1799950, was actually the only SNP of the 25 to have an increased odds ratio for breast cancer to be over 1.5 in carriers and to also be present at a minor allele frequency of over 5%. The odds ratio calculated was 1.72 (P = 0.0002). The risk (minor) allele is (G). The orientation has been changed to minus manually. We'll see what the bots do to it, with the next major update.

Categories