Surgery in stage 4?

Options
2»

Comments

  • Micmel
    Micmel Member Posts: 9,450
    edited April 2017

    Mae~ I hope whatever you decide to do, that it works wonders for you. Congrats again on your 5k. That is something alright! You're a strong beautiful woman! Keeping all close in prayer! I know I was so confused with them all talking about me like I wasn't there. I put an end to that though. I wouldn't have changed getting the surgeries, the AC chemo could stop a Train.to me the abraxane is also vicious. None of this is easy to deal with. The way they offer surgery also depends on your age in some venues. The aggressive chemo is hard to tolerate and some people have trouble recovering fully if they ever do. I think your amazing to even sign up for that 5k, and see it to the end. You're a strong person. I hope you continue to gan your strength,. I pray we all do.

    ~M~

  • illimae
    illimae Member Posts: 5,710
    edited May 2017

    I'm scheduled for a lumpectomy, left axillary node removal, reduction and lift next month. I am very concerned about lympadema impacting my quality of life and mobility living at 7,000 elevation. I will ask this of my surgeon but from what I've read, the primary purpose of node removal is to check for cancel cells and prevent metastasis through the lymph system but I was diagnosed at stage 4 from the beginning 6 months ago with a biopsy positive tumor in an axillary node and bone met in my hip, so what would be the point of removing all the left axillary nodes?I appreciate any thoughts or knowledge you all might have on the matter. Thanks!

  • DivineMrsM
    DivineMrsM Member Posts: 9,620
    edited May 2017

    Illimae, my thoughts are to tell you that my surgen wanted to do the lymph node removal and I said "No." And I was not a strong advocate for myself then so I really had to learn to stick up for myself.

    I, too, was diagnosed stage iv from the start. MRI showed no lymph node involvement. I, too, worried about lymphoma. I, too, questioned the point of checkng the lymph nodes since the metasteses were already discovered.

    You must do what you think right, make your own choice. I am glad I stuck to my guns. I am six + years stable on Arimidex now and cannot say if not having the node taken out is one of the reasons I am having an exceptional response to treatment. But I also felt like I did 't want my lymph system unnecessarily invaded. This is my personal experience only and I don't have any stats on any studies on the matter.

    Best wishes to you on the choices you make.

  • Micmel
    Micmel Member Posts: 9,450
    edited May 2017

    Mae~I had my liver resected and they also removed my nodes and my breast. It was a lot of cancer gone. Then I was re classed to stage III A, because it was then isolated in the bones only. In my opinion the nodes are where the cancer cells travel from,so I wanted to get out as much of cancer as I could. I did develop lymphedema. It was very painful, but when I started to move around and excersise, it felt so much better and is now very manageable. I had a scan last week and it still just remains stable in my bones. No soft tissue ares or organs. I'll take it! My one doctor said to me flat out, you can live a lot longer with it staying in the bone, then when it invades soft tissue organs. I wanted that thing off of my liver. And I am so glad I went through with the surgery, because in my opinion, there is less cancer in my body to spread, especially nodes. I did it because I thought it might just reset my clock back for as much time as I am able to get. I have us BC sisters in Constant prayer, this is such a terrible disease! I hate you cancer!! Hugs Mae!! ~M~

    Divine~ god bless your six years honey. That's wonderful. You give me hope. Hugs to you as well! Nice to see you! ~M~

  • Heidihill
    Heidihill Member Posts: 5,476
    edited May 2017

    Illimae, here is something to discuss with your doctors,

    https://www.cancer.gov/types/breast/research/micromets-sentinel-nodes

    Women with Breast Cancer Micrometastases in Their Sentinel Lymph Nodes May Not Need Axillary Dissection

    "Some patients, especially those for whom radiation therapy plus chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy is planned, may be able to avoid an axillary lymph node dissection.” 

    When I read the article I was sort of miffed that I had to have so many nodes removed. But the study is for early stage, which may or may not apply to us. And of course, I have no idea if the fact I am still NED after all these years had to do with the ALND.

