TRIPLE POSITIVE GROUP

1101010111013101510161334

Comments

  • PoseyGirl
    PoseyGirl Member Posts: 359
    edited March 2017

    P.S.

    Does anyone else feel funny addressing people by their online names when we are talking about breast cancer? LOL. I'm Carolyn and it's nice to meet you...:)

  • SpecialK
    SpecialK Member Posts: 16,486
    edited March 2017

    suburbs - additional biopsy and post surgery pathology and testing depends on several things. First, will it change any planned treatment? For Her2+ patients, particularly who have had neoadjuvent treatment, re-testing for receptors or Her2 status would be pretty moot. Same with testing a second biopsy sample - if it wouldn't change treatment choices there is little point, particularly if your first biopsy sample is pointing to maximized systemic treatment - for triple positives that means chemo, targeted therapy and anti-hormonals. Looking at a second biopsy probably wouldn't change any of those things. Same deal with having an MRI - if your breast tissue will be removed I am not sure if it is worth the expense of looking at it with an imaging modality that is less effective than the pathology that will be done on the tissue after it is removed. MRI is usually done if one is trying to determine extent of disease, or deciding between LX, MX or BMX, or making treatment choices. Also, imaging can be faulty when looking at tumors post chemo. Often they can appear to indicate a lack of pCR, when in fact it has happened. I would be willing to wait a week for the pathology than be upset or worried prior to surgery that I still have a tumor in place after having undergone chemo. Tumors may leave ghost remnants that do not contain cancer but do appear on MRI. If you had nodal involvement - or suspected nodal involvement prior to neo-chemo, some body-wide imaging might be appropriate, if it was not done prior to chemo. It is not a good idea to do that imaging too soon after surgery because it can yield false positives based on post-surgical inflammation.

    I absolutely did have pathology done on the "prophy" breast and it showed ADH and ALH - have your surgeons indicated no pathology will be done? I find that unusual as everything I have had removed from my body - including my port, tissue expanders and exchanged implants have all been sent to pathology afterward.

    Also, with BMX - particularly with aggressive types of cancer, my BS does SNB on the prophy side at the time of surgery. He is one of the pioneers of SNB, and not an old-fashioned or reactionary surgeon, but he feels that when you remove the breast tissue you need to do a SNB even on a prophy breast. This does cause some inconvenience because now one has two potentially limited use arms for BP or needle sticks, but it does give a more complete picture. Other surgeons don't do this, but finding a sentinel becomes a lot more complicated after breast tissue has been removed because the dye/tracer has no lymphatic path to travel to identify the sentinel. Since I had adjuvant chemo I don't know if this would be his process with a neoadjuvent patient, since the assumption might be that chemo had eradicated anything in the sentinel.

  • Suburbs
    Suburbs Member Posts: 429
    edited March 2017

    SpecialK. THANK YOU! Your note is extremely helpful to me and for others currently undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for HER2 positive DX. I understand much better the whys of the decisions for testing prior to surgery, pathology,and what to insist upon. Significant reduction in anxiety level! Your clipboard is super charged with stress reducing pixie dust. Most sincerely appreciated.

  • BBwithBC45
    BBwithBC45 Member Posts: 727
    edited March 2017

    Suburbs, my husband is a foot surgeon and he tells me that absolutely anything cut out of a person's body gets sent for pathology, cancer or no cancer patients. He even had to send screws he took out of patient's foot. Pathology would come back as "stainless screw", which sounds funny, but it had to be sent. So, I'm pretty sure the "healthy" breast is looked at by a pathologist too.




  • Chelseah555
    Chelseah555 Member Posts: 3
    edited March 2017

    Hello all. This is my first post ever on any site. Although I have read numerous posts like this before I never imagined joining in. However I find myself more desperate than ever for answers but unable to get them from medical professionals. I myself am a nurse and am used to being able to have answers. I was diagnosed with triple positivebreast cancer at 29. I had just celebrated my 1 year wedding anniversary and was looking forward to starting a family. Fast forward almost 3 years later after 6 TCHP treatments, surgery, radiation, and almost 2 years of tamoxifen I find myself frustrated, scared, and anxious to conceive. I stopped my tamoxifen 5 months ago and have been trying to conceive the last 2 months with no success. I know it takes time to get pregnant but time is not in my favor. I have only been given a short window to conceivebefore needing to start more aggressive options to get pregnant. Here's the kicker chemo killed a lot of my eggs and no one knows exactly what to expect because of the lack of research. So I find myself here looking for answers from people who may have been through my current situation. I am looking for hope because I am struggling to find it on my own. Desperately wanting to be a mommy..........

