INSOMNIACS place to talk in the wee hours

Morning, New week. On Bikers, Did you see Rolling Thunder in DC. Rex Tillerson road with them.

Wenchie, too cool you are a biker babe. I couldn't hold one up even when I was strong.

Remodel: Two walls are tiled. Lesson on the tile. Top tile in the box was exactly what I wanted. Other tile had these varying brown streaks running through it. One tile had a large brown streak. I was out, the tiler put it up. It's ugly, but not sure if we can get it down. Of course, it was one of two pieces around the window. Intricate and time consuming cut. I planned on putting a picture over the window. The picture will cover it partially. So, there is some hope it can be disguised.

The tile was a brand new product. They didn't have the wall sample up yet. They did on sunday when we went back for two pieces that we were short for. Floor & Decor puts up a 4-6 foot wall sample for each of the major tiles. Also, the reason we were short was, we didn't know a window increased wastage by 10-15%.

Wenchi, Apparently the marbles are prone to this. I just didn't know. We looked at all the procelains simulated marble and real marbles that were up. Sunday the fella let us go through the boxes to pick the tiles we wanted. I thought that was very nice. Just really hoping we can get those two tiles down. UGH. I'll have to try and take a picture.

Good Luck with the BS. BTW why are you getting a new BS?

Mags, hmm improvement, oh so slow, but at least seems in the right direction yay. My twin won't let go of her port either. I think she's had it since 2006(7), she also said she'd keep it forever. That was her second port. Road trip, have fun. Your friends in Missouri are such lovely folks.

Junie, You could never go on about Kirby too much. Always love hearing about him. Sorry your neighborhood party went awry. Bummer.

Remodel: I'm intentionally losing weight. I went to weigh myself this morning. Donnie had nailed a piece of drywall to the closet door b/c this is going to be a high dust day. Scale is in the closet.

Loverly, Hugs, sometimes words aren't understood, but saying them is necessary. I'm counting the days till your trip, like I'm the one going. Are the girls excited? Will you be able to send pictures?

Hi Mommy, The climate change agenda follows closely with the globalist agenda of dividing the world in to "Unions". While discussion of it's actual beginning for breaking the world up into the 10 unions is unknown, it's commonly reported as occurring after WW2.

The European Union exists. It was one union of 10 planned.

The North American Union was planned to include all of Central America, Mexico, Cuba, USA, Canada.

A characteristic of the planned unions is open borders, and open economic borders. This occurred with the European Union until the Lisbon treaty......more later

I don't oppose reasonable EPA or environmental controls, but when a farmers furrow with water in it is claimed to be under control of the EPA Clean Water regulations. That's gone to far.

The globalist have directed this since the late 40's, progressively using climate as a tool to gain further control of countries. Scientist that disagree by there research with climate warming are discredited and unfunded to bring them into alignment with "the consensus". Attempts have been made to criminalize disagreement.

This quote is self explaining" The A.G.s may be acting on behest of the Obama Administration and liberal Democrats in the Senate. U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch testified to Congress that, in response to requests by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), the Obama administration's Justice Department has asked the Federal Bureau of Investigation to investigate whether there is sufficient evidence to prosecute Exxon and other companies, researchers, and think tanks for exercising their First Amendment rights in promoting climate skepticism. A group of nine Democratic Senators have repeatedly threatened conservative groups that question the Obama Administration's alarmist dogma on the climate change issue."(bolding emphasis mine)

https://www.heartland.org/topics/climate-change/state-attorneys-general-launch-legal-attack-climate-realists/index.html

This is serious folks when the Government threatens folks b/c they don't believe in the government dogma and the science isn't irrefutable/

The next link is to an abstract of a study related to the compilation of aricles & studies of skeptics . I have included the entire abstract to encourage discussion through ease of access of statements made in the conclusion of the study.

