Oncotype score
Hi. I'm 37. I had my mastectomy on the right breast 2montha ago and has a re excision one month later to get clear margins. Margins were clear. I'm stage 1A. My onco score came in a couple days ago and it's high with a Score of 39. Oncologist Is recommending chemo. 6 rounds of t/c. I'm just just very afraid And confused as I've read the possible permanent hair loss with taxotere. I'm 37 so loosing my hair permanently is a huge deal. I expressed my concerns to my MO he gave me a 2nd option which is 4rounds of A/C followed by 12wks of taxol . I'm confused. Scared. Don't knoW what to do. I know a/c has the heart disease risk and luikemia.
Comments
-
What you have to remember is, everyone is different. No one is going to react the same way to the drugs that are given. That big list of all the things that CAN happen does not mean that it WILL happen. I have done a regime of 4 A/C and I am now doing the 4 Taxol. It is true that both of them will cause you to loose your hair, which has happened, but I still feel stubble on my head.
TAKE A BIG BREATH !! LOOK at your options and make a choice. You can only decide with the information that you have on hand and no one else can make the choice for you.
-
Also ask about tamoxifen my SIL was one of the unfortunate ones who developed gyn cancer from it that cancer spread into abdomen . Some oncologists are going to letrozole and get younger woman into menopause for AI treatment. The oncodx number for risk of recurrence is for tamoxifen, they are finding that AI drugs are a little more effective.
My oncodx was 34. I didn't do chemo but sounds like you should do the chemo. Check out cold capping for hair loss.
Also they monitor you when you are getting that chemo and hopefully your heart will be ok.
-
Hi all, trying to keep this oncotype dx thread alive. Advice/ personal experiences appreciated!!
Just got my results today. Score of 16. So at the very upper edge of "low risk." Distant recurrance rate is 10% with rads and tamoxifen.
What complicates things a bit is that I'm only 32. If I was older I think it would be easier to say no chemo, but I'm young and I don't know what to do. Theoretically I have a long life ahead of me... it seems like a long time for the cancer to come back. However, my onc said that I could go either way, but she thinks the side effects of chemo are worse than the potential benefit. She estimated 2% benefit. I honestly don't even know how accurate any of these statistics are. Sometimes it seems like one giant "guess"
Please help! I am getting a second opinion, but I also don't want to put off my rads too much longer while I wait.
Sarah
-
nem126, are you a candidate for savi radiation, the internal radiation? I agree chemo might not be the answer, what are you considering hormone wise? Some are considering surgical menopause? You are so young not sure this is something you would consider.
-
Nem126--I had a an Oncotype of 28, in my mid 40s. I did 4 rounds of chemo and had the last one 4 weeks ago. My opinion, don't do it for your score. The risks suck. I've endured, nausea, constipation, heartburn, extreme fatigue, bone pain, headaches, neuropathy, watery eyes, hair loss (I cold capped and only lost 30%), taste loss and now lymphadema. They would have you do the same regimen--4 rounds of TC. I had a second opinion. This was to get my 18% chance down to 12%. A 30% drop for me. I am still suffering from anemia, low immune system, lymphadema, watery eyes, fatigue, and hair loss. I wouldn't wish this on ANYONE!! I looked at the research. If it's such a low drop, change some lifestyle choices and environmental sources. Cut out parabens, phyla's, eat a ton of fruit/veg daily, cut out red meat and all the other things they suggest. Again, my opinion. Look at the threads of the women who started chemo in Nov & Dec. I'm in those chat groups and they are in the midst of the side effects that are not only physical but emotionally draining. Get a second or 3rd opinion but you should be ok being below 18.
-
2% benefit from chemo is not too much and the "cost" of chemo may nullify that
-
Thank you all SO much for your advice. My tumor was 9 mm. So just a smidge under 1 cm, reasonably small, but right up against my chest wall. I am still going to get a second opinion at another hospital (Penn in Philadelphia), but I am leaning toward no chemo.
