I'm considering refusing chemo

Options
1235»

Comments

  • Meow13
    Meow13 Member Posts: 4,859
    edited October 2017

    Good news no cancer. I also have mild arthritis in spine and neck. I blame AI drugs.

  • 53nancy
    53nancy Member Posts: 497
    edited October 2017

    Meow13. If I understand right, you are cancer free. That is wonderful. I am going to increase my walking for OA and am looking into yoga, aerobic exercise

  • BrooksideVT
    BrooksideVT Member Posts: 2,211
    edited October 2017

    Not to worry, Nancy. Just because you have arthritis does not mean you necessarily will have symptoms. My bone scan, similarly to yours, showed arthritis in just about every joint. except the joints that actually hurt. A couple of years later (and having switched from arimidex to tamoxifen), I have absolutely no pain in any area, just the occasional tweak in one hip. My guess is that if all of us had bone scans, pretty much all of us would find we had arthritic surprises that never will show themselves in any other way.

    I do pop the occasional aspirin or other anti-inflammatory to help keep those spots at bay.

  • 53nancy
    53nancy Member Posts: 497
    edited October 2017

    BrooksideVT, thanks for your encouragement. I have already been in touch with a Yoga Instructor in our small town, and we are meeting Tuesday morning to discuss some suggestions. I don't want to try to teach myself yoga, because I want to be sure I know how to it properly. There are also drop in classes and regular class schedules that come at a reasonable cost, so I may consider those. I can live with the OA, Pending the results of my Abdominal CT on Monday, if they are clear I am inclined to refuse the chemo. I am in my sixties, my husband is ten years older and we have no children, so I want the rest of our lives together to be quality years and not a constant stream of treatments and appointments. If my cancer recurs, I will reconsider. I am not sure about radiation; I understand that if cancer recurs in the same breast, radiation cannot be used a second time. With changes like going to an Alkaline Diet, use of Essential Oils, boosting vitamins and supplements, and walking, I think I am prepared to wait. My biggest concern would be the liver; if that shows any metastases, I will have to consider, though I have always heard that cancer in the liver is a death sentence.

  • Sunflower12
    Sunflower12 Member Posts: 4
    edited October 2017

    I had a Lumpectomy with lymph notes removed. Stage II cancer. This was followed by several weeks of radiation. My doctors put me on chemo pills, they were debilitating, I tried, but it was a horrible experience. I decided to stop taking them after one week of hell. My doctors then all decided I needed chemo. I questioned why, as they all said I was cancer free. It was a preventative measure, they all told me ... just in case.

    After much deliberation, I refused. I did much research and decided to take a chance. Doctors were not happy with my decision so they scheduled me for a PET scan. What is that? I asked. It is a test (similar to a CAT scan) that can tell if there is cancer in any part of your body. (They save this alternative for last?) I had the test. Everything came back negative. This was 5 years ago. All my blood work, mammograms, etc. come back fine... no cancer. I have been tested every six months since.

    Just my experience, you have to do research, then make your decision. There are just so many negatives with chemo. For me, I made the right choice.

    Good Luck!

  • 53nancy
    53nancy Member Posts: 497
    edited October 2017

    subflower12, you are a ray of sunshine in my day. I wonder, did you do radiation? To me, doing chemo would be like taking poison. Some people would say using Essential Oils is poison. If so, then why am I so much better than when I first started using them? To me, they are not poison, they are keeping me healthy. I am already using some on my liver area. The cancer came as a shock. I never felt a lump and the cancer was caught early because I had a mammo six months early due to having moved to a new location. Thanks so much for your encouragement. Hoping the best for all of us, no matter the choice we make.