    Lymphedema can also be caused by chemotherapy or radiation. I had a mastectomy and 19 nodes removed as well as chemo and rads so should be at high risk for lymphedema. (30% I was told 9 years ago.) I have a very slight form of it, which is more like fluid accumulation in response to some stressors (14-hour flights, carrying a heavy back pack on hour-long hikes, for example), which I can fix through self-massage and exercise. But for some people with a lumpectomy and one node removed, they still get lymphedema. They are still trying to find out why this is. Another mystery of cancer.

    Also cancer can spread directly through the bloodstream and does not need to go through the lymphatic system. They even say mets can spread before tumors are formed, which may explain mets with unknown primaries. Another mystery for the books.


  • illimae
    illimae Member Posts: 5,710
    edited May 2017

    Thanks Divine, Micmel and Heidi. I've emailed my concerns to my BS. I have a feeling I would get it and have pain issues especially since I've been told that being overweight increases the risk significantly. Even with the crappy chemo taste buds, I doubt I'll be dropping 100 lbs by the end of next month, lol.

  • Alcarroll
    Alcarroll Member Posts: 16
    edited May 2017

    Hello all,

    So glad to have found this thread. I've got a decision coming up and I'm struggling.

    I was diagnosed last May stage 4 extensive mets to bones. Before staging, I met with the surgeon who recommended chemo to shrink tumor then removal (she did not specify at the time lumpectomy or mastectomy). After staging and it was determined I was already at stage 4 so they were not going to do surgery. I was started on Femara and have been on it since. I asked my oncologist if the surgeon had "given up on me?" She said "no, there just isn't any proof that removal of primary tumor helps overall prognosis". Ok, got it.

    Now, a year later, my onc. Said I should meet again with surgeon. I've responded well to AI, tumors shrunk, mets under control. Ok, got it. I met surgeon and she offered lumpectomy with sentinel node OR mastectomy. I opted for lumpectomy. Pathology showed they did not get clear margins and 5 of 5 nodes were bad. Hmmm, not what I was expecting. Surgeon and onc presented my case to the tumor board and they agreed mastectomy is the course of action. Sigh.

    I have worried about what previous posts describe as removing primary causing other areas to flare. I also don't feel good about a single mastectomy. I think I would lean toward double. I'm feeling frustrated with the back and forth and change of course, but I know in my head they just don't know and everyone is different...

    So, what should I do ladies

  • zarovka
    zarovka Member Posts: 3,607
    edited May 2017

    Alcaroll -

    I've read a lot on about this and you can find support for and against surgery ... it is not clear whether or not surgery helps or hurts. It certainly seems to help many women. For the women who want it done, it DEFINITELY helps them mentally and I am firm believer in following your gut ... if having a certain procedure will give you a sense of confidence and piece of mind it is likely that is the procedure you need.

    Here's my story. Pretty much all my mets have been resolved by systemic therapy but I haven't had surgery done. My initial breast tumor was not localized. There was a main tumor and several satellites and as far as they could tell, all lymph nodes were impacted. In addition, the PET scan showed the cancer going into my pectoral muscle. That may be an artifact of the scan but who knows. You can't resect the cancer from my breast with any confidence you got it all.

    Even if i had a clearly resectable tumor in my breast and no lymph node involvement, my cancer is clearly broadly systemic. It was present in my sternum and liver upon diagnosis. I am going to have to bet on systemic therapy and I do believe it is a good bet.

    You will certainly here from women who did surgery and are glad they did it. Do what makes you feel comfortable and confident.