I figure if they agree with no chemo at Penn, I can still also talk to them about hormone therapy. My onc gave me 4 possible options:
1. Tamoxifen for 5 years
2. Tamoxifen for 10 years
3. Start on tamoxifen for a few years then switch to a menapause inducing shot and take arimidex.
4. Do the menapause shots and arimidex right off the bat.
I did have a uterine polyp in my 20s. It was benign and no big deal at the time, but it puts that teensy bit of doubt in the back of my head with tamoxifen. I know the risk of uterine cancer is very low... but still.
meow13- I'm doing the 6 1/2 weeks external rads. I've considered the surgical menapause, but I'd probably wait until I'm a little older if I went that route. No kids yet, and we are clinging onto some faint hope that pregnancy might still be possible someday.
Pamela23- thank you for the advice. You're right, my onc said if i do chemo it would be 4 rounds of TC. Hope you recover and feel like yourself again very soon!!!
beebs- I tend to agree with you there
Amapola- definitely great advice- thank you so much. Looks like the node is probably what pushed them to do the chemo for you even though we both had 16s. What is luminal A? Is that on the oncotype dx results? Forgive me if that's a dumb question. I've heard other people talk about it before but I was never quite sure what it meant.
Again, thank you ALL! So good to have support here. I feel like I get more definitive answers here than from my doctors sometimes
Sarah
-
Hi Amapola,
I met with fertility when I was diagnosed and they have been fighting with my insurance company for 2 months to cover IVF. No go there. Which... don't even get me started. Assholes. Lol! Guess if we have kids we'll attempt the natural way or if I can't get preggo we'll adopt. My MO seemed hesitant about me getting the hormone shots for IVF anyway. So, for many reasons (mostly $$$) it's off the table for me.
My MO seems to think I could try to get pregnant (after several years on anti estrogens). I asked and she said I'd have a possibility of getting pregnant either way ( if I did the tamoxifen or the shots/AIs). I guess neither is "permanent."
What made you lean more toward Tamoxifen than the shots/AIs? I know both have side effects. Maybe tamox has a little less? It's just my history of the uterine polyp that makes me pause.
Love you're profile pic too! You are rockin it! Hope you continue to handle things as well as you have
-
DX 12/2016 at 31 yo, IDC, stage 1A, grade 2, clear margins, 1.5cm, ER/PR+, HER2-, 0/8 nodes, Oncotype 15 (9%), KI-67 40%I met with my MO this week and she is recommending 4 rounds of TC, which surprised me. I'm engaged but have not had children and the risk of permanent infertility as a result of chemo seems high - not to mention the other side effects. MO admitted that chemo is likely to only reduce my recurrence risk by 2-3% but given my age she still thinks it's a good idea. I asked if I could delay a few weeks to do IVF but she said the delay would make it not worth it to do chemo. So if I delay she'd recommend Tamoxifen with Lupron for five years.
I have an appointment for a second opinion in a couple weeks.
Is there anyone in a similar position?
-
hi lizzy b. ,your score is very low. I would get another opinion. I would not have done chemo with your score. There are so many side effects and will put u into chemo pause. Good luck.
-
Lizzie, another option is starting lupron before chemo to reduce the chance that chemo will affect your ovaries and push you into menopause. I did lupron shots for that reason, then offered to keep going with it if it would offer any survival advantage. In my particular case the benefit was not worth bothering, according to my MO.
I believe chemo is recommended when the tumour is more than 1cm, or it is HER2+, especially for younger women. Being diagnosed at a young age tends to be associated with more aggressive breast cancer. Chemo is not as bad as you might think! Especially for younger people.
As my ex-father-in-common-law told me:
"For people like us, who are strong, chemo is no problem."
Good luck gathering the information you need to make choices. I'm all for deciding for oneself.
P.S. A couple of weeks seems long to wait for a second opinion. Pleasant persistence can often score a cancellation spot, if you call in every couple of days asking nicely. (It helps to mention that you are very worried and hoping to get more information soon. People like to be helpful.)