  • CA1943
    CA1943 Member Posts: 13
    edited October 2017

    Although I am MUCH older than you, I too want to refuse chemo.  I was originally diagnosed with stage I invasive breast cancers with 2 masses and 2 different type of cancer cells (estrogen and progesterone)  in one breast and none in the other. I underwent mastectomy end of September, and unfortunately the cancer had spread to one lymph node by 5mm. Others were not affected. PET scan revealed no progression of cancer anywhere else.  BUT because my GENE test showed me at  "high risks", they now want to do chemo.  I have seen what chemo does first hand with my son who underwent chemo and radiation at 34... He lost his short term memory and has permanent neuropathy since 2004. At 75, what are my chances considering I have heart problems, and BONES problems ie spine degeneration, severe arthritis and osteoporosis at the lumbar?. I am very petite, and I feel I won't survive the poison of chemo drugs.  IF they really have taken the cancer out with the operation WHY would the risks involved with chemo be benficial to a patient with health and drugs intake issues?  I would rather have pills to suppress estrogen rather than trying chemo...  I am like you, skeptical, and fear the worst in the name of "preventive treatment" in case of... What was the point to have mastectomy then???!!!  Why did they just not do the chemo and/or radiation instead of putting me through so much pain with the surgery and reconstruction!  I am still feeling stabbing pain like mad!!! Now they STILL want that chemo!!! I do not get it... 

  • CA1943
    CA1943 Member Posts: 13
    edited October 2017

    Although I am MUCH older than you, I too want to refuse chemo.  I was originally diagnosed with stage I invasive breast cancers with 2 masses and 2 different type of cancer cells (estrogen and progesterone)  in one breast and none in the other. I underwent mastectomy end of September, and unfortunately the cancer had spread to one lymph node by 5mm. Others were not affected. PET scan revealed no progression of cancer anywhere else.  BUT because my GENE test showed me at  "high risks", they now want to do chemo.  I have seen what chemo does first hand with my son who underwent chemo and radiation at 34... He lost his short term memory and has permanent neuropathy since 2004. At 75, what are my chances considering I have heart problems, and BONES problems ie spine degeneration, severe arthritis and osteoporosis at the lumbar?. I am very petite, and I feel I won't survive the poison of chemo drugs.  IF they really have taken the cancer out with the operation WHY would the risks involved with chemo be beneficial to a patient with health and drugs intake issues?  I would rather have pills to suppress estrogen rather than trying chemo...  I am like you, skeptical, and fear the worst in the name of "preventive treatment" in case of... What was the point to have mastectomy then???!!!  Why did they just not do the chemo and/or radiation instead of putting me through so much pain with the surgery and reconstruction!  I am still feeling stabbing pain like mad!!! Now they STILL want that chemo!!! I do not get it... 

  • 53nancy
    53nancy Member Posts: 497
    edited October 2017

    ca1943, I totally understand where you and anyone else who wants to avoid chemo are coming from. The more I read, the more I want to say no. I have to meet with the powers that be, hopefully in Novenber, and listen to what they say, but I know I have the option to refuse, and they cannot refuse to treat me if the cancer comes back. All the best to you in your journey.

  • Meow13
    Meow13 Member Posts: 4,859
    edited October 2017

    CA1943, just say no, maybe hormone treatment but not chemo.

  • BrooksideVT
    BrooksideVT Member Posts: 2,211
    edited October 2017

    Nancy, in your reading about chemo, please do be sure you are reading about chemo for grade three triple negative, where chemo can significantly reduce your chance of recurrence. In the case of more slow growing cells, chemo is often counterindicated as its effect can be minimal. Much of the literature out there is slanted toward those who might not need it anyway. You do want to be sure that your research is targeted to you and your tumor.

  • 53nancy
    53nancy Member Posts: 497
    edited October 2017

    Thank you, BrooksideVT, for your comments. There is a lot to consider

  • VL22
    VL22 Member Posts: 851
    edited October 2017

    Another thing to consider about TN is that it is more likely to metasis than to recur in the breast. I would never be able to move on with my life without getting chemo and rads, knowing that that is the only treatment available - I'd be a head case. If I were older, I'm 45 with two kids at home, and/or had other serious health issues, I might have decided differently.

  • 53nancy
    53nancy Member Posts: 497
    edited October 2017

    VL22, thank you. I have considered that. My bone scan was negative for metastasis, and I get the results of my Chest, Abdomen and Pelviv Scan next week. I am in my 60s, my husband is ten years older and we have no children. It will make whatever decision I make easier to face. As well, my research tells methat chemo will not kill cancer stem cells or dormant cancer cells. That, too, is a consideration I hope you are doing well.

