Anyone else skip radiation? Even with micrometastisis?

Options
Nthrutheoutdoor
Nthrutheoutdoor Member Posts: 11

I am currently waiting for results of my Oncotype DX. Through this whole process I have been very hesitant about radiation. My tumor is on the left side and I am concerned about the possible damage to my heart and lungs. My sentinel node revealed a .35mm micrometastisis so that has changed my thinking a bit, but I am still very reluctant. It is worth noting that there was about 3 months in between my biopsy and lumpectomy. I had a mix of DCIS and invasive cancer. Initial diagnosis was DCIS only, but a second opinion on pathology revealed an invasive component to the tumor. Hence the time between diagnosis and surgery.

I would like to hear from anyone who skipped radiation and know how they fared over time. From what lurking I've done in these forums so far it seems rare, but I'm still curious. Or for those of you that were on the fence, what changed your mind?

I'm only 39 years old and have two small children. I want to be around for them for a long time. All indications so far tell me I should be, but of course as we all know, that worry is always there. Thank you for reading and taking the time to respond. I wish you all well in your own journey.





«1

Comments

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited March 2017

    Hi Nthrutheoutdoor, and welcome to Breastcancer.org!

    We're sure you'll get some great responses here soon from other members who have weighed this decision as well. You've joined a great space for support, advice, and information and we're happy to have you!

    Please let us know if you need anything at all while you navigate the boards. We look forward to hearing more from you soon.

    --The Mods


  • LisaAlissa
    LisaAlissa Member Posts: 1,092
    edited March 2017

    Hi Nthrutheoutdoor,

    I've sent you a private message.

    LisaAlissa

  • peggy_j
    peggy_j Member Posts: 1,700
    edited March 2017

    Rads will reduce the risk of a local recurrence. The micro-mets is a factor for a distant recurrence and will probably increase the likelihood that your MO will recommend chemo. My understanding is that there haven't been many studies of patients doing lumpectomy without rads, so it may be difficult to get data on that. Each person needs to decide how much and which treatment is right for them. I know a few people who chose a Mx to avoid rads. I chose lumpectomy + rads.

  • Falconer
    Falconer Member Posts: 1,192
    edited March 2017

    Do you have a sense of your pathology? I had rads bc I had microdermal invasion as well as an 8mm micrometasteses in one node. My RO (who is fabulous) said that those two factors were enough -along with the total of 6cm of cancer cells, to warrant rads.My oncotype was low so I was spared chemo.

  • Wildplaces
    Wildplaces Member Posts: 864
    edited March 2017

    I am just finishing radiation after a mastectomy - left largish tumour and one node positive 3.5mm.

    I too was hoping to skip rads - I ended up with two opinions but once it was on the table ...I have a seven year old.

    My thought would be to find an RO you click with and have a good long talk - some of the fear might be ironed out a little.

    Breatholding and Mepitel were my friends

  • Artista928
    Artista928 Member Posts: 2,753
    edited March 2017

    Interesting how MOs can differ. When I first met mine before bmx the MRI showed 4 cm tumor and no one felt a thing in nodes. He said he's on the fence for rads when I asked if I must. He was basing it on no nodes. After bmx he said the tumor size (7 cm) and the micromets = rads for me.

    My cancer was on the left as well, and that was my big concern. You should ask your RO but mine told me the left lung has 2 lobes v the right one has 3 so it's smaller and it won't hit it. As for the heart, it may nick the top part. So I weighed my options and decided that even though I had bmx that I should do rads. They do a CT scan to see where everything is in your chest and map it out so it should hit intended area only. Of course no guarantee even if you RO has state of the art in tech.

    If it were me with 2 kids, I'd do it. You're young and you don't want to chance a recurrence. I've never heard of someone doing lumpectomy and no rads. My mother was DCIS with no node involvement. Of course no chemo but had lumpectomy and rads and now is on an AI for her ER+ reading. If anything hits the heart/lung they say the damage is minimal.

    There is also a thread here somewhere on cardiomyopathy induced from rads. Maybe check that out. Best wishes.

  • jcolford
    jcolford Member Posts: 120
    edited March 2017

    Hi Nthrutheoutdoor,

    My original diagnosis I had 3 of 5 nodes with micromets and didn't qualify for radiation here in Canada at the time. I wish I would have fought for them harder. Now just over 4 years post treatment I am back here again with a 3.8 cm lymph node in the axilla, Mets in my supraclavicular region as well as multiple nodules in both lungs. Would things have been different with radiation? Who knows, but it certainly didn't help not having them. Best of luck to you in whatever you choose.

  • Lilo244271
    Lilo244271 Member Posts: 40
    edited March 2017

    Hello. I have three chemo infusions left and then need to make a decision on rads. My MO told me in the beginning I would need chemo and rads because I had lymph node involvement. All along I have said no way to rads. Now that it is getting closer to meeting with the RO I'm scared to make the wrong decision. Below are my stats. I had a bmx and 1/15 lymph nodes with a 8mm micro. My MO wouldn't do an oncotype because I agreed to chemo. My Ki67 was only 1% which is slow growing. I'm so confused.

  • Artista928
    Artista928 Member Posts: 2,753
    edited March 2017

    My MO says Ki67 isn't the best indicator for chances of reccurence. I think if you think you'd kick yourself should you progress for not doing rads then do it.

    You have to be comfortable in your decisions and not look back. I'm kind of doing this with my decision to stop Femara (letrozole) after 5 weeks and going back to Tamox. I'm 52 and in menopause so AIs should provide extra protection. What sucks is with all of this, it's a should. Why do some progress and some don't anywhere from those who do everything they're told to those who don't. That's why there's no cure imo.

  • Lilo244271
    Lilo244271 Member Posts: 40
    edited March 2017

    Artista928...I definitely live on the no regret attitude but rads scare me for some reason. How did it affect your TEs? Also, do you mind me asking why you switched from Tamoxifen and then back again. I'm 50 and prechemo blood work showed I'm post menopausal (had a hysterectomy but kept 1 ovary 15 yrs ago) and thought I would take an armostase inhibitor vs Tamoxifen.

  • Artista928
    Artista928 Member Posts: 2,753
    edited March 2017

    Lilo

    Actually, my ps wouldn't do the final implant sx until after rads. He didn't want to chance the rads damaging perm implants. TEs are not a concern like that. TEs are coming out anyway. Also they are thicker material than perm implants. You'll feel the difference once you have your ex sx. My ps said 6 mo wait after rads for the exchange sx, monitoring my skin 3 times in between.

    I found it much easier than chemo. You don't feel a thing and it's quick once you get marked up and after your first session (it's about 20 min, mostly getting the positioning right). The % of people that get noteable se for the heart and lung(s) isn't high. It's a risk that must be disclosed. Just like the meds you take have everything under the sun that could happen on it because 1 person reported it. The only people I've read not doing rads seem to be DCIS with no node involvement and very small tumor. My mom did rads because her tumor was 2.5 cm. I'm glad she did. She's 72. Because of her age though they did I think it was 20 rounds whereas for me at 52 and with my #s I had 28 with the bolus on all except the last 2. I will say though I did get burned and who knows if anything is damaged, but I've been out since 6/26/16 and I feel fine. Just skin is discolored. It's also tighter on my rad left side than on my right so with the perm implants, the right one hangs a bit lower and wider. I notice it. But it's a federal law that insurance must cover any revisions cosmetic or otherwise if you have the breast cancer dx. So I will be making a sx appt for summer to get my right side adjusted to match my rad left.

    As for why I switched back and forth... the se's about killed me on letro. I was ready to toss in the towel after 2 weeks but thought give it a month. I just posted this in the Femara thread:

    "I quit letro starting last Fri and gave myself till last night for it to get out of my system when I took a tamox pill. I feel much better not being on letro. I expect to get the same se's I had on tamox before but at least I didn't feel like utter shit and so many aches and pains. My head fuzziness was probably the worse, coupled with being sleepy feeling dopey all the time. But then for some they don't have se's or nothing bothersome. My pcp was on Femara for her bc dx'd in 2004 and she felt ok on it. I gave it a try. I'm relieved to feel better after stopping it. Hopefully my hair will stop shedding so much. On tamox it wasn't coming out in droves."

    So you can always try it and see if you're not one of those who can actually tolerate it ok, or maybe have no se's like my pcp. If the se's get so bad like they did for me, you could try one of the other 2 (Aromasin or Arimidex) instead and see or switch manufacturers of the same med. I think most people do the switching of manufacturer and med before tossing the AI all together. My MO didn't even say that to me. She could tell by my look that I was in dire straits. But I'm at peace and feel better. If I progress then I'll remind myself I very well could have even on an AI as it's all a crap shoot since we are all different even with the same #s.

  • Nthrutheoutdoor
    Nthrutheoutdoor Member Posts: 11
    edited March 2017

    Hi Falconer,

    Thank you for taking time to reply. I think I have a pretty decent sense of my pathology. My tumor was roughly 6mm in size - almost an equal mix of DCIS and invasive cancer. It is stage 1, grade 1. The micromet they found in the lymph node was .35mm - so very small, but too big to be considered just isolated tumor cells. That is final pathology from my surgery, which was 3 weeks ago today.

    I'm guessing you have finished treatment by now? How are you feeling?

  • Nthrutheoutdoor
    Nthrutheoutdoor Member Posts: 11
    edited March 2017

    Hi Wildplaces,

    Thank you for responding. Glad to hear that your treatment is almost over. And I'm with you - my kids are 4 and 5, so while I am apprehensive, I'll do whatever I have to to make sure I'm around for them. I have an appointment with an RO in a few weeks, but you make a good point. I need to start researching and meet with a few to make sure I find one that is best for my situation.

    Best of luck to you! Hoping you have many cancer-free years ahead!

  • Nthrutheoutdoor
    Nthrutheoutdoor Member Posts: 11
    edited March 2017

    Hi jcolford,

    Thank you for taking time to respond. I can't believe you didn't qualify for radiation! My doctors acted like that was just a given from the beginning when they thought it was only DCIS.

    Your story definitely gives me some pause, so thank you for sharing it. My thoughts are with you and I wish you all the best in your treatment and recovery.


  • Nthrutheoutdoor
    Nthrutheoutdoor Member Posts: 11
    edited March 2017

    Hi Lilo,

    Thanks for responding. I thought stage and grade had more to do with how fast a tumor would grow? I might be wrong on that because my head is very full from all the reading I've done in the last few months. :)

    Can they still do an Oncotype on your biopsy sample? The chemo part is a moot point since you're already almost done with that, but it could still give you an idea of your recurrence rate. Insurance may not cover it at this point, but the Oncotype people are pretty good about offering financial assistance and haggling with the insurance companies. It might be worth a try. Also, 8mm in the lymph node is significant. That is something to take into account as well.

    In my situation I'm on the fence, but faced with your circumstances I would probably go with radiation. That said, you have to do what's right for you. Nothing in this world is a guarantee. You are in my thoughts and I wish you well, whatever you decide

  • Nthrutheoutdoor
    Nthrutheoutdoor Member Posts: 11
    edited March 2017

    Hi peggy j,

    Your stats are very similar to mine - with the exception of lymph nodes. What made you decide to do radiation?

  • Lilo244271
    Lilo244271 Member Posts: 40
    edited March 2017

    Artista928...thank you so very much for all the information. Everything you said makes perfect sense and actually has helped me feel better with making a decision. My PS has assured me several times that his job is to make me look good after treatment and my concern is to be cancer free. I am definitely not look forward to the hormone se but I will just have to deal with those when the time comes and if necessary try out different ones to find what works best for me..

    Nthrutheoutdoor...I get so confused too. Especially now that some time has gone by. I'm pretty sure they can still do an oncotype test. I'm going to ask my MO tomorrow when I see him and just let him know that it really will help me with the rad decision. That way I'm not waiting for the results later when it is time to start rads. I also have a follow up with my BS on Monday and will talk to her. I think sometimes we can fill our mind with too much information and it makes decision making harder.

    Thank you both for your input. I really appreciate it and will check back in after I talk to my drs.

  • Lilo244271
    Lilo244271 Member Posts: 40
    edited March 2017

    Ok another question....what is the purpose of radiation if I had a bmx and lymph node removal then chemo? Wouldn't chemo have killed any cancer in the nodes?

  • BG46TN
    BG46TN Member Posts: 286
    edited March 2017

    my MO said doing radiation is the best week investment I can make in my life right now...I am getting a bmx and have no lymph nodes involved, he said newer studies show the better the outcomes long term on women who have radiation over just chemo...

    I really didn't want rads...but once he explained it all to me, as well at the radiologist I felt much better about doing it...and i have a one hour trip each way to get it ugh!

  • Artista928
    Artista928 Member Posts: 2,753
    edited March 2017

    Lilo,

    I think it's because we don't know if chemo got it all or the surgeon for that matter even if it says clear margins, otherwise there wouldn't be so many recurrences. This is the American Cancer Society site where it talks about rads. I think for you the part about "or if cancer is found in the lymph nodes" is why it's recommended. So hard to decide I know. I feel bad for folks like you who don't have a clear cut answer for what txs to do like me. If I didn't do chemo and rads I know I'd progress. At least if I progress I know I did what I could. Sucks doesn't it?

    https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/treatment/radiation-for-breast-cancer.html

  • Denise-G
    Denise-G Member Posts: 1,777
    edited March 2017

    No cancer center in my area had Breath Hold Radiation for left breast in 2011. When my sister was diagnosed last year, also left breast, she had Breath Hold Radiation to prevent radiation from damaging her heart....here is more info.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4364809/

  • Hopeful82014
    Hopeful82014 Member Posts: 3,480
    edited May 2017

    I was very concerned about rt damaging my heart and left lung. Hashing it out w/my RO, I made those concerns very, very clear. In the end the CT showed that the treatment field would entirely exclude my heart; seeing that on the screen was a relief. The breath hold technique is a great option for those who need it. I would not let that concern hold me back from rt - and I say this as someone who really dreaded rt.


    Edit for spelling

  • VLH
    VLH Member Posts: 1,258
    edited March 2017

    BG46TN, could you explain, "best week investment"? Is there a word missing?

    It was a bit challenging to find someone who does prone position radiation without driving an hour to the downtown cancer centers, but I was lucky enough to find someone 35 minutes away (assuming my blasted encapsulated shoulder will cooperate...mapping / tattooing is upcoming). If you're not familiar with prone positioning, you lie on your stomach on a special table with an opening for your breast rather than your breast tissue spreading across your chest wall so it's a great option for buxom women whose bosoms have lost the battle with gravity. With a left-side tumor, trouble with shortness of breath since my 3rd AC treatment, and very large breasts (F/G), I figured prone would offer the best protection for my heart while blasting those cancer cooties. Luckily, my three nodes tested negative so I don't know if prone positioning is an option for women having their lymph nodes radiated. Similarly, I'll be able to have the shorter "Canadian" protocol while I think the traditional 6 week protocol is recommended for those with positive nodes. Good luck, Nthrutheoutdoor!

    Lyn

  • Nthrutheoutdoor
    Nthrutheoutdoor Member Posts: 11
    edited March 2017

    Thanks for the heads up about breathholding radiation, for those who mentioned it. I have also heard about proton radiation as well, but haven't really researched it yet. It seems an unlikely option for me bc the closest place I can get it is a 4 hr drive from where I live and I ain't making that trip every day for 6 weeks! But I am stillcurious. If anyone has any experience with it, please share. Thanks!

  • CCtoo
    CCtoo Member Posts: 41
    edited April 2017

    hi, I had same diagnosis and same fears about radiation, so I skipped it, and still wonder if any cells escaped....I am 80 tho, and so radiation at my age not as effective.....Also, I could not physically make it to hospital daily for 6weeks....Too tired. But as young as you are I would do it for peace of mind.

  • Nthrutheoutdoor
    Nthrutheoutdoor Member Posts: 11
    edited April 2017

    Hi CCtoo,

    The more I think about it, the more I think I will do it - for the very reason you mentioned. Peace of mind is important, especially with two small children. I'm not looking forward to those daily trips to the hospital, but hopefully those 6 weeks will go by quickly.

    Was your diagnosis fairly recent? How are you doing now

  • ChiSandy
    ChiSandy Member Posts: 12,133
    edited April 2017

    My radiation was on the right side, targeted to just the tumor cavity, and 16 sessions (hypo-fractionated, therefore all “boosts”). I too have very large breasts (H/I on the right, I/J on the left) and preferred prone radiation but my hospital didn’t have the necessary equipment (and I don’t think any of the other hospitals in its system did, either).

    Why do radiation if you’ve had a BMX and chemo? Because, as said earlier, there is still some tissue left over (especially if the surgery was skin-sparing or otherwise in contemplation of reconstruction) even after breast removal. And chemo, while systemic (body-wide), kills only rapidly-dividing (i.e., fast-growing) cells such as epithelials (mucous membranes, digestive system linings), hair follicles, bone marrow, etc, and of course rapidly-dividing cancer cells. It won’t touch the slowest-growing (“indolent”) tumor cells which can lie dormant for years or even decades before (and even after) migrating to bones or organs. When they "wake up" outside the breast & lymph nodes and are detectable on imaging or via symptoms, that’s metastasis. Any of these “indolent” tumor cells possibly left behind in the tissues remaining after mastectomy need to be mopped up before they can migrate &/or wake up—and radiation destroys them.

  • Artista928
    Artista928 Member Posts: 2,753
    edited April 2017

    Did not know that Sandy. I wondered why rads if chemo after bmx- although for my profile I knew I had to throw the book at it.

  • ChiSandy
    ChiSandy Member Posts: 12,133
    edited April 2017

    The Canadian protocol of 16 hypofractionated external doses aimed at the tumor cavity is usually limited to those over age 60 whose tumors were Stage IA and Luminal A-type (hormone-receptor+, HER2-, grade 1 or 2) and in a fortuitous location (mine was at 10:00, “high & outside” in baseball-speak).

    Nthroughtheoutdoor, you wouldn’t happen to own a raspberry beret, now, would you? ;-)

  • MexicoHeather
    MexicoHeather Member Posts: 365
    edited April 2017

    Hi. I'm new on this board. Sounds like Lolo and I have some common concerns.

    I have only two more chemo and then I meet with a radiologist (date not set yet) for a recommendation. I probably just need additional education, but I really don't want radiation.

    The surgeon and plastic reconstruction surgeon did not think I was a candidate for immediate rebuild because I WOULD have Rad treatment, but the oncologist seems to not want to weigh in at all. He thinks I am on the line with the size of tumor and lymph nodes.

    There will be 10 years of Tamoxifen and perhaps prophylactic ovary removal. Isn't that enough?

    Stresses me out. Makes me want to cry.

Categories