When should TNs do radiation?

Options
FelineMum
FelineMum Member Posts: 141
edited September 2018 in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Hello,

I started radiation yesterday. Today, I have my first appointment with my RO. (Had to change facilities and ROs because of technical difficulties.) As time goes by, I find I have more and more questions. My first attempted mapping was in early October but due to my non-cancer-side TE needing to be reduced, then completely deflated; I've had a lot of time in rads facilities to think. And realize how little I know.

How does rads benefit TNBC?

No one has been able to tell me that it does. "It kills cancer cells." Okay, how effective is it at killing TN cancer cells? "That's an interesting question." And? "What nice weather we're having today."

As of this Thursday, I'll have finished my 3rd month on Xeloda. I have 3 months to go. I wouldn't call it fun, but I'm managing. Xeloda causes sun sensitivity and I've known it will worsen my skin's reaction to rads. But doing online research, I found that combining X (capecitabine) with rads after neoadjuvant chemo may increase the odds of recurrence and death.

"Conclusions: Capecitabine/RT after NAC is associated with worse PFS and OS using two control populations, suggesting capecitabine/RT should be discouraged in BC." - Journal of Clinical Oncology (American Society of Clinical Oncology).
- http://ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15...

My BS - who prescribed X - mentioned at my check-up last week the X also will amplify rads effects internally.

I found this article last night. I already was worried about looking like a crispy critter due to my very fair skin, X, using a bolus and the possibility of 33 sessions plus boosts. By "looking," I mean severe skin damage, infection and permanent scarring. As much as I still want my implants, I want to be healthy more. But now, I wonder if rads actually will hurt me. I've been kinda thinking, "Well, there's no harm in trying."

My gut has been telling me all along that rads will hurt me more than they can help. I'm not very good at listening to my gut. And I've asked about rads a lot. My gut's reaction to warm, reassuring talks seems to be to wait a few hours, then yell, "H-ll No!"

I don't feel like I can tell my RO about my gut feelings without sounding like I'm scared or vain. I'll be bringing a print-out of the article's abstract along with a list of questions.

I know it's not likely someone will see this before early afternoon EST and have time to respond, but please chime in anyways with your thoughts, experiences, questions you asked or wish you'd asked, any studies/trials/data/etc. To me, TNBC and rads is something we need to know more about, regardless of whether X is a factor.

Thanks for reading.

Comments

  • Sam0623
    Sam0623 Member Posts: 110
    edited November 2017

    Hi FelineMum,

    I was diagnosed around the same time as you and started rads last month. I wasn't very excited about it (I was originally diagnosed stage 2 and since I had a mastetomy we never planned on rads) but here I am. I did ask my RO about the effectiveness, and like chemo they don't really know who will respond to rads and who won't, but studies consistently show that women who have rads are less likely to have reoccurances across the board, which is why we do it. This was important to me, because my tumor did not really respond to chemo, but my RO told me response to one treatment or lack of response in my case doesn't mean radiation won't be effective.

    I also asked my RO about Xeloda while getting radiation and he said no. I am being treated at MD Anderson for rads, and I really respect his opinion. He said if I asked him 18 months ago he might have been open to it, but the more recent research doesn't really show a benefit and it does increase the side effects (redness, peeling, etc.). Instead I will be starting Xeloda after I finish rads next month.

    I also live in Michigan, but decided to come here for rads because I just don't want to mess around with this anymore. Where are you being treated? I went to a few places for second opinions after I found out chemo didn't work- Karmanos was open to the Xeloda. Did anyone mention lowering your dose while you are getting radiation? If I did do it at Karmanos it would not have been the normal full dose.

  • FelineMum
    FelineMum Member Posts: 141
    edited November 2017

    Hi Sam0623,

    It's interesting that you're at MD Anderson because it finished gathering data in June from a study on the effectiveness and safety of using Xeloda and radiation together for invasive BC that didn't respond to chemo. The findings haven't been released yet. (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00916578)

    I'm going through Spectrum. I live in an area dominated by Trinity Health, so I do a lot of driving. My finances are too limited to go anywhere that's not within driving/commuting distance. Spectrum seems to have no concerns about combining X with rads. I am concerned.

    I didn't see my RO yesterday after all. Yesterday morning, a herniated disc in my lower back that's been grumpy since I spent more than an hour 'in position' on a table (prone on my back, hands above head, feet rubber banded together, mouthpiece and goggles on for deep breath hold) while a broken machine was fixed during my dry run, started causing severe pain and muscle spasms from my back down to my toes on one side.

    I cancelled rads yesterday and today. I did see an orthopedic specialist yesterday. Right now, walking remains difficult, and I hurt. Ortho follow-up on Tuesday. I can't lie perfectly still if I'm spasming or in severe pain. At this point, I need a meeting with the RO before/if I continue.