  • 53nancy
    53nancy Member Posts: 497
    edited October 2017

    Update! I saw the oncologist yesterday and ALL tests have come back negative for cancer, so I have chosen NOT to do chemo. I have decided to do the radiation, not because I really want to, but because it makes sense that if there is a possiblity of stray cells in the breast, to treat it without affect the whole body. Most people are not in agreement with my decision, and perhaps the radiation is also a compromise for them, but the oncologist will have a teleservice meeting with me in January and I return to see her in April. She asked me if I would leave the door open for chemo, and I said yes. I got a call today that I go to see the radiation team tomorrow, so things are moving along. I hope things are going better for all of you.

  • Meow13
    Meow13 Member Posts: 4,859
    edited October 2017

    Hi Nancy, I didn't do chemo either, even though it was recommended. I didn't have radiation doctors saw no reason for it. I had er postive pr negative her2 negative but equivocal, so I took AI drugs for 4 years. I am NED for 6 years. I knew I was making the right decision. Best of luck to you.

  • 53nancy
    53nancy Member Posts: 497
    edited October 2017

    Thanks, Meow13. I I am glad that you have done well without the chemo. I wonder if you can explain to me what A1 drugs are.

  • VL22
    VL22 Member Posts: 851
    edited October 2017

    53nancy - So happy all your tests came back negative! Great news! Get through radiation and put this all behind you.

  • 53nancy
    53nancy Member Posts: 497
    edited October 2017

    Thanks VL22. I just listened to tHe recoding of the meeting with the oncologist. I don't think the 7 percent better chance of survival is worth taking the chemo. The two chemo drugs would be taken together and I am told by my nurse navigator that they are extremely harsh on the body and would definitely have major side effects

  • marijen
    marijen Member Posts: 3,731
    edited October 2017

    53nancy, you are TNBC, so AI drugs don't apply to you. But what they are is Aromatase Inhibitors (anti-hormone) for hormone positive cancer. ER+ and HR+ and Her2-. There's four Tamoxifen, Femara, Arimidex, and Aromasin. You've probably heard us talking about those four drugs.


  • 53nancy
    53nancy Member Posts: 497
    edited October 2017

    Thank you, Marijen. The drugs they recommended for me are Docetaxel (Taxotere) and Cyclophosphamide. Serious risks during treatment include infection, increased risk of bleeding, tissue or vein injury. Also the possibility of Leukemia and Neuropathy.

    COMMON side effects: nausea and vomiting, allergica reactions, hair loss, mouth sores, fatigue, nail changes, diarrhea, elevated blood sugars (as a diabetic, I can't afford that), difficulty sleeping, swelling in hands, feet, lower legs, mood changes, pain, low white blood count. I am sure you all know all about that. What a nightmare! I admire the women who take the risk, but I am sure many are much younger than I am. My husband is older than I am and not well, and we have no children, so perhaps that makes it easier for me to refuse chemo. But I stand by my choice, and the door to reconsider has been left open in case of recurrence.

    I had blood work done yesterday and they are looking for tumor markers; if the results are high, they may delay the radiation therapy so that the surgeon can see me again. It is all a game of chance. My appointment with the radiation oncologist is tomorrow. Very fast response, but they told me because I am already three and a half months past surgery, they need to put a rush on it.

  • Meow13
    Meow13 Member Posts: 4,859
    edited November 2017

    Wishing you the very best Nancy. Chemo is nothing to take lightly but neither is cancer. I totally understand your decision for choosing no chemo. I would continue with high surveillance looking at tumor markers.

  • 53nancy
    53nancy Member Posts: 497
    edited November 2017

    Meiw13, I know I will have the tumor markers checked in January and again in April. A lot can happen between now and then. What stage was your cancer Thanks for your good wishes.

  • Meow13
    Meow13 Member Posts: 4,859
    edited November 2017

    I was stage one with 2 tumors one ILC and one IDC each 1 cm. I was er+ 95% but less thann 1% pr, her2+ was equivocal but considered negative. I had an oncodx of 34, high risk recurrence. No nodes

    I wasn't willing to take the health risk of chemo. AI, armotose inhibitor drugs were down played. I have some permanent side effects but nothing earth shattering.