    >Z<

  • Micmel
    Micmel Member Posts: 9,450
    edited May 2017

    Alcarroll~ I like you have a similar story. I did have surgery, in my mind I wasn't leaving any cancer in there that didn't have to be in there at all. I am still glad I did it. Because I feel Like it gave me more time. If there is more cancer in my body, doesn't that mean that there is a chance, that more could have the opportunity to keep spreading ? I have done well even though I also have bone mets and they were there all along. Just not able to be detected. I am doing much better than I was with cancer in my liver, that is now gone and I had 35 nodes removed and one breast. I hate it. But I absolutely hate cancer more. My tumor was 4 cm and was dissolving when I was done my chemo, but I had 13 of 35 nodes with cancer and they took them all. Two scans later thank goodness, the bone is where is remains. I'll take it. Follow your heart and what your gut tells you. get many opinions even, but never shut it down because it truly, I feel in my case has given me more time. I'll be sending prayers and strength as you make your decision, everyone is different, some stage four never have never had surgery or the heavy chemo. I had both, my docs wanted to be aggressive because I was diagnosed at 45, and in great health, they didn't want to give up on me as you said!! So don't give up on you. I'm glad still I did it Even though I miss my breast. But I don't miss the cancer at all! ~M~

  • illimae
    illimae Member Posts: 5,710
    edited June 2017

    Well, after much debate and bone scans read as healing or progression, then healing (happy but I find it annoying that it looks the same with contrast), I am going for it. The surgeon believe's the ALND is necessary with the biopsy proven positive node, so this Tuesday 6/27 is the big day. Hopefully with care and luck, I won't have many of the issues that concern me or at least not to an intolerable degree.

  • Micmel
    Micmel Member Posts: 9,450
    edited June 2017

    Mae~ will be keeping you in prayer Ugh! I hate you cancer. Big hugs for you ~M~

  • DivineMrsM
    DivineMrsM Member Posts: 9,620
    edited June 2017

    Illimae, I wish you the best as you head to surgery on Tuesday.


  • livebig
    livebig Member Posts: 86
    edited June 2017

    yes - best of luck!

    I was in similar spot and decided to go for the BMX they were talking me through once I finished 6 rounds of TCHP and was at a place of stability. My surgery was 3 weeks ago, and I've got another week before I start back with more chemo, but I am overall so glad that I took the opportunity - haha, I also realize how easy it is to say that on this side of things. I had ANLD on both sides - so far going slow with recovery but thankful to be feeling good.

    Good luck with surgery!

  • illimae
    illimae Member Posts: 5,710
    edited July 2017

    The drains are a major annoyance and I haven't had such small breasts since middle school but recovery is going well.

    image

  • zarovka
    zarovka Member Posts: 3,607
    edited July 2017

    wooo hooo. Here's to small cancer free breasts.

    >Z<

  • BellaTassie15
    BellaTassie15 Member Posts: 106
    edited August 2017

    My mammogram and breast ultrasound taken 3 weeks ago showed that my original primary is back but about double in size, and there is now a second smaller one below my nipple. Last August the ultrasound showed no tumour left after 13 months of treatment, only fibrosis. My mets were resolved last August also and that is still the case (as of 2 months ago). My Onc wants to keep me on my current treatment - herceptin and perjeta - but have surgery to my breast. I said surely the current treatment is no longer working, so shouldn't we be moving on? She said we want to milk it for as long as possible and it is keeping the mets in check, only the breast is a problem. I am very reluctant to have surgery so asked what the alternative would be? She said adding tamoxifen. (I am triple positive but have only been on chemo and anti-HER2 therapy up to now due to developing inflammatory arthritis triggered by the targeted therapy. This is now under control.)

    Has anyone been given similar advice?

  • illimae
    illimae Member Posts: 5,710
    edited August 2017

    Simila advice but different situation, maybe. Surgery was recommended for me but as part of my initial treatment. Was it offered to you earlier? Is there a surgical option that you would be less reluctant about?

  • Heidihill
    Heidihill Member Posts: 5,476
    edited August 2017

    I think it´s great that mets were resolved. Herceptin and Perjeta seem to have done that job. So I could see why the doctor would want to stay on them. As for the breast, now is a good time for a second opinion, if that´s possible. I was also recommended surgery after chemo. I still needed to take an anti-estrogen even with surgery.