  • Sam0623
    Sam0623 Member Posts: 110
    edited November 2017

    Wow, very interesting study. He didn't mention it, but since it started 8 years ago my guess is they have some idea of the results. I met with an integrative medicine doctor while I have been here, and she said they do send out information they find out via trials before it is published so patients can benefit from it sooner.

    I am also treated at Spectrum. I had my chemo there and surgery there. I have been pretty happy, I just thought (and my MO agreed) that this cancer wasn' behaving and it might be time to call in the big guns. I am very high risk for this to come back, so I will be participating in a clinical trial at Memorial Sloan Kettering after I finish Xeloda. I was so looking forward to this being behind me.

  • IntegraGirl
    IntegraGirl Member Posts: 147
    edited November 2017

    I did 2 rounds of Xeloda in October then took a 3 week break while doing radiation. I finish rads next Tuesday and meet with my MO on Monday and RO on Tuesday to discuss the restarting of Xeloda.

    I finished 12/16 radiation treatments and so far my skin is a bit pink in places but nothing alarming is going on. I'm using aloe and Miaderm.

    As far as reoccurrence goes, we're high risk no matter how you cut it

  • FelineMum
    FelineMum Member Posts: 141
    edited November 2017

    There's a much smaller study (whose link I can't find) that documented severe skin reactions when X and rads were used together in BC patients:

    Conclusions: Use of CCRT (concurrent capecitabine-radiotherapy) for breast cancer was associated with significant acute grade 3 dermatitis, however, all patients successfully completed their radiation course *without interruption.

    * without interruption of rads. X was stopped in most cases.

    Overall, I've been happy with Spectrum. Rads is the only area where I feel like I get canned answers that don't address my specific questions and concerns. Only one RO questioned using X during rads and he works at a regional facility that can't do my type of rads. It's where I started because it's closer to home.

    Being halfway done with X, I don't want to stop now. Its benefits are cumulative. Stopping for at least 7 weeks of treatment - throw in Xmas, New Year's, boosts and projected breaks for skin reax, probably closer to 3 months - will likely lessen the benefits of X. With it being proven to help TNBC without pCR, stopping a known thing for a Maybe seems foolish to me.

    I don't think being high risk is a reason to stop fighting to reduce that risk --- to stay alive and healthy. At the end of the day, I want to be here.

  • AgathaNYC
    AgathaNYC Member Posts: 473
    edited November 2017

    FelineMum: Thank you so much for starting this topic. I hope your back is on the mend. There should be a cosmic law against having to deal with anything extra while we're in treatment.

    I'm still in the neo-adj stage of my chemo, but have been thinking a lot about radiation. I will have to make a decision about surgery soon and I'm leaning toward lumpectomy if possible, but want to know if that means significantly more radiation than if I had a mastectomy.

    My MO said she plans on putting me on Xeloda, but I believe it's after radiation. I see her Friday and confirm that. Thanks to you all I now know to ask about it.



  • VL22
    VL22 Member Posts: 851
    edited November 2017

    AgathaNYC - with lumpectomy, expect 6-6 1/2 weeks of radiation.

  • Hopeful82014
    Hopeful82014 Member Posts: 3,480
    edited November 2017

    Actually, there is a shorter radiation protocol than the "6-6 1/2 weeks" referenced above that has been demonstrated to be at least as effective as the longer course of treatment - for those who are suitable candidates. Ask your RO about the "Canadian Protocol" which it sounds as though IntegraGirl is doing. It's not appropriate for every woman and some ROs are still slow to accept the evidence but it is worth asking about.

  • VL22
    VL22 Member Posts: 851
    edited November 2017

    Thanks Hopeful - I haven’t heard of this

  • AgathaNYC
    AgathaNYC Member Posts: 473
    edited November 2017

    Hopeful82014 - Thanks so much for telling me about the Canadian Protocol. I just did a quick search and found so interesting reports. I'll be sure to ask about it. This is why I love this community!

  • IntegraGirl
    IntegraGirl Member Posts: 147
    edited November 2017

    I asked my RO about why we do a shorter radiation protocol in Canada than they typically do in the US and her response was that the American ROs get paid more if they do the extended protocol because they get paid per treatment. If that's true, it's really infuriating.

    I finished my 16/16 radiation treatments yesterday. Back to the Xeloda program today.