  • YoungTurkNYC
    YoungTurkNYC Member Posts: 334
    edited November 2017

    Congratulations on your scans/tests being clear.

    I just wanted to correct one misunderstanding above. Just because scans/tests are clear does not mean that individual cancer cells (which are invisible on scans/tests) have not escaped the tumor prior to its removal. Chemo kills those individual cells or collection of cells (which are not visible on scans/tests) that may already be circulating inside the body, in the lymphatic system or in the bloodstream. These cells may cause distant recurrence (metastasis) in the future in a different part of the body or organ. Getting radiation in your breast will not kill these circulating cancer cells.

    These circulating cancer cells also get killed by anti-hormonal treatment which is NOT an option for TBNC, and this is why chemo is recommended for TNBC even for small tumors which are not pathologically found in the lymph nodes.

    Of course, I hope no cells have escaped your tumor, and that you will be fine and completely recurrence free in the future, whether or not you decide to do chemo. However, I wanted to mention the above because it is important to be fully informed in the making of our chemo/no chemo decisions. I have found that sometimes our doctors are not the best in articulating the nuances regarding why these treatments are needed.

    I wish you all the best.

  • 53nancy
    53nancy Member Posts: 497
    edited November 2017

    YoungTurkNYC, thank you for your input. I have considered all that, But at this time I am comfortable with my decision and will deal with the consequenes if and when they arise

  • CA1943
    CA1943 Member Posts: 13
    edited January 2018

    I have now finished my proton radiation treatments (33 of them!). Went through hell with the burning and itching, but at least no side effects worth mentioning, and certainly NOT as chemo could have given to me..  After my mastectomy and lymph nodes removal, they too said I should do chemo, radiation and aromatase drugs as a preventive measure. Preventive is NOT justifying all of these detrimental treatments to my health at my AGE to begin with.  One has to take into account, what chemo can actually DO to an older body in the name of "prevention".  "Preventing" is "guessing" that one will get her cancer back; well I am BETTING I won't!  With God's help and my strong faith, I feel I have done enough to control the "beast" from coming back or doing more damage to my body... Believing is Winning, and "Guessing the what IF" is "Defeating"... SO, let's time play its role with God supervising it all for me!  God bless us all!  We are conquerors and can beat that darn cancer!

     

  • 53nancy
    53nancy Member Posts: 497
    edited January 2018

    CA1943, you expressed this better than I could. I am older, have diabetes, osteoarthritis and a tendency to anemia so felt my immune system was already compromised. I may not have mentioned that before. I felt chemo would make things worse. Now, six weeks after finish of radiation, I feel good except for fatigue. I have a telehealth conference with my medical onc on Monday and really don't expect any surprises. If there are, I will dwal worry about itthen.

  • CA1943
    CA1943 Member Posts: 13
    edited February 2018

    53Nancy, you are further down than I after your radiation ended, but not sure you are older than I... I turned 75 on 1/3/18.  I just had my cardiologist visit, and he placed me on a heart monitor as I experienced some issues with the heart's rymths during radiation treatments (which some issues were there before anyway). I am not too terribly anxious about the readings' result on 2/21. What I am anxious about relates more to the aromotase drug I am supposed to take shortly... Side effects are debilitating and I am not too excited about even starting on the regimen. Has your oncologist placed you on estrogen dominance's suppressant drug?  And if so, are you having some serious side effects from the medication?  I know I refused chemo so I might not be able to get away from not taking that Femara drug... Stay strong, keep the faith! 

  • 53nancy
    53nancy Member Posts: 497
    edited February 2018

    CA1943, silly me. I did not catch your year of birth. I just turned 64 in December. My only treatment radiation therapy; because I am triple negative, hormone therapy would not help. We did see the radiation oncologist last week and he told us he was signing me to the medical oncologist and would not need to see me again. When I asked him if I was still considered to have cancer, he said, no you are cancer free. I will be seeing the medical oncologist at the end of April, and will know thenwhat course she intends to follow for me.

Categories