Text-mining the signals of climate change doubt

• Constantine Boussalis^a,
• Travis G. Coan^{b, ,}

• ^a Department of Political Science, Trinity College Dublin, 3 College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
• ^b Department of Politics and Exeter Q-Step Centre, University of Exeter, Amory Building, Rennes Drive, Exeter, Devon EX4 4RJ, United Kingdom

Received 27 September 2015, Revised 22 November 2015, Accepted 10 December 2015, Available online 30 December 2015

Highlight

Think-tank contrarian information has increased exponentially over 1998–2013

Sceptical themes are diverse and range from scientific integrity to policy.

Science-related discourse has grown relative to policy in key sceptic organizations.

Think-tank discourse is highly influenced by external factors.

We generate longitudinal data on think-tank contrarian themes over a 16 year period.

Abstract

Climate scientists overwhelmingly agree that the Earth is getting warmer and that the rise in average global temperature is predominantly due to human activity. Yet a significant proportion of the American public, as well as a considerable number of legislators in the U.S. Congress, continue to reject the "consensus view." While the source of the disagreement is varied, one prominent explanation centres on the activities of a coordinated and well-funded countermovement of climate sceptics. This study contributes to the literature on organized climate scepticism by providing the first systematic overview of conservative think tank sceptical discourse in nearly 15 years. Specifically, we (1) compile the largest corpus of contrarian literature to date, collecting over 16,000 documents from 19 organizations over the period 1998–2013; (2) introduce a methodology to measure key themes in the corpus which scales to the substantial increase in content generated by conservative think tanks over the past decade; and (3) leverage this new methodology to shed light on the relative prevalence of science- and policy-related discussion among conservative think tanks. We find little support for the claim that "the era of science denial is over"—instead, discussion of climate science has generally increased over the sample period.(bolding emphasis mine)

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378015300728

The following link is to wiki of " List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming

There are 73 authors represented in the above list. How many others were prevented either due to funding or threats by the Obama Whitehouse is unknown. But the fact that the research shows a compilation of 16,000 articles from 19 organizations over 16 years where the conclusion of the study on "Text-mining"is that "consenus" on climate change is not present.

Yoohoooo.. we are out.

Stock market high. Yay. Same as the day he was elected. The pick pockets that were on the receiving end of the money that would be taken from your pocket, are decrying his move. Wellllll, they will be crying the sky is falling forever. They are off the dole too.

If you want a real discussion go to Fox News. Any another mainstream will convince you that the world has collapsed. Laughing about the words from Merkel and Macron. Two big members of NATO. Germany isn't paying their committed amount. Germany isn't pulling it's way in NATO. Why expect they will pull their way in the Paris Accord. The loudest voice out of the EU is Merkel. Macron is following Merkel , not b/c he has an interest in France. They both are committed to the NWO. Globalism.

How many reading this ever heard of Globalism, New World Order, !0 world divided Unions, European Union, North American Union? I heard a speech around 1992. it was the elder Bush talking about a New World Order and Globalism. I remember it well. Not the date. It was 1990. A cousin shared a link today. I'll link it if I can. But never thought of it again till I heard the same language out of Bill Clinton in a speech. May have been with Nafta. I thought odd, Bill Clinton used the same words that Bush senior used. Noted and moved on with life.

Seems trivial, but I wondered at the buddi-budiness of Senior Bush and Bill Clinton post presidencies. Put in the perspective that they are both Globalists....makes sense. They were in on taking us to a different place.

Fast forward, DJT announces. I'm into the Trump pocket right away. He's made and lost money. He's a businessman. The USA is broke. Why broke. Debt. I don't believe in debt that can be avoided. Income can't exceed outgo, particularly, if the holder of the debt can call the note on debt due any time.

Trump was a wildcard that changed the Globalist march towards the New World Order. Am I parroting someone no. No one in MSM has made that connection in those words. He has upset the coffee table. Had he not entered the race and become president, how the next president would have accepted or driven us into the NWO is unknown and can't be surmised. But the last four president's have driven us in that direction. No clue if Reagan or any president preceding him knew back to the post WW2 regarding the NWO were involved. But denial that the NWO was the plan when it is documented in history would be counterintuitive.

But we know now, if we are drawn into the NWO, it isn't b/c we didn't know. Prior to DJT, we were going there without knowing.