  • VL22
    VL22 Member Posts: 851
    edited November 2017

    I’ve been doing some reading on this “Canadian protocol”. Very interesting. It will be even more interesting to see my RO’s reaction when I bring it up

  • Hopeful82014
    Hopeful82014 Member Posts: 3,480
    edited November 2017

    VLH & Agatha - I'm glad that info was helpful. I know the "Canadian protocol" has been in wide use for some time in other countries. American ROs have been slower to embrace it, in part because of caution and a conservative approach to adopting new treatment protocols. I wouldn't be surprised if finances enter into it as well but I'm not sure I'd credit that as the primary reason. :)

    Good luck to all of you with your radiation treatments. Since TN cancers are so fast growing I would think you'd get even more bang for your buck with RT than ERs but that's just an educated guess. I hope all of you sail through treatment and benefit greatly from RT.

  • AgathaNYC
    AgathaNYC Member Posts: 473
    edited December 2017

    Hopeful82014 - I still haven't met with the RO, but today my BS told me that I should expect 4 weeks of radiation, including a boost. That's the standard post-lumpectomy at my hospital. That seems somewhere between the Candian Protocol you told us about and the lengthier treatment some people seem to get here in the states. I'm all for the least amount of radiation that can yield optimal results.

  • Hopeful82014
    Hopeful82014 Member Posts: 3,480
    edited December 2017

    Agatha - I'm glad you've been able to get at least some info on what to expect. The not knowing is hard, isn't it?

    Four weeks including the boost sounds like the Canadian protocol - 3 weeks of 5 treatments then a boost week, for four total. The total dosage of radiation can vary (I've seen a couple of different numbers) but I think it's still a bit less than the longer course of radiation.

    It's good to know that it's standard at your hospital - acceptance of this approach seems to be spreading pretty rapidly.

    If you want to help your skin, you can start (if you haven't already) moisturizing your skin now, including the upper shoulder. Use something very pure and gentle and use it a.m. and p.m. Of course, you'll want to avoid any surgical scars. Babying your skin now can pay big dividends later. One of my RO nurses shared that with me early on and it certainly didn't hurt! It was a good habit to adopt and continue.

    Have a good weekend!

  • AgathaNYC
    AgathaNYC Member Posts: 473
    edited December 2017

    Hopeful82014 - Thanks for the kind words and the tip about starting good moisturizing early. I'll do that. Also, I'm going to be getting a reduction with my lumpectomy so expect the RO to be able to use less intense radiation to reach my chest wall.

  • FelineMum
    FelineMum Member Posts: 141
    edited December 2017

    Interesting reading! Does anyone know if the Canadian Protocol is used for mastectomies? I read awhile back that in the United States, the new recommendation for lumpectomies was 16 radiation treatments, but it remained 33 for mastectomies.

    My rads are on-hold while I get a second opinion; meet with my RO for the first time - I was transferred and we never had a consultation; and hope for my back pain and muscle spasms to ease. The botched dry run which left me on a table unable to move for an hour damaged a vertebrae near my herniated disc. Apparently, a 5-week-old spine cat scan and multiple visits with my spine specialist have confirmed this ... or damage within a 24 hour time frame. Either way, I have NO desire to go back to the rads center.

    I have continued moisturizing. My BMX scars look better and it's a way to help me get more comfortable with my "new" body. I'm using the recommended Aquaphor (now in spray form!) and Emu Oil (okay'd by a skin education nurse). I used pure aloe vera for sores on my scalp during chemo infusions. Fruit of the Earth brand. Everyone seems to recommend that for rads skin too.

    I hope everyone has a peaceful weekend.

  • IntegraGirl
    IntegraGirl Member Posts: 147
    edited December 2017

    FelineMum: I had BMX on Aug 30 and just finished my 16/16 radiation treatments. It's the same amount of radiation delivered over a shorter time frame.

  • FelineMum
    FelineMum Member Posts: 141
    edited December 2017

    IntegraGirl: Thanks! I'll ask about this when I get a second opinion later this month.

  • cccmc2
    cccmc2 Member Posts: 131
    edited August 2018

    I see some with similar diagnosis as me who are getting radiation treatment. My MO says with size of tumor, clear margins/nodes and having a mastectomy I don’t need it? If it reduces reoccurance then I want it. I want to do all I can! What to do? I don’t like thinking that if I had a different Dr my treatment would vary?

  • kam62
    kam62 Member Posts: 1
    edited September 2018

    ccmc2,

    I had chemo BEFORE surgery due to the size of my tumor it was 4.8 cm...because I didn't have surgery first it was hard to grade the tumor, Oncologist said stage 2 or 3 grade 3. My first PET showed left lung node and left axillary node involvement so probly stage 3

    I did not do radiation as my oncologist said with mastectomy and clear sentinal node biopsy and margins it was not necessary. I start reconstruction (expander insert on 9-24-18) I was told if I had lumpectomy I would HAVE TO DO RADIATION.....glad now I don't need it because of mastectomy.

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited September 2018

    Welcome, kam62! Thanks so much for sharing your experience! We hope your reconstruction goes well, we look forward to seeing you on the boards!

    The Mods

Categories