  • Robin1234
    Robin1234 Member Posts: 45
    edited March 2017

    Hi Ladies wondering if any you ladies can help me with this my fish test HER2:Cep 17 ratio = 2.65 Average HER2 copy number = 12.62 Oncotype Dx: Not ordered (does not meet reflex criteria based on size) what does that all mean. I've looked it up many of times and tried doing it again and just don't understand it. Does anyoneone know and can help me? This is what my hormones are Estrogen Receptor (ER): POSITIVE (30%, weak) Progesterone Receptor (PR): POSITIVE (15%, weak) Ki67 Proliferative Fraction: 50%

    Thank you

  • SpecialK
    SpecialK Member Posts: 16,486
    edited March 2017

    Robin - Her2 FISH testing has four possible results, 1) amplified, 2) not amplified, 3) equivocal, or 4) indeterminate. To reach an amplified result your ratio must be greater than 2. Since your ratio is 2.65 your result would be considered amplified, thus positive. The OncotypeDx would not be ordered with an amplified FISH result because Oncotype is not set up to test known Her2+ patients, it is a test designed for ER+, Her2- patients. Reflex testing is testing that is ordered due to the result of a previous test. In your case this comment is meant that Oncotype would not be ordered as a "reflex" test due to the positive result of your FISH and the size of your tumor. Your tumor is of standardized treatable size for a Her2+ tumor, meaning that all 1cm tumors that are Her2+ are suggested to have chemo and targeted therapy (Herceptin). Oncotype Dx would not be done since its purpose is to determine whether chemo is necessary or recommended so the test is unnecessary because the standard of care is to treat.

  • Robin1234
    Robin1234 Member Posts: 45
    edited March 2017

    Hi SpecialK thank you helping me. i was jyst woundering bevause mine was idc 0.25cm

  • SpecialK
    SpecialK Member Posts: 16,486
    edited March 2017

    robin - sorry - going off your sig line for the tumor size. OncotypeDx would still not be ordered since the test is not designed for Her2+ tumors, of any size. What is the treatment recommendation for you from your MO?

  • Robin1234
    Robin1234 Member Posts: 45
    edited March 2017

    My MO give me 3 options 1 treatment the hormones (tamoxifen) and said we can remove ovaries down the road if interested. 2 herceptin and tamoxifen 3 taxol, herceptin and tamoxifen. I had a bilateral mastectomy with reconstruction already.

  • deni1661
    deni1661 Member Posts: 463
    edited March 2017

    SpecialK, thank you so much for all the helpful info! I didn't completely understand all the testing numbers etc so your explanation helps. I'm in neoadjuvant therapy with Suburbs; so much information and surgery decisions to make! My BS follows the same protocol as yours i.e. pathology would be done on both breasts in addition to SNB. My MO also said pathology is the only way to accurately confirm cancer cells as imaging cannot pick up every cell. I have an MRI on both breasts every 3 months and tumors/enhancements are not visible. I never had any abnormalities in the right but they still do MRI to monitor and confirm no changes. My MO has been very clear that while the MRIs indicate the HP treatments have shrunk the tumors in the left, surgery is still the only way to confirm pCR. My husband is still asking why I need surgery if MRI isn't showing tumors, so my MO explained the concept several times.

    Suburbs, I'm surprised at some of the responses you're getting to your questions. I'm finding each medical team/cancer center has their own philosophy on treatment. The first hospital I went to was very standard of care and when pressed for other treatment options and/or stats, their reply was "there are no other options". I went for a second opinion and found a cancer center that offers individualized treatment with the utmost concern for maintaining quality of life. Keep pressing for answers until you feel confident in what is being offered.

    I had a Mammaprint done before I started treatment, which is a test to determine risk of recurrence and whether early stage BC patients would benefit from chemo. My results were low risk, 93% cure with HP and hormone therapy and no chemo. My test was paid for by cancer center. I was not offered this test at the first hospital I went to so I'm not sure if it is standard or if you have to request it onyour own.


  • deni1661
    deni1661 Member Posts: 463
    edited March 2017

    Chelsea555 - I am very sorry for what you are going through. I pray you find answers and support here, best of luck. Keep the fait

  • Suburbs
    Suburbs Member Posts: 429
    edited March 2017

    bbwbc55, deni1661, and poseygirl, thank you for your feedback and advice.I'll double check on the pathology of the good side and make sure that gets done. I could have misheard that point.

    Specials, I reread your note and will add asking about SnB on good side. Doesn't hurt to ask.




  • jb134
    jb134 Member Posts: 1
    edited March 2017

    I am still alive after TP diagnosis in 2003.

  • Kattis894
    Kattis894 Member Posts: 218
    edited March 2017

    HI all,

    Thought I would post my wonderful news today. There is no cancer in my body at the moment. After this past year I am in a state of disbelieve but beyond relieved for the time being. This board has been such tremendous help threw some of my worst moments.

    I have decided to color the little hair I have (all gray) with organic products tomorrow and try to start life again...:)

  • ElaineTherese
    ElaineTherese Member Posts: 3,328
    edited March 2017

    Congrats, jb134!

    Oh, Kattis, I am so happy for you!!! Pick out a fun color!

  • SpecialK
    SpecialK Member Posts: 16,486
    edited March 2017
  • Robin1234
    Robin1234 Member Posts: 45
    edited March 2017

    Congratulations Kattis894 and many many many more to come!!

  • kae_md99
    kae_md99 Member Posts: 621
    edited March 2017

    Katiis congrats! jb 134 congrats too!

  • Suburbs
    Suburbs Member Posts: 429
    edited March 2017

    kattis894, bravo and hurrah. So happy to hear your excellent news. Nice to get a report card that says it worked given what you have to go through to get there. Anyway, congratulations and many many more

  • Tresjoli2
    Tresjoli2 Member Posts: 868
    edited March 2017

    love my MO. I have just been feeling off since December. I talked to her about it, she wants me to take a 2 to 3 week break from tamoxifen to see if I feel better. If I don't, we may add effexor...anyone taken effexor? If I do feel better, we may switch to an AI. Staying on lupron, she said it's a bad idea to take a break from lupron?

    She is also doing a thyroid panel and checking for vitamin deficiency and estradial. Let's see...

    I just want to feel better. I've been "punky" since December...I'm also the heaviest I've ever been... :-)

    Kattis -yay yay yay!!!

  • BeautifullyBroken4284
    BeautifullyBroken4284 Member Posts: 45
    edited March 2017

    Has anyone here lost their voice, Layringitis, as a side effect of chemo?

  • deni1661
    deni1661 Member Posts: 463
    edited March 2017

    Wonderful news Kattis, I am so happy for you! Your news is inspiring for us all thanks for sharing.

    jb134 congrats, great news for you too!

  • SpecialK
    SpecialK Member Posts: 16,486
    edited March 2017

    beautifully - that sometimes can happen as chemo can irritate all of the soft tissue. Another possibility is that the chemo agents are causing acid reflux, which is then irritating your throat. You should mention this to your MO, he/she may prescribe an acid reducer, which can help - this is pretty common.

  • Jumpship
    Jumpship Member Posts: 305
    edited March 2019

    Maybe off topic....I have two implants, nearly two years post-surgery and I feel like I can find stretch bras to place over them, like I used to use a bra, and really tight sports bras that I can't wear for very long because it feels like the implants are pushing into my rib cage. Braletts don't have enough "cup". I'd love to have the implants pushed more to the center, rather than the sides. What bothers me most is at night when I sleep on my back I feel like they slide to the sides. Now I know that they don't really slide but one foob looks like the saline does move to the outside when I lay down.


    Any recommendations?

  • PoseyGirl
    PoseyGirl Member Posts: 359
    edited March 2017

    Chelsea, while I personally am not going through the wanting to conceive feeling (am 48 and just had my salpingo oophorectomy), I know a girl who did conceive at 36. She had gone through all the treatments (was also triple positive) and went off Tamoxifen after 2 years. She did conceive and now has a four year old daughter. I just don't know how long she waited. So it can happen! May I ask why time is not on your side (i.e. before getting into more aggressive options?).

    Kattis...congratulations to you...that's really great. Did you have a bunch of scans, then? You deserve to go treat yourself. I remember feeling like I wanted to buy a few pretty things again last month. It's nice to feel that way. I have been wondering about my hair too. I don't want to commit to anything permanent, and don't want strong ammonia products. I may go for something like you to see what happens. You should show us when you do it :)

    Carolyn

  • Suburbs
    Suburbs Member Posts: 429
    edited March 2017

    Oh dear. I haven't seen much discussion of this question. So, if one does TCHP and then has surgery and the must continue with Herceptin and possibly radiation, how does this impact tissue expanders and exchange surgery? Do the fills happen while Herceptin or radiation happens? Is everything on hold until the two therapies are complete? Does exchange have to wait until Herceptin is done? Yikes. My head is spinning.

    I wonder if we need to do a TCHP surgery group thread? The monthly chemo and surgery threads just don't exactly address all the triple positive twists.


  • shelabela
    shelabela Member Posts: 584
    edited March 2017

    good question suburbs, curious to hear what others say

  • ElaineTherese
    ElaineTherese Member Posts: 3,328
    edited March 2017

    Hmm, some women have the expanders put in with BMX; some start reconstruction after radiation. I had my lumpectomy (early January), then waited a bit to resume Herceptin and start Aromasin/Zoladex (late February). I began radiation in March.

    I think the big problem with doing expanders with the BMX is that radiation can cause problems. Some plastic surgeons won't start reconstruction until after radiation is completed. Herceptin isn't really the issue. But, hopefully, some reconstructed ladies can chime in!

  • deni1661
    deni1661 Member Posts: 463
    edited March 2017

    good question Suburbs...my PS advised recon would take place only after radiation if I end up needing it. The plan for me is surgery to confirm pathology, if cancer cells present then radiation/chemo recommended. If no cancer then I'll have recon 2 weeks later. The HP treatments will continue as close to the 3 week schedule I have now around the surgeries.

    I too am interested in what others may have to say. These surgery decisions were very difficult for me but I finally had to make peace with my choice and move forward.

Categories