  • BellaTassie15
    BellaTassie15 Member Posts: 106
    edited August 2017

    I had inflammatory breast cancer so my initial plan was chemo, mastectomy then radiotherapy. However while on chemo mets appeared and they then told me the initial lung nodule was also a met, so I was actually stage Four de novo. Surgery was dropped, which I was pleased with, thinking I didn't have long and a mastectomy wouldn't save my life so why go through the physical and mental trauma? But I'm still here two years later, like many of you.

    I would accept a lumpectomy but doubt it would be appropriate considering my nipple and areola involvement, but I will have to wait for the surgical consult.




  • Iwillwinthisbattle
    Iwillwinthisbattle Member Posts: 1,076
    edited August 2017

    I was stage 4 from the get go, and did not have surgery. 6 rounds of chemo got me to NED for 6 yeas

  • grrifff
    grrifff Member Posts: 104
    edited August 2017

    iwillwinthisbattle- I'm new here, diagnosed as stage IV de novo. Because of that I'm on letrozole not chemo but I see you too werestage IV de novo yet you had chemo. Anyone know why some are on chemo and others hormonal therapy? Thanks-Jill

  • BellaTassie15
    BellaTassie15 Member Posts: 106
    edited September 2017

    Although reluctant to have a mastectomy for my local recurrence, I told the breast care nurse I would consider it if I could have an immediate reconstruction with an implant above the muscle. She said that should probably be fine, there was one particular plastic surgeon who specialised in this at the hospital. I was relieved and feeling better about this. But the next day I saw the surgeon and when I told her this she replied you can't have reconstruction, you have inflammatory breast cancer and you have to have radiotherapy. I was stunned and could not understand why neither my oncologist nor breast nurse had realised that! I insisted on a referral to a plastic surgeon as I thought I may be able to have flap reconstruction, although I do not want to sacrifice muscle to do this. I also asked for biopsies of the two tumours to see if the hormone and HER2 status had changed.

    I've had the biopsies and should find out the results next week. I contacted the breast care nurse to ask for a referral to a Radiotherapist so as to not waste anymore time. She told me I had to wait for the biopsy results because if I was no longer triple positive I may need chemo before surgery. I just can't believe how things keep changing! First just surgery, then surgery plus radiotherapy, now maybe chemo as well! As a stage 4 I've been agonising over the surgery, worried that if I agree it could be too late and already in my muscle, making the physical and emotional pain all for nothing. And now this extra treatment withthe accompanying side effects. But then I think if it hasn't spread further and I have the suggested treatment, I would be NED. I have been see-sawing about surgery for the last four weeks and just don't know what to do!

  • MommyErin
    MommyErin Member Posts: 187
    edited September 2017

    I was diagnosed de novo in March with one small liver met and extensive lymph node involvement (including supraclavicular and mediastinum). I had 6 rounds of TCHP. Liver met was indetectible after 2 rounds, and PET showed NEAD after 4 rounds. I opted for a BMX in August for my own peace of mind (I'm 31 and BRCA1 positive). My MO encouraged me to wait 6 months or so before surgery so we could see how I did on herceptin and perjeta alone, but I really wanted to go the "curative" route asap (surgery and radiation), and since there was no longer evidence of cancer in my liver, my surgeon was on board with surgery. Knowing my mind was made up, my MO has been supportive of my decision. I have no idea what will happen going forward, but I'm happy I'm doing everything i can while I'm young and healthy. Knowing the ticking time bombs on my chest are gone has been a huge relief. I'm currently receiving radiation treatmen, including to the mediastinum and supraclav, and hoping the H&P keep the liver met at bay.

  • illimae
    illimae Member Posts: 5,710
    edited September 2017

    grrifff, I assumed that chemo was recommended to all newly dxd stage IV patients, very interesting that this is not necessarily the case. Now I'm curious.

    Bella, things do change very fast, I agree. My plan was chemo, surgery, rads, then my post chemo CT scan showed a flare up on my hip bone met. The radiologist said progression, MO said healing, then the MO, BS and RO all met and said surgery was 50/50 for recommended or not. I hated to risk lympadema but did it anyway, then the MRI was interpreted as healing too. Ugh, we do the best we can with what we've got.

    Mommyerin, I was told that at 41 with a single met, I would be treated with curative intent, im glad other MO's are doing the same and not just writing us off from the get go.

  • BellaTassie15
    BellaTassie15 Member Posts: 106
    edited September 2017

    Thanks MommyErin and illimae! I was 50 when diagnosed with adult kids so in a different situation. I know there are no guarantees with treatment, and you are right, we do have to do our best with the information we have at the time. It is reassuring MommyErin that your Onc also hopes to keep your mets at bay with H&P! I guess I just worry that I'm past 2 years Stage 4 and time is ticking, I don't want to waste it with recovery from surgery, radiotherapy and perhaps more chemo. But I guess I could view it as an investment in more years. I am terrified of lymphodema and know if I proceed I won't have surgery or rads to my axilla nodes, even though I know one at least is enlarged againand was positive on initial diagnosis. But I didn't mention that to the surgeon so unsure of her opinion. Anyway I will wait for my biopsy results and try to keep busy in the interim. Thanks again.

  • Chrstene502
    Chrstene502 Member Posts: 9
    edited June 2018

    Dilemma of a major decision.

    Having MBC is and will be the hardest thing a woman has to face.

    I am one of them.

    My breast surgeon sent me to an oncologist. He ordered me to have a port put in and more tests - MRI, PET- CT scan, bone scan.

    Had the port surgically installed. ..Next day I was suppose to start Chemo. That is when the Oncologist read the scan reports. He told me Chemo is out of the question, being the cancer had spread to surrounding breast area, lymph nodes, and bone.

    Big oops! Major mistake I say. He should have ordered the scans first, then decide on treatment. So the port is no use, being it can't even draw blood.

    I have been on Ibrance and Leterzole for 5 months now. Went to Sloan for a second opinion. Big mistake. Felt like cattle. Communication was horrible. No follow-up appt made. Received a call about a bone biopsy, Which I no knowledge of, etc. Never went back!!!

    Had another PET-CT Scan and great news the breast tumor has shrank drastically.

    Now my breast surgeon wants to immediately do a mastectomy. He doesn't want me to wait. Is this another rush job???

    Not sure if I should have it done?

    I had lymphoma in my left leg after my total hip replacement. ( That is where the cancer is showing up). After months and months of treatment, and wearing a customized shocking. I had my left knee replaced. Surprisingly after that, my lymphodema subsided. No more treatments, no more thick heavy stocking.

    So the dilemma is a major one for me, mastectomy or not.

    God bless everyone. Keeping all in my prayers.


  • Chrstene502
    Chrstene502 Member Posts: 9
    edited September 2018

    I have Stage IV and Metastatic Breast Cancer - spot on lung and in my bones. I am 64 years young.

    My mother had breast cancer, then ovarian, liver cancer took her life at 78 years.

    I have been on Ibrance and letrozole for a year.... Shrunk my breast tumors. Doctors are very impressed.

    Now my Onco and BS want me to have a double mastectomy.

    I fear having more surgeries, had several, THR, TKR, Bone Fractures, Bone Infection. Etc.

    I also have lymphedema in my left leg.

    My BS recommended a Plastic Surgeon, but he doesn't accept my insurance for Reconstruction.

    That would entail more surgeries.

    I don't know what to do.

    Mastectomy without Reconstruction?

    No Mastectomy? Just live out my life?



  • illimae
    illimae Member Posts: 5,710
    edited September 2018

    christine502, I was fortunate to have my surgery and reconstruction together in a single operation and I had just turned 42, so breasts were still pretty important on a superficial level. I hated the drains but recovery wasn’t too difficult and I am a stickler about doing my post surgery stretches even now. I have no regrets but I don’t know if I would have gone through with it if I would have needed all the breast tissue removed, expanders and another surgery later on. Tough decision for sure.

Categories