-
Hi Lizzie, I'm a little confused because I thought the point of the Oncotype DX test was to get a really comprehensive view of the genetic makeup of the tumour and to establish its aggressiveness, likelihood to recur etc. If your score is 15 i.e. well within the low range, why would your MO recommend chemo? Scores in the low range show that your particular BC will not be so affected by chemo, and also that the potentially serious side effects outweigh any benefit.
As far as I'm aware, the Oncotype DX test doesn't give one answer for those say, under 40, and those over 40. Also you are node negative, so to do chemo wouldn't be within the usual BC protocols. Best wishes with all of this, none of it is easy.
-
I think some oncologists just go through the motions and have the tunnel vision of killing cancer at any cost. They believe the younger you are the more the need for chemo. I would run away from these doctors. If chemo was the answer we would have the cure.
-
Thanks ladies! Her recommendation was just very surprising to me based on everything I read and she wasn't able to point to anything that supported the need for chemo in my case. By the time I left she almost seemed to have come full circle, saying it would only decrease my risk by 2-3%.
Hopfull - thank you I need all of the perspectives I can get on this!
Tunegrrl - I'll keep pushing for an earlier appointment.
Optimist - that's what I though also; but the MO said because I'm so young she needs to keep me alive longer than her average BC patient and thinks we should throw everything at it... we'll see.
Meow - I agree. I think that's why she's recommending it here. I told my BS and she was surprised that this was the MO's recommendation - my BS didn't think she was one of those MO's that push chemo when it's not necessary.
Amapola - I'm in NYC also. The tumor board is a great a idea.
Does anyone know of a MO in the northeast that specializes in younger BC patients??
-
Lizzie B- my oncotype was 16, and they recommended no chemo, saying there was only a 2% benefit. I'm 32.
I have mixed feelings about it. No chemo, so yay! I guess that's good. Chemo has some nasty, potentially long term side effects. But I also wonder if they are doing enough to treat it since I could live another 50+ yrs with that 10% risk of recurrance (with tamoxifen) hanging out.
I'm getting a pretty intense course of rads too, 6 1/2 weeks.
In the end I decided to just start on rads because I felt pushing that off any longer was risky. Other hospitals couldn't get me in for a second opinion on chemo for another month.... I didn't have that time.
So, I don't know. To some degree you feel like you are flipping a coin and hoping for the best. It sucks, but I'm trying to just find a way to live my life without too much fear going forward.
BosumBlues- I am still going to Penn, but since they couldn't get me in in a reasonable amount of time (for the chemo decision), I plan on just discussing their recommendations for hormone therapy instead.
Sarah
-
Completely agree Amapola. Throughout this whole experience I have been alarmed by how little information they have for young people with BC. It's really unsettling.
-
Nem - I agree, it's very frustrating. A 2% chance seems like so little; but, we had a less than 1% chance of getting BC, so...
Amapola - I have a second opinion with Cigler next week as well as practically every other major MO in NYC!
Do either of you know what the typical follow-up is to check for mets? Do we get regular bone scans, blood work, etc? I just feel like if I'm not going to go the chemo route, I want to make sure I'm getting regular check-ups for mets.
-
Lizzie, here in Ontario it seems they don't scan for mets unless the cancer has advanced to some extent. Stage 1A and no extra scans for me. Some bc friends here with much larger tumours did get sent for additional scans.
-
Oh man... I really worry that I am being undertreated now. I couldn't wait the extra month to get a second opinion...
I'm assuming once you are too far out from your surgery chemo is no longer as effective.
-
nem, yes, there are guidelines for when chemo should start. I am not positive, but I think they recommend within 12 weeks of SX. You should check the NCCN guidelines or ask your MO to be sure. For what it's worth I had a 21 onco-score and did TC. It really wasn't as bad (for me) as I thought it would be. Best wishes to you all!
-
Nem, for what it's worth, I was 34 when diagnosed and my MO told me when ordering the oncotype that she would not recommend chemo for me if my score came back low (ended up I got a high score plus found out my tumor was Her2 